| June 1, 2026

Manila Voice Network: Experience and Performance in a Controlled Network Test

The Philippine mobile telecommunications market is undergoing a transformation as operators expand 5G networks ahead of the planned 3G sunset in December 2026. This shift requires operators to migrate both data and voice traffic to modern 4G LTE and 5G architectures. The three operators follow different voice strategies that translate into measurable differences in call quality and call connection performance for consumers.

Ookla® conducted independent, controlled network testing across Manila from 17 to 22 February 2026 to assess real-world performance across the country’s three mobile operators, applying Ookla’s controlled testing methodology with the latest Samsung flagship handset. The evaluation spanned 1,200 kilometers and collected more than 23,000 controlled test samples across voice and data, capturing how each operator’s network architecture translates into measurable user experience. The drive route covered 14 cities and municipalities: Manila, Caloocan, Quezon City, Marikina, San Mateo, San Juan, Mandaluyong, Pasig, Makati, Pasay, Taguig, Parañaque, Las Piñas, and Muntinlupa.

Key Takeaways

  • VoLTE penetration in the Philippines remains well below global and regional levels. GSMA Intelligence data places VoLTE at 30.9% of total mobile connections in the Philippines in 2025, against a global average of 57.7% and regional peers such as Thailand at 65.2%, with Malaysia and Singapore both above 90%. VoLTE delivers HD-grade voice where deployed, so the gap reflects how many connections have yet to benefit from that experience, underscoring the migration required ahead of the December 2026 3G shutdown.
  • Operator voice architectures translate into measurable differences in call setup time, with all three operators delivering HD-grade voice quality once connected. Smart and Globe route over 99% of voice through mature VoLTE networks, delivering median call setup of 1.65 seconds on Globe and 2.30 seconds on Smart. DITO’s 5G Standalone (5G SA) core uses Evolved Packet System Fallback (EPS-FB) for voice, recording a median call setup of 4.59 seconds. All three operators delivered HD-grade voice quality, so the differences among them appear in call setup time rather than audio quality.
  • Consumers experience HD-grade audio quality on operator voice calls across all three networks, while Over-the-Top (OTT) voice apps such as WhatsApp deliver Fair audio quality.  Mean Opinion Score (MOS), the standard 1-to-5 measure of perceived audio quality, rated HD-grade on mobile-to-mobile calls for every operator, while OTT calls rated Fair across operators, reflecting the typical exposure of VoIP packets to congestion in a shared internet pipeline.
  • Consumers in weaker coverage areas continue to experience HD-grade audio on operator-managed VoLTE calls, while OTT calls degrade further. In moderate-to-low Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) conditions, VoLTE calls remained HD-grade across all three operators. OTT calls slipped lower within the Fair range at the cell edge. Charting MOS against RSRP shows VoLTE holding within a 4.0 to 4.5 band (Good to Excellent) as coverage weakens, while OTT slopes from around 3.7 toward 2.9 (Fair into Poor and Bad) in the weakest coverage bins. The pattern reflects how dedicated voice bearers protect call quality where best-effort data cannot.

The Philippine mobile market is transitioning to modern VoLTE infrastructure

Although 4G LTE has been commercially available in the Philippines since mid-2012, Voice over LTE (VoLTE)—the technology that enables voice calls over the high-speed 4G network—has taken longer to deploy. The shift toward modern voice standards accelerated significantly between 2020 and 2021. In November 2020, Smart Communications officially announced the completion of its nationwide VoLTE rollout, making the service accessible to both postpaid and prepaid subscribers. Globe Telecom followed a similar path, initially launching VoLTE in Manila in May 2020 and progressively expanding coverage nationwide throughout 2021. The 2021 commercial launch of DITO Telecommunity also relied on VoLTE for calls, as it does not operate legacy 2G/3G networks.

The Philippines is transitioning toward VoLTE and away from legacy networks, driven by wider 4G coverage and the rising adoption of VoLTE-compatible smartphones. GSMA Intelligence data places VoLTE connections at 30.9% of total mobile connections in the Philippines in 2025,  below the global average of 57.7% and well behind regional peers such as Thailand (65.2%), Malaysia (96.1%), and Singapore (94.9%). The same source forecasts VoLTE will cross the majority threshold in 2027 and reach 70.4% of connections by 2030, pointing to the eventual phase-out of legacy 2G and 3G voice networks. The regulator, the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC), has mandated a phased shutdown, requiring the full nationwide decommissioning of 3G services by December 31, 2026.

Philippines VoLTE Connections as a Share of Total Mobile Connections (2021–2030)
Source: GSMA Intelligence | 2021 – 2030

Breaking down the Philippines market by operator, GSMA Intelligence data for 2025 shows VoLTE accounting for 41.9% of DITO’s connections, the highest of the three operators, and consistent with DITO’s 4G/5G-only network. Smart follows at 31.7% and Globe at 27.4%. With the regulatory push for a complete nationwide 3G shutdown looming, legacy operators are being forced to accelerate subscriber migration, directly shaping the country’s VoLTE adoption landscape.

VoLTE Share of Operator's Total Connections (%)
Source: GSMA Intelligence | 2025

As the Philippines’ third mobile operator, DITO operates on a 4G/5G-only network built from the ground up, making VoLTE mandatory for voice calls. Since DITO operates on 5G Standalone (5G SA) with limited native Voice over New Radio (VoNR)  support, devices camped on DITO’s 5G network must temporarily step down to the 4G LTE network to establish a VoLTE voice call, a technical process called Evolved Packet System Fallback (EPS-FB).

In contrast, Smart and Globe manage massive subscriber bases that still include users with older devices. While both operators process nearly all of their active 4G voice traffic through mature VoLTE architecture, migrating the remaining legacy 3G devices ahead of the 2026 NTC deadline will depend heavily on regulatory support, since consumer device upgrades are constrained by affordability and cannot be driven by operators alone.

Core network architectures dictate how operators route voice calls 

To capture the complete voice experience on a mobile network, controlled network testing evaluates both traditional mobile-to-mobile (M2M) connections and app-based digital calls using VoLTE-capable devices. Mobile-to-mobile voice testing measures standard phone calls that utilize dedicated, high-priority pathways established directly by the cellular network. These dedicated channels ensure reliable, immediate connections for standard voice traffic by separating it from standard internet usage.

Conversely, Over-the-Top (OTT) testing evaluates the performance of voice calls routed through third-party internet applications. For this controlled test, the methodology simulated OTT voice calls via WhatsApp, one of the most widely used messaging platforms. OTT applications function as Voice over IP (VoIP) services, compressing and transmitting voice data as digital packets over a standard internet connection.

An analysis of the mobile-to-mobile voice call distribution reveals a sharp contrast in how operators route standard voice calls. Smart and Globe rely almost exclusively on VoLTE for their voice traffic, with 99.94% and 99.85% of test samples on VoLTE, respectively.  VoLTE allows these operators to connect calls using dedicated 4G voice channels without switching network types. Testing revealed that DITO routed 88.89% of its traditional voice calls using Evolved Packet System Fallback (EPS-FB), with only 11.11% routed directly over VoLTE.

Mobile-to-Mobile Voice Traffic Routing by Underlying Network Technology
Source: Speedtest Drive™ | February 2026

The distribution of call network technology shifts when examining OTT call results. The results show that Globe and Smart primarily used E-UTRAN New Radio-Dual Connectivity (EN-DC) for 90.12% and 84.15% of their application-based calls, respectively. EN-DC is a 5G Non-Standalone (5G NSA) technology that allows a mobile device to connect to both 4G and 5G networks simultaneously, leveraging existing 4G infrastructure to anchor the high-speed 5G data connection. In contrast, DITO completed 89.27% of its OTT calls exclusively over 5G SA, with the remaining 10.73% falling back to standard LTE.

