| February 18, 2025

5G Significantly Enhanced Experience for Tourists and Business Travellers to the Gulf Region

Roaming is a significant revenue stream for Gulf operators, especially as the region is becoming an important tourist destination. Travelers increasingly expect network experiences abroad to match or exceed what they have at home. This article uses Ookla’s Speedtest Intelligence® data to assess the mobile experience of inbound roamers visiting select Gulf countries – Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. – in  2024, comparing their experience across different destinations and their respective home networks.

Key Takeaways:

  • Travelers to Qatar, the U.A.E., and Kuwait enjoy top speeds over 5G. Median download speeds over 5G reached 381.05 Mbps in Qatar, 374.60 Mbps in the UAE, and 240.37 Mbps in Kuwait in 2024.
  • Generally, travelers experience slower mobile speeds when roaming in the Gulf region than on their home networks. However, exceptions include Russian travelers in the U.A.E., Pakistani tourists in Saudi Arabia, and Saudis and Indonesians in Qatar who experience notable speed improvements.
  • Visitors from outside the Gulf typically experience slower speeds than those from within it. This could be due to more favorable agreements between regional operators to keep fees low and encourage usage when traveling within the region. In contrast, high roaming charges and speed caps for travelers from Europe, Asia, or the United States would constrain usage and speed.

The Gulf region is rapidly becoming a popular global tourist destination, creating opportunities to increase roaming revenue

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region is experiencing a tourism boom, rapidly becoming a popular global tourist destination. According to Fitch Ratings, the tourism sector contributed around USD 130 billion to GCC’s GDP in 2023, with projections to surpass USD 340 billion by 2030, equating to 10% of total GDP. This growth is fueled by the GCC’s ambitious goals to diversify their economies beyond oil and enhance their global standing.

Unlike Europe and other parts of the Middle East, the Gulf region recovered quickly from COVID-19. In 2023, passenger traffic at its airports exceeded pre-pandemic levels by 8%. The region’s appeal is not just its warm weather, beaches, and shopping; it also offers modern amenities and top-notch services for both business travelers and vacationers. The straightforward entry visa process and the introduction of a unified tourist visa further facilitate travel.

Mobile connectivity through roaming is important for the travel experience. It allows travelers to stay connected with family and friends, use mapping and navigation tools, locate attractions, read restaurants’ reviews, and share experiences on social media. With 5G, roamers can access high-speed internet, stream HD videos, and make lag-free video calls. However, 5G roaming is still in its nascent stages, and not all hosting operators provide access to its full capability.

Most inbound roamers originate from Asian countries, the Gulf region, and the U.S.A. 

We used Ookla’s Speedtest Intelligence® to assess the mobile network performance for inbound mobile roamers to Gulf countries during 2024, comparing it with their home network performance. Based on Speedtest samples, the U.A.E. and Saudi Arabia are the top roaming destinations for international travelers, followed by Kuwait and Qatar. Bahrain and Oman saw fewer roamers.

Indonesia accounted for 14.4% of total inbound roamers in 2024, with most heading to Saudi Arabia. The latter received the second-highest number of inbound roamers, behind the U.A.E., likely linked to the Hajj and Omra pilgrimages. Saudi Arabian visitors were also prominent within the region  (8.0% of total samples), with the U.A.E., Bahrain, and Qatar being favored destinations. 

Outside the Gulf, the U.S.A. had the most travelers to the GCC who activated roaming services and ran speed tests (7.9%), followed by India and Austria at 5.6% and 5.3%, respectively. Other Asian regions, such as Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Pakistan, also contributed strongly to the roaming cohort. Egypt is the largest non-GCC Arab country, contributing to the visitor pool (4.2%).

Map of distribution of inbound Speedtest Roaming Samples in the Gulf region by country of origin

Our findings also reveal that among the top 10 countries contributing to roamers in the Gulf region, Austria, Saudi Arabia, and Hong Kong had the highest proportion of 5G users. On the other hand, travelers from Pakistan, India, and Egypt were the least likely to use 5G while roaming.

5G Share of Inbound Roamers Speedtest Sample, Top-10 Countries of Origin
Speedtest Intelligence® | 2024
5G Share of Inbound Roamers Speedtest Sample, Top-10 Countries of Origin

The following sections provide additional insights into network performance for international roamers visiting the U.A.E., Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar in 2024. For each country of origin and destination, we include the median download speed for roamers during travel and compare it with the median download speed on their home networks. 

