| October 11, 2021

Internet Access on U.S. Tribal Lands is Imperative to Daily and Creative Life


Tribal lands in the United States have often been sidelined or simply excluded from decisions critical to funding infrastructure initiatives and improvements. As COVID-19 revealed the internet to be an essential utility for daily life, the internet served as a lifeline and an opportunity for people living on reservations and other Tribal lands to connect with education, telehealth resources, businesses and the “at large” community. But with 628,000 Tribal households having no access to the internet, access to those critical services is lacking for too many.

In honor of Indigenous People’s Day, Ookla for Good spoke with a Cherokee Nation citizen and advocate about the importance of the internet to Native communities. We’ve also provided analysis on internet performance on federally recognized Tribal lands and off-reservation trust land areas, including an easy download for anyone who would like to do further research on this important topic.

The internet is a vital connector between places and cultures

We sat down with Joseph Cloud, formerly the Community Hope Center Project Manager at the Boys and Girls Club of Chelsea, Oklahoma and a student of the Cherokee Cultural Studies program at Northeastern State University, to discuss the impact that digital access has on Indigenous communities.

The Boys and Girls Club of Chelsea is funded by the Delaware Tribe and Cherokee Nation to help the children of the region reach their full potential. Cloud began working with the Club when they received a grant from the state of Oklahoma through the CARES Act. Cloud recounted that the CEO contacted him to say they had received a large grant and needed to spend it within a month.

The best way to do that was to install high-speed internet at the Club. Before, they had the one router that served the whole space and you couldn’t access the Wi-Fi from the outbuildings. I thought, “How can we make this center a space for kids who don’t have internet at home?” We installed internet and bought lots of equipment so kids could come there and do their homework. We bought specialized laptops with different editing suites so they could grow their skills in things like photography as they grew older. We weren’t designing for a certain kid, we were growing the program for the future.

The internet was important to getting this project done, too. Cloud was living in New Orleans at the time. He contacted a friend who was a tech wizard in Nashville, Tennessee to consult on this project in Oklahoma. Together they settled on a Ubiquiti system that provides high speed internet throughout the facility.

Cloud has unique insight into how the internet benefits kids on the reservation beyond access to Wi-Fi, too. He grew up as part of the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma but he was separated from the Tribal community when his family moved to Florida. “All I’ve had in the last 21 years to stay connected to my culture is the internet,” he stated, “I needed to follow an instinct to strengthen my connection with my culture and my heritage.” He found the Cherokee studies program at Northeastern through online research and now continues to rely on the internet to attend class and connect with peers. “Schools are doing very little to hold together Native scholars — so we must turn to the internet to stay connected, not just across the country, but also locally” he said.

Last year, Cloud attended the Symposium on the American Indian, which was held virtually for the first time in 2020. Attending from Florida, he learned from leaders within the Indigenous advocacy community about a variety of issues. Digital access has empowered Joseph to reconnect with his Indigenous heritage through virtual events, online school and a cross-cultural online community.

Digital access has also had a large impact on his advocacy work, “The internet allows us to bring people into the conversation. We can combat power dynamics by addressing Indigenous issues with predominantly white institutions. These are very important moments.” For Joseph Cloud and so many other Native people, the internet is essential. It provides them with a platform to connect with other scholars, artists and with the world at large — allowing them to be heard and advocate for themselves and their communities.

Too many Tribal lands fall behind U.S. averages for internet performance

As we’ve seen, the internet is a critical utility for people living on Tribal lands in the U.S. However, that vital connection only works well if the internet performance is strong enough to support modern use cases, like video conferencing and streaming. We analyzed Speedtest Intelligence® data from American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian (AIANNH) Areas in the U.S. during Q3 2021 to see how they compare to the U.S. as a whole.

29% of Tribal lands did not meet the FCC’s fixed broadband standards for download speed

Our analysis showed that fixed broadband speeds varied wildly between different AIANNH areas in the U.S. during Q3 2021. The Chickahominy Tribal designated statistical area between Richmond and Williamsburg, Virginia, for example, with one of the fastest median broadband speeds among Tribal lands in the U.S. at 218.86 Mbps, serves as a model of how state funding can radically improve internet infrastructure and performance. Quinault Reservation in northwestern Washington had one of the slowest download speeds at 3.98 Mbps.