OTT Voice Traffic Routing by Underlying Network Technology
Source: Speedtest Drive™ | February 2026

Operators delivered consistent high-definition voice clarity in Manila

The controlled test measured Mean Opinion Score (MOS) for both mobile-to-mobile and OTT calls using the Perceptual Objective Listening Quality Analysis (POLQA) algorithm to evaluate the overall consumer voice experience in Manila. MOS POLQA objectively analyzes audio signals to predict human perception of speech clarity, filtering out differences in device hardware, on a standardized 1-to-5 scale. Results are grouped into standard ITU-T MOS quality categories on the 1-to-5 scale: Excellent (4.3 to 5.0), Good (4.0 to 4.3), Fair (3.6 to 4.0), Poor (3.1 to 3.6), and Bad (1.0 to 3.1). Calls in the Good and Excellent range, with MOS at or above 4.0, are referred to as HD-grade and deliver clear, high-quality audio, while Fair reflects noticeable but tolerable quality loss, and Poor or Bad indicates degraded calls. Mobile-to-mobile testing measures the fidelity of dedicated cellular voice pathways, while OTT testing evaluates the audio quality of third-party platforms — in this case, WhatsApp — over data networks.

OTT voice quality was measured using a simulated WhatsApp client rather than the live application, because end-to-end encryption, proprietary codecs, and frequent app updates make the production app impractical to benchmark consistently. The simulated client replicates WhatsApp’s codec and audio behavior. Because the test placed two co-located devices on shared radio conditions and routed calls through a hosted SIP server, the OTT MOS values represent a controlled, best-case path for OTT voice — real-world WhatsApp calls between parties in different locations on live internet infrastructure may perform below these figures.

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) Rating by Operator, Manila
Source: Speedtest Drive® | February 2026

Across the full test sample, all three operators delivered HD-grade audio on mobile-to-mobile voice calls, while OTT calls rated Fair across operators. Mobile-to-mobile calls rated Excellent on DITO and Smart and Good on Globe.  OTT applications like WhatsApp use the OPUS codec to compress voice into data packets that travel alongside standard web traffic, and OTT calls rated Fair on all three operators,  reflecting the expected exposure of VoIP packets to congestion in a shared internet pipeline.

Codec note: During the drive, Globe’s mobile-to-mobile calls predominantly negotiated the AMR-WB codec, while EVS was the dominant codec on the other two networks in the same drive. EVS is a mature, widely deployed codec in the region, and Globe’s network is understood to be EVS-ready. The codec used on any given call is determined by the negotiation between the device and the network. On the Samsung test devices used in this drive, the IMS/VoLTE profile applied for Globe, as provisioned through the device vendor’s certification process, did not enable EVS, so the negotiation defaulted to AMR-WB. This is consistent with a device-side profile outcome, specific to the Samsung test devices, not a limitation of the codecs supported by Globe’s network. The MOS result above reflects perceived quality under AMR-WB and is not directly comparable to an EVS-based measurement.

For Manila subscribers, mobile-to-mobile calls deliver consistently HD-grade clarity across all three operators, while OTT calls rate Fair across the full Manila drive test. 

Operator voice holds up in weak coverage where OTT calls degrade

Voice network performance varies most where coverage weakens. We filtered the test sample to measurements collected in moderate-to-low RF coverage, defined as Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) at or below -100 dBm and Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) at or below 5 dB. These conditions occur on outdoor routes that sit at distance from the nearest cell site, along corridors where dense high-rise construction blocks line-of-sight at street level, and on peripheral stretches of the drive route where cell density is lower. Approximately 9% of VoLTE samples and 10% of OTT samples fell within this band.

The share of measurements falling into the moderate-to-low band varied by operator. Globe recorded the smallest cell-edge sample share on both call types, with 5.8% of its VoLTE measurements and 7.3% of its OTT measurements in this coverage band, indicating more uniform RF coverage across the tested Manila routes. Smart recorded approximately 10% on VoLTE and 12% on OTT in the moderate-to-low band, while DITO recorded approximately 11% on both call types.

Cell-Edge Mean MOS Rating by Operator and Call Type, Manila
Source: Speedtest Drive™ | February 2026 | RSRP ≤ -100 dBm and SINR ≤ 5 dB

Within the cell-edge sample, VoLTE held HD-grade across all three operators, sustaining the clarity recorded on the full mobile-to-mobile sample. OTT calls slipped lower within the Fair range across operators, below the level they recorded on the full sample. The pattern was consistent across operators — operator-managed VoLTE preserved audio quality at the cell edge, while shared-bandwidth OTT voice degraded further.

Mean MOS by RSRP and SINR, Cell-Edge Subset, Manila
Source: Speedtest Drive™ | February 2026

Mobile-to-mobile VoLTE mean MOS held within a stable 4.0 to 4.5 band (Good to Excellent) across most of the RSRP distribution, sustaining HD-grade audio across the cell-edge band. The curve is largely flat, which means VoLTE quality stayed near its full-sample baseline regardless of how the radio link moved.

OTT mean MOS tracked a different shape. From around 3.7 at the cell-edge band entry, OTT MOS declined as RSRP weakened, falling below 3.0 (into Poor and Bad) in the weakest, well-populated bins. The same divergence holds when MOS is plotted against SINR — mobile-to-mobile VoLTE remains largely in the 3.8 to 4.5 band (Good to Excellent), while OTT spans a wider range that dips below 3.0 in the deepest interference bins. The shape of the curves matters as much as the cell-edge averages. VoLTE’s flat profile reflects active protection of the voice bearer. OTT’s downward slope reflects a connection that responds directly to the underlying radio link.

The divergence reflects how each voice path handles network resources. VoLTE calls are carried on a dedicated quality-of-service bearer that the network prioritizes over best-effort traffic, and the IMS core can refuse a call setup if it cannot guarantee quality. OTT voice rides over standard data bearers, sharing capacity with web browsing, video streaming, and other internet traffic. As RF degrades, OTT packets compete for limited radio resources, which translates into higher packet loss and lower mean MOS. The flat VoLTE curve under weakening RSRP is the visible signature of admission control and dedicated bearer prioritization at work.

OTT voice calls connect faster than traditional cellular calls, but shared internet bandwidth raises call block rates

Beyond the cell-edge view, the test captured three call connection metrics across the full sample to characterize how successfully calls connect and persist under representative network conditions. Call setup time tracks how quickly a network establishes a connection, the block rate measures initial connection failures, and the drop rate identifies active calls that terminate unexpectedly.

VoLTE Call Connections Metrics, Per Operator, Manila
Source: Speedtest Drive® | February 2026

VoLTE voice performance reflects the operator’s underlying network infrastructure. Globe led in initial connectivity, with a median VoLTE call setup time of 1.65 seconds, followed by Smart at 2.30 seconds. Both operators benefit from mature VoLTE networks that provide dedicated voice channels. VoLTE has benefited from a decade of global tuning, including optimized SIP signaling (the protocol that initiates and manages voice calls), dedicated QoS bearers (reserved data channels that guarantee consistent call quality), and robust SRVCC handovers (Single Radio Voice Call Continuity, which seamlessly transfers calls to older networks when needed).

DITO recorded a median VoLTE call setup time of 4.59 seconds. As the only provider operating on a 5G SA network in the market, DITO relies heavily on EPS-FB. In controlled testing, 88.89% of mobile-to-mobile call samples transitioned back to 4G upon connection, acting as a bridge when the SA footprint or operational maturity is incomplete.

Call block rates varied across operators on the VoLTE path. Globe recorded the lowest at 0.47%, with Smart at 0.59% and DITO at 0.73%. Once connected, call drop rates were uniformly low across the VoLTE sample, ranging from 0.04% on DITO to 0.20% on Globe, with Smart at 0.09%.

OTT Voice Call Connection Metrics, Per Operator, Manila
Source: Speedtest Drive™ | February 2026

OTT voice calls achieved faster median call setup times than VoLTE calls on all three operators. Globe recorded a median OTT call setup time of 1.62 seconds, narrowly faster than its 1.65-second VoLTE median. DITO bypassed EPS-FB for OTT calls and recorded a median OTT setup time of 1.72 seconds, compared with its 4.59-second VoLTE median. Smart recorded a median OTT setup time of 1.91 seconds compared with 2.30 seconds on VoLTE.

The size of the VoLTE-versus-OTT setup time gap reflects each network’s architectural maturity. Globe and Smart, with mature VoLTE deployments, recorded VoLTE setup times within 0.03 to 0.39 seconds of their OTT setup times — the dedicated voice bearer adds little overhead on top of the underlying data path. DITO’s 2.87-second gap reflects the structural cost of the EPS-FB step-down required to establish a VoLTE call on its 5G SA core.