Saudi Arabian and Russian Roamers Enjoy Top 5G Speeds in the U.A.E.

Over 37% of the Speedtest sample roaming in the U.A.E. came from India, Saudi Arabia, Austria, Russia, and Hong Kong. Network experiences varied significantly between these countries. Saudi Arabian and Russian travelers experienced the fastest download speeds for all technologies and 5G. Saudi visitors had comparable roaming experiences to their home countries. At the same time, Russian tourists saw more than a threefold increase in median download speeds in the U.A.E compared to their home networks. On the other hand, travelers from Austria, India, and Hong Kong experienced comparatively lower performance.

Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in the U.A.E and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies
Speedtest Intelligence | 2024
Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in the U.A.E and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies

French and American Tourists Enjoy Excellent 5G Performance in Saudi Arabia

Most travelers to Saudi Arabia are religious pilgrims, with a significant number from Indonesia and Malaysia comprising 38.7% of total inbound roamers in 2024, as captured in Speedtest data, reported the best mobile experience and 5G download speeds when visiting Saudi Arabia. Median download speeds reached 78.46 Mbps for all technologies and 153.66 Mbps for 5G among American visitors, while French tourists experienced speeds of 49.33 Mbps and 153.79 Mbps.

Saudi operators delivered a more moderate performance to travelers from Malaysia, Pakistan, and Egypt, with median download speeds below 50 Mbps across all technologies. However, there were notable improvements over 5G for users from Malaysia and Pakistan, with speeds reaching 90.97 Mbps and 112.68 Mbps, respectively. Interestingly, Indonesian operators appear to enforce a uniform speed cap of 10 Mbps across all networks in Saudi Arabia, suggesting a restriction from the home operator rather than the host network.

Generally, inbound roamers experience similar or worse network conditions in Saudi Arabia compared to their home networks, with Indonesians feeling the most restricted due to the speed cap. Pakistanis are the only exception among the top six countries in Speedtest samples, with median download speed increasing from 19.38 Mbps at home to 27.22 Mbps when roaming.

Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in Saudi Arabia and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies
Speedtest Intelligence | 2024
Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in Saudi Arabia and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies

Inbound roamers from Saudi Arabia enjoy the fastest 5G network speeds in Kuwait

Saudi visitors enjoyed fast 5G speeds at 240.37 Mbps, though ‘all technologies’ speeds were around 40% lower than their 5G speeds and about 30% less than what they would have experienced back in the Kingdom. The other major tourist groups in Kuwait saw a decline in median download speeds compared to their home countries, most notably those from the United States.

Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in Kuwait and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies
Speedtest Intelligence | 2024
Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in Kuwait and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies

Qatar offers exceptionally fast 5G speeds to its inbound roamers from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait

Many travelers to Qatar come from Saudi Arabia and the U.S.A., representing an aggregate of 36.2% of total roamers. There is also a huge difference in speeds experienced by roamers, with those coming from neighboring countries enjoying the best performance. Saudi and Kuwaiti visitors experience a median download speed of 381.0 Mbps and 227.1 Mbps over 5G, respectively. By contrast, those from Austria would have experienced a much more modest speed of around 36 Mbps on both ‘all technologies’ and 5G.

Comparing the network experience of visitors in Qatar to their home networks, travelers from Indonesia and Saudi Arabia saw significant improvements, with roaming-to-home download speed ratios of 1.7 and 1.5, respectively. On the other hand, those from Kuwait, the U.S.A., and Austria likely experienced a decline in network performance.

Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in Qatar and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies
Speedtest Intelligence | 2024
Network Performance By Technology for Roamers in Qatar and Comparison with Home Network for All Technologies

Operators generally offer good mobile roaming experience in the Gulf region, but there is room to make it more accessible

This analysis shows that Gulf operators provide excellent mobile experiences to roaming customers. Kuwait, Qatar, and the U.A.E. tend to offer top speeds for all technologies and 5G, especially for tourists coming from within the region.

