| June 30, 2025

Starlink Elevates In-Flight Wi-Fi Performance

Airlines are using in-flight connectivity to differentiate their service and create brand value

Just as hotels have progressively integrated Wi-Fi connectivity as a standard amenity for their guests, in-flight Wi-Fi is transitioning from a novelty to a convenience to an expected service.

Reflecting this increasing expectation, the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) this year incorporated “Quality of in-flight Wi-Fi” into its benchmarks for the airline industry. In-flight Wi-Fi placed 21st out of the 21 benchmarks, ranking lower than baggage handling, seat comfort, and even airline food.

To assess this performance, we analyzed our Speedtest data collected during Q1 2025. We examined performance for individual airlines and for in-flight connectivity service providers.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • In-flight Wi-Fi for the majority of users compares very poorly with their experience on terrestrial networks
  • Hawaiian Airlines and Qatar Airways stand out as the best performing airlines based on our data
  • Starlink’s low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation drives performance for leading airline Wi-Fi
  • Expect airlines to ramp up their efforts — in-flight connectivity can be a key point of differentiation for travelers, helps support the premium brand value that many international airlines aspire to create, and is an opportunity to monetize a literally captive audience

Airline In-Flight Wi-Fi Performance – Download / Upload / Latency

In-flight Wi-Fi Speed and Latency Performance by Airline
Speedtest data, Q1 2025, airlines sorted by median

Hawaiian Airlines and Qatar Airways use Starlink’s low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation to deliver their inflight Wi-Fi, resulting in download speeds and upload speeds and latency that are better than the other airlines.

Many other airlines are also providing very usable speeds. Spirit Airlines, Air Canada, Delta Airlines, Breeze Airlines, American Airlines and Aeromexico all provide 10th percentile (where 90% of the results are faster) download speeds above 10 megabits per second (Mbps) and very respectable median download speeds. Furthermore, upload speeds on most of these airlines tend to support basic uplink connectivity needs like emailing. However, when the upload speed is observed alongside the many high-latency results, real-time uses like gaming or video calling are likely not possible (to the relief of all other passengers).

Lufthansa, at the other end of the download speed ranking, is limited by the Deutsche Telekom LTE ground-to-air network. While Lufthansa may offer other connectivity options, our data shows a significant number of its passengers are still connecting via this poorer-performing service.

Likewise, given the premium brand reputation of carriers like Japan Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and Cathay Pacific, they likely offer better-performing connectivity services on other aircraft. However, as with Lufthansa, our data reveals that a notable portion of their passengers are still encountering a substandard Wi-Fi experience.

Qatar Airways presents additional insight as, along with Starlink as one of its connectivity service providers, it also operates planes with geo-stationary orbit GEO connectivity. This is most evident in the multiserver latency results. While Qatar’s median latency is similar to Hawaiian Airlines, its 10th percentile (the laggiest experience) is much higher, keeping it in the company of other GEO-supported airlines.

Connectivity Service Providers

In our Speedtest samples of in-flight connectivity service providers we collect a mix of GEO, LEO, medium earth orbit (MEO), multi-orbit / hybrid network providers, and even ground-based LTE.  Furthermore, the category includes satellite service integrators. These integrators do not own or operate their own satellite constellations. Instead they partner with satellite operators for capacity while managing the business relationship with the airline, including installing and managing the in-flight connectivity system on the aircraft.

In-flight Connectivity Service Providers and Associated Airlines

Deutsche TelekomAir France, Cathay Pacific, Condor, Lufthansa
Hughes (SES)Spirit Airlines
Inmarsat (Viasat)Air New Zealand, Qatar Airways
IntelsatAir Canada, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, United Airlines
MTN Satellite CommunicationsSouthwest Airlines
Nelco (PAC/Intelsat)Air India
Panasonic Avionics CorporationAer Lingus, Air France, American Airlines, ANA, Asiana Airlines, British Airways, Etihad Airways, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Finnair, Iberia Airlines, ITA Airways, Japan Airlines, KLM, Korean Air, Malaysian Airlines, Scandinavian Airlines, Singapore Airlines, SWISS Airlines, TAP Air Portugal, Thai Airlines, United Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, VoeAzul, WestJet, Zipair Tokyo
SITA SwitzerlandQatar Airways
SpaceX StarlinkHawaiian Airlines, Qatar Airways
Türk TelekomTurkish Airlines
ViasatAeromexico, American Airlines, Breeze Airlines, Delta Airlines, EL AL Airlines, Icelandair, JetBlue, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, Virgin Atlantic
* Based on Speedtest data samples, Q1 2025; not based on active or announced partnerships
  • Deutsche Telekom is in the European Aviation Network, a hybrid network that combines a GEO satellite from Viasat/Inmarsat with a ground-based LTE network across Europe. 
  • Hughes, an EchoStar company, provides GEO satellite internet for consumers and enterprises. In late 2022 it began offering “Hughes Fusion,” a multi-orbit in-flight connectivity solution that can simultaneously communicate with both GEO and LEO satellites. Hughes frequently collaborates with European satellite operator SES, a GEO and MEO provider.
  • Intelsat provides in-flight connectivity through its fleet of GEO satellites and offers a multi-orbit solution that combines its GEO network with access to a LEO constellation. Intelsat is in the process of being acquired by SES.
  • MTN Satellite Communications, primarily known for its services in the maritime and remote land-based sectors, also provides in-flight connectivity. The company leverages capacity from various satellite operators across different orbits, both GEO and LEO.
  • Nelco, a Tata Group enterprise, has partnered with Intelsat to offer its GEO-based connectivity services to airlines operating in Indian airspace. 
  • Panasonic Avionics Corporation (PAC) – a provider of in-flight entertainment and connectivity systems, does not operate its own satellite constellation. Instead, it partners with various satellite operators, including those with GEO and LEO networks (eg, Eutelsat OneWeb), to offer multi-orbit connectivity service to airline customers.
  • SITA Switzerland, a multinational information technology company, partners with satellite network operators, to deliver passenger broadband.
  • SpaceX Starlink is rapidly expanding its LEO satellite network, offering high-speed, low-latency internet service to airlines, and is being adopted by several carriers.
  • Türk Telekom has been providing in-flight connectivity through partnerships including Panasonic Avionics.
  • Viasat operates a constellation of high-capacity GEO satellites. Its services are used by numerous airlines globally. Viasat acquired Inmarsat, another GEO satellite network, in May 2023.

Connectivity Service Provider In-Flight Wi-Fi Performance – Download / Upload / Latency

In-flight Wi-Fi Speed and Latency Performance by Connectivity Service Provider
Speedtest data, Q1 2025, provider sorted by median

The advantages of its dense LEO constellation compared to the GEOs make SpaceX’s Starlink the clear standout in speeds and latency. Its medians are 152.37 Mbps download speed, 24.16 Mbps upload speed, and 44 milliseconds (ms) multi-server latency.

Hughes and Intelsat, with their multi-orbit offering, deliver solid median download speeds – 84.55 Mbps and 61.61 Mbps, respectively. Viasat performs well on download speed, too, at 50.38 Mbps, given it is a GEO provider. 

On the other end of the scale, the LTE ground network of Deutsche Telekom delivers a minimally usable median download speed of 4.14 Mbps. Passengers on these flights may have access to GEO services (which, for example, we see in our data with Air France, though not in sufficient sample size to include in this article), but, as stated above, given we record Speedtest samples on Deutsche Telekom means that passengers are connecting with very slow internet speeds.

Looking more closely at slower download speeds, the 10th percentile reveals a similar pattern to the median, with Starlink still performing well at 65.31 Mbps, and Hughes and Viasat still managing usable download speeds of 28.29 Mbps and 12.78 Mbps, respectively. The rest of the provider speeds tail off and down into the single-digit Mbps, and raises a question: is it the satellite constellation capacity or the onboard Wi-Fi technology (or both) that is the limiting factor? The question of onboard Wi-Fi technology is taken up in the conclusion to this research article.

Examining the uplink, besides Starlink at 24.16 Mbps, only Intelsat provides adequate median upload speeds at 9.96 Mbps. Next, Panasonic Avionics, Turk Telekom (also PAC) and Nelco (also PAC) neatly cluster – 3.65, 3.40 and 2.60 Mbps, respectively – followed by Deutsche Telekom at 2.53 Mbps.

Latency is the starkest separation between LEO and GEO, which is obvious given the orbital altitude differences in distance between them is roughly 60 times or more. Bearing this in mind, Starlink’s median multiserver latency of 44 ms would otherwise seem an outlier compared with all other providers, ranging from 667 ms to 839 ms.

Nowhere to go but up

In-flight connectivity isn’t seamless. Depending on airline routes or models of airplanes, different connectivity service providers may be used (or occasionally restricted by governments when crossing over certain territories). Moreover, old equipment on and in the airplanes takes time and expense to upgrade.

However, the upgrades are happening as many airlines see value and opportunity to provide extended services, along with better Wi-FI. For example, United Airlines is not just moving its entire fleet to Starlink for better performance, but also to deepen its customer loyalty relationships. “Access will be free for all MileagePlus customers and includes game-changing inflight entertainment experiences like streaming services, shopping, gaming and more.” SAS is also working with Starlink to enhance its “gate-to-gate” connectivity and offer free high-speed Wi-Fi by the end of this year.

Not all airlines are selecting Starlink. Also announced this year, American Airlines has aligned itself with Viasat and Intelsat, while Delta has gotten on board with Viasat and Hughes, deplaning Intelsat.

Another example of improvement, this time inside the airplane, is Panasonic Avionics offering Wi-Fi 6E. Wi-Fi 6E adds the 6 GHz frequency band to prior Wi-Fi generations (that offered 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz), which has more channels and less interference than older Wi-Fi devices. 

Finally, competition is heating up. The likes of Project Kuiper and, perhaps, AST SpaceMobile will add new LEO options, where we see the leading LEO Starlink performing very well in our Speedtest data. Intention to provide “direct-to-device” connectivity to wireless customers from the mobile network operators, helps support the scale of the capital-intensive business case for launching rockets and orbiting satellites.

Watch this space

We will be revisiting this topic soon with updated information and insights. If you are an airline or an in-flight connectivity service provider, we’d like to hear from you to ensure we’re capturing and reflecting your passengers’ Wi-Fi connection experience.

Ookla assists ISPs, venue owners, and companies in designing Wi-Fi networks, monitoring their performance, and optimizing them. Please contact us to learn more about Speedtest Intelligence and Ekahau.


Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| November 3, 2025

Cruise Ship Wi-Fi Steams Ahead

Staying connected at sea can enhance the voyage, for a price.

Wi-Fi connectivity is a consumer expectation throughout the travel industry. From airports and hotels to airplanes and trains, Ookla has examined all of these just this year alone. Now we walk the gangway to the cruise ship industry to see what type of connectivity is offered on the seas.

There are any number of reasons for needing to be connected online on the cruise ship. Staying in touch with people back home directly (messaging, video calls) and sharing the experience via social media are a given. Staying up on things – sports, news – seemingly antithetical to the spirit of taking a cruise, is certainly welcome as well, including access to one’s on-shore streaming habits. 

On the cruise itself, the logistics and planning for on-board classes (Vinyasa Yoga) and on-shore activities (Top things to do in Cozumel in 6 hours) are managed online, and keeping in touch with travel companions on the same ship (wru). Of course, put-upon business professionals who are “working from helm” (shout out Virgin Voyages) appreciate a high-speed, stable connection to project their hopefully-convincing Zoom background images.

Key Takeaways

  • iPhones prevail. Over 60% of cruise passengers carry iPhones compared to 25% with Samsung Galaxy, based on Speedtest samples. This iPhone share, similar to that in the United States, reflects a relative mass-market, financially comfortable cruise line customer.
  • Older Wi-Fi limits customer experience. With 12.6% of access points on Wi-Fi 4, there is an instant opportunity to improve the quality of connectivity for passengers and crew by upgrading to a newer Wi-Fi generation.
  • Starlink is the provider of choice. Most cruise lines have equipped their ships’ connectivity with Starlink to take advantage of the speed and latency performance of low-Earth orbit satellites.

Phones and Tablets On Board

While the global market share of iPhones hovers around 20%, in the United States the Apple logo adorns just over half of the smartphones shipped in 2024 and 1H 2025, per Counterpoint Research. On cruise lines, the iPhone share of mobile device Speedtest samples is a few ticks higher than that of its U.S. share. This makes sense, with iPhones and cruises being both simultaneously mass market and higher end.