Of the 140 AIANNH areas that met our sample count criteria for fixed broadband, 36 did not meet the FCC minimum download speed for broadband of 25 Mbps. Sixteen did not meet the minimum 3 Mbps for upload. For context, the median download speed over fixed broadband in the U.S. was 119.84 Mbps. Only 13 Native areas exceeded that.

ookla_tribal-lands_us_fixed-broadband_1021-1

124 Tribal lands had slower mobile download speeds than U.S. average

There was also a wide array of mobile speeds across AIANNH areas in the U.S. during Q3 2021. Of the 203 Tribal lands that met sample count criteria for mobile performance, 124 showed a slower median download speed than the U.S. average of 44.84 Mbps. Fifty-eight Native areas showed a mobile download speed less than 25 Mbps and 17 had uploads slower than 3 Mbps. Lualualei Hawaiian Home Land, on the west side of Oahu, had one of the fastest median download speeds over mobile during Q3 2021 at 162.09 Mbps. Moapa River Indian Reservation in southern Nevada had one of the slowest median download speeds over mobile during the same period at 3.73 Mbps.

ookla_tribal-lands_us_mobile_1021

4G Availability varies widely between Tribal lands

Of the 217 Tribal lands with sufficient samples, 102 showed a 4G Availability (the percent of users on all devices that spend the majority of their time on 4G and above) lower than the U.S. average of 96.0% during Q3 2021. Nine Tribal lands showed 100% 4G Availability: Auburn Rancheria in California, Big Pine Reservation in California, Reno-Sparks Indian Colony in Nevada, Soboba Off-Reservation Trust Land in California, Sycuan Reservation in California, Viejas Reservation in California, Kapolei Hawaiian Home Land, Waimanalo Hawaiian Home Land and the Kiowa-Comanche-Apache-Fort Sill Apache/Caddo-Wichita-Delaware joint Oklahoma Tribal statistical area. Walker River Reservation in Nevada had one of the lowest 4G Availability calculations at 30.2%.

ookla_tribal-lands_us_4g-availability_1021g-1

The internet is a lifeline and a basic utility. While some Tribal lands do have good connectivity and speeds according to our data, those that do not are being further left behind. As experts in internet performance (but not Tribal policy), we are offering our full Tribal data set for anyone who would like to do further analyses. Download the full data set here.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| September 22, 2020

How Georgia is Leveraging Cell Analytics™ to Enable Virtual Classrooms

Students are returning to class as the school year begins, but in many areas it is not safe to return to the classroom. This means the massive and unprecedented shift to remote learning we saw in the early spring continues for many into the fall. Even where schools have chosen to reconvene in-person classes, the moment a case of COVID-19 is detected, students and faculty are pushed back out of the facility and into online learning. Eager to keep their 1.7 million students connected, education boards in cities and counties throughout the state of Georgia are outfitting school buses with hotspot devices. And they are using Cell AnalyticsTM data from Ookla® to identify the best locations to position those buses to help remote learners.

The digital divide makes remote learning even harder for some families

Many families are simply not equipped to deal with remote learning. This is especially true in economically stressed households where children often do not have the equipment or connectivity necessary to participate in virtual classes. In the state of Georgia alone, an estimated 80,000 households with students cannot access a wireline service.

National wireless operators have donated thousands of portable Wi-Fi hotspots to connect students to their 4G LTE networks (5G networks are so new, coverage is limited and only a few devices are available). As generous as these donations have been, they do not come close to filling the total need.

CARES Act funding provides resources

The U.S. Congress passed the $2.2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, also known as the CARES Act, earlier this year. Signed into law on March 27, this stimulus bill includes funding to assist each state with providing broadband connectivity for students so that they can continue to attend classes remotely. The CARES Act has provided the respective state departments of education and municipal and county education boards with resources needed to buy the millions of laptops required to allow remote learning as well as hotspots that can connect these new laptops or existing ones to the internet.

Hotspots can only help in areas with adequate coverage

Programs providing broadband for education over the past decade have focused on installing high-speed service in community anchor institutions, which include schools and libraries. If these facilities are closed for safety reasons, those connections may not be available. Even when those connections are available, wireless coverage at many anchor institutions is quite poor. Compounding the issue, some constituents have objected to installing critically important cell sites near schools.