Performance differences between countries and operators can stem from technical and commercial factors. Roamers’ experience can degrade if home operators impose data speed and usage limitations to manage costs, prevent bill shocks, or favor certain operators for roaming. Host operators can also restrict roamers’ full-capacity access to avoid network congestion. 

To ensure optimal visitor experiences and maximize potential revenue from increased traffic, some guest and host operators should review roaming agreements, offer speed-tiered tariffs, and alleviate speed caps. Domestic operators can also address roaming charge concerns by offering local SIMs. For instance, tourists arriving in the UAE receive a free local SIM at Dubai airport. Maintaining roaming high charges and applying speed or data caps might push users towards eSIM options, where operators have less control over their experience.

Ookla provides unique insights into inbound and outbound roamers’ experiences and conducts country-level and operator-level benchmarks. If you want to learn more about Speedtest Intelligence, please contact us.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| February 16, 2025

5G in High Places: Indoor Coverage Across the World's Iconic Skyscrapers

Skyscrapers are not just architectural achievements; they also test the limits of telecommunications and connectivity systems. These structures highlight both the obstacles and innovations required for seamless connectivity in high-rise environments. This report, using data from Cell Analytics™, benchmarks the 5G indoor coverage experience in nine of the world’s most iconic buildings by analyzing the average Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) and Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ), providing critical insights into the signal strength and quality that subscribers experience within these architectural marvels.

Icons That Shape Skylines

Modern skyscrapers are more than just towering structures—they shape city skylines, serve as commercial and cultural hubs, and play a crucial role in defining a nation’s global presence. Their impact also goes beyond aesthetics. They contribute significantly to a city’s economy by attracting businesses, investors, and tourists. For example, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai has helped position the city as a global business and tourism hub, drawing millions of visitors each year. Similarly, the Empire State Building in New York remains a historic landmark and one of the most visited tourist attractions in the world.

Using Ookla® Cell Analytics™ data, we analyzed nine of the most iconic buildings in the world, recognized for their unique architectural designs, global influence, and economic and cultural significance.

Chart of select skyscrapers of the world by height and significance

Most skyscrapers provide strong signal strength but coverage gaps still exist

Drilling down into data at the individual building from the second half of 2024, we evaluated subscribers’ 5G indoor experience by measuring the average Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) and Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ). RSRP represents the network signal strength received by a mobile phone. An RSRP value that exceeds -90 dBm indicates superior coverage. If the signal strength is between -90 dBm and -100 dBm, then network coverage is considered good. Below this range, expect slower download speeds and potential network disconnections. RSRQ is a metric used to evaluate the quality of the reference signal received by a device. A value of -10 dB or higher indicates excellent network quality while a value between -10 dB and -15 dB is considered good. An RSRQ value lower than -15 dB is poor or indicates no signal at all.

Overall, the ​​5G indoor coverage across the nine skyscrapers reveals that most buildings provide superior 5G signal strength, as well as excellent network quality. However, some still face challenges in ensuring consistent connectivity. Shanghai Tower recorded the strongest 5G signal among all buildings, with a weighted average RSRP of -71.04 dBm of all samples detected inside the building. This suggests a well-optimized indoor network, likely supported by China’s extensive 5G infrastructure. As China is one of the major leaders in 5G deployment, major urban centers like Shanghai benefit from advanced indoor network solutions, such as small cells and distributed antenna systems (DAS), ensuring strong coverage even in high-rise environments.

Burj Khalifa in UAE, and the Empire State Building New York City, showed strong 5G coverage, with average RSRP values of -85.53 dBm and -83.19 dBm, respectively. Both buildings also reported very good signal quality, with an average RSRQ of -11.07 dB and -11.95 dB respectively. The Empire State Building, completed in 1931, has undergone modernization efforts to enhance its telecommunications infrastructure. Similarly, the Burj Khalifa benefits from Dubai’s extensive 5G rollout, with the UAE ranking among the top countries in 5G performance.

The Shard in London reported the weakest 5G coverage among the selected buildings, with an average RSRP of -96.69 dBm. The Shard’s glass-heavy design may contribute to this weaker performance, as glass can reflect and absorb mobile signals. The building also reported a much weaker signal strength in the lower 10% with RSRP value of -113 dBM, indicating that in certain areas of the building, users are experiencing poor 5G coverage and quality.