Mobile Devices – iCruise
Speedtest sample shares on select cruise lines, 1H 2025

With over 500 different device models in this data set, a fair number of Chinese manufacturers make an appearance – Honor, Huawei, OnePlus, Oppo, realme, Vivo, Xiaomi, ZTE – though small in numbers. Farther out in the long tail is the Galaxy S8+ (0.03% of devices). Launched in 2017, it is a pre-5G hold over. 

However, there are no surprises among the most popular devices being the iPhones and Galaxies released in the past couple of years.

Top 10 Devices Taking Cruises, 1H 2025 Speedtest data share of samples

DeviceShare
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max10.2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max9.7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro5.5%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro5.3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max5.1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra4.7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro3.5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra3.4%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max3.1%
Apple iPhone 132.5%

Wi-Fi Doldrums

The eight-year old Samsung Galaxy S8+ from the 4G era illustrates a point about performance. Simply, old technology restricts the customer experience. The S8+ is not only on an older cellular technology, it is also an older Wi-Fi technology – Wi-Fi 5. In the meantime, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 6E and, last year, Wi-Fi 7 added new capabilities that enhance the speed and reliability of the Wi-Fi connectivity.

Among the cruise lines the mix of Wi-Fi generations is quite varied. Royal Caribbean has deployed the most Wi-Fi 6 with half (49.7%) of its Speedtest user samples on this standard. MSC and Princess are entrenched in Wi-Fi 5 (76.1% and 72.0%), while P&O has the most on older Wi-Fi.  

802.11 Standard Bearers
Speedtest sample shares by Wi-Fi Generation, 2H 2024 – 1H 2025

There were no signs of the latest generation of Wi-Fi 7, which is gaining momentum in some countries like the United States. While there are significant technological advances that would improve the Wi-Fi customer experience of the passengers with this latest technology, when we consider the immense cost of adding thousands of access points and miles of cabling to upgrade the ship , the absence of Wi-Fi 7 is understandable.  

However, swapping a Wi-Fi 4 access point for a Wi-Fi 6 access point can be done. Wi-Fi 6 median download speed was around twice as fast Wi-Fi 4 in Speedtest data. Newer technologies often bring faster speeds, and also the overall user experience is enhanced with more efficient spectrum utilization and traffic management, and an increased number of connected devices per access point. The complex infrastructure of a cruise ship and user density present a tall challenge for getting the most out of the Wi-Fi signal. (Expertise from Ookla can help with solutions found under our Ekahau business.)

Starlink Performance Floats the Boat

As mentioned, most cruise lines have moved to Starlink over the past few years for their internet connectivity. Indeed, the 1H 2025 Speedtest data results for Carnival, Costa, Holland America, P&O (all under the Carnival company), and MSC performed in such a similar range that it is clearest to present their results as a group average. This also allows us to easily compare to prior published research on in-flight Wi-Fi performance where Starlink is also the internet provider.

The Starlink cruise line Wi-Fi download speeds perform well, even though it doesn’t keep up with the Starlink in-flight Wi-Fi. Putting aside plans and policies, we can imagine that higher user density loads the cruise ship’s Wi-Fi network more than an airplane’s. Even the cruise line’s 10th percentile at 21.14 Mbps is a serviceable speed for most any application.

The upload speed story is more nuanced. While the median upload is proportional to the download comparison between the cruise lines and the airplanes, the story changes at the opposite ends. The 10th percentile at 1.74 Mbps on the cruise lines is not usable for video calling or posting the day’s images to social media. It is likely that this slow 10th percentile speed is reflecting time-of-day congestion, when heavy usage is occurring on the ships. (A topic for possible follow up investigation.) The 90th percentile for the cruise lines slightly outperforms the airplanes (42.55, 38.07 Mbps).

Latency is always interesting when it comes to satellite internet connectivity. Airplanes outperform cruise lines on the median (44, 87 ms) – literally being closer to the satellite may offer some advantage here. The 90th percentile is far worse on cruise lines, again possibly as a consequence of time-of-day congestion as well as more hops from the access point in the ship to the radio on the ship than with an airplane.

The cruise ship passenger’s Wi-Fi experience can be affected by the service package they select. There are a variety of prices and models (prepay or pay-as-you-go; for the day or for the trip) that offer increasing capabilities, such as basic, value and premium choice set. Many of these packages can cost more than a monthly mobile phone service. For example, for one of the leading cruise lines based on total passengers, the least expensive “Social” package is $18.70 per day. However, in hotels and, increasingly on airlines, the trend is toward offering free internet connectivity as an enhancement of the customer experience or loyalty perk. Norwegian Cruise Line even touts free Wi-Fi in one of its commercials, though, overall, the “free” Wi-Fi may have limited usage or it is only included only in the most expensive VIP packages. 

There Once was a Princess… 

…with a medallion. That is to say, Princess Cruise Lines offers MedallionNet® which it touts as “Unmatched Wi-Fi Experience at Sea – Fast. Reliable. Unlimited. Affordable. Now on all ships.” As we’ve noted and is stated on its site, the internet service is provided by Starlink. 

And yet, links on the site connect to a press release from 2018 about another satellite provider, SES, and an explainer video about mid-earth and geo-stationary orbits (which has a major impact on performance) of which Starlink is neither. SES has been the long-time provider, and a more recent press release from August 2024 explains that the two satellite partners support tiered service offerings. 

Noting this isn’t an attempt to call out Princess for confusing content, but instead to recognize that the cruise line industry is potentially in a phase change about how it delivers and manages customer experience on its cruises. Future generations of passengers (as in Gen-X or Millennials, not Wi-Fi 7 or 8) are digital natives with a different expectation of always-on, high-quality connectivity.

Sailing to the Other Side?

Hotels charged for poor Wi-Fi. Over the years, however, hotel Wi-Fi service went from an expensive customer pain point to a point of customer service expectation and loyalty. Airlines appear to be mid-flight on this same journey, also realizing they have a captive audience that they can entertain and monetize. When will cruise lines also reach the point of no return?


Methodology Remarks

The basic building block of this analysis is identifying Speedtest data tests related to the SSIDs (the name of the Wi-Fi network) of the cruise lines and ships. Comparing the counts of Speedtest samples in 1H 2025 with the cruise line market shares based on passenger totals found at Cruise Market Watch, we are capturing Wi-Fi performance on 80% of the cruise line market. In fact, Speedtest samples correlate with passenger market share (r = 0.75). Furthermore, where we have Speedtest samples identified on a per ship basis, these correlate with ship passenger capacity as well (r = 0.71). Netting this out, the Speedtest samples offer a strong representation based on these anchors of market share and ship size.

Still, as with in-flight Wi-Fi, cruise ships present fresh complexity different from Speedtest’s bread-and-butter fixed broadband and mobile service providers because of ships’ mobility, variety of SSID approaches (ie, one cruise line uses the same SSID on all its ships, while most use SSIDs unique to the ship), changing of internet service providers (fleet-wide upgrades to Starlink), and policies inhibiting high-data usage applications. Thus, this analysis is offered in the context of “here’s what we see” rather than a definitive census of cruise ship Wi-Fi performance.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| October 8, 2023

Gulf ISPs should help fiber customers upgrade and configure their Wi-Fi routers to deliver faster speeds

Gulf countries improved fiber coverage and adoption by investing in fixed infrastructure, raising entry-level speeds, and making fiber services more affordable. Their efforts paid off, as evidenced by their improved position in Ookla’s Speedtest Global Index™. However, the persistent use of legacy and underperforming Wi-Fi standards in home networks can hamper efforts to provide the best network experience to customers.

Key messages

  • Wi-Fi 4 is still prevalent in the region which limits fiber’s potential. Many customers cannot get close to headline fixed broadband speeds because of the widespread use of Wi-Fi 4. Indeed, more than one-third of Speedtest® samples during Q2 2023 were using this old Wi-Fi standard. That means that a sizable proportion of users are not utilizing broadband services to their full potential.
  • Migrating to modern Wi-Fi standards can bring significant speed gains. On average, customers who used Wi-Fi 5 had a median download speed that was more than five times higher than those on Wi-Fi 4 in Q2 2023. Likewise, the speed over Wi-Fi 6 was 1.2 times faster on average than with Wi-Fi 5. Therefore, fixed broadband subscribers in the Gulf (most of whom use fiber services) with routers that only support Wi-Fi 4 would benefit the most from a CPE (Customer Premise Equipment) upgrade.
  • ISPs should do more to ensure their customers’ routers and smartphones are configured correctly. Even if consumers in the Gulf region own modern smartphones and Wi-Fi routers, they may still unknowingly use Wi-Fi 4 due to device misconfiguration and coverage constraints. ISPs can help educate consumers about how to correctly set up their home Wi-Fi routers and offer solutions to improve their indoor connectivity in order to use the more efficient 5 GHz spectrum band.

Most Gulf countries improved their global fixed broadband speed ranking since 2020

The GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) region which comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. leads the Middle East in fiber coverage and adoption. Local ISPs, backed by the government, accelerated fiber roll-outs to keep pace with the demand for data services and to ensure universal access to high-speed internet as part of national broadband development strategies. According to the FTTH Council industry body, the U.A.E. topped the global rankings for fiber household coverage, reaching 98.1% in September 2022, a position it has maintained since 2016. Qatar closely followed in the second position with 97.8% coverage.

These two GCC countries ranked ahead of Singapore (96.5%), Hong Kong (91.6%), and China (89.4%). In Bahrain, meanwhile, more than 88% of households were connected to the fiber infrastructure, whereas fiber coverage exceeded 60% in Saudi Arabia and reached 52% in Oman.

According to Speedtest Intelligence®, the U.A.E. leads the Gulf region in median download speeds at 236.67 Mbps in Q2 2023, a number that doubled since Q2 2022. Bahrain saw another story of improvement, with its median download speed reaching 70.17 Mbps, an increase of 46% year-on-year since Q2 2023. ISPs also saw significant improvements in upload speeds. Fixed upload speeds increased by 61% and 40% in Oman and Qatar, respectively, reaching 29.27 Mbps and 73.21 Mbps. Users in Bahrain experienced the biggest jump in median upload speed, which doubled between Q2 2022 and Q2 2023 to 20.37 Mbps.

As a result, most Gulf countries boosted their ranking in the Ookla Speedtest Global Index™. The U.A.E was ranked second in the Speedtest Global Index™ for median download speeds over fixed broadband in June 2023. Other GCC countries improved their rankings as well but trailed the U.A.E.

The telecom regulatory regimes and policies also helped, to different degrees, stimulate competition in the market, raise minimum broadband speeds, and reduce broadband tariffs. For example, in April 2023, Bahrain’s Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) approved an offer from BNET, the wholesale fixed infrastructure provider, to double the speed of entry-level fiber packages while maintaining the same wholesale prices. In the U.A.E., Etisalat by e& and du increased minimum download speeds to 500 Mbps and offered discounts on higher-tier fiber plans in 2022. 

Wi-Fi 4 is still prevalent in the region which limits fiber’s potential

The choice of Wi-Fi standards and spectrum bands has a direct impact on connectivity quality, throughput, and network coverage. Indeed, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) significantly increases the maximum theoretical throughput speed of the access point to 3.5 Gbps, compared to 600 Mbps supported by the old Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) standard. 

Wi-Fi 6/6E (802.11ax) supports even faster maximum data rates (up to 9.6 Gbps) and lower latency than earlier generations. It also combines 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz spectrum bands and wider channels for better throughput and less interference. Note that achievable speeds in real life will be much lower than these theoretical limits because of signal attenuation, interference, and the hardware and software variety of connected devices.

The rest of the analysis focuses on the most penetrated fiber markets in the region: Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. We used the percentage of samples that used a particular Wi-Fi standard and frequency band when connecting to the CPE as a proxy for their adoption by wired broadband customers in each country. We assume that most of the results reflect the performance of fiber services given that fiber represents the majority of fixed broadband connections in these four markets.

Our results show that more than one-third of test samples reported using Wi-Fi 4 to connect to the fixed CPE, but this varies considerably by country. Bahrain has the highest incidence of samples that use Wi-Fi 4 and the lowest proportion of Wi-Fi 6. Wi-Fi 4 was more prevalent in the U.A.E. than Wi-Fi 6 (30.8% compared to 17.2% in Q2 2023). This suggests that the ISPs have an opportunity to improve the network experience for nearly a third of their customer base and extend their lead in the speed leaderboard if they can address that CPE speed bottleneck.

