| August 1, 2017

How Fast is the Internet at the Busiest Airports in Australia?

Almost all the way through our tour of internet speeds at the busiest airports in the world we find ourselves in Australia. With the delightful distinction of being both a continent and a country, we were able to look at more airports here than in any other country except the U.S. We’re proud to present data on which of Australia’s six busiest airports has the fastest free airport Wi-Fi and cellular speeds based on Speedtest data from March-May 2017.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

There is some seriously fast free airport Wi-Fi in some parts of Australia.


In fact, download speed on the free airport Wi-Fi at Gold Coast Airport is faster even than that in Denver, which was previously the fastest seen of all the airports we analyzed around the world. Denver still has faster uploads, though—barely. The download speed at Perth Airport is also excellent and flyers who travel through Brisbane and Melbourne should also be able to use the free airport Wi-Fi with no complaints about speed.

All of these airports offer faster downloads over Wi-Fi than Australia’s average speed of 20.77 Mbps for downloads over mobile Wi-Fi.

The story is very different in Adelaide and Sydney, however. Download speeds at airports in both cities are as slow as they are at Shanghai Pudong International Airport and at Gatwick Airport. The connections are fast enough for basic emails and likely some social updates, but you will not want to try streaming video or catching a last minute client video conference.

Fastest airport cell

Cellular download speeds, on the other hand, are universally good at the airports we looked at in Australia. Taken as a group, they’re almost as good as the speeds we saw at airports in Canada and better on average than cellular speeds at airports we’ve surveyed on any other continent.


Although cellular downloads at Brisbane Airport are 35% faster than those at Gold Coast Airport, download speeds at almost every airport we analyzed outpaced the average cellular download speed in Australia of 41.96 Mbps. And Gold Coast Airport was not too far behind that average.

Wi-Fi or cell?


Face it, unless you’re trying to use the free airport Wi-Fi at airports in Adelaide or Sydney, there’s not a bad choice in the bunch. Wi-Fi at Gold Coast Airport and Perth Airport is so amazingly good that you probably want to use it because you can. And Brisbane Airport’s cellular download speed is 74% faster than their already good Wi-Fi download speed, while cellular downloads are 115% faster at Melbourne Airport than those over Wi-Fi. But for the most part, Australians and travelers to Australia will be very, very happy with internet performance at the airports we analyzed.

Regional trends

New South Wales

The airport in Sydney has a strong showings for cellular download speeds but the Wi-Fi download speed seriously suffers.

Queensland

Gold Coast and Brisbane Airports are very close to one another and both take top marks among airports we’ve analyzed—Gold Coast Airport for fastest Wi-Fi download speed in Australia (and the world) and Brisbane Airport for fastest cellular download speed in Australia.

South Australia

The only airport we examined in South Australia, Adelaide Airport had the second to worst download speed over free airport Wi-Fi in the country. Thankfully, the cellular download speed outpaces the country average.

Victoria

Melbourne’s airport performed well for cellular download speeds. The Wi-Fi download speed, albeit strong, is on the slow side among Australia’s busiest airports.

Western Australia

Perth Airport holds its own way out west with very fast Wi-Fi downloads and fast cellular downloads.

We’d love to present data from Australian airports that are farther afield like Darwin and Hobart on our next go round. If you’re traveling through, please take a Speedtest on Android or iOS to discover internet speeds and help us gather data about the best and worst Wi-Fi and cellular experiences.

Editor’s note: This article was amended on August 2, 2017 to correct a geographical error.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| July 19, 2017

Ranking the Busiest Airports in South America by Internet Speed

Whether you’ve been closely following our fastest airports on every continent series or you’re simply headed to the southern hemisphere for a little winter in your summer, you must be dying to know which airports have the fastest free Wi-Fi and where you should use cellular service instead. Without further ado, Speedtest data from March through May 2017 reveals which of the busiest airports in South America is also the fastest.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

São Paulo/Congonhas Airport has the fastest download speed over free airport Wi-Fi of all the airports we looked at in South America. And their upload speed is even faster. Compared with Brazil’s country-wide download speed over mobile Wi-Fi of 13.79 Mbps, travelers using the Wi-Fi at Congonhas should be able to enjoy the best that the internet offers while waiting for connecting flights.


Average download speeds over free Wi-Fi at the rest of the busiest airports in South America are similar to those in much of Europe or Africa. And that’s not a good thing. Some of the download speeds, like those at second-place Jorge Chávez International Airport in Lima and Bogotȧ’s El Dorado International, are serviceable. But those at airports in Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Brasília, Brazil; Buenos Aires, Argentina and Caracas, Venezuela are likely to leave you daydreaming about faster service while you wait for your pages to load.

This is less surprising in Venezuela where the average download speed over Wi-Fi is 3.18 Mbps than it is in Colombia (9.05 Mbps) or Argentina (10.86 Mbps) during the same time period analyzed. Lima’s airport download speed is slightly faster than the Peruvian average of 10.68 Mbps while the Wi-Fi download speed at Chile’s busiest airport falls far behind that of the country as a whole (26.23 Mbps).

On the other hand, the Wi-Fi upload speed at Bogotȧ’s airport is remarkably fast.

Fastest airport cell

With just over a 10 Mbps difference between fastest and slowest, cellular download speeds at the busiest airports in South America fell into a much narrower band than those on any other continent we’ve surveyed so far. Upload speeds are even more similar to one another with less than 6 Mbps separating the fastest airport from the slowest.


Tancredo Neves/Confins International Airport in Belo Horizonte had the fastest cellular download speed of any of the airports we looked at in South America. The download speed there is nearly twice as fast as the 13.70 Mbps average for Brazil as