Taipei 101 and the Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur, showed good average 5G RSRP but experienced weaker signals in certain areas. The lower 10% RSRP values for both buildings were below -100 dBm (-105.00 dBm for Taipei 101 and -101.00 dBm for Petronas Twin Towers), suggesting that parts of these buildings may suffer from inconsistent coverage. Taipei 101 was designed to withstand earthquakes and typhoons, incorporating thick concrete and reinforced steel, which can interfere with mobile signals. While the Petronas Twin Towers currently lack a dedicated indoor 5G coverage solution.

One World Trade Center in New York City and Autograph Tower in Jakarta had similar 5G characteristics, with very good average RSRP around -85 dBm or better, but the reported lower 10% values suggest potential dead zones or weaker coverage in some areas.

From lobby to observation deck

Using Cell Analytics data, we compared the 5G the average RSRP and RSRQ at two different height levels in each skyscraper: Bottom 10% of the building height, which represents coverage on the lower floors, based on samples collected closest to the ground floor, and Top 10% of the building height, which represents the highest levels, based on samples collected at the floors nearest to the top of the building.

Several skyscrapers showed minimal differences in 5G signal strength and quality between the lowest and highest floors. Burj Khalifa, One World Trade Center, Taipei 101, and the Empire State Building all had RSRP variations of 3 dBm or less between measurements taken at the bottom and top levels. The Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world at 828 meters, reported a slight improvement from -77.09 dBm at the lower floors to -76.30 dBm at the top.

Burj Khalifa, Taipei 101, and the Empire State Building also reported consistent 5G RSRQ between their lower and top floors, indicating stable 5G network quality. All four buildings have high-altitude observation decks, where strong 5G coverage is essential for tourists, businesses, and building operations.

In contrast, some skyscrapers exhibited noticeably larger differences between the lower and top floors RSRP and RSRQ, with weaker 5G signals at their higher levels. Petronas Twin Towers, Lotte World Tower, and Autograph Tower all showed a significant decline in signal strength as elevation increased. Petronas Twin Towers recorded a relatively strong -80.44 dBm at nearer to ground levels, but this dropped to -92.67 dBm at the top. This is mainly due to the lack of a dedicated indoor 5G coverage solution, with most 5G signals coming from outdoor cell towers. Similarly, the RSRP at Lotte World Tower fell from -71.14 dBm at the lower floors to -92.54 dBm for samples at the highest point. This suggests that while the lower sections of these buildings benefit from stronger 5G coverage, the network infrastructure at the upper floors may not be as robust.

Reliable 5G coverage in skyscrapers requires targeted network solutions

Skyscrapers play a key role in modern cities as business hubs, residential spaces, and major tourist attractions, making strong indoor 5G coverage essential. Tourists visiting observation decks, businesses operating in high-rise offices, and residents in skyscraper apartments all require seamless connectivity for work, communication, and entertainment. However, the primary challenge lies in delivering consistent performance and quality across various indoor settings, where issues may be confined to certain floors or sections. Modern building materials, such as low-emissivity (Low-E) glass, can significantly impact 5G signal attenuation by blocking or reflecting radio frequencies, especially in high-frequency bands like mmWave.

These challenges highlight the need for dedicated indoor solutions such as small cell deployments, distributed antenna systems (DAS), and enhanced in-building network infrastructure. An alternative to deploying in-building 5G systems is to selectively offload usage to Wi-Fi provided these systems are designed, optimized, and operated to deliver an equivalent quality of experience – this can be done using Ekahau.

As 5G continues to evolve, telecom providers and building developers must work together to improve indoor network quality, ensuring that users at all levels of a skyscraper experience fast, stable, and uninterrupted connectivity. For operators, 5G indoor deployments are a strategic avenue to monetize their investments through advances such as massive IoT (IoT), enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), and fixed wireless access (FWA), which will all play an important role in transformation across sectors such as industrial automation, retail applications, and smart cities.