The distribution of samples by Wi-Fi standard is largely similar between the U.A.E and Saudi Arabia. The minimum broadband speed currently offered by ISPs in Saudi Arabia is 100 Mbps, while the median download speed on fixed broadband measured by Speedtest Intelligence data was 93.85 Mbps in Q2 2023. This suggests that many customers might still be on legacy, lower-speed plans, but the more likely case is that home Wi-Fi CPEs are limiting speeds in users’ homes. Indeed, 40.2% of Speedtest samples used Wi-Fi 4 in Saudi Arabia, limiting maximum achievable speeds.

Chart of Share of Wi-Fi Samples by Generation in Gulf Countries

Migrating to modern Wi-Fi standards can bring significant speed gains

Consumer-initiated speed tests confirm that users’ experience of network speed is significantly affected by how their devices connect to Wi-Fi access points. The chart below shows the median download speed distribution by Wi-Fi standard used.

Chart of Median Download Speed by Wi-Fi Generation in Gulf Countries

Median download speeds for devices that use Wi-Fi 4 topped out at 37.18 Mbps in Bahrain, and dropped to a low of 28.47 Mbps in Saudi Arabia. Contrary to what some might think, speed improvements were far more pronounced when looking at results on Wi-Fi 4 compared to those on Wi-Fi 5, rather than comparing speeds on Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 6. Users who connected to Wi-Fi 5 had a median download speed that was more than five times higher on average than those on Wi-Fi 4. While download speeds over Wi-Fi 6 were 1.2 times faster than with Wi-Fi 5.

Wi-Fi 5 users in the UAE had the largest speed lead over Wi-Fi 4 users (6.5x). With Wi-Fi 6, median download speeds more than doubled to 251.68 Mbps for users in Qatar compared to those on Wi-Fi 5. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia were outliers, with speeds largely similar regardless of whether test samples were with Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6. This is because these three countries have the lowest reported median download speeds (below 100 Mbps), and many users who consider upgrading from Wi-Fi 5 to Wi-Fi 6 are unlikely to see a difference in their home network performance.

Looking at the performance of the fastest 10% samples in Q2 2023 reveals a more significant potential speed uplift for data-heavy users when using modern Wi-Fi standards. Users in the top 10% of our results experience the best performance, so it is possible to gauge from their results what speeds are achievable with each Wi-Fi standard. To that end, the median download speed of the 10th percentile results on Wi-Fi 4 users across Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. was 71.60 Mbps, compared to 330.91 Mbps on Wi-Fi 5 and 693.48 Mbps on Wi-Fi 6. Wi-Fi 5 was 2.7x faster than Wi-Fi 4 in Bahrain and 5.9x faster in Qatar, while the speed ratios of Wi-Fi 6 to Wi-Fi 5 ranged from 1.2 in Saudi Arabia to 1.9 in the UAE.

Given the clear performance advantages of Wi-Fi 5, ISPs should encourage customers to migrate from Wi-Fi 4 to Wi-Fi 5 because it will significantly impact the end-user network experience. It’s also important to note that our data confirms that fiber broadband subscribers who continue using Wi-Fi 4 are the most penalized, especially if they subscribe to a service that is advertised as offering hundreds of megabits per second.

Chart of Performance of Top 10% of Speedtest Samples by Wi-Fi Generation in Gulf Countries

The persistent usage of legacy Wi-Fi is likely due to incorrectly configured routers

Huawei and TP-Link are the top router brands reported by Gulf users utilizing Wi-Fi 4. However, their popularity can vary vastly by market depending on the equipment bundled by ISPs with their broadband offerings, as well as the ability of consumers to use third-party routers (some ISPs allow only their own routers). Our data shows that Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have the highest proportion of samples connected to a Huawei CPE. TP-Link routers are most common in Qatar and the U.A.E.

The U.A.E. has the highest proportion of routers from D-Link, Cisco, and less popular brands used with Wi-Fi 4 (nearly 64% of samples reported using ‘other’ manufacturers). This high level of market fragmentation is likely due to users replacing routers provided by their ISP or installing refurbished routers to extend coverage indoors. Such fragmentation complicates the task of ISPs to ensure that their customers use more recent routers or that they configure them correctly to use more modern Wi-Fi standards.

Chart of Wi-Fi 4 Router Market Share by Manufacturer in Gulf Countries

Our research showed that most commercial CPEs in the region introduced since 2020 likely support Wi-Fi 5 (if not Wi-Fi 6). Further, tests also showed that most Android-based smartphones that used Wi-Fi 4 were equipped with Wi-Fi 5-capable chipsets. Therefore, many users in the region are capable of using Wi-Fi 5 but are still on Wi-Fi 4. We believe that misconfigured routers could be the primary cause of such a high prevalence of legacy Wi-Fi 4 technology among Gulf countries.

ISPs can address the factors that favor Wi-Fi 4 and 2.4 GHz spectrum usage, for example, by working more closely with device manufacturers, supporting customers to acquire newer Wi-Fi routers, and correctly configuring them, as shown in the table below. 

Factors that lead to Wi-Fi 4 usage and how ISPs can address them

Legacy equipment
  • Some fixed broadband customers are locked into long service contracts and are not eligible for router upgrades
  • ISPs may not offer newer routers to existing customers whose contracts are automatically renewed
Solutions
  • Encourage existing broadband customers to upgrade to faster fiber packages to benefit from modern Wi-Fi routers
  • Offer customers the option to replace their old Wi-Fi routers for free or for a small fee during their contract
Configuration issues
  • Routers may, by default, use older Wi-Fi standards or diactivate the 5 GHz band
  • Some routers are pre-configured to use the same network name for both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, and some devices may not handle this well
  • Some old mobile devices latch to 2.4 GHz (which is more likely used by Wi-Fi 4) on first-run but do not switch back to 5 GHz due to firmware limitations or a hardware/software setting in the router/end-user devices
Solutions
  • Work with OEMs to push firmware and software updates to prioritize newer Wi-Fi standards and the use of 5 Ghz over 2.4 GHz
  • Educate customers about the importance of updating the router’s firmware and smartphone software
  • Preconfigure the routers to have separate names for the 2.4 GHz and the 5 GHz bands
  • Offer routers that can automatically select the optimal Wi-Fi channel and band to improve performance
Coverage and performance issues
  • Distance from CPE, physical obstruction, and interference in the crowded 2.4 GHz band
Solutions
  • Offer Wi-Fi extenders to improve indoor coverage
  • Share best practices with customers on the configuration and placement of the router

Gulf-based IPSs have managed to rapidly grow their fiber footprint and migrate their customers to faster broadband services. However, a substantial portion of subscribers may not benefit from these speed increases due to the prevailing usage of Wi-Fi 4. As many ISPs in the region already offer a minimum fiber speed of 250 Mbps, they should, as a priority, migrate existing customers with legacy Wi-Fi routers to more modern models and educate customers with newer routers on how to correctly configure them. ISPs’ efforts to introduce newer CPEs will help improve the end-user experience, boost global speed rankings in the region, and ensure that their routers are more future-proof as gigabit speeds become more widespread.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| December 15, 2025

Cellular is Faster than Wi-Fi in Many U.S. Airports

Still downloading shows over airport Wi-Fi before your flight? Here’s where you should consider your mobile provider

Many passengers’ pre-boarding ritual remains that of jumping on the free airport Wi-Fi to download the latest shows from Netflix, Hulu, or Amazon Prime Video for guilt-free binging during the flight. This is despite the improving performance of in-flight Wi-Fi and airlines hosting oodles of content — movies, games, shopping – accessible by fingertip through the screens on the back of the seat inches from one’s eyeballs.

If you are still logging into the airport Wi-Fi to download season 21 of One Piece (197 episodes) or have been saving the season 5 four-episode drop of Stranger Things for your flight home for the holidays (before three more episodes on December 25th), using your mobile service provider might be the faster option if you’re about to board your plane.

Key Takeaways

  • Mobile providers had a faster median download speed than Wi-Fi in most airports and more than twice as fast on average (219.24 Mbps, 101.39 Mbps).
  • Verizon was fastest in the most airports comparing among all mobile providers and airport Wi-Fi including ties, and even with T-Mobile considering outright results.
    • Among only mobile providers in airports, Verizon also led the airports count of outright fastest results. 
  • Airport Wi-Fi was faster than mobile providers in just over one-third of head-to-head comparisons (including ties), and faster than all mobile providers in five airports.
    • Older Wi-Fi technologies may be holding back internet speed in airports with 72.9% of Speedtest samples on Wi-Fi 5 and older generation versus 46.0% in the U.S. overall. 

 

Approach

In the past year, Ookla reported on airport Wi-Fi and mobile service together. However, mobile service together, in aggregate, does not represent the actual choice the most mobile consumers have before them. That is, the options for online connectivity are Wi-Fi and my mobile service provider.

Across the top 50 U.S. airports by passengers, we examined Speedtest user data for median download speed across the airport Wi-Fi (based on SSID; two airports’ network management policy excludes our tests) and by each of the big three mobile providers – AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon – in the first half of 2025. Download speed is understandable to the individual, especially for our cherished Speedtest users, and directly appropriate to the use case of downloading content. And, more significantly, it is a representation of network capacity for everyone. That said, network design requirements and performance objectives of the Wi-Fi and mobile providers may not be to maximize throughput speeds, versus handling more connected devices or optimizing connection stability, for example.

 

Altitude: Highest and Lowest Five Airports for Mobile and Wi-Fi Download Speeds

All of the airport results are available in the map above, and here are the fastest and slowest five airport median download speeds (in Mbps) for each mobile provider and Wi-Fi.

 

Arrivals

The mobile providers held an edge overall and individually compared with Wi-Fi in terms of the number of airports with the fastest median download speed. Verizon had the most with 34 where it was faster than Wi-Fi, including two airports that were tied with Wi-Fi. T-Mobile was faster than Wi-Fi in 32 airports, and AT&T faster in 28 airports, including one tie.

Mobile or Wi-Fi? Number of airports where faster
Speedtest Intelligence data, count of airports by service provider with fastest median download speed, 1H 2025

Comparing just the mobile providers (i.e., Wi-Fi excluded), Verizon had the fastest median download speed in 26 airports (including two ties), T-Mobile was fastest in 16 airports (including one tie), and AT&T was fastest in 8 airports (including one tie).

Fastest Mobile Provider | Number of airports where fastest
Speedtest Intelligence, based on median download speeds, 1H 2025

Wi-Fi was faster than any mobile provider in these five airports:

  • Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International 
  • San Francisco International 
  • Orlando International 
  • Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International 
  • Baltimore/Washington International (tie)

Mobile and Wi-Fi Median Download Speeds at U.S. Airports
Speedtest Intelligence® | 1H 2025

Observation Deck

Houston’s problem

Appearing in AT&T’s, Verizon’s and Wi-Fi’s bottom five, the two airports serving the Houston metropolitan area had slow median download speeds for their airport Wi-Fi as well.

Airport

AT&T

T-Mobile

Verizon

Airport Wi-Fi

George Bush Intercontinental 

4.77

242.29

15.79

21.36

William P. Hobby 

19.97

108.65

43.74

21.67

Wi-Fi is better by the Bay

As shown in Wi-Fi’s fastest five airports, Oakland International and Norman Y. Mineta San José International made that list. Rounding out the Bay Area airportstrio, the Wi-Fi speed in San Francisco International comfortably topped the mobile providers.

Airport

AT&T

T-Mobile

Verizon

Airport Wi-Fi

Oakland International 

229.70

28.58

103.90

194.23

Norman Y. Mineta San José International 

103.83

211.40

251.06

176.59

San Francisco International 

67.07

92.91

100.56

169.51

If you’re going to San Francisco, SFO was the only airport in our analysis with Speedtest samples using the 6 GHz band. This was on Wi-Fi 6E – too soon to expect Wi-Fi 7 in airports – with a median download speed of 364.74 Mbps (also remarkable were the median upload speed of 426.04 Mbps and an 8 ms multi-server latency).

Wi-Fi generations

Wi-Fi 6E is part of the Wi-Fi 6 standard (802.11ax) that has “extended” (hence the E) to include the 6 GHz band along with 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands.