Additionally, schools are sometimes located where a plot of land is inexpensive or large enough to accommodate a new campus. This may place the anchor institution far from the residential areas from which students are trying to connect to their online classes.

Hotspots can help by connecting previously unserved buildings with the internet. Even when service is available to a building, some families cannot afford the additional expense of a fixed internet connection. However, indoor coverage from hotspots can be insufficient to provide enough throughput for sustained video streaming for one user, let alone multiple students at a time. In many rural areas, even outdoor hotspot coverage will be too weak to provide students with the level of connectivity needed to remain engaged in the remote classroom.

Read the full case study

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| August 18, 2021

How Loudoun County, VA Secured Over $17M in Broadband Funding Using Ookla Data to Create Accurate Maps and Challenge FCC Data [Case Study]


Virginia’s Loudoun County is interwoven with rural and suburban landscapes, making it especially difficult for policymakers to understand where the county’s residents are — or are not — able to access the Internet. FCC Form 477 broadband availability data shows that nearly 100% of Loudoun residents have access to what the FCC defines as broadband (25 Mbps download, 3 Mbps upload). This is inconsistent with the connectivity experiences of county residents, so Loudoun Broadband Alliance (LBA) set out to create an accurate, reliable broadband access mapping methodology using real-world network performance data.

Loudoun Broadband Alliance (LBA) chose Ookla® Speedtest Intelligence® to research residents’ actual connectivity and network performance. With this data, LBA identified a large number of unserved households in contrast to FCC data which showed them as served. Loudoun County was subsequently awarded over $17 million of funding to help eliminate the broadband gap.

Situation

In an effort to close the digital divide in rural and urban communities across the nation, the United States federal government has allocated billions of dollars in broadband funding with the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act. Funding allocation is based on current federal broadband mapping through FCC Form 477 data. For Loudoun County, FCC data reports:

loudon-map-1-3

loudon-map-2-2

However, the FCC’s findings were not reflective of the real-world network experience of Loudoun County residents. LBA used Speedtest Intelligence data in conjunction with other publicly available datasets to get a more accurate picture of broadband accessibility in their county.

Read the full case study

Editorial note: This case study was updated on April 25, 2022 to include the broadband funding won by Loudoun County.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| May 17, 2022

Federal Broadband Funding is Available for Local Governments — It’s Time to Get in Line

Local governments, the clock is ticking. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) set billions of dollars out on the infrastructure buffet table for local governments in the United States and there are more guests invited to the party than ever before. This funding is almost certainly a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to connect your community and provide access for all to the digital economy. The question is: will you be at the front or the back of the line?

Ookla® can help you. This article is designed to give you the information you need to get started on the path toward getting the funding you need for your communities.

Look to your state for funding

Historically, broadband funding has had a very top-down approach. The FCC has held almost all the power to determine where federal broadband infrastructure dollars have been spent. But for the first time, state governments will have an active role in guiding these decisions.

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) directs $65 billion to improving broadband connectivity across the US, with $42.45 billion earmarked for building new infrastructure. Once the initial FCC map has been released, each state that has declared their intent to participate through NTIA will be provided a minimum $100 million to get the process started (U.S. territories will split an additional $100 million). Much of the remaining $22 billion will target affordability, but more on that later. The race for resources will be officially off and running.

Following this initial disbursement, there will be roughly $37 billion more to be awarded from the IIJA alone. Many states are still sitting on billions of dollars from the American Rescue Plan Acts (ARPA) and broadband is an allowable expenditure for these remaining stimulus dollars. Add to that the long running connectivity programs such as CAF, RDOF, Mobility Fund, and the upcoming Rural 5G Fund, and all those programs combined approach $100 billion over the next decade.

Plan ahead to increase your competitiveness

Past programs have provided funding without setting proper expectations on results. More emphasis is now being placed on planning. With a focus on estimated cost per service address, network design takes a front seat to ensure these resources are spent efficiently and state officials will be allowed to use up to five percent of this for mapping, designing, and cost estimation. 

Most states are already planning, or already building, their own broadband availability maps. But if you have connectivity issues in your community, it’s time to make it known to those who will be responsible for directing funds and deciding which communities will see investment and which will not.