Ookla can assist operators in identifying buildings or indoor venues with coverage or capacity issues using crowdsourced data and diagnosis. Powered by millions of signal measurements collected daily by Speedtest®, Cell Analytics provides intelligence about wireless service quality, RF measurements, data usage, user density, cell site locations, and much more. To find out more about Cell Analytics, please get in touch.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| October 8, 2023

Gulf ISPs should help fiber customers upgrade and configure their Wi-Fi routers to deliver faster speeds

Gulf countries improved fiber coverage and adoption by investing in fixed infrastructure, raising entry-level speeds, and making fiber services more affordable. Their efforts paid off, as evidenced by their improved position in Ookla’s Speedtest Global Index™. However, the persistent use of legacy and underperforming Wi-Fi standards in home networks can hamper efforts to provide the best network experience to customers.

Key messages

  • Wi-Fi 4 is still prevalent in the region which limits fiber’s potential. Many customers cannot get close to headline fixed broadband speeds because of the widespread use of Wi-Fi 4. Indeed, more than one-third of Speedtest® samples during Q2 2023 were using this old Wi-Fi standard. That means that a sizable proportion of users are not utilizing broadband services to their full potential.
  • Migrating to modern Wi-Fi standards can bring significant speed gains. On average, customers who used Wi-Fi 5 had a median download speed that was more than five times higher than those on Wi-Fi 4 in Q2 2023. Likewise, the speed over Wi-Fi 6 was 1.2 times faster on average than with Wi-Fi 5. Therefore, fixed broadband subscribers in the Gulf (most of whom use fiber services) with routers that only support Wi-Fi 4 would benefit the most from a CPE (Customer Premise Equipment) upgrade.
  • ISPs should do more to ensure their customers’ routers and smartphones are configured correctly. Even if consumers in the Gulf region own modern smartphones and Wi-Fi routers, they may still unknowingly use Wi-Fi 4 due to device misconfiguration and coverage constraints. ISPs can help educate consumers about how to correctly set up their home Wi-Fi routers and offer solutions to improve their indoor connectivity in order to use the more efficient 5 GHz spectrum band.

Most Gulf countries improved their global fixed broadband speed ranking since 2020

The GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) region which comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. leads the Middle East in fiber coverage and adoption. Local ISPs, backed by the government, accelerated fiber roll-outs to keep pace with the demand for data services and to ensure universal access to high-speed internet as part of national broadband development strategies. According to the FTTH Council industry body, the U.A.E. topped the global rankings for fiber household coverage, reaching 98.1% in September 2022, a position it has maintained since 2016. Qatar closely followed in the second position with 97.8% coverage.

These two GCC countries ranked ahead of Singapore (96.5%), Hong Kong (91.6%), and China (89.4%). In Bahrain, meanwhile, more than 88% of households were connected to the fiber infrastructure, whereas fiber coverage exceeded 60% in Saudi Arabia and reached 52% in Oman.

According to Speedtest Intelligence®, the U.A.E. leads the Gulf region in median download speeds at 236.67 Mbps in Q2 2023, a number that doubled since Q2 2022. Bahrain saw another story of improvement, with its median download speed reaching 70.17 Mbps, an increase of 46% year-on-year since Q2 2023. ISPs also saw significant improvements in upload speeds. Fixed upload speeds increased by 61% and 40% in Oman and Qatar, respectively, reaching 29.27 Mbps and 73.21 Mbps. Users in Bahrain experienced the biggest jump in median upload speed, which doubled between Q2 2022 and Q2 2023 to 20.37 Mbps.

As a result, most Gulf countries boosted their ranking in the Ookla Speedtest Global Index™. The U.A.E was ranked second in the Speedtest Global Index™ for median download speeds over fixed broadband in June 2023. Other GCC countries improved their rankings as well but trailed the U.A.E.

The telecom regulatory regimes and policies also helped, to different degrees, stimulate competition in the market, raise minimum broadband speeds, and reduce broadband tariffs. For example, in April 2023, Bahrain’s Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) approved an offer from BNET, the wholesale fixed infrastructure provider, to double the speed of entry-level fiber packages while maintaining the same wholesale prices. In the U.A.E., Etisalat by e& and du increased minimum download speeds to 500 Mbps and offered discounts on higher-tier fiber plans in 2022. 

Wi-Fi 4 is still prevalent in the region which limits fiber’s potential

The choice of Wi-Fi standards and spectrum bands has a direct impact on connectivity quality, throughput, and network coverage. Indeed, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) significantly increases the maximum theoretical throughput speed of the access point to 3.5 Gbps, compared to 600 Mbps supported by the old Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) standard. 