Wi-Fi Generations | U.S. Airports and U.S. Overall
Speedtest sample mix, 1H 2025 and 1Q 2025

Examining the mix of Speedtest samples across Wi-Fi generations, an astonishing share (70.1%) were on Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), which was introduced in 2013. Wi-Fi 6, introduced in 2019, offers numerous benefits:

Speed and capacity 

  • Higher theoretical maximum speeds 
  • Sends data to multiple devices simultaneously in a single transmission (versus one device at a time)
  • Handles more connected devices

Performance and latency 

  • Manages traffic more efficiently for lower latency
  • More effective interference mitigation for better performance in crowded environments
  • Improved uplink technology means faster uploads

These are many good reasons for an airport to upgrade to Wi-Fi 6. However, the cost and effort needed for upgrading an airport is undoubtedly magnitudes beyond that of swapping out the home router. Most homes don’t have capital budget planning cycles for upgrading technology infrastructure, but judging by the overall U.S. Wi-Fi 6 at 44.2% (versus 26.2% in airports), more passengers are carrying devices capable of using the upgrade.

Boingo-es faster

Boingo, a connectivity solutions company, frequently appears in this research as the airport’s Wi-Fi service provider – 29 times in this analysis. Boingo-served airports averaged download speeds of 110.30 Mbps compared to non-Boingo airports at 88.38 Mbps. This difference in speed suggests that Boingo’s know-how is scalable and portable.

Baggage Claim

For the millions of passengers traveling through U.S. airports, this analysis offers a clear strategy: don’t assume the free Wi-Fi is your best option. This isn’t to denigrate Wi-Fi’s performance, which in most airports is more than satisfactory, and again, free (well, ad supported, frequently). It’s a great value. 

For mobile-first travelers, already paying for unlimited data, the sunk cost economics of downloading over cellular is also free. But also this isn’t a false-choice fallacy – both options are waiting for you to use. Run a Speedtest to see which to select. Luffy and Nancy Wheeler will be glad you did.


Recent Ookla analysis and reporting on airports:

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| November 17, 2025

New Silicon, New Speeds: How Apple's N1 compares with Android Flagships for Wi-Fi Performance

New wireless silicon in the iPhone 17 family delivers material performance improvements over predecessors, pushing it ahead of many Android flagship devices in Wi-Fi.

If the last few smartphone releases were defined by cellular milestones, 2025 has quietly become the year of Wi‑Fi. Apple’s first custom networking chip, the N1, arrives in the iPhone 17 family, while Android flagships (meaning companies’ top-of-the-line models) have leaned into Wi-Fi 7 and 6 GHz with enhanced capabilities made possible by 320 MHz channels. The primacy of Wi-Fi performance in the everyday user experience and the proliferation of new form factors mean device manufacturers are competing more intensely for access to the best networking silicon.

Using global, crowdsourced Speedtest Intelligence® data from the six weeks after the iPhone 17 family of devices hit stores, we compared the performance of Apple’s N1 with its Broadcom-based predecessor and leading Android flagships using Wi-Fi silicon from Qualcomm, MediaTek and Broadcom.

Key Takeaways:

  • Apple’s N1 chipset is a substantial upgrade. The iPhone 17 family delivers a clear step-change in Wi-Fi performance vs. the Broadcom-based iPhone 16 lineup, with faster download and upload speeds across every region. Globally, median download and upload speeds on the N1 were each up to 40% higher than on its predecessor.
  • Google’s Pixel 10 Pro and iPhone 17 families jostle for Wi-Fi leadership. The Pixel 10 Pro recorded the highest global median download speed at 335.33 Mbps during the study period, marginally edging out the iPhone 17 family at 329.56 Mbps. The pattern flips at the 10th percentile (worst-case), where the iPhone 17 family leads globally with 56.08 Mbps, just ahead of the Pixel 10 Pro family at 53.25 Mbps.
  • Xiaomi’s 15T Pro delivers the strongest upload and latency performance. Based on MediaTek Wi-Fi silicon integrated with the Dimensity 9400(+) platform, the 15T Pro performed strongest in 90th-percentile (best-case) download speed at 887.25 Mbps, upload speed at the 10th, median and 90th percentile levels and median multi-server latency (15 ms) globally.
  • Huawei’s Pura 80 family suffers from lack of 6 GHz support but remains competitive on non-6 GHz networks. Based on a “self-developed chip-level collaboration” (likely from HiSilicon), it lags other flagships in download and upload speeds, with a particularly acute gap at the 90th percentile where the absence of 6 GHz support hurts peak performance. Notwithstanding this, when looking only at non-6 GHz samples, the Pura 80 family is more competitive and, on Wi-Fi 6, delivers the second-fastest upload speeds at the 90th percentile (603.61 Mbps) in Southeast Asia against Android flagships.
  • Wi-Fi 7 and 6 GHz are force multipliers for flagship Wi-Fi silicon, though adoption remains regionally skewed. Across Android families, median 6 GHz download speeds were at least 77% faster than 5 GHz, and the step from Wi-Fi 6 to Wi-Fi 7 delivered a similar lift. In North America, flagship Android users spend much more time on 6 GHz networks, with the Galaxy S25 family showing over 20% of Speedtest samples on 6 GHz, compared with about 5% in Europe and Northeast Asia and just 1.7% in the Gulf region.

Methodological note: This analysis uses Speedtest® data collected from September 19 to October 29, 2025. The included Wi-Fi 7-capable devices are listed below. For each device family, the results represent the aggregate of all devices in that family:

  • Apple iPhone 16 family (iPhone 16, 16 Plus, 16 Pro, 16 Pro Max)
  • Apple iPhone 17 family (iPhone Air, iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max)
  • Samsung Galaxy S25 family (Galaxy S25, S25+, S25 Ultra)
  • Google Pixel 10 Pro family (Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL)
  • Huawei Pura 80 family (Pura 80 Pro, Pura 80 Ultra)
  • Xiaomi 15T Pro
  • Vivo X200 Pro
  • Oppo Find X8 Pro

Apple’s N1 focuses on tighter hardware-software integration rather than chasing peak capability

The arrival of the N1 marks the next ambitious step in Apple’s multi-year plan to bring the last major piece of the iPhone’s wireless stack in-house. By moving off Broadcom-supplied parts, Apple gains tighter control over mission-critical silicon, reduces supplier dependence and pricing exposure and creates a reusable radio platform that can scale across iPhone, Mac, iPad, Watch and Home devices.

Technically, the N1 is a single-die chip that integrates Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6 and Thread radios. Aside from the step up from Bluetooth 5.3 to 6 and Apple’s claim that tighter hardware-software integration improves features like AirDrop and Personal Hotspot, the N1’s Wi-Fi capabilities appear, on paper, virtually identical to its Broadcom-based predecessor.

This continuity in Wi-Fi specifications is notable because it means the N1 is capped at 160 MHz channels and lacks support for 320 MHz operation and thus the peak link rates (or PHY speeds) available with flagship silicon from vendors such as Qualcomm and MediaTek.

In practical terms, this should limit the N1’s peak performance in markets that allow the full 6 GHz band, like the US, which offers up to three non-overlapping 320 MHz channels. It should also limit performance (although potentially to a lesser degree) in regions that allow only the lower 6 GHz block, like the EU and UK, which offer just one non-overlapping 320 MHz channel.

iPhone 17 family delivers a clear step up in Wi-Fi performance over its predecessors

Analysis of Speedtest Intelligence data shows that, despite the similar headline specifications between the Broadcom-based iPhone 16 family and the N1-powered iPhone 17, the 17 delivers a clear step-change in real-world Wi-Fi performance. New devices often appear to outperform in their early weeks, partly because early adopters skew toward wealthier markets with more capable Wi-Fi networks. However, the consistency and magnitude of the iPhone 17’s lead indicate this is not a launch-period skew but a genuine improvement.

iPhone 17 Family Delivers Step-Change in Wi-Fi Performance Globally
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Regional.

To ensure the gains are not a simple country-mix artifact, we matched markets where both families exhibited the most samples during the study period. Across all of those countries analysed, including major markets such as the US, UK, Germany, Japan, Italy and India, the iPhone 17 outperformed the iPhone 16 on download performance. This pattern holds across markets with very high absolute speeds (e.g., France) and more typical markets alike, pointing to genuine device-side improvements.

N1 Silicon is Driving Wi-Fi Gains Across Major Markets
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Country-level.

The iPhone 17 family delivered higher download and upload speeds on Wi-Fi compared to the iPhone 16 across every studied percentile (10th, median and 90th) and virtually every region. During the study period, the iPhone 17 family’s global median download of 329.56 Mbps was as much as 40% higher than the iPhone 16 family’s 236.46 Mbps. Upload speeds improved similarly, jumping from 73.68 Mbps to 103.26 Mbps. 

iPhone 17 Family Sees Biggest Upload Gains in Asia
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Regional

Notably, the N1 delivers a far bigger generational uplift at the 10th percentile than at the 90th, implying Apple’s custom silicon lifts the floor more than the ceiling, a pattern we also saw in our analysis of the in-house C1 modem’s cellular performance.

iPhone 17 Family is Stronger in Tough Wi-Fi Conditions
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Regional.

This means the N1 appears to deliver a more consistent experience across a wider range of environments, in particular uplifting performance under challenging Wi-Fi conditions. Specifically, 10th-percentile speeds on iPhone 17 were over 60% higher, versus just over 20% at the 90th percentile.

Singapore and France Lead Global iPhone 17 Speeds
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Country-level. iPhone 17 family.

At a regional level, iPhone 17 users enjoyed the highest median download speeds in North America at 416.14 Mbps (up from 323.69 Mbps on the iPhone 16 family), mainly due to greater 6 GHz use. At a country level, meanwhile, iPhone 17 users in Singapore (613.80 Mbps) and France (601.46 Mbps) saw the highest speeds out of all the markets where the device has launched, reflecting the very high penetration of multi-gigabit fibre in both.

The lack of 320 MHz support does not yet impact N1 performance in the wild

The N1’s performance not only surpasses its Broadcom-based predecessor but also places the iPhone 17 family in a strong competitive position across all Wi-Fi metrics in every region. Notably, Apple’s latest lineup achieved the highest global 10th-percentile download speed at 56.08 Mbps, reinforcing the observation that the N1 is likely to deliver more consistent performance in non-ideal Wi-Fi conditions.

The N1’s apparent handicap on paper, with channel width capped at 160 MHz rather than the 320 MHz that Wi-Fi 7 supports with 6 GHz, does not materially affect performance in real world use for most people. In theory, this cap could halve peak link rates right next to a top tier router, yet the impact is rarely visible outside controlled tests, highlighting the importance of real-world testing and crowdsourced data to reflect the actual end-user experience. 

Strong iPhone 17 Performance in North America
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. North America.

This is evident in the iPhone 17 family posting the highest median (416.14 Mbps) and 90th percentile (976.39 Mbps) download speeds of any device in North America, where gains from 320 MHz channels should be most apparent. The most likely explanation is that the installed base of 320 MHz-capable routers remains very small (and our recent shows Wi-Fi 7 adoption itself is still limited), so usage is not yet material enough to move results at the aggregate level.

North American iPhone 17 Speeds Hold Up Without 320 MHz
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. North America.

This may also explain why Apple chose not to add the capability to the N1, even though the performance benefit of 320-MHz-capable silicon is likely to grow as the Wi-Fi ecosystem matures, making it a future-proofing feature for Android flagships that include it.

Google’s Pixel 10 Pro leads on median download speed, Samsung’s Galaxy S25 delivers lowest best-case latency

Beyond the iPhone 17 family, Google’s Pixel 10 Pro also performed strongly on download speed. Likely powered by Broadcom Wi-Fi silicon (consistent with the Pixel 8 and 9 lineage), it achieved the highest global median download speed at 335.33 Mbps during the study period, narrowly ahead of the iPhone 17 family at 329.56 Mbps. In markets such as North America, where Chinese Android brands have limited share, the Pixel 10 Pro also leads in upload performance at both the median and the 90th percentile.

Pixel 10 Pro Leads Global Wi-Fi Download Speeds
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Global.