OTT voice packets share bandwidth with regular internet traffic such as web browsing and video streaming, leaving them more vulnerable to network congestion. Heavy data traffic can disrupt data packets, impacting initial connections and causing interruptions to active calls. OTT block rates were materially higher than VoLTE block rates across all operators — Globe at 1.64%, DITO at 2.33%, and Smart at 2.76% — consistent with the higher congestion exposure of best-effort data bearers. OTT call drop rates ran in a similar low range to VoLTE, between 0.12% on Globe, 0.16% on Smart, and 0.19% on DITO.

OTT’s marginal setup-time advantage at the median is best read alongside the cell-edge MOS finding established earlier. The OTT path achieves a small speed savings on the median by routing voice through best-effort data bearers, but the same path lacks the dedicated bearer protection that holds VoLTE call quality at the cell edge.

Each operator’s architecture shapes how consumers experience voice in Manila

Manila’s controlled benchmarking captures how each operator’s voice architecture translates into measurable consumer experience. Globe and Smart route voice over mature VoLTE, delivering fast call setup. DITO’s 5G SA core uses EPS Fallback to route mobile-to-mobile voice through its LTE layer, recording a longer median setup time. Across the full sample, operator voice calls on every network deliver HD-grade audio to consumers, while OTT calls rate Fair.  In weaker coverage areas, operator-managed VoLTE held HD-grade across all three operators, while OTT fell further.  These voice architecture differences will shape how each operator handles the December 2026 NTC 3G shutdown.

To learn more about Ookla’s controlled drive and walk testing with Speedtest Drive and first-party crowdsourced data from Speedtest®, please contact us.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| April 22, 2026

A Closer Look at Network Reliability in Algiers with the Advent of 5G

The year 2025 marks a milestone in the history of Algeria. While the preceding decade was characterized by the expansion and stabilization of 4G LTE networks, more recently, the country embraced 5G to stimulate the digital ecosystem and also in reaction to the competitive landscape of North Africa, where neighboring nations (Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia) also accelerated their 5G initiatives in 2025. 

As 5G was only recently launched, consumers expect a higher-performing and more reliable network. To quantify how the network reliability race is unfolding in Algeria’s mobile market, we independently measured performance using RootMetrics’ controlled methodology on the latest Samsung flagship handsets. This report analyzes data from drive testing conducted in Algiers, the capital city, between January and February 2026, covering only outdoor locations. During drive testing in high-usage areas, we covered more than 650 km and collected nearly 6,000 samples. The methodology is designed to mirror real-world network performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Djezzy outperformed its competitors across most data reliability metrics. This includes access success for downlink and uplink, and uplink task success without interruption. However, the results were very close, with Mobilis leading in “lite” data task success and Ooredoo leading in downlink task success.
  • Djezzy recorded the fastest call setup time and the lowest dropped-call rate (0.29%). On the other hand, Mobilis had the lowest blocked call rate (0.58%) but suffered from a significantly slower voice call setup time (median of 7.6 seconds).
  • During the 5G early launch phase, Ooredoo had a high share of active 5G network usage during the drive test across Algiers. 76% of test samples were on 5G in the mid-band 3.5 GHz (n78), while Djezzy had over 30% of its samples on 5G. Mobilis is primarily operating an LTE network as it prepares for its 5G launch.

5G launch had a significant impact on network performance at the national and provincial levels

Algeria embarked on the 5G journey in Q2 2024 when the Regulatory Authority of Post and Electronic Communications (ARPCE), under the supervision and policy direction of the Ministry of Post and Telecommunications, drafted a regulatory framework, conducted a public consultation, and finalized licensing conditions by the end of 2024. In the summer of the following year, the Regulatory Authority of Post and Electronic Communications (ARPCE) granted operating licenses and spectrum bands to the three MNOs Mobilis, Djezzy, and Ooredoo. The operators were then permitted to launch the service commercially by the end of 2025. 

The licenses awarded were for 15 to 20 years, and they stipulated coverage and QoS obligations, with coverage prioritized initially in major urban centers across eight provinces, such as Algiers, Oran, and Constantine. Operators had access to the mid-band 3.5 GHz band (3400-3800 MHz) for capacity, where each obtained a contiguous block. As the top-ranked bidder in the auction process, Mobilis was able to obtain a tranche of 2.6 GHz spectrum, available at launch, while Ooredoo also obtained 2.6 GHz spectrum, but available post-launch, and phased in over time. The operators have plans to complement their new spectrum with re-farmed low‑band 900 MHz and mid‑band 1800 MHz holdings as a coverage layer.

5G is also set to drive sector growth and establish a new base for competition. The mobile market is a triopoly, with Mobilis, a subsidiary of state-owned Group Telecom Algerie, consistently leading in subscriber numbers and geographical coverage. According to ARPCE, Mobilis controlled 42.4% of the market, followed by Djezzy (31.6%) and Ooredoo (25.9%). The market is predominantly prepaid (95.6%), and the majority of users use 4G technology (88.8%).

The launch of 5G has a significant impact on network performance. According to Speedtest Intelligence® data, the median mobile download speed in Algeria saw a significant improvement, rising from 23.6 Mbps in January 2025 to 40.87 Mbps in December 2025. The performance is highest in December in the cities where 5G became available: Algiers (102.56 Mbps), Setif (76.94 Mbps), Constantine (64.47 Mbps), and Oran (55.69 Mbps). 

National Mobile Median Download Speed, Algeria
Source: Speedtest Intelligence® | Jan-Dec 2025
National Median Download Speed, Algeria

Mobile Median Download Speed in Key Cities, Algeria
Source: Speedtest Intelligence® | Nov-Dec 2025
Mobile Median Download Speed in Key Cities, Algeria

However, beyond network performance and coverage improvements, network reliability is a key measure of the quality of experience for end-users, especially as operators continue to deploy new sites and optimize their 5G network.

All operators had a high Reliability Score based on the RootMetrics drive test in Algiers

To rigorously and scientifically assess the connection between network investments by operators and service reliability in Algiers, RootMetrics employs controlled testing focused on a straightforward metric: successful task completion—does a user’s initiated action finish without interruption?

The Reliability score is a composite metric, derived from tens of thousands of “connect and complete” tests performed across various routes and locations. These tests encompass calls, data uploads, and downloads. The final score is heavily weighted towards data (80%), with calls contributing 20%, reflecting current real-world usage. The results show that Djezzy and Mobilis have similar overall Reliability Scores, while Ooredoo is behind. 

Network Reliability Scores, Per Operator, Algiers
Source: RootMetrics® | Jan-Feb 2026
Network Reliability Scores, Per Operator, Algiers

The methodology rewards successful starts and uninterrupted completion and penalizes blocks, drops, and timeouts. Since each test follows the full path from device to radio to core to service edge, the results reflect end-to-end robustness rather than any single parameter. Below, we examine the performance of each operator on the two components of Reliability Scores: data and call.

Data Reliability (80% overall weight). This measures whether devices can establish a secure, usable data path (access success) and complete common transfers (task success) without stalls or timeouts. It covers both download and upload under light tasks, such as webpage loads, and heavy tasks such as file transfers, rewarding successful setup and uninterrupted completion, and penalizing setup failures, timeouts, and mid-flow resets. Even when users see full signal bars on their devices, data reliability metrics like task success can decline due to factors such as packet loss and TCP resets (e.g., at a busy stadium) or poor mid-transfer handovers (e.g., while on a high-speed train).

Djezzy outperformed its competitors across most metrics, recording the highest success rates for downlink access, uplink access, uplink task, and “lite” data access. On the other hand, Ooredoo pulled ahead of the others for downlink task success, while Mobilis achieved the highest rate for “lite” data task success. The results for this category of tests were very close, indicating a high degree of reliability across all three mobile operators for mobile data tasks.

Mobile Data Reliability Results, Per Operator, Algiers
Source: RootMetrics® data | Jan-Feb 2026
Mobile Data Reliability Results, Per Operator, Algiers

Call Reliability (20% overall weight). This measures the success rate of setting up and maintaining voice calls. Blocked calls occur when the network fails to initiate a call, often during congestion. It assigns more weight to blocking (when a user presses call and the network refuses or never sets it up) than to dropping (when a call starts but ends unexpectedly), because initial failures tend to disrupt user intent more profoundly. Dropped calls occur when active calls end unexpectedly, usually due to poor radio conditions and handover issues, such as low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SINR) and coverage gaps.