Wi-Fi 6/6E (802.11ax) supports even faster maximum data rates (up to 9.6 Gbps) and lower latency than earlier generations. It also combines 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz spectrum bands and wider channels for better throughput and less interference. Note that achievable speeds in real life will be much lower than these theoretical limits because of signal attenuation, interference, and the hardware and software variety of connected devices.

The rest of the analysis focuses on the most penetrated fiber markets in the region: Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. We used the percentage of samples that used a particular Wi-Fi standard and frequency band when connecting to the CPE as a proxy for their adoption by wired broadband customers in each country. We assume that most of the results reflect the performance of fiber services given that fiber represents the majority of fixed broadband connections in these four markets.

Our results show that more than one-third of test samples reported using Wi-Fi 4 to connect to the fixed CPE, but this varies considerably by country. Bahrain has the highest incidence of samples that use Wi-Fi 4 and the lowest proportion of Wi-Fi 6. Wi-Fi 4 was more prevalent in the U.A.E. than Wi-Fi 6 (30.8% compared to 17.2% in Q2 2023). This suggests that the ISPs have an opportunity to improve the network experience for nearly a third of their customer base and extend their lead in the speed leaderboard if they can address that CPE speed bottleneck.

The distribution of samples by Wi-Fi standard is largely similar between the U.A.E and Saudi Arabia. The minimum broadband speed currently offered by ISPs in Saudi Arabia is 100 Mbps, while the median download speed on fixed broadband measured by Speedtest Intelligence data was 93.85 Mbps in Q2 2023. This suggests that many customers might still be on legacy, lower-speed plans, but the more likely case is that home Wi-Fi CPEs are limiting speeds in users’ homes. Indeed, 40.2% of Speedtest samples used Wi-Fi 4 in Saudi Arabia, limiting maximum achievable speeds.

Chart of Share of Wi-Fi Samples by Generation in Gulf Countries

Migrating to modern Wi-Fi standards can bring significant speed gains

Consumer-initiated speed tests confirm that users’ experience of network speed is significantly affected by how their devices connect to Wi-Fi access points. The chart below shows the median download speed distribution by Wi-Fi standard used.

Chart of Median Download Speed by Wi-Fi Generation in Gulf Countries

Median download speeds for devices that use Wi-Fi 4 topped out at 37.18 Mbps in Bahrain, and dropped to a low of 28.47 Mbps in Saudi Arabia. Contrary to what some might think, speed improvements were far more pronounced when looking at results on Wi-Fi 4 compared to those on Wi-Fi 5, rather than comparing speeds on Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 6. Users who connected to Wi-Fi 5 had a median download speed that was more than five times higher on average than those on Wi-Fi 4. While download speeds over Wi-Fi 6 were 1.2 times faster than with Wi-Fi 5.

Wi-Fi 5 users in the UAE had the largest speed lead over Wi-Fi 4 users (6.5x). With Wi-Fi 6, median download speeds more than doubled to 251.68 Mbps for users in Qatar compared to those on Wi-Fi 5. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia were outliers, with speeds largely similar regardless of whether test samples were with Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6. This is because these three countries have the lowest reported median download speeds (below 100 Mbps), and many users who consider upgrading from Wi-Fi 5 to Wi-Fi 6 are unlikely to see a difference in their home network performance.

Looking at the performance of the fastest 10% samples in Q2 2023 reveals a more significant potential speed uplift for data-heavy users when using modern Wi-Fi standards. Users in the top 10% of our results experience the best performance, so it is possible to gauge from their results what speeds are achievable with each Wi-Fi standard. To that end, the median download speed of the 10th percentile results on Wi-Fi 4 users across Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the U.A.E. was 71.60 Mbps, compared to 330.91 Mbps on Wi-Fi 5 and 693.48 Mbps on Wi-Fi 6. Wi-Fi 5 was 2.7x faster than Wi-Fi 4 in Bahrain and 5.9x faster in Qatar, while the speed ratios of Wi-Fi 6 to Wi-Fi 5 ranged from 1.2 in Saudi Arabia to 1.9 in the UAE.