Samsung’s Galaxy S25 family, based on Qualcomm’s FastConnect 7900 Wi-Fi silicon integrated with the Snapdragon 8 Elite platform, did not lead outright in any metric at the global level but was positioned in the upper mid-pack across most. Its clearest regional strength was latency, where it delivered the lowest best-case response times in North America (6 ms), Europe (7 ms) and the Gulf (9 ms). It also led in median multi-server latency in Europe (17 ms) and 90th percentile upload speeds in the Gulf (330.80 Mbps). 

Galaxy S25 Shows Strong Latency Performance
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Regional.

Xiaomi’s 15T Pro dominates upload performance with MediaTek Wi-Fi silicon

During the study period, the device ranking for upload speed differed markedly from the download ranking, even after controlling for country mix effects (that is, cases where devices skew toward markets with unusually high or low upload speeds). In markets where it has a large installed base, including Europe and Northeast Asia, Xiaomi’s 15T Pro, built on MediaTek Wi-Fi silicon integrated in the Dimensity 9400 (+) platform, showed a commanding lead in upload performance.

During the study period, Xiaomi’s 15T Pro achieved the fastest upload speeds in Europe at every percentile measured (10th, median, 90th) and also led 10th percentile uploads in Northeast Asia. In fiber-rich markets such as France, which are characterized by very high upstream performance and symmetrical line speeds, the 15T Pro was the only device to surpass 100 Mbps at the 10th percentile, 500 Mbps at the median, and 1,000 Mbps at the 90th percentile.

Xiaomi’s 15T Pro Leads on Upload Speed
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Global.

Beyond upload performance, Xiaomi’s flagship also provided strong performance on multi-server latency, delivering the lowest response times globally at the median (15 ms) and 90th percentile levels (42 ms). 

Huawei’s Pura 80 family performs relatively more strongly where 6 GHz is not used

The Pura 80 series is based on a “self-developed chip-level collaboration” for Wi-Fi 7, suggesting, but not confirming, continued use of a HiSilicon solution after the Pura 70’s in-house silicon. If this is the case, Huawei would be the only other manufacturer besides Apple using vertically integrated Wi-Fi silicon across its current flagship lineup.

Critically, however, Huawei’s Wi-Fi 7 implementation in the Pura 80 family lacks 6 GHz support, both on devices sold in China (where 6 GHz is not available for Wi-Fi anyway) and overseas. This limitation significantly impedes performance capability on 6 GHz-capable Wi-Fi networks, especially in crowded environments, where the additional spectrum unlocks major speed gains on devices that can take advantage of it.  

Huawei's Pura 80 Performs Better on Non-6 GHz Wi-Fi
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Southeast Asia.

The lack of 6 GHz support is particularly evident at the 90th percentile, where the Pura 80 family trailed all other devices in Southeast Asia, the region with the largest observed install base for the device, posting download speeds of 541.33 Mbps that were more than 39% below the top performing Oppo Find X8 Pro there. This lag also extended to median download speeds in the same region, where the Pura 80 family again trailed all other devices.

Notwithstanding this disadvantage, the Pura 80 was competitive on some metrics, including upload performance on access points lacking Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7 (which do not benefit from 6 GHz access). On Wi-Fi 6 connections, Huawei’s flagship delivered the second-fastest upload speeds at the 90th percentile (603.61 Mbps) in Southeast Asia against Android flagships.

Wi-Fi 7 and 6 GHz propel flagships to new performance levels, but benefits remain fragmented

Although Wi-Fi outcomes vary by device, even between models using the same silicon because factors like hardware and software integration and chassis tuning affect results, and although they also vary by region, the commonality is a step-change in performance on flagship devices enabled by newer standards such as Wi-Fi 7 and access to the 6 GHz band.

North American Flagship Users Spend More Time on 6 GHz Wi-Fi
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Samsung Galaxy S25 Family.

On modern access points and devices with Wi-Fi 7-capable silicon, users can take advantage of newer features like Multi-Link Operation (MLO), which enables the use of multiple Wi-Fi bands at the same time (similar to carrier aggregation with cellular).

Flagship Devices See Higher Speeds on Newer Wi-Fi Standards
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Global.

These upgrades are translating into tangible gains, with Wi-Fi 7 delivering roughly double the median download speeds of Wi-Fi 6 on the same flagship Android devices included in this study (uplift ranging from +74% to +108% depending on device family). The step from Wi-Fi 5 to Wi-Fi 6 delivered a similar uplift on these devices (uplift ranging from +72% to +123%). Similarly, median download speeds on flagship devices connected to 6 GHz were at least 77% faster than 5 GHz.  

Flagship Devices Perform Better on Higher Wi-Fi Bands
Speedtest Intelligence® | Sept 19 – Oct 29, 2025. Global.

The diffusion of these benefits in the real-world, however, is still at an early stage and regionally fragmented. For instance, while over 20% of Speedtest samples conducted on the Galaxy S25 family in North America originated on the 6 GHz band during the study period, only about 5% of samples in Europe and Northeast Asia and 1.7% in the Gulf region were based on 6 GHz. 

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| March 19, 2025

Fiber-Rich, Wi-Fi Poor: Spain Exemplifies the Scourge of Outdated Wi-Fi | Rica en fibra y pobre en Wi-Fi: España ejemplifica la ‘enfermedad’ del Wi-Fi obsoleto

Spanish/Español

Spain leads Europe in fiber deployment but is now paying the price for neglecting modern Wi-Fi CPE, undermining its global competitiveness in fixed broadband performance. 

Spain’s remarkable transformation from a telecoms laggard a decade ago to a global leader in fiber availability has been dizzying in both scale and speed. Widely hailed as a model of best practice, this transformation has played a key role in vaulting the country to the forefront of Europe in economic growth over the last two years, supporting the attraction of inward investment in precision manufacturing, renewables, and a growing digital nomad community.

If deploying fiber to as many doorsteps as possible were a sprint, Spain would have won hands down. But the real race—the marathon of extending gigabit coverage throughout the entire home, beyond merely the doorstep—requires modernizing Wi-Fi customer premises equipment (CPE). Here, Spain is falling behind, eroding its global competitiveness in fixed broadband performance and limiting Spanish ISPs’ ability to differentiate in a market saturated with multiple overlapping fiber builds.

This chasm between the highly capable fiber connections reaching most Spanish homes and the outdated Wi-Fi equipment delivering that connectivity to end devices exemplifies the paradox of ‘old’ fiber markets like Spain. As an early mover in fiber, Spain migrated from copper before modern Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 7 CPE—designed to fully leverage fiber’s multi-gigabit potential—became widely available.

Key Takeaways

  • Spain features one of the oldest and least capable Wi-Fi footprints in Europe: By the end of 2024, two-thirds of all Wi-Fi connections in Spain still relied on legacy standards (Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5) based on Speedtest Intelligence® data, leaving the country notably behind peers with lower fiber penetration, including neighboring France, the United Kingdom, and all Nordic countries. This deep entrenchment of legacy Wi-Fi standards is artificially constraining the performance of Spain’s full-fiber connections, contributing to its underperformance in the Speedtest Global Index™ compared to countries with less extensive fiber deployment.
  • The capabilities of Spain’s Wi-Fi footprint vary significantly across different ISPs: DIGI has distinguished itself  by offering modern CPE with Wi-Fi 6 as standard across its subscriber base, benefiting from its position as a newer entrant without a legacy customer base. This has driven its strong lead in Wi-Fi 6 penetration in Spain—nearly half of all Speedtest samples on DIGI connections in January used Wi-Fi 6 or 7, compared to less than a quarter on Movistar and Vodafone—enhancing its overall fixed broadband performance. By comparison, ISPs that were slow to introduce modern CPE, such as Movistar, or restricted access to subscribers opting for premium equipment rental add-ons, like Vodafone, retain a much larger share of users on legacy Wi-Fi standards.
  • Modern CPE with Wi-Fi 6 and 7 deliver significant performance gains across all ISPs: The gap between advertised fiber speeds to the doorstep (typically achievable via wired Ethernet) and actual Wi-Fi performance is smallest in homes where Wi-Fi 6 and 7 CPE have been deployed. At the end of 2024, median download speeds on Wi-Fi 6 in Spain reached 419.13 Mbps, exceeding Wi-Fi 5 speeds by more than 54% and surpassing Wi-Fi 4 performance by an order of magnitude. Meanwhile, median latency on Wi-Fi 7 connections (19 ms) was notably improved compared to outcomes on earlier Wi-Fi standards. 

Spain is a victim of its own success, having deployed fiber far and wide before the arrival of Wi-Fi 6 and 7

Spain typifies the legacy Wi-Fi challenges now confronting Europe’s early fiber adopters—countries that moved aggressively to deploy full-fiber networks using GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Network) technology. The market incumbent, Telefónica, began large-scale fiber deployment in the early 2010s, accelerating from 2015. By the end of the decade, Spain had leapfrogged most countries in fiber coverage and the migration from copper-based DSL, with a groundswell of investment driving multiple overlapping fiber builds across many areas.

The scale of Spain’s success in fiber deployment is often under-appreciated. The European Commission’s latest DESI Index reported that over 95% of Spanish households were passed by a full-fiber network—well above the EU average of 64%. This has placed Spain within striking distance of the Commission’s Digital Decade 2030 target of achieving full-fiber coverage across all member states by the end of the decade.

Spain Continues to Lead Europe in Fiber Deployment
European Commission | DESI 2018 – 2024

Spain’s initial fiber rollouts in the early 2010s coincided with Wi-Fi 4 being the de facto standard for many ISP-supplied CPE. Based on a 2009 standard, Wi-Fi 4 offers theoretical maximum download speeds of up to 600 Mbps. By the peak of fiber deployment in the latter half of the decade, Wi-Fi 5 had become the state-of-the-art standard, delivering peak speeds of 3.5 Gbps and gradually becoming dominant. For instance, in 2016, Telefónica’s Movistar fiber CPE featured a dual-band Wi-Fi 5 model, which was considered high-end at the time.

By the time Wi-Fi 6—the first standard truly designed for multi-gigabit fiber based on XGS-PON (the latest optical networking technology enabling symmetrical speeds of up to 10 Gbps)—became available, Spanish ISPs had already deployed tens of millions of legacy CPE. Analysis of Speedtest Intelligence data reveals that Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5 CPE have remained deeply entrenched in Spain’s fiber base, collectively accounting for over 75% of all fixed connections by December 2024, based on Speedtest sample share. 

Competitive dynamics play a key role in shaping Wi-Fi outcomes across countries and ISPs

The long tail of legacy Wi-Fi CPE in Spain stands in stark contrast to other fiber-rich countries like neighboring France, another European leader in fiber deployment—though it lagged behind Spain until recent years. By December 2024, Wi-Fi 6 accounted for nearly a third of all Wi-Fi connections in France, compared to less than a quarter in Spain.

Beyond France’s later fiber deployment timeline compared to Spain, broader competitive dynamics and consumer behavior have likely influenced the differences in Wi-Fi adoption between the two countries. While Spain’s fixed market is highly competitive, it has been led by a few large converged players that have traditionally prioritized convergence and bundling over investing in cutting-edge CPE.

For the most part, Spanish ISPs have traditionally competed on price, content, and speed tiers, with Wi-Fi CPE upgrades not seen as a key differentiator. In France, by contrast, the entry of market disruptor Iliad’s Free at the start of the last decade intensified competition not just on price but also on innovation in the ‘internet box.’ For over a decade, Free set the market pace by integrating cutting-edge technology into its Freebox gateways, from built-in media servers to high-end Wi-Fi.

Wi-Fi 6 Penetration Continues to Rise Slowly in Spain
Speedtest Intelligence® | January 2025

This sparked a ‘box war’ in France, where rival ISPs faced competitive pressure to regularly update their CPE to avoid being outpaced. For example, when Free introduced a Wi-Fi 6-capable Freebox for new subscribers, Orange (Livebox 6) and Bouygues (Bbox Wi-Fi 6) quickly followed suit with their own offerings, treating hardware as a key competitive feature to attract subscribers.

Additionally, French ISPs typically included these newer CPE solutions at no extra cost in standard fiber tariffs. When Orange launched the Livebox 6 in 2022 with Wi-Fi 6E support—leveraging additional spectrum in the 6 GHz band to boost theoretical maximum speeds to 9.6 Gbps—it made the device available to all new fiber customers on eligible tariffs. Free took a similar approach earlier with its mid-range Freebox Pop, adding Wi-Fi 6 support in 2021 for new sign-ups without increasing the base subscription fee.