Results show that Mobilis was the clear leader with 0.58% blocked calls, but had significantly slower voice call setup (median value of 7.6 seconds). On the other hand, Djezzy came first in both the percentage of dropped calls (0.29%) and the voice call setup time.

Mobile Voice Call Reliability Results, Per Operator, Algiers
Source: RootMetrics® data | Jan-Feb 2026
Mobile Voice Call Reliability Results, Per Operator, Algiers

During the 5G early launch phase, Ooredoo had a high share of active 5G network

Based on drive testing conducted in the capital city of Algiers, Djezzy and Ooredoo are the only operators with an active 5G network, while Mobilis operates mostly an LTE network as it prepares its 5G launch. 

Djezzy had over 30% of the samples on 5G, while over 45% were on LTE (the remainder were tests that either initiated or completed on 5G). Djezzy utilizes 170 MHz bandwidth using carrier aggregation with 4G spectrum (contributing 77% of 5G samples).

During the initial 5G launch phase, Ooredoo recorded a high share of active 5G network usage during the drive test across Algiers (76% of test samples), operating a contiguous 100 MHz channel over 3.5 GHz (n78) spectrum band. This means that its subscribers are more likely to be connected to 5G while driving or walking in Algiers than subscribers on other networks. This suggests that Ooredoo moved more quickly than its competitors in deploying an extensive 5G network.

Map of observed technology usage during drive test route in Algiers, Algeria | RootMetrics Data January-February 2026

Algeria’s entry into the 5G era in late 2025 has materially boosted the mobile experience in major cities, establishing a new ground for competition. The RootMetrics data in Algiers confirms the renewed dynamism of the market with tight competition on network reliability.

Djezzy and Mobilis had similar overall Reliability Scores for the capital, but their parity stems from different areas of strength: Djezzy holds an advantage in voice performance, while Mobilis demonstrates strong data reliability and the lowest rate of blocked calls. Ooredoo on the other hand, has the most aggressive 5G deployment in Algiers, having the highest share of active 5G network usage in the city.

As Algeria enters its first year of 5G commercialization, the market is in a phase of rapid evolution. This report captures a critical snapshot from early 2026. Since the conclusion of our testing window, all three operators have continued to make significant strides in their rollouts, with Ooredoo for example recently announcing that it has extended 5G coverage to all provinces in the country. Continued investments in 5G expansion by the three operators, including the introduction of 5G by Mobilis, will undoubtedly further improve network reach and service reliability, and we will continue to monitor the market to track this evolution and the impact on consumers.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| April 20, 2026

Discover Speedtest Certified™: On-Site Verified Network Excellence

We have all experienced the same universal moment of frustration: You check into a hotel, prepare for an important video call, and suddenly the connection drops. You are forced to go off-camera just to keep the audio from breaking up.

This scenario represents a massive friction point in the modern economy. Whether it is a Fortune 500 company selecting a venue for a sales kickoff, a family booking a vacation, or a commercial tenant signing a ten-year lease, they are all essentially gambling on connectivity. While connectivity has become a fundamental utility, the market lacks a reliable way to verify it before signing the contract or checking in. This creates an industry-wide risk to brand reputation and revenue—but it also reveals a powerful opportunity for properties and technology partners to verifiably prove they stand apart from the competition.

While multiple programs share the goal of elevating digital excellence, they each serve fundamentally different strategic purposes. Understanding this distinction is essential for the C-suite and IT Director audience to choose the certification model that best aligns with their goals—whether that is promoting a smart building’s infrastructure or guaranteeing a network’s superior user experience.

What makes Speedtest Certified unique?

Speedtest Certified is the definitive property network verification program built to solve the universal problem of unreliable, unpredictable connectivity. Here is how we deliver a competitive advantage:

Measured, data-driven assessments

While other certifications have made significant contributions to the industry by championing the importance of digital infrastructure, Speedtest Certified takes a different approach. We are all-in on verifying the user’s digital experience. As a part of Ookla—a global leader in connectivity intelligence trusted by mobile network operators, ISPs, regulators, and enterprises—network measurement and analysis is in our DNA. We believe that the true measure of a network is how it performs when a user actually connects to it. Speedtest Certified is engineered to validate the actual connected experience, moving beyond theoretical capacity to proven reality.

  • Focus on Real-World Performance: Rather than rely on infrastructure assessments and self-reported data, Ookla uses a multi-faceted methodology to deliver consistent and unbiased results focused on the end-user.
  • Comprehensive Methodology: Our rigorous on-site assessment combines professional-grade tools like the Ekahau Sidekick 2 for comprehensive RF analysis with Speedtest SDKs to measure real-world performance metrics, including download/upload speed, latency, and jitter. This process delivers objective data on what users truly experience.
Quote: We see tremendous value in Speedtest Certified. Historically, the industry has lacked a clear, data-driven definition of what constitutes a great on-site digital experience. Speedtest Certified creates that standard, removing ambiguity for property owners and giving users a trusted signal of quality they can count on.

World-renowned brand recognition and trust

The Speedtest® brand is known across industries, across the globe. While other certifications have built respectable names within the commercial real estate industry, there often still exists an “explanation tax”—you have to educate the end-user (the tenant, the guest, the fan) and the executive teams on what the certification means and why they should care. Speedtest Certified eliminates that friction entirely.

  • No Translation Required: When a prospective tenant tours an office or a guest checks into a hotel and sees the Speedtest Certified seal, the message is immediate and visceral. They don’t need a brochure to understand it. Consumers and people who care about connectivity know the Speedtest brand, use the app, and trust the data. This instant recognition transforms your network into a premium amenity that justifies higher ADRs, accelerates leasing velocity, and validates your positioning in a way that industry-specific certifications cannot.
  • Global Authority: Speedtest is not just an industry standard; it is a trusted part of the global digital experience. With over 11 million daily user-initiated tests and adoption by network operators in dozens of countries, it is the yardstick by which the world measures internet performance. We have taken this network analysis verification to the edge, transforming invisible network infrastructure into a visible, marketable asset that builds immediate consumer trust. Trusted by over 90% of the Fortune 500—we combine decades of expertise with continuous innovation to enable flawless wireless networks from initial planning through implementation and beyond.

Easy-to-understand digital portal: Translating technical data into business value

Network data is often complex, and different stakeholders need different insights. While infrastructure-focused certifications provide deep dives into physical readiness—essential for engineering teams during development—Speedtest Certified focuses on the operational reality of the network.

The Speedtest Certified Digital Platform is engineered to bridge the gap between technical metrics and business outcomes, ensuring both Engineering and Executive teams have the specific intelligence they need.

We synthesize thousands of technical measurements into a clear, marketable narrative. The portal presents a Total Weighted Score and Activity-Based Assessments that allow stakeholders to track performance at a glance. By contextualizing performance for specific user needs—such as “Excellent for Video Streaming” or “Great for Remote Work”—we empower leasing and sales teams to pitch specific, verified use cases to prospects rather than relying on abstract technical specs.

While blueprints tell you what should happen, our platform tells you what is happening. For the IT & Network Team, the portal assesses the network infrastructure and provides a roadmap for continuous optimization based on real-world conditions.

The bottom line is that we don’t just tell you if your building is ready for great connectivity… Speedtest Certified proves you are delivering it, using a brand the world already trusts and a platform that turns data into the assurance needed for internal teams, prospective guests, and tenants.

Speedtest Certified for technology partners

For technology partners—including MSPs, VARs, and systems integrators—Speedtest Certified offers a unique opportunity to differentiate your business by leveraging the global authority and trust associated with the Speedtest brand. By transforming complex network data into automated, recognized proof of performance, you can help IT leaders bridge the communication gap with non-technical stakeholders and clearly articulate the long-term value of their digital infrastructure.

This program empowers partners to provide a standardized benchmark of excellence across every deployment, utilizing professional-grade tools and rigorous validation conducted by trained, certified assessors. Whether validating a new installation or providing a clear roadmap for continuous optimization, becoming an authorized partner allows you to stand out as a leader in delivering superior user experiences.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| April 17, 2026

Ookla and Microsoft Partner to Launch Speedtest from the Windows Taskbar

Ookla and Microsoft announce an expanded partnership, establishing Speedtest® as the integrated network performance testing platform across Bing and Windows.