Ookla helped Loudoun County, Virginia secure $17 million

We have experience helping local governments navigate this challenging planning process. When FCC Form 477 broadband availability data showed that nearly 100% of Loudoun residents have access to what the FCC defines as broadband (25 Mbps download, 3 Mbps upload), this was inconsistent with the connectivity experiences of county residents. So the Loudoun Broadband Alliance (LBA) chose to use Ookla Speedtest Intelligence® to create an accurate and reliable broadband access mapping methodology using real-world network performance data. With this data, LBA identified a large number of unserved households in contrast to FCC data which showed them as served. Loudoun County was subsequently awarded over $17 million of funding to help eliminate the broadband gap.

Keep in mind that the maps will never be finished. They will change and evolve as the networks in your area grow. Funded projects will need to be monitored for compliance and older networks will need to be watched for signs of deterioration. Everyone will need to keep an eye on progress, measure successes, and have the data to act early when projects go off track.

Acadiana, Louisiana used Speedtest data to win $30 million

With Speedtest data, the Acadiana Planning Commission (APC) was able to successfully challenge FCC maps on over 900 out of approximately 1,000 census blocks. The APC applied for funding through the NTIA Broadband Infrastructure Program, which made $288 million in funding available to help close the digital divide in the U.S.. There were over 230 applicants, and only 13 grants were awarded. Vice President Kamala Harris visited Acadiana in March to announce that the APC had been awarded a $30 million grant that will fund high-speed internet in 11 rural Acadiana communities.

Think big! Broadband funding is available for more than just infrastructure

Accessibility to broadband requires at least four components: infrastructure, affordability, equipment, and knowledge. The lack of any one of these means an individual does not have access to today’s digital economy. Much of the focus has been on the lack of infrastructure in many rural communities, but infrastructure is the absolutely essential piece for anyone in any community to get connected. The second component, affordability, often drives the last two requirements as people who cannot afford internet service often cannot afford the necessary equipment and, therefore, are less likely to have developed the knowledge to use it. Tracking both of these two primary elements is key to understanding the digital divide.

You might qualify for funding in more than one of these four areas. For example, over $14 billion in a new Affordable Connectivity Program is included in the broadband portion of the IIJA. Remaining funds include $2.75 billion for the Digital Equity Grant Program and the $2 billion Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, as well as two more programs that will assist the USDA improve the internet in agricultural communities.

Agencies and local governments should work together

Cities should be coordinating with counties and other government entities within the same region — but someone needs to be in charge. If your local government does not have an individual charged with coordinating all these efforts, there is bound to be duplication of efforts, wasted resources, stagnation of ideas, or all of the above. Whether this person reports directly to the CTO, CIO, Mayor, or City Manager, their purpose is to understand what all departments are doing in the space and coordinate discussions, grant opportunities, and overlapping initiatives to make sure that departments aren’t working at cross purposes. Non-profits, community activists, and local corporations all have a stake in the success of these efforts. Traffic problems won’t suddenly end at the municipal boundary. Improving traffic on one side of the line may create more problems on the other side. Working together with your neighbors is just as important as working with internal departments. The same can be said of both fixed and wireless broadband infrastructure.

Dig-once projects will score extra points in the competition to have projects selected. Broadband is only part of the $1.2 billion infrastructure law. Roads, bridges, ports, and rail have billions of dedicated dollars as well. Digging a new trench for a clean water system? Coordinate with the project to include conduit and fiber and your efficient use of taxpayer funds will likely be rewarded.

Consider funding for multiple technologies 

As great as it might be to provide every service address in the country with a fiber connection, it may not make economic sense in some places. But an important detail was clearly stated in the legislation that recognizes a technology neutral stance on solutions. The rules are not yet complete on how the FCC and NTIA will award the IIJA funds and contend with challenges to their findings, but there are certainly far fewer restrictions on the ARPA funds that are already disbursed to the states. Many connectivity projects are already underway whether through infrastructure development, equipment distribution, or subsidies for affordable service.

Wireless services can get people connected much faster and there are several forms. Traditional mobile operators are rolling out 5G and Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) in some areas that can directly compete with traditional fixed services. Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs) have launched coverage to homes and businesses that previously had satellite as their only option. Some municipalities and school systems have launched private 4G LTE networks to connect underserved areas in their communities. And municipal Wi-Fi can still be an important part of an overall solution.