The absence of a Free-equivalent disruptor in Spain until the later arrival of DIGI, combined with a longstanding focus on bundling and content rather than CPE hardware and multi-gigabit tariffs for competitive differentiation, has likely been a key factor in dampening the adoption of Wi-Fi 6 and 7 in Spain.

DIGI's Emphasis on Modern CPE Drives Leadership in Wi-Fi 6 Penetration
Speedtest Intelligence® | January 2025

  • Telefónica’s Movistar: Movistar introduced its first Wi-Fi 6 CPE (Smart Wi-Fi 6) in mid-2022. The ISP initially sought to monetize the device, charging a one-time installation fee for existing customers while bundling it with a new high-speed multi-gigabit tariff. By January, Wi-Fi 6 accounted for as much as 19% of Movistar’s customer base, based on Speedtest sample share.

    The ISP leveraged its presence at MWC 2025 in Barcelona to unveil plans for a Wi-Fi 7 CPE solution, designed to harness the higher-speed multi-gigabit tariffs enabled by its XGS-PON upgrades and expansion. As it phases out legacy hardware, the ISP is accelerating the migration of subscribers from Wi-Fi 4 and 5 CPE, with Speedtest Intelligence data revealing a progressive decline in Wi-Fi 4 penetration since August last year in Movistar’s base.

    At the start of this year, it announced that all new Movistar fixed subscribers, regardless of tariff tier, would receive its Smart Wi-Fi 6 solution as standard, replacing the previous ‘HGU’ Wi-Fi 5-based offering and replicating the strategy of DIGI.

Movistar is Making Progress in Driving Down Wi-Fi 4 Usage
Speedtest Intelligence® | January 2025

  • Orange: Orange was among the first major ISPs in Spain to introduce Wi-Fi 6 CPE, bringing its Livebox 6 and later Livebox 7 solutions from France to the Spanish market starting in 2021, later extending them to sub-brands like Jazztel. The ISP provided this CPE free of charge to new customers across all tariffs, regardless of speed tier. Like Movistar, it initially charged existing subscribers a (monthly, in this case) fee to upgrade to the new hardware. This relatively early and widespread deployment has given Orange a lead in Wi-Fi 6 adoption over Movistar, with as much as 35% of connections on the ISP using the standard by January, based on Speedtest sample share.

    The ISP has since introduced the ‘Livebox Wi-Fi 7’ CPE solution, bundled with a new suite of 10 Gbps converged fiber tariffs. Leveraging Orange’s XGS-PON footprint, it offers among the highest advertised provisioned speeds in the Spanish market.
  • Vodafone: Vodafone introduced its ‘Wi-Fi 6 Station’ in Spain around mid-2021, making it one of the earliest Wi-Fi 6 solutions in the market. However, the ISP positioned it as a premium add-on rather than a standard feature. While new customers could access the Wi-Fi 6 Station, it was initially bundled with Vodafone’s ‘Super Wi-Fi 6’ service, which required a monthly rental fee unless they were on the top Gigabit plan.

    As a result, customers who did not opt in and pay extra continued to receive the older Wi-Fi 5-based CPE by default (similar to many other ISPs). This approach, combined with the legacy composition of Vodafone’s HFC (hybrid fiber-coaxial) base,  has left the ISP’s Wi-Fi 6 adoption lagging behind competitors, with fewer than 14% of its connections using the standard by January based on Speedtest sample share. 

DIGI is the only Spanish ISP where Wi-Fi 6 penetration surpasses Wi-Fi 5
Speedtest Intelligence® | January 2025

  • DIGI: Unlike other ISPs managing a diverse base of legacy customers across various access technologies and CPE generations, DIGI’s relatively recent entry into the Spanish market has given it a significant competitive advantage, allowing it to build a subscriber base largely equipped with newer Wi-Fi CPE. 

    In early 2022, the ISP introduced a Wi-Fi 6 CPE solution for all its fiber subscribers at no additional cost, ensuring that even customers on DIGI’s basic tariffs received the latest Wi-Fi hardware. This approach has driven rapid Wi-Fi 6 adoption, with penetration surpassing 46% by January. DIGI remains the only Spanish ISP where Wi-Fi 6 represents a larger share of its connection base than Wi-Fi 5, contributing to its lead in fixed download speed performance in the market.

    Building on this, last year, DIGI became the first Spanish ISP to launch a Wi-Fi 7 CPE solution in partnership with ZTE, initially bundling the hardware with its premium ‘Pro-DIGI’ tariffs, which leverage XGS-PON to offer advertised symmetrical speeds of up to 10 Gbps. However, adoption remains limited, with Wi-Fi 7 accounting for less than 1% of Speedtest samples on DIGI in January.

Newer Wi-Fi standards enhance performance across all metrics and Spanish ISPs

Despite the wide variation in Wi-Fi standard adoption among Spanish ISPs, the common feature is that newer CPE models drive significant performance improvements across all metrics. Most notably, Wi-Fi 6 and 7 are playing a key role in narrowing the performance gap between advertised fiber speeds—typically achievable via wired Ethernet—and real-world wireless performance in Spanish homes.

Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 7 Drive Substantial Performance Gains Across All ISPs and Metrics
Speedtest Intelligence® | January 2025

At the end of 2024, median download speeds on Wi-Fi 7 in Spain reached 664.25 Mbps, surpassing Wi-Fi 6 by 58% and more than doubling speeds on Wi-Fi 5. Median upload speeds on Wi-Fi 7, enhanced by features like Multi-Link Operation (MLO), which enables simultaneous transmissions across multiple spectrum bands, reached 449.69 Mbps—28% higher than Wi-Fi 6 and 51% above Wi-Fi 5. Wi-Fi 7 also delivered marked latency improvements, with a median latency of 19 ms, up to 12% lower than Wi-Fi 6.

Wi-Fi 7 is Key to Unlocking the Full Potential of Multi-Gigabit Fiber Tariffs
Speedtest Intelligence® | January 2025

The proliferation of multi-gigabit tariffs with XGS-PON, which has progressed more slowly in Spain than in other fiber-rich markets like France but is now accelerating thanks to moves by ISPs like DIGI and Orange, underlines the need for CPE capable of fully utilizing provisioned speeds and spreading gigabit performance throughout the home. Speedtest Intelligence data reveals that early Wi-Fi 7 CPE deployments are the first to achieve median download speeds exceeding 1 Gbps at the 90th percentile in Spain, showcasing how Wi-Fi 7’s technical advances like wider channel bandwidth and higher modulation are emerging as key differentiators for the technology in the premium segment.

Newer Wi-Fi Generations Drive Latency Improvements
Speedtest Intelligence® | January 2025

Driving adoption of newer Wi-Fi standards requires fresh strategies but create new revenue opportunities for ISPs

As advanced fiber markets like Spain mature, the focus is shifting from simply delivering gigabit speeds to the doorstep to ensuring seamless whole-home performance that meets the diverse demands of emerging connected devices. As a result, investments in enhancing the Wi-Fi experience through ISP-supplied CPE will be key to differentiating multi-gigabit tariffs beyond price and ensuring the full potential of fiber connections can be realised.

Spain must accelerate the modernization of its Wi-Fi base to fully capitalize on substantial investments in XGS-PON, deliver meaningful improvements in quality of experience (QoE) for consumers, and catch up with leading markets in the Nordics. Spanish ISPs can take cues from neighboring countries like France, where CPE upgrades are bundled with tariff speed upgrades, and targeted swap-and-replace programs systematically identify and phase out legacy Wi-Fi hardware to drive adoption of next-generation Wi-Fi 6 and 7 equipment. Recent moves by ISPs like Telefónica’s Movistar to sunset legacy CPE and provide Wi-Fi 6 solutions as standard are evidence of progress in this respect.

Leading European ISPs that have prioritized consumer awareness of Wi-Fi standards and their impact on fiber performance—while modernizing their Wi-Fi CPE base to support monetizable offerings like minimum speed guarantees in every room—are seeing tangible benefits. This strategy not only enhances the overall fixed broadband experience but also unlocks new revenue streams through service differentiation.


Rica en fibra y pobre en Wi-Fi: España ejemplifica la ‘enfermedad’ del Wi-Fi obsoleto

España lidera Europa en despliegue de fibra, pero está pagando el precio de descuidar la modernización de equipos Wi-Fi, lo que socava su competitividad global en rendimiento de banda ancha fija.

La notable transformación de España, que hace una década pasó de ser un país rezagado en telecomunicaciones a convertirse en líder mundial en disponibilidad de fibra, ha sido vertiginosa tanto en escala como en velocidad. Aclamada ampliamente como modelo de buenas prácticas, esta transformación ha desempeñado un papel clave para que el país se sitúe a la vanguardia de Europa en crecimiento económico durante los dos últimos años, apoyando la atracción de inversión en fabricación de precisión, energías renovables y una creciente comunidad de nómadas digitales.

Si el despliegue de fibra en el mayor número posible de hogares fuera una carrera de velocidad, España habría ganado sin duda alguna. Pero la verdadera carrera -la maratón de extender la cobertura gigabit a todo el hogar, más allá de la puerta- requiere modernizar los equipos Wi-Fi de las instalaciones del cliente (CPE). En este aspecto, España se está quedando rezagada, lo que merma su competitividad global en rendimiento de banda ancha fija y limita la capacidad de los proveedores de servicios de internet (ISP) españoles para diferenciarse en un mercado saturado con múltiples despliegues de fibra que se solapan. 

Este abismo entre las conexiones de fibra de alta capacidad que llegan a la mayoría de los hogares españoles y los anticuados equipos Wi-Fi que suministran esa conectividad a los dispositivos finales ejemplifica la paradoja de los “antiguos” mercados de fibra como España. Como pionera en fibra, España migró desde el cobre antes de que los modernos CPE Wi-Fi 6 y Wi-Fi 7 -diseñados para aprovechar al máximo el potencial multi-gigabit de la fibra- estuvieran ampliamente disponibles.

Aspectos Clave:

  • España cuenta con una de las huellas Wi-Fi más antiguas y menos capaces de Europa. A finales de 2024, dos tercios de todas las conexiones Wi-Fi en España todavía dependían de estándares heredados (Wi-Fi 4 y Wi-Fi 5), dejando al país notablemente por detrás de sus iguales con menor penetración de fibra, incluyendo la vecina Francia, el Reino Unido y todos los países nórdicos. Este profundo arraigo de los estándares Wi-Fi heredados está limitando artificialmente el rendimiento de las conexiones de fibra de España, contribuyendo a su bajo rendimiento en el Speedtest Global Index™ en comparación con países con un despliegue de fibra menos extenso.
  • Las capacidades de la huella Wi-Fi de España varían significativamente entre los distintos ISP. DIGI se ha distinguido por ofrecer CPE modernos con Wi-Fi 6 como estándar a toda su base de abonados, beneficiándose de su posición como nuevo operador sin una base de clientes heredada. Esto ha impulsado su fuerte liderazgo en la penetración de Wi-Fi 6 en España -casi la mitad de todas las muestras de Speedtest en conexiones de DIGI en enero utilizaban Wi-Fi 6 o 7, frente a menos de una cuarta parte en Movistar y Vodafone-, mejorando su rendimiento global de banda ancha fija. En comparación, los ISP que tardaron en introducir CPE modernos, como Movistar, o que restringieron el acceso a los abonados que optaron por complementos de alquiler de equipos premium, como Vodafone, conservan una cuota mucho mayor de usuarios con estándares Wi-Fi heredados.
  • Los CPE modernos con Wi-Fi 6 y 7 ofrecen importantes mejoras de rendimiento en todos los proveedores. La diferencia entre las velocidades de fibra anunciadas hasta la puerta de casa (normalmente alcanzables a través de Ethernet por cable) y el rendimiento Wi-Fi real es menor en los hogares en los que se han desplegado CPE Wi-Fi 6 y 7. A finales de 2024, las velocidades medianas de descarga en Wi-Fi 6 en España alcanzaron los 419,13 Mbps, superando las velocidades de Wi-Fi 5 en más de un 54% y el rendimiento de Wi-Fi 4 en un orden de magnitud. Mientras tanto, la latencia mediana de las conexiones Wi-Fi 7 (19 ms) mejoró notablemente en comparación con los resultados de los estándares Wi-Fi anteriores.