Microsoft and Ookla announced a major expansion of their strategic partnership. Powered by Ookla’s Speedtest Web SDK, the global standard for internet metrics will now be more closely integrated across Microsoft’s most popular platforms. This integration places trusted, accurate network diagnostics exactly where users already are—from Bing to the system tray.

This expanded partnership eliminates the friction of everyday network troubleshooting. Following a successful integration of Speedtest into Bing in late 2023, Speedtest by Ookla will now serve as the public internet speed testing platform of choice for Microsoft, easily launched from Windows 11. 

For Windows users, this means a network speed test is accessible directly from the taskbar. Users can soon simply right-click their network icon in the system tray or open their Wi-Fi and Cellular Quick Settings to launch a diagnostic check without needing to manually open a browser or run a secondary tool.

Historically, diagnosing a slow connection meant manually opening a browser, navigating to a testing site, and running a secondary tool. Now, by embedding the testing launchpad within the OS, Microsoft and Ookla are empowering users to understand their network performance seamlessly.

Users across the Microsoft ecosystem gain several key advantages from this expanded partnership:

  • Faster access from Windows: Launch a speed test from common Windows networking entry points without manually opening the browser and searching, raising visibility for those less familiar with speed tests. 
  • Frictionless Troubleshooting: Instantly diagnose connection speeds and latency natively within the OS or platform, empowering consumers and enterprise users to validate their internet performance without interrupting their workflow.
  • Trusted Global Infrastructure: Rely on Ookla’s established backend network to provide highly accurate, real-world throughput and latency metrics directly through Microsoft interfaces.

The integrated Speedtest experience is currently available to Windows Insiders in the Release Preview channel and is now rolling out broadly to all eligible Windows devices.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| March 24, 2026

Downdetector’s New Web Experience is Here

When your favorite app, streaming platform, or internet provider goes down, you need answers fast. That’s why we are excited to introduce a modern refresh to the Downdetector web experience, designed to bring new features and significantly upgrade your user experience. This redesign brings Downdetector into a new era, creating a flexible, accessible framework that paves the way for more future enhancements.

What’s New in the Downdetector Refresh

We’ve rebuilt the Downdetector web experience to give you more clarity and control when troubleshooting your digital world. Here are some key features to look out for:

  • Enhanced UI: Enjoy a sleek, modernized interface with improved accessibility across both mobile and desktop platforms. Navigating outage data is now even smoother and more intuitive, no matter what device you are using.
  • Improved Service Indicators: Get the answers you need at a glance. We’ve updated our service indicators to provide clearer, immediate visual cues of which services are actively experiencing problems.
  • Enhanced Search with Trending Services: Find what you’re looking for instantly. Our upgraded search feature now highlights trending services so you can jump straight to platforms experiencing active outages.
  • Light and Dark Mode Support: You can now easily toggle between Light Mode and Dark Mode to match your system preferences and reduce eye strain during those late-night service disruptions.
  • Multi-Language Support: To better serve our global community, the new web experience is tailored to your location. Depending on your region, the site now supports the primary local languages, in addition to English.

Now Available Globally

The rollout is complete! The refreshed Downdetector web experience is now live across all 67 countries we serve. You can explore the newly upgraded design in the following locations:

  • The Americas: Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Perú, Puerto Rico, and the USA.
  • Europe: Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, and the UK.
  • Middle East & Africa: Algeria, Israel, Jordan, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tunisia, and the UAE.
  • Asia-Pacific: Australia, Bangladesh, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Visit Downdetector today to check out the new look and monitor outages in your region!

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| March 19, 2026

The GFiber In-Home Advantage: Validating Superior Wi-Fi with Speedtest Data [Case Study]

Fiber internet continues to raise the bar for speeds and reliability across the United States, and GFiber is leading this effort through their commitment to delivering the best internet service. This leadership is built on a foundation of significant, ongoing investment in GFiber’s 25G PON fiber optic network, which delivers the next-gen capacity and low latency required for today’s and tomorrow’s bandwidth-intensive applications. GFiber offers a full range of symmetrical multi-gig plans today, with speeds up to 20 Gbps in early deployment. While driving innovation in network speeds, GFiber also aggressively targets superior Quality of Experience (QoE) by optimizing the performance of customer Wi-Fi inside the home. This focus supports GFiber’s mission of providing consistent, high-performance connectivity to every customer in every market, wrapped in a service experience that defies the norms.

This commitment is underpinned by a tech-forward strategy that prioritizes the aggressive deployment of best-in-class Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) and an exceptional, high-quality installation experience. These are the crucial factors that ensure the high-performance capabilities of the fiber network translate seamlessly to the Wi-Fi experience, where customers need it most.

Situation

The demand for internet speed and bandwidth in the modern home is increasing rapidly. This growth is driven by the high volume of connected devices and the emergence of bandwidth-intensive applications like AI, Virtual Reality (VR), and high-resolution live streaming/video. These use cases are creating a future that requires significantly higher network capacity and extremely low latency for a strong user experience.

As bandwidth-intensive applications and high-performance client devices became standard in the home, GFiber continued to aggressively manage the end-to-end quality of its service. Unwilling to compromise on the customer experience, GFiber identified that legacy routers could eventually become a limiting factor for these modern devices. While customer device choices (like phones, computers, etc.) also impact the experience,  GFiber is continually investing in its core network and CPE to ensure the infrastructure is ready to deliver full performance the moment a customer upgrades to the latest equipment.

To stay ahead of this curve, GFiber leveraged data to pinpoint where older Wi-Fi technology might restrict performance. By proactively upgrading this CPE, GFiber ensured that its hardware strategy remained as forward-looking as its network infrastructure, maximizing the value of the connection for every customer.

Download the full case study

Check out our full case study to find out how GFiber adopted a data-driven approach to confirm customers were receiving the promised speeds across all their devices via Wi-Fi.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| February 23, 2026

Ookla and Imagine Wireless Partner to Drive Innovation in Aviation Connectivity and Private Networks

Ookla, a global leader in connectivity intelligence, announced a strategic partnership with Imagine Wireless to help airport leaders navigate the complexities of digital transformation. This collaboration, combining Ookla’s world-class network insights with Imagine Wireless’s specialized advisory services, equips aviation stakeholders with the future-proofed strategies and private network expertise necessary to build resilient, next-generation infrastructure.

The alliance leverages Imagine Wireless’s role as a trusted strategic advisor to airports, integrating Ookla’s suite of measurement and analysis tools, including Speedtest Insights, Speedtest Certified, and Ekahau, to validate network performance. By combining Imagine Wireless’s deep domain expertise with Ookla’s data and services, the partnership enables clients to optimize private 5G, Wi-Fi, and public cellular networks.

“At Ookla, our mission is to provide industry-leading network intelligence that empowers organizations to make data-driven decisions,” said Chip Strange, Chief Strategy Officer at Ookla. “By partnering with Imagine Wireless, we are extending the impact of our insights into the critical aviation vertical. This collaboration ensures that airports and enterprise clients have the independent validation and performance metrics necessary to support mission-critical operations and their ambitious digital transformation goals.”

Redefining Connectivity Standards for Aviation

A primary focus of the Ookla-Imagine Wireless relationship is the aviation sector, a vertical that consumes wireless services at significant scale compared to many other industries. As airports increasingly utilize set-aside spectrum for private wireless networks, the need for accurate, independent performance data continues to grow to support core airport operations and long-term infrastructure investment.

The partnership supports the next-generation airport digital modernization initiative, focused on deploying and validating private 5G and advanced Wi-Fi networks that power safety, security, logistics, and passenger experience systems. Independent performance data, including Ookla’s Speedtest Certified methodology, allows the aviation industry to define and validate its connectivity requirements with telecommunications providers and support confirmation of agreed-upon service levels, rather than relying solely on standard commercial benchmarks.

“The aviation sector is now the second largest consumer of mobile operator telecom services globally. Airports are utilizing spectrum for private wireless networks as a critical piece of infrastructure enabling a new digital transformation program we call ‘AviationX’,” said Norman Fekrat, Managing Partner of Imagine Wireless.

Fekrat continued, “While public cellular networks are mostly for consumers/passengers and Wi-Fi is an alternative where public cellular signals don’t reach. Airports are utilizing set-aside spectrum to increase the security and safety around aviation. Our relationship with Ookla is focused on measuring the wireless service levels and Quality of Service (QoS) metrics necessary to deploy next-gen use cases like autonomous vehicles and provide private secure wireless services to their ecosystem.”

Showcasing Innovation at MWC Barcelona and Beyond

The partnership highlights the growing importance of independent third-party validation in complex environments. Ookla’s enterprise solutions support the communications teams responsible for airport networks, helping ensure connectivity keeps pace with the evolving demands for airport operations, passengers, and the broader aviation ecosystem they serve. More information about these solutions is available at www.ookla.com/solutions/airlines-and-airports.

This work aligns with Imagine Wireless’s industry leadership, including their role as a GSMA research partner and contributions to the Smart Airport Summit and the Airport of the Future pavilion at Mobile World Congress Barcelona 2026.

Key benefits of the collaboration include:

  • Independent Validation: Utilizing Ookla’s Speedtest Certified methodology to validate that private and public networks meet the specific performance requirements of airport CIOs
  • Strategic Network Planning: Leveraging crowdsourced and controlled testing data to identify coverage gaps and optimize infrastructure investment for security and logistics
  • Future-Ready Operations: Ensuring networks are robust enough to support “AviationX” use cases, such as autonomous tarmac vehicles and biometric security systems

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| February 3, 2026

The Benchmark Network: How Umniah by Beyon Built Jordan’s Best Mobile Network with Ookla Data [Case Study]

Delivering a consistently higher-quality mobile experience is central to Umniah by Beyons strategy as one of Jordan’s leading telecom operators, providing both mobile and fixed services to customers across the country. As customers increasingly rely on connectivity for everything from streaming and gaming to navigation, mobile payments, online learning, and remote work, expectations for speed, stability, and reliability continue to rise wherever they go, whether in dense urban districts or rural communities. The transition to 5G has further raised the bar, introducing new performance demands and a greater need for precision in how networks are planned, monitored, and optimized, raising the stakes for operators to deliver consistent performance in real-world environments.

In this environment, network leadership can no longer be sustained through traditional monitoring or periodic testing alone. Instead, leadership must be achieved through the continuous management of real-world customer experience measured at scale.

The Best Mobile Network award is determined using Ookla’s independent and statistically rigorous methodology, based on millions of real-world network performance measurements collected nationwide from everyday consumer devices used by real customers. These measurements include consumer-initiated Speedtest® data alongside other independently collected mobile usage signals, providing a comprehensive view of actual customer experience across apps, locations, and usage scenarios. The award reflects real-world performance through a composite score derived from median download and upload speeds, latency, and consistency metrics, rather than laboratory simulations or drive-test-only data.

To respond effectively to rising customer expectations and strengthen its competitive position, Umniah partnered with Ookla® to incorporate real-time, independently collected, crowdsourced intelligence into its network operations, providing continuous visibility into how customers experience the network in everyday conditions across Jordan. 

Insights from Ookla solutions, including  Speedtest Insights™, Speedtest Intelligence®, Cell Analytics™ and Consumer QoE™, provide Umniah with a continuously updated view of real-world user experience across Jordan. 

This real-time intelligence enables faster detection and troubleshooting of issues, sharper prioritization of network investments, and ongoing validation of improvements, while strengthening the overall 5G experience, helping ensure that enhancements translate into tangible benefits for customers. 

These insights are derived from a statistically significant volume of measurements collected during Q3–Q4 2025. Ookla applies robust statistical validation techniques, including outlier removal and confidence checks, to ensure accuracy, fairness, and comparability across operators.

As a result of this data-driven approach, Umniah won the Speedtest Award™ for Best Mobile Network for Q3–Q4 2025.

Situation

Mobile customers rely on connectivity across many different locations and usage settings every day, at home, work, and across public areas where performance can vary. Traditional measurement methods, such as periodic drive tests or one-time data collections, provide only limited snapshots of these day-to-day conditions and do not provide the continuous visibility Umniah needed to make faster, more informed decisions about the network that ultimately enhance the customer experience.

Umniah wanted a more agile, data-driven model that supported real-time verification of performance, faster operational adjustments, and ongoing optimization. The company saw clear limitations in legacy collection practices and aimed to build a dynamic process that would strengthen decision-making across both network engineering and broader business operations.

Download the full case study

Check out our full case study to find out how Umniah has adopted a data-driven and agile network measurement strategy with crowdsourced data for smarter decision-making.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| November 26, 2025

Major Cloudflare Outage Sparks Global Service Disruptions

A major service disruption involving Cloudflare last week underscored the systemic concentration risk present in today’s internet ecosystem, where so much of the world’s internet traffic depends on a small number of core providers. With over 3.3 million Downdetector user reports across all impacted services globally, the event demonstrated the wide-ranging and cascading impact that foundational infrastructure failures have on countless dependent online services.

To see how the recent Cloudflare outage compares to other outages this year, register for our upcoming webinar: Lessons Learned from the Biggest Service Outages of 2025.

Downdetector Reports Highlight Global Impact of Cloudflare Outage

The Cloudflare disruption on November 18, 2025, was not a simple capacity overload, but a systemic failure of the global control plane. Preliminary analysis indicates that a configuration update intended to optimize routing across the Cloudflare backbone inadvertently triggered a “thundering herd” scenario, causing edge locations to reject valid traffic.

As shown in the timeline below, the issue began at 11:00 AM UTC when the erroneous config propagated to the Europe and North America regions simultaneously. Because Cloudflare acts as the “immune system” and content delivery layer for a significant portion of the modern web, this single point of failure instantly decoupled backend infrastructure (AWS/Google) from end-users, affecting services ranging from low-latency gaming (League of Legends) to real-time AI inference (OpenAI).

The significant blast radius meant that the incident triggered a massive surge in user-reported problems. Downdetector amassed over 3.3 million global user reports across impacted services over the course of the outage. The graphic below offers a timeline of how the reports started to appear on Downdetector:

Downstream Impact: Services Most Affected by Cloudflare Outage

The primary impact was felt by services that rely on Cloudflare’s infrastructure. Besides just Cloudflare, we saw a surge in reports for a number of impacted services. Here is a look at the services that received the most reports during this time:

The impact spanned multiple critical verticals, including Streaming, Gaming, and Cloud/SaaS providers.

Global Outage Volume by Region

In addition to impacting individual services, we were able to track the global footprint of the outage by monitoring reports by country. The United States received the most reports during this time with over 150K reports on Cloudflare alone. 

The ability to quickly see a geographic heatmap of problem reports is a key feature in the Downdetector Explorer dashboard, helping teams quickly see if an issue is regional or global.

A Succession of Major Outages is Stimulating Deeper Policymaker Oversight

This outage lands in the middle of a wider policy shift that treats large cloud and internet infrastructure providers as potential sources of systemic risk rather than ordinary vendors. In the EU, regulators have just published the first list of critical ICT third-party providers under the new Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), bringing hyperscale cloud, data centre and network providers into a dedicated oversight regime that explicitly targets concentration risk, while the UK is rolling out a parallel Critical Third Parties framework for services whose disruption could threaten financial stability.

Coming so soon after a major AWS outage and other large-scale incidents, the Cloudflare event is likely to be used as further evidence that dependence on a small number of core cloud and edge platforms is now a live concern for boards, regulators and policymakers, and that organizations need much better mapping, monitoring and stress-testing of their third-party digital dependencies. 

For companies operating in these complex environments, understanding the true scope and source of a disruption is vital. Downdetector Explorer allows companies to quickly monitor both their own services and the third-party dependencies (like cloud hosting providers) to understand when external issues affect their customer experience.

Ready to turn user reports into actionable intelligence? Learn how you can leverage Downdetector to be better prepared for outages by visiting downdetector.com/for-business.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| November 10, 2025

Solve Connectivity’s Biggest Problems: Introducing Speedtest Pulse

Key Takeaways

  • The Era of Connectivity Has Changed: As customer expectations increase and high-speed internet access matures, the new No. 1 battleground for ISP customer satisfaction and retention is the “last 50 feet”—the in-building Wi-Fi experience. For enterprises, the move to wireless-first has made Wi-Fi the backbone of employee productivity and operational continuity.
  • There is a Massive Market Gap: The industry’s current two-tiered support model relies on either low-visibility guesswork without specialized tools that leads to costly repeat truck rolls, or unscalable expert devices that are too expensive and complex to deploy fleetwide.
  • Speedtest Pulse™ Fills This Gap: We built Speedtest Pulse to solve this specific, costly problem. Pulse is a new, professional-grade diagnostic tool, precision-engineered at a disruptive price point. It empowers every frontline technician—for the first time—to definitively validate installs, resolve Wi-Fi issues on the first visit, and provide proof of performance.

The Connectivity Landscape Today

Wi-Fi is now the primary lens through which residential and business customers experience and judge their internet service. For Internet Service Providers (ISPs), controlling the quality of that experience has become a critical battleground for customer satisfaction and retention. For enterprises, Wi-Fi is the backbone of employee productivity and a critical component of core operations.

The internet’s evolution is driven by a constant cycle between infrastructure and applications. When ISPs build faster networks, they create new capacity. Application developers fill that capacity with more demanding experiences, such as the shift from standard-definition to 4K streaming. These new, richer applications quickly become the standard, raising user expectations and creating demand for even more network speed and quality. This virtuous circle in which infrastructure enables innovation, innovation raises consumer expectations, and together those create demands for better infrastructure, is the engine that pushes our digital world forward.

For the last two decades, ISPs have viewed their greatest challenge as the last mile—the final leg of the network connecting their infrastructure to the subscriber’s premises. This became the industry’s primary focus, the biggest driver of capital expenditure (CapEx), and the main competitive battleground.

And now, that last-mile challenge is fundamentally changing, largely becoming a problem of execution and investment—not capability. The industry has multiple, powerful paths to deliver speed—from fiber and DOCSIS 4.0 to innovations in low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellite and fixed wireless access (FWA). While the competition to deploy these solutions is immense, the raw speed to the doorstep is less of a problem for a majority of customers in advanced markets.

For an increasing number of ISPs and their customers, the challenge is no longer about getting the necessary speed to the building, but about what happens once it gets inside. By delivering all that speed to the modem, ISPs have also shined a massive spotlight on a new bottleneck: the in-building Wi-Fi experience—the “last 50 feet.” The entire digital experience, from the enterprise to the living room, is now wireless. For example, the average U.S. internet household has about 17 connected devices, and the Macbook Pro hasn’t had an ethernet port in over a decade.

Rising Consumer Expectations

This new in-building bottleneck—where weak Wi-Fi coverage, interference, congestion, or device issues can cause slow speeds or other issues—hasn’t just created a technical problem; it has exposed a massive gap between what customers now expect and what most ISPs efficiently deliver. While Ookla data confirms broadband speeds are rising, the customer sentiment of fiber customers is actually declining. New benchmarks from the American Customer Satisfaction Index show every single one of 14 key satisfaction metrics—from reliability to streaming quality—declined from 2024 to 2025 among fiber customers.

Consumer expectations have fundamentally changed, shifting away from just speed and towards whole-home or business connectivity. In fact, consumers now see their ISP as the single point of responsibility for their entire connected experience. The proof is in the data: a 2025 Techsee report based on a survey of nearly four thousand U.S. households found that 77% of consumers expect providers to test coverage during installation and verify that every room is connected. They don’t just want a promise of speed; they want trusted proof of coverage.

This new expectation comes with a severe, high-stakes penalty for failure: customer churn. Customer loyalty is no longer tied to the last-mile cable, but to the quality of the in-home experience. The same Techsee study found that 51% of consumers would switch providers if their Wi-Fi issues aren’t resolved quickly. This is the new battleground for customers, fought across the entire in-home experience, from the living room to the back bedroom to every corner where users expect flawless connectivity.

The problem is that ISPs are being held accountable for an environment they can’t see, which poses a significant reputational risk. This gap between customer expectations and reality is already at a breaking point.

  • 68% of households reported Wi-Fi problems in the past 12 months. 
  • 39% of those households required a technician to be dispatched, a process commonly known as a “truck roll.” 
  • Worse, about 20% of those costly truck rolls failed to resolve the issue on the first visit—a classic “No Fault Found” scenario where the tech proves the speed to the modem is good, but the customer’s problem remains unsolved.

Based on these figures, common connectivity issues can cost a typical ISP with one million subscribers up to $140 million annually in customer churn and technician costs.

This crisis of rising expectations, however, hides a massive opportunity. Data shows that customers aren’t unreasonable; they just want proof. In fact, 56% of consumers said they would purchase additional equipment, like mesh systems, if a technician presented them with clear evidence of coverage gaps.

The findings from the Techsee study create a clear mandate for ISPs: solve the top customer complaint (in-home Wi-Fi issues), reduce repeat truck rolls, stop churn, and turn a costly service call into a new revenue stream by giving technicians the proof they need to recommend upgrades or additional equipment that improve the in-home experience.

Gap in Current ISP Solutions

The industry has been actively trying to gain visibility into the in-home experience for years. The problem is that the available tools were either not purpose-built or not scalable for this new, complex, and highly variable environment. This critical mismatch has forced providers into a largely broken, two-tiered operational model.

The first tier is the default model for the vast majority of subscribers, and relies on low-visibility guesswork. When a customer calls their ISP with a Wi-Fi complaint, the ISP’s diagnostics stop at the modem, providing an “inside-out” view, using CPE-embedded tools. This approach, which Ookla also provides, is valuable for getting a performance baseline from the router, or for proving service levels to the router. However, it cannot measure the true customer experience, which happens on a device two rooms away. This inside-out view is also completely blind the moment a customer plugs in their own router, leaving support teams with little or zero visibility.

This process inevitably results in a “No Fault Found” truck roll. A frontline technician is dispatched—at significant operational cost—without the tools needed to definitively diagnose the in-building problem. Instead, the technician is limited to confirming whether the service to the home is working, leaving the customer’s problem unsolved and increasing the risk of churn.

The second tier is the expert escalation model, reserved for high-value accounts where the cost of failure is too great to risk customer loss or reputational damage. When all else fails, the ISP is forced to escalate. This requires dispatching an expert network engineer equipped with highly specialized, enterprise-grade hardware.

While this specialist approach can eventually find the root cause, the model itself is operationally and financially unsustainable. These specialized devices cost thousands of dollars each and require significant training for thousands of ISP troubleshooting technicians and installation teams, making them economically unfeasible to deploy at scale. More importantly, they are what we call ‘data-rich, but insight-poor.’ Many of these tools provide complex RF data that requires an expert to interpret—not a simple, actionable recommendation.

Furthermore, these tools are not designed for autonomous testing of network performance; they are only useful when a technician is physically on-site, making it nearly impossible to diagnose the intermittent problems that frustrate customers and generate the most repeat truck rolls.

The fundamental challenges of large enterprise connectivity

ISPs aren’t the only ones struggling with the in-building connectivity problem. Enterprise faces a parallel challenge, where the stakes are measured in operational continuity and employee productivity. For large enterprises, this connectivity challenge is no longer just an IT issue—it’s a C-suite business problem, with a recent study finding that 70% of CEOs claim their network is slowing business growth.

Wi-Fi is now the backbone for enterprise environments. New network installations have moved to either wireless-first or wireless-only. This move concentrates all operational risk onto the Wi-Fi network, which is why visibility into the end-user experience is absolutely vital. This isn’t just about employee laptops and video calls; it’s about mission-critical systems: logistics scanners in a warehouse, medical devices in a hospital, and point-of-sale systems in retail. When Wi-Fi fails, business stops.

The shift to wireless-first and wireless-only networks has created a set of immense operational hurdles for IT leaders, both for their internal teams and their external partners:

  • The Scale Challenge: Managing network performance across hundreds or thousands of distributed sites is an immense operational challenge.
  • The Visibility Challenge: Central IT teams lack visibility into the real user experience at each site.
  • The Expertise Challenge: IT directors face a constant, unsustainable choice: pull their highest-skilled network engineers into routine troubleshooting, or let frontline problems pile up and drag down productivity.

This leaves IT leaders and their partners grappling with critical, unanswered questions. They are left struggling to ensure a consistent quality of experience across all their locations and service providers. Without objective, real-world wireless throughput and RF performance data, enterprises are forced to guess which locations to prioritize for network upgrades. All the while, they must reckon with the true, and often uncalculated, cost of pulling their senior engineers—both internally and at their partner organizations—away from strategic projects.

Introducing Speedtest Pulse™

This new era of connectivity, rising consumer expectations, and the gap in current solutions is precisely why we built Speedtest Pulse. Pulse solves these fundamental industry challenges at a disruptive and scalable price point.

To bring that vision to life, we at Ookla looked to the unique combination of core capabilities across our business and solutions. We’ve combined the unmatched Wi-Fi expertise of Ekahau—the creators of the market-leading Sidekick 2 Wi-Fi diagnostic device—with the powerful performance and experience validation, and iconic ease-of-use of Speedtest.

We packed decades of network intelligence into a single device that fits in the palm of your hand. The result is Speedtest Pulse, a professional, pocket-sized device and software application built for ISP technicians and Enterprise IT teams who need a simple way to validate network installs, resolve Wi-Fi issues, and guarantee network performance.

  • For ISPs, Pulse makes every technician their first line of defense against churn. It validates new installs and provides trusted proof to close trouble tickets on the first visit. This results in drastically reduced operational costs, fewer repeat truck rolls, and new sales opportunities.
  • For IT teams across large enterprises, hospitals, universities, and more, Pulse provides a simple way to validate network health across complex environments without immediately escalating to specialist teams.

We built Pulse from the ground up as a next-generation diagnostic platform, precision-engineered for today’s Wi-Fi-centric environment. Our goal is simple: to provide technicians and IT teams with simple, actionable recommendations that help them quickly identify and fix in-home and enterprise Wi-Fi performance issues—all at a price point that enables fleetwide adoption.

Active Pulse: Validating New Installs and Resolving Trouble Tickets

Active Pulse mode is the technician’s primary tool for guaranteeing performance on every site visit, whether it’s a new installation or a service call. Active Pulse provides one-tap, smartphone-based validation that translates complex network data into clear, actionable recommendations. The workflow is designed to eliminate guesswork and provide definitive proof of performance:

Step 1: Verify the inbound service

Before assessing the customer’s Wi-Fi, the technician’s first step is to isolate the service delivery from the local network. The technician is guided to connect the Speedtest Pulse device directly to the customer’s modem or router using an Ethernet cable.

The technician then runs an initial test to verify the performance of the inbound wired connection, up to 1 Gbps. This establishes a trusted performance baseline, confirming the inbound ISP service is functioning properly before any potential Wi-Fi issues are investigated.

Step 2: Test the wireless network performance

Once the wired service is validated, the technician disconnects the Ethernet cable and uses the Pulse mobile app to verify and/or diagnose the Wi-Fi environment. The technician can verify wireless performance in multiple areas of a home or business.

Using the app, technicians tap to initiate a test that measures key wireless throughput performance metrics using the trusted Speedtest server network. Then, Pulse scans the RF environment to identify common Wi-Fi problems like channel congestion or weak coverage and can analyze client-specific connectivity issues.

Step 3: Receive simple, actionable recommendations

Instead of showing raw data, the Speedtest Pulse app provides easy-to-understand results and recommendations.

If an issue is detected, the Pulse software analyzes the network’s KPIs holistically and provides clear instructions for improvement, such as, “Reduce Wi-Fi Contention. Your network is on Channel 36, which is crowded…Action: Change radio setting to channel 149.”

This empowers technicians to diagnose and fix problems on the spot—quickly and efficiently, even for those without Wi-Fi expertise.

Step 4: Provide definitive proof of install performance or issue resolution

After addressing a customer’s issues, the technician can generate a standardized install performance or issue resolution report to provide the proof that consumers today are seeking.

For new installs, this report serves as an internal “Day-One Performance Baseline” and provides data-driven confidence that the network is deployed consistently. It also directly addresses the growing number of customers who expect providers to prove whole-home or whole-business coverage, building customer trust and creating a positive first impression.

For troubleshooting tickets, this report provides definitive, trusted proof that the source of the customer complaint has been pinpointed and the issue has been resolved. It equips the technician with the actionable data needed to close the ticket in minutes, ending costly disputes  and validating for the customer that their network is now performing correctly.

A technician can typically complete a full diagnostic workflow—which includes an initial wired test to baseline the inbound service and multiple subsequent Wi-Fi tests in key locations—in approximately 5-10 minutes.

Continuous Pulse: Autonomous Testing Capabilities

When a technician visits a home or business to troubleshoot connectivity, that visit captures only a single moment in time. This leaves ISPs and IT teams struggling with a two-part visibility gap: they lack the real-world data to proactively assess long-term network health, and they struggle to diagnose problems they cannot replicate on site.

This gap has forced the industry into a reactive, “squeaky wheel” support model, where resources are only dispatched after a customer is already frustrated. This drives up costs with repeat truck rolls, leaves tickets unresolved, and damages customer confidence.

Intermittent issues that can’t be reproduced during a site visit are among the toughest challenges ISPs and IT teams face. They drive repeat truck rolls, unresolved tickets, and lead to even more frustrated customers. Historically, there hasn’t been a cost-effective way to capture and resolve these elusive problems. 

Speedtest Pulse’s Continuous mode, slated for release in 2026, solves this problem directly. As an affordable leave-behind testing tool, Pulse’s Continuous mode captures performance data over time and provides the conclusive evidence needed to finally close lingering tickets and restore customer confidence. Unlike internal monitoring tools that only show the network’s perspective, Pulse measures performance from the client device’s perspective, providing the trusted real-world data needed to measure service quality. With Continuous Pulse, organizations can:

  • Leave the device behind: Continuous Pulse is a “leave-behind” mode that operates as a standalone device for long-term, autonomous data collection without requiring a mobile app for ongoing operation.
  • Capture long-term trends: Continuous mode establishes clear performance baselines and makes it possible to detect degradation before it impacts end users.
  • Diagnose elusive problems: By running consistent tests over time, Pulse provides the evidence needed to identify and address intermittent problems that traditional tools can miss.
  • Integrate with existing systems: Data from Continuous Pulse feeds directly into Speedtest Insights™ and can be incorporated into existing network performance and assurance platforms.

Continuous Pulse mode provides the long-term, client-side visibility needed to catch intermittent issues early and cut down on repeat visits. In effect, Speedtest Pulse acts as the canary in the coal mine to identify underperforming networks. For large organizations, this allows IT leaders to stop guessing and deploy their expert resources (like senior engineers and specialized tools) only to the locations where their expertise will have the greatest impact. For customers using Speedtest Certified—our data-driven network certification for properties—Continuous mode will further enrich the certification by providing ongoing performance measurements.

The Power of the Ookla Ecosystem

The launch of Speedtest Pulse marks the start of a new chapter in how organizations approach network troubleshooting and validation. For ISPs, Pulse provides the scalable, easy-to-use, and insight-driven tool they need to fix the broken, two-tiered operational support model currently in place. Pulse empowers every technician to solve top wireless complaints on the first visit and drastically lower operational costs. And for Enterprises, Pulse delivers the outside-in visibility needed to solve scale and expertise challenges, empowering frontline IT personnel to validate network health across distributed sites.

Data from Speedtest Pulse will seamlessly integrate with Speedtest Insights, our centralized network intelligence platform, and/or can be integrated with existing experience and performance management systems. To build a truly comprehensive picture, data from Pulse can be used in conjunction with other products, including:

  • Speedtest Certified: The data-driven network certification for properties that proves on-site network excellence.
  • Speedtest: Leverage insights from 11 Million daily consumer-initiated tests.
  • Downdetector: Real-time problem and outage monitoring for early alerting on service issues.
  • Speedtest Embedded: Integrate Speedtest functionality into on-premise CPEs and other connected devices for network monitoring.
  • Speedtest SDK: Integrate Speedtest testing into any mobile application for performance insights.

Speedtest Pulse is the new, crucial piece of our holistic vision to collect and analyze data from all sources in the Ookla data ecosystem. Together, they provide a 360-degree view of the connected experience that is unmatched in the industry. Contact us to learn how Speedtest Pulse can help your organization.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.