Given the clear performance advantages of Wi-Fi 5, ISPs should encourage customers to migrate from Wi-Fi 4 to Wi-Fi 5 because it will significantly impact the end-user network experience. It’s also important to note that our data confirms that fiber broadband subscribers who continue using Wi-Fi 4 are the most penalized, especially if they subscribe to a service that is advertised as offering hundreds of megabits per second.

Chart of Performance of Top 10% of Speedtest Samples by Wi-Fi Generation in Gulf Countries

The persistent usage of legacy Wi-Fi is likely due to incorrectly configured routers

Huawei and TP-Link are the top router brands reported by Gulf users utilizing Wi-Fi 4. However, their popularity can vary vastly by market depending on the equipment bundled by ISPs with their broadband offerings, as well as the ability of consumers to use third-party routers (some ISPs allow only their own routers). Our data shows that Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have the highest proportion of samples connected to a Huawei CPE. TP-Link routers are most common in Qatar and the U.A.E.

The U.A.E. has the highest proportion of routers from D-Link, Cisco, and less popular brands used with Wi-Fi 4 (nearly 64% of samples reported using ‘other’ manufacturers). This high level of market fragmentation is likely due to users replacing routers provided by their ISP or installing refurbished routers to extend coverage indoors. Such fragmentation complicates the task of ISPs to ensure that their customers use more recent routers or that they configure them correctly to use more modern Wi-Fi standards.

Chart of Wi-Fi 4 Router Market Share by Manufacturer in Gulf Countries

Our research showed that most commercial CPEs in the region introduced since 2020 likely support Wi-Fi 5 (if not Wi-Fi 6). Further, tests also showed that most Android-based smartphones that used Wi-Fi 4 were equipped with Wi-Fi 5-capable chipsets. Therefore, many users in the region are capable of using Wi-Fi 5 but are still on Wi-Fi 4. We believe that misconfigured routers could be the primary cause of such a high prevalence of legacy Wi-Fi 4 technology among Gulf countries.

ISPs can address the factors that favor Wi-Fi 4 and 2.4 GHz spectrum usage, for example, by working more closely with device manufacturers, supporting customers to acquire newer Wi-Fi routers, and correctly configuring them, as shown in the table below. 

Factors that lead to Wi-Fi 4 usage and how ISPs can address them

Legacy equipment
  • Some fixed broadband customers are locked into long service contracts and are not eligible for router upgrades
  • ISPs may not offer newer routers to existing customers whose contracts are automatically renewed
Solutions
  • Encourage existing broadband customers to upgrade to faster fiber packages to benefit from modern Wi-Fi routers
  • Offer customers the option to replace their old Wi-Fi routers for free or for a small fee during their contract
Configuration issues
  • Routers may, by default, use older Wi-Fi standards or diactivate the 5 GHz band
  • Some routers are pre-configured to use the same network name for both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, and some devices may not handle this well
  • Some old mobile devices latch to 2.4 GHz (which is more likely used by Wi-Fi 4) on first-run but do not switch back to 5 GHz due to firmware limitations or a hardware/software setting in the router/end-user devices
Solutions
  • Work with OEMs to push firmware and software updates to prioritize newer Wi-Fi standards and the use of 5 Ghz over 2.4 GHz
  • Educate customers about the importance of updating the router’s firmware and smartphone software
  • Preconfigure the routers to have separate names for the 2.4 GHz and the 5 GHz bands
  • Offer routers that can automatically select the optimal Wi-Fi channel and band to improve performance
Coverage and performance issues
  • Distance from CPE, physical obstruction, and interference in the crowded 2.4 GHz band
Solutions
  • Offer Wi-Fi extenders to improve indoor coverage
  • Share best practices with customers on the configuration and placement of the router

Gulf-based IPSs have managed to rapidly grow their fiber footprint and migrate their customers to faster broadband services. However, a substantial portion of subscribers may not benefit from these speed increases due to the prevailing usage of Wi-Fi 4. As many ISPs in the region already offer a minimum fiber speed of 250 Mbps, they should, as a priority, migrate existing customers with legacy Wi-Fi routers to more modern models and educate customers with newer routers on how to correctly configure them. ISPs’ efforts to introduce newer CPEs will help improve the end-user experience, boost global speed rankings in the region, and ensure that their routers are more future-proof as gigabit speeds become more widespread.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.