España, víctima de su propio éxito: desplegó fibra por todas partes antes de la llegada de Wi-Fi 6 y 7

España es un ejemplo típico de los retos que plantea el Wi-Fi heredado a los que fueron los primeros en adoptar la fibra óptica en Europa, países que se lanzaron a desplegar redes de fibra completa con tecnología GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Network, red óptica pasiva Gigabit). En este sentido, Telefónica inició el despliegue de fibra a gran escala a principios de la década de 2010 y lo aceleró a partir de 2015. A finales de la década, España se había adelantado a la mayoría de los países en cobertura de fibra y en la migración desde la DSL basada en cobre, con una inversión que impulsó múltiples despliegues de fibra superpuestos en muchas zonas. 

A menudo se subestima la magnitud del éxito de España en el despliegue de fibra. El último índice DESI de la Comisión Europea indica que más del 95% de los hogares españoles contaban con una red de fibra óptica, lo que sitúa al país muy por encima de la media de la UE (64%). Esto ha colocado a España a una distancia asombrosa del objetivo de la Comisión para la Década Digital 2030 de lograr una cobertura total de fibra en todos los Estados miembros al final de la década.

España sigue liderando Europa en despliegue de fibra
Comisión Europea | DESI 2018-2024

Los despliegues iniciales de fibra en España a principios de 2010 coincidieron con el hecho de que el Wi-Fi 4 era el estándar de facto para muchos CPE suministrados por los operadores. De acuerdo con una norma de 2009, el Wi-Fi 4 ofrece velocidades máximas teóricas de descarga de hasta 600 Mbps. En el punto álgido del despliegue de fibra en la segunda mitad de la década, el Wi-Fi 5 se había convertido en el estándar de vanguardia, ofreciendo velocidades máximas de 3,5 Gbps y convirtiéndose gradualmente en dominante. Por ejemplo, en 2016, el CPE de fibra de Movistar contaba con un modelo Wi-Fi 5 de doble banda, considerado de gama alta en aquel momento.

Para cuando el Wi-Fi 6 (el primer estándar realmente diseñado para fibra multi-gigabit basado en XGS-PON -la última tecnología de redes ópticas que permite velocidades simétricas de hasta 10 Gbps-) estuvo disponible, los ISP españoles ya habían desplegado decenas de millones de CPE heredados. El análisis de los datos de Speedtest Intelligence revela que los CPE Wi-Fi 4 y Wi-Fi 5 han permanecido profundamente arraigados a la base de fibra de España, representando colectivamente más del 75% de todas las conexiones fijas en diciembre de 2024, según la cuota de muestras de Speedtest. 

La dinámica competitiva desempeña un papel clave en la configuración de los resultados de Wi-Fi de los distintos países e ISP

La gran cantidad de CPE Wi-Fi heredados en España contrasta fuertemente con otros países ricos en fibra, como la vecina Francia, otro líder europeo en despliegue de fibra a pesar de que ha ido a la zaga de España hasta hace pocos años. En diciembre de 2024, el Wi-Fi 6 representaba casi un tercio de todas las conexiones Wi-Fi en Francia, frente a menos de una cuarta parte en España.

Más allá del calendario de despliegue de fibra más tardío de Francia en comparación con el de España, es probable que la dinámica competitiva y el comportamiento de los consumidores hayan influido en las diferencias de adopción del Wi-Fi entre ambos países. Aunque el mercado fijo español es muy competitivo, ha estado liderado por unos pocos grandes operadores convergentes que tradicionalmente han dado prioridad al precio de los paquetes y a los contenidos frente a la inversión en CPE de vanguardia.

En su mayor parte, los ISP españoles han competido tradicionalmente en precio, contenido y niveles de velocidad, sin que las mejoras del CPE Wi-Fi se considerasen un diferenciador clave. En Francia, por el contrario, la entrada en el mercado de Free, de Iliad, a principios de la década pasada, intensificó la competencia no sólo en precios, sino también en innovación en la “caja de Internet”. Durante más de una década, Free marcó el ritmo del mercado integrando tecnología punta en sus pasarelas Freebox, desde servidores multimedia incorporados hasta Wi-Fi de alta gama.

La penetración del Wi-Fi 6 sigue creciendo lentamente en España
Speedtest Intelligence® | Enero 2025

Esto desencadenó una “guerra de cajas” en Francia, donde los operadores rivales se enfrentaron a la presión competitiva de actualizar periódicamente sus CPE para evitar ser superados. Por ejemplo, cuando Free introdujo un Freebox Wi-Fi 6 para nuevos abonados, Orange (Livebox 6) y Bouygues (Bbox Wi-Fi 6) no tardaron en lanzar sus propias ofertas, considerando el hardware como una característica competitiva clave para atraer abonados. 

Además, los ISP franceses solían incluir estas nuevas soluciones CPE sin coste adicional en las tarifas de fibra estándar. Cuando Orange lanzó el Livebox 6 en 2022 con soporte Wi-Fi 6E -aprovechando el espectro adicional en la banda de 6 GHz para aumentar las velocidades máximas teóricas a 9,6 Gbps- puso el dispositivo a disposición de todos los nuevos clientes de fibra con tarifas elegibles. Free ya había adoptado un enfoque similar con su Freebox Pop de gama media, añadiendo la compatibilidad con Wi-Fi 6 en 2021 para los nuevos suscriptores sin aumentar la cuota de suscripción básica.

La ausencia de un disruptor equivalente a Free en España hasta la posterior llegada de DIGI, combinada con un enfoque centrado desde hace tiempo en la paquetización y los contenidos más que en el hardware (CPE) y en las tarifas multi-gigabit para la diferenciación competitiva, ha sido probablemente un factor clave para frenar la adopción de Wi-Fi 6 y 7 en España.

Foco de DIGI en CPE modernos promueve liderazgo en la adopción de Wi-Fi 6
Speedtest Intelligence® | Enero 2025

  • Telefónica: Movistar introdujo su primer CPE Wi-Fi 6 (Smart Wi-Fi 6) a mediados de 2022. Inicialmente, el operador trató de rentabilizar el dispositivo cobrando una cuota única de instalación a los clientes y combinándolo con una nueva tarifa multi-gigabit de alta velocidad. En enero, el Wi-Fi 6 representaba hasta el 19% de la base de clientes de Movistar, según la cuota de muestreo de Speedtest. 

    El operador aprovechó su presencia en el MWC 2025 de Barcelona para desvelar sus planes para una solución CPE Wi-Fi 7, diseñada para aprovechar las tarifas multi-gigabit de mayor velocidad habilitadas por sus actualizaciones y ampliaciones XGS-PON. A medida que va eliminando hardware heredado, el operador está acelerando la migración de abonados desde CPE Wi-Fi 4 y 5. A este respecto, los datos de Speedtest Intelligence revelan un descenso progresivo de la penetración de Wi-Fi 4 desde agosto del año pasado en la base de Movistar. 

    A principios de este año, Movistar anunció que todos sus nuevos abonados de telefonía fija, independientemente del nivel de tarifa, recibirán su solución CPE ‘Smart Wi-Fi 6’, para sustituir la anterior oferta basada en Wi-Fi 5 ‘HGU’, replicando, así, la estrategia de DIGI.

Movistar avanza en la reducción del uso de Wi-Fi 4
Speedtest Intelligence® | Enero 2025

  • Orange: Orange fue uno de los primeros grandes operadores en España en introducir un CPE Wi-Fi 6, al traer sus soluciones Livebox 6 y más tarde Livebox 7 de Francia al mercado español a partir de 2021, y extenderlas más tarde a submarcas como Jazztel. El ISP proporcionó este CPE de forma gratuita a los nuevos clientes en todas las tarifas, independientemente del nivel de velocidad. Al igual que Movistar, cobró inicialmente a los abonados existentes una cuota (mensual, en este caso) para actualizar al nuevo hardware. Este despliegue relativamente temprano y generalizado ha dado a Orange una ventaja en la adopción de Wi-Fi 6 sobre Movistar, con hasta un 35% de sus conexiones utilizando el estándar en enero, según la cuota de muestra de Speedtest.

    Desde entonces, el operador ha introducido la solución CPE ‘Livebox Wi-Fi 7’, incluida en un nuevo paquete de tarifas de fibra convergente de 10 Gbps. Aprovechando la huella XGS-PON de Orange, ofrece las velocidades más altas anunciadas en el mercado español.
  • Vodafone: Vodafone introdujo su ‘Wi-Fi 6 Station’ en España a mediados de 2021, lo que la convierte en una de las primeras soluciones Wi-Fi 6 del mercado. Sin embargo, el proveedor la posicionó como un complemento premium más que como una característica estándar. Aunque los nuevos clientes podían acceder al router Wi-Fi 6, en un principio estaba vinculado al servicio ‘Súper Wi-Fi 6’, que exigía una cuota mensual de alquiler a menos que estuvieran en el plan gigabit superior. 

    En consecuencia, los clientes que no optaban por este servicio ni pagaban una cuota adicional seguían recibiendo por defecto el antiguo CPE basado en Wi-Fi 5 (al igual que en el caso de muchos otros operadores). Este enfoque, combinado con la composición heredada de la base HFC (fibra híbrida coaxial) de Vodafone, ha dejado la adopción de Wi-Fi 6 por parte del operador por detrás de sus competidores, con menos del 14% de sus conexiones utilizando este estándar en enero según la cuota de muestreo de Speedtest. 

DIGI es el único ISP español en el que la penetración de Wi-Fi 6 supera la de Wi-Fi 5
Speedtest Intelligence® | Enero 2025

  • DIGI: A diferencia de otros ISP que gestionan una base diversa de clientes heredados a través de diversas tecnologías de acceso y generaciones de CPE, la entrada relativamente reciente de DIGI en el mercado español le ha dado una ventaja competitiva significativa, lo que le ha permitido construir una base de suscriptores en gran parte equipada con CPE Wi-Fi más nuevos. 

    A principios de 2022, el operador introdujo una solución Wi-Fi 6 CPE para todos sus abonados de fibra sin coste adicional, garantizando que incluso los clientes de las tarifas básicas de DIGI recibieran el hardware Wi-Fi más reciente. Este enfoque ha impulsado la rápida adopción del Wi-Fi 6, con una penetración superior al 46% en enero. DIGI sigue siendo el único proveedor español en el que el Wi-Fi 6 representa una cuota mayor de su base de conexiones que Wi-Fi 5, lo que contribuye a su liderazgo en rendimiento de velocidad de descarga fija en el mercado

    Sobre esta base, el año pasado DIGI se convirtió en el primer operador español en lanzar una solución CPE Wi-Fi 7 en colaboración con ZTE, e incluyó inicialmente el hardware con sus tarifas premium ‘Pro-DIGI’, que aprovechan XGS-PON para ofrecer velocidades simétricas anunciadas de hasta 10 Gbps. Sin embargo, la adopción sigue siendo limitada, y el Wi-Fi 7 representó menos del 1% de las muestras de Speedtest en DIGI en enero.

Los nuevos estándares Wi-Fi mejoran el rendimiento en todas las métricas e ISP españoles

A pesar de la amplia variación en la adopción de estándares Wi-Fi entre los ISP españoles, un resultado común es que los nuevos modelos de CPE impulsan mejoras en el rendimiento significativas en todas las métricas. En particular, Wi-Fi 6 y Wi-Fi 7 desempeñan un papel clave en la reducción de la diferencia entre las velocidades de fibra anunciadas -que normalmente se consiguen a través de Ethernet por cable- y el rendimiento inalámbrico real en los hogares españoles.

Wi-Fi 6 y Wi-Fi 7 impulsan mejoras sustanciales en todos los ISP y métricas
Speedtest Intelligence® | Enero 2025

A finales de 2024, las velocidades medianas de descarga en Wi-Fi 7 en España alcanzaron los 664,25 Mbps, superando las de Wi-Fi 6 en un 58% y duplicando con creces las velocidades de Wi-Fi 5. Por su parte, las velocidades medianas de carga en Wi-Fi 7, mejoradas por características como la Operación Multienlace (MLO), que permite transmisiones simultáneas a través de múltiples bandas de espectro, alcanzaron los 449,69 Mbps, un 28% más que en Wi-Fi 6 y un 51% por encima de Wi-Fi 5. El Wi-Fi 7 también ofreció notables mejoras de latencia, con una latencia mediana de 19 ms, hasta un 12% inferior a la de Wi-Fi 6.

Wi-Fi 7 es clave para aprovechar el potencial de las tarifas de fibra multi gigabit
Speedtest Intelligence® | Enero 2025

La proliferación de tarifas multi-gigabit con XGS-PON, que ha progresado más lentamente en España que en otros mercados ricos en fibra, como Francia, pero que ahora se está acelerando gracias a los movimientos de operadores como DIGI y Orange, subraya la necesidad de CPE capaces de utilizar plenamente las velocidades provisionadas y extender el rendimiento gigabit por todo el hogar. Los datos de Speedtest Intelligence revelan que los primeros despliegues de CPE Wi-Fi 7 son los primeros en alcanzar velocidades medias de descarga superiores a 1 Gbps en el percentil 90 en España, lo que demuestra cómo los avances técnicos de Wi-Fi 7, como un mayor ancho de banda de canal y una modulación más alta, se están convirtiendo en diferenciadores clave de la tecnología en el segmento premium.

Las nuevas generaciones de Wi-Fi promueven mejoras en la latencia
Speedtest Intelligence® | Enero 2025

Impulsar la adopción de los nuevos estándares Wi-Fi requiere nuevas estrategias, pero crea nuevas oportunidades de ingresos para los ISP

A medida que los mercados avanzados de fibra (como el español) maduran, la atención pasa de centrarse simplemente en ofrecer velocidades gigabit hasta la puerta de casa a garantizar un rendimiento sin fisuras en todo el hogar, que satisfaga las diversas demandas de los dispositivos conectados emergentes. Como resultado, las inversiones para mejorar la experiencia Wi-Fi a través del CPE suministrado por el ISP serán clave para diferenciar las tarifas multi-gigabit más allá del precio y garantizar que se pueda aprovechar todo el potencial de las conexiones de fibra. 

España debe acelerar la modernización de su base Wi-Fi para capitalizar plenamente las importantes inversiones en XGS-PON, ofrecer mejoras significativas en la calidad de la experiencia (QoE) para los consumidores y alcanzar a los mercados líderes de los países nórdicos. Los operadores españoles pueden seguir el ejemplo de países vecinos como Francia, donde las actualizaciones de CPE se incluyen en las actualizaciones de velocidad de las tarifas, y los programas de intercambio y sustitución identifican y eliminan sistemáticamente el hardware Wi-Fi heredado para impulsar la adopción de equipos Wi-Fi 6 y 7 de nueva generación. Los recientes movimientos de ISP como Movistar para eliminar el CPE heredado y ofrecer soluciones Wi-Fi 6 de serie son una prueba de los avances en este sentido.

Los principales ISP europeos que han dado prioridad a la concienciación de los consumidores sobre los estándares Wi-Fi y su impacto en el rendimiento de la fibra, al tiempo que han modernizado su base de CPE Wi-Fi para dar soporte a ofertas rentables como las garantías de velocidad mínima en cada habitación, están viendo beneficios tangibles. Esta estrategia no sólo mejora la experiencia general de la banda ancha fija, sino que también desbloquea nuevas fuentes de ingresos a través de la diferenciación del servicio.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| October 12, 2025

Assessing Wi-Fi Speeds in the Middle East’s and Türkiye's Busiest Airports

Airports in the Gulf region and Türkiye have experienced a surge in air passenger traffic. As they compete to be key transit hubs and main tourist and business destinations, high-performance Wi-Fi networks have become increasingly important in shaping the overall passenger experience. We use Speedtest Intelligence® data to evaluate the Wi-Fi performance of the busiest airports in the region between January and August 2025. These insights help to inform travelers where they are more likely to have the best online experience while transiting through an airport in the region or waiting at a lounge to embark on an outbound flight. 

Key Takeaways:

  • King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh (RUH) achieves top-tier public Wi-Fi download speeds of over 86 Mbps. Wi-Fi performance in airports across the Gulf region and Türkiye varies significantly, with RUH offering strong public Wi-Fi speeds ahead of Hamad International Airport in Doha (DOH) and Dubai International Airport (DXB). Kuwait International Airport (KWI) and Zayed International Airport in Abu Dhabi (AUH) fall in the mid-range of download speeds, and the two airports in Istanbul, IST and Sabiha Gokcen (SAW), lag considerably. 
  • Very few airport lounges provide superior Wi-Fi performance compared to the general public airport networks. The fastest lounges, such as those in IST and DXB, exhibit a substantial increase in download speeds, 5X for the former and 2X for the latter, compared to public airport Wi-Fi. Top lounges in other airports, such as at RUH and Zayed International Airport in Abu Dhabi (AUH), offer more modest speed gains. Without the ability to demonstrate superior Wi-Fi performance, lounge operators are missing out on a point of differentiation to add to comfort and other amenities.
  • Wi-Fi performance differs greatly between lounges, even within the same airport. This suggests that the specific lounge operator plays a crucial role in determining the quality of the Wi-Fi experience. For instance, in Riyadh (RUH), the Al Fursan lounge significantly outperforms the Plaza Premium and HAYYAK lounges. Similarly, in Dubai (DXB), the Marhaba lounge boasts much faster speeds than the Emirates (EK) lounge or the DIH lounge. Lounge operators must address these performance gaps to remain competitive, attract high-value customers, and enhance guest experience and satisfaction.

Wi-Fi performance varies significantly across Middle East and Türkiye airports

Airline passengers today expect seamless connectivity, from check-in to landing. That is why airport operators need to understand how passengers (and staff) access the internet throughout the venue, and ensure their infrastructure meets their connectivity needs. 

In January 2025, Ookla® analyzed the cellular performance at the busiest airport in the Gulf region and Türkiye. We found that Abu Dhabi’s Zayed International Airport (AUH) achieved top-tier median mobile download speeds of over ​​450 Mbps. In comparison, Istanbul Airport (IST) significantly leads in 5G performance, with download and upload speeds of 861.98 Mbps and 101.96 Mbps, respectively.

This time, we used Speedtest Intelligence data to understand whether the public Wi-Fi networks and lounges of the nine busiest airports in the Middle East and Türkiye deliver the kind of internet experience travelers expect—whether that’s for streaming, video calls, or quick file uploads. We compared median Wi-Fi download and upload speeds at each location over a period of eight months (January to August 2025).

Ookla’s data shows that Wi-Fi performance varies greatly from airport to airport. King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh (RUH) has the highest download speed at 86.34 Mbps, placing it at the top of the list, while its upload speed is a more moderate 25.48 Mbps. In contrast, Hamad International Airport in Doha (DOH) and Dubai International Airport (DXB) demonstrate high upload speeds; Dubai leads with 101.86 Mbps, and Doha follows closely at 96.45 Mbps. DXB and DOH also stand out because they are the only two airports where upload speed is higher than download speed.

The two airports in Istanbul, IST and Sabiha Gokcen (SAW), generally have the lowest speeds. IST has a download speed of 22.65 Mbps and an upload speed of 22.20 Mbps, while SAW ranks at the bottom for both metrics, with a download speed of 9.69 Mbps and an upload speed of 9.52 Mbps.

Other airports, like Kuwait International Airport (KWI) and Zayed International Airport in Abu Dhabi (AUH), fall in the mid-range for download and upload speeds. At the same time, Sharjah International Airport (SHJ) and Muscat International Airport (MCT) show slower, sub-30 Mbps download speeds.

Wi-Fi Network Performance, Select Airports in the Gulf Region and Türkiye
Speedtest Intelligence® | January–August 2025
Wi-Fi Network Performance, Select Airports in the Gulf Region and Türkiye

A few airport lounges offer better Wi-Fi performance than public airport networks, but the majority need improvements 

Good Wi-Fi in airport lounges is essential for enhancing the travel experience, especially as their popularity grows. With more travelers seeking comfort and productivity during layovers, the demand for reliable internet access has never been higher.

Airport and airline companies position lounges as distinctive features to cater to the needs of business travelers, families, and leisure travelers. A survey by Airport Dimensions revealed that lounge users enjoy the airport more than non-users. Lounge visits are common among frequent travelers in the Middle East, with 66% of those in the U.A.E. and 60% in Saudi Arabia utilizing lounges during their trips. This trend is driven by various factors, including the desire for a more comfortable environment and the availability of amenities, but also the increasing number of financial institutions that incorporate premium travel-related benefits such as lounge access into their loyalty strategies. 

Lounges typically offer dedicated and faster Wi-Fi than the general airport network, making them an attractive option for business travelers and those looking to maximize productivity. Hamad International Airport in Doha is the exception where a single public Wi-Fi network is deployed and accessible to everyone, including inside the lounges. 

We used Speedtest Intelligence data again to examine the download speed that is typically experienced at different airport lounges, and we selected the venues with the highest number of samples, indicating more popularity. Note that we have excluded Kuwait International Airport (KWI) or Sharjah International Airport (SHJ), as there were no Speedtest samples captured that were associated with lounges in these two locations. We have also aggregated samples from different lounges within the same airport that share the same Wi-Fi Service Set Identifier (SSID). 

Ookla data suggests that the fastest lounge’s Wi-Fi performance in all airports is superior to that of the general public Wi-Fi network. The most dramatic difference is at Istanbul Airport (IST), where the YOTEL lounge Wi-Fi clocks in at 119.46 Mbps, while the public Wi-Fi lags far behind at 22.65 Mbps. Similarly, airports in Riyadh (RUH) and Dubai (DXB) show substantial advantages for Saudia’ Al Fursan and Marhaba lounge users over the free public Wi-Fi, with lounge speeds reaching 120.5 Mbps and 101.98 Mbps, respectively.

The Pearl Lounge in Abu Dhabi Airport (AUH) shows the smallest speed increase over the free Wi-Fi network. At the other end of the spectrum, Istanbul’s Sabiha Gökçen Airport (SAW) recorded the slowest speeds for lounge Wi-Fi at 25.8 Mbps, lagging the other airports in public Wi-Fi ranking.

Performance Comparison Between the Fastest Lounge Wi-Fi and Public Airport Wi-Fi, Select Airports in the Gulf Region and Türkiye
Speedtest Intelligence® | January–August 2025
Performance Comparison Between the Fastest Lounge Wi-Fi and Public Airport Wi-Fi, Select Airports in the Gulf Region and Türkiye

Wi-Fi performance across lounges in the same airport exhibits strong variation, emphasizing that the choice of a lounge could be a critical factor for travelers needing a fast internet connection. In Riyadh’s RUH, the Al Fursan lounge delivers a fast median download speed of 120.5 Mbps, contrasting strongly with Plaza Premium and HAYYAK lounges in the same airport, which offer sub-22 Mbps speeds. A similar, though less extreme disparity can be observed in Istanbul Airport (IST), where YOTEL lounges provide a download speed that is more than double that of the iGA lounge at 48.32 Mbps. 

Dubai International Airport (DXB) is another example of substantial intra-airport variability. While Marhaba lounge boasts a speed of nearly 101.98 Mbps, airline Emirates’s (EK) lounges provided slower download speeds of just over 60 Mbps. The Dubai International Hotel (DIH) lounge offers a mere 29.16 Mbps download speed at the same location.

Airports like Abu Dhabi (AUH) and Muscat (MCT) exhibit more consistent, albeit moderate, speeds across their lounge offerings in the 40-55 Mbps range; still, it is faster than the public airport Wi-Fi. The Plaza Premium Lounge in Istanbul (SAW) offers slightly better Wi-Fi than the public Wi-Fi but still lags behind the other lounges, except its sister lounge in Abu Dhabi.

Chart of Wi-Fi Performance of Different Airport Lounges, Select Airports in the Gulf Region and Türkiye

The surge in air passenger traffic and growing demand for seamless connectivity underscore a critical need for airport operators and lounge managers to prioritize and invest in their Wi-Fi infrastructure to enhance their overall experience and gain a competitive edge. Our analysis of the busiest airports in the Gulf region and Türkiye shows that while some locations offer high-performance Wi-Fi networks, the variability in speeds across different venues and even within the same airport’s lounges highlights significant opportunities for improvement. 

Airport authorities and lounge operators must actively monitor and enhance their Wi-Fi capabilities to meet and exceed traveler expectations and differentiate their offerings in a competitive market. By doing so, they can unlock new growth opportunities, improve customer loyalty, and strengthen their position as major global travel hubs.

Please contact us for more details on how tools such as Speedtest Intelligence can help provide actionable insights into network performance and become Speedtest Certified™ to publicly demonstrate your commitment to delivering top-tier internet experiences for every traveler. 

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.