A portion of families may never find subscribing to a fixed network practical, but wireless services allow for easier movement and some don’t even require a residence. Understanding wireless network availability and performance across your jurisdiction is just as important as planning a fiber network. And here’s a bonus — cellular and other transmission sites need fiber for any new 5G cell site. So if you know where your wireless networks need additional infrastructure, you can plan for places in the network to offer them accessible fiber connections.

If your state still has ARPA funds available, you still have an opportunity to make improvements and learn more about connectivity issues so you are better able to make your case for the IIJA funds as they begin to flow.

Ookla can provide you with the data you need to be competitive for federal funding

It has been said for years that broadband is the fourth utility. Local governments have spent a lot of their resources managing the first three: water, gas, and electricity. If any of those become unavailable, even for a brief period of time, their citizens will make their unhappiness known. Resiliency of these services will play a part in how elected officials are judged, whether the local government supplies these services or just manages an external provider.

If you serve in local government, you should anticipate the same expectations going forward for broadband in your community. The internet has become vital to the way we live our lives, and access to it dictates much of our success both as residents and businesses. Recognizing connectivity as a critical service may have been a consequence of a pandemic, but that change in thinking is here to stay.

That’s why Ookla is here to help you learn more about the connectivity in your area. We’ve already helped local governments secure tens of millions of dollars in federal funding in Loudoun County, Virginia and Acadiana, Louisiana. We are also working with state broadband offices as well as municipalities to help them gain visibility into network availability and performance. If you want your community to take advantage of the billions pouring into improving connectivity, get in line before it’s too late. 

Drawn from billions of Speedtest® results, Ookla’s Broadband Performance Dataset provides governments, regulators, ISPs, and mobile operators with insights about the state of fixed networks and broadband accessibility. The Broadband Performance Dataset helps you identify unserved and underserved areas, prioritize investment opportunities to improve access to broadband, challenge funding decisions, and secure grants. 

To learn more about the Broadband Performance Dataset, Speedtest Intelligence, and other solutions for your state and/or local governments, please contact us.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| June 23, 2022

How the Acadiana Planning Commission Won $30M in Broadband Funding by Using Speedtest® Data to Challenge FCC Maps [Case Study]

The Acadiana region of Louisiana — made up of the Parish governments of Acadia Parish, Evangeline Parish, and St. Landry Parish — has historically lacked equitable access to high-speed internet connectivity. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, about 50% of households in the parishes lack access to the internet. The Acadiana Planning Commission (APC), responsible for the region’s economic and community development, wanted to provide better educational and economic opportunities by improving broadband access.

The APC applied for funding through the NTIA Broadband Infrastructure Program, which has made $288 million in funding available to help close the digital divide in the United States. There were over 230 applicants, and only 13 grants were awarded. 

Vice President Kamala Harris and Deputy Secretary of Commerce Don Graves visited Louisiana in March of 2022 to announce that the APC had been awarded a $30 million grant to fund high-speed internet in 11 rural Acadiana communities.

Situation 

With $288 million in federal funding on the table to help close the digital divide, the Acadiana Planning Commission knew that the residents of the region would benefit greatly from funding allocation to help improve broadband access. 

Federal funding allocation decisions are based on FCC Form 477 broadband mapping data. FCC Form 477 requires broadband providers to self-report the census blocks where they offer internet speeds greater than 200 kbps download or upload to at least one location. The problem with this is that even if only one location receives service, the entire census block is considered “served”. This information can be misleading because the provider may not be able to offer those speeds or be able to offer them everywhere in the entire census block. The APC needed a way to determine which census blocks were unserved or underserved, in order to challenge FCC data and submit a winning grant application. 

Solution

The Acadiana Planning Commission overlaid Ookla® Speedtest data with FCC data to find out where the real-world network experience of residents was significantly worse than the broadband availability shown in FCC maps, which rely on data reported by internet service providers (ISPs) about their own network performance.

Using only the Acadia parish as an example below, FCC data showed that the entire parish was served with speeds between 25-50 Mbps, however Speedtest data revealed that many locations were actually underserved (represented by the red dots on the map).

Based on these findings, the APC challenged approximately 1000 census blocks across six parishes that comprise the Acadiana region and was successful in 900 of those challenges. Speedtest data helped APC demonstrate that FCC data was inaccurate, and many residents in those 900 blocks did not have access to broadband.

Read the full case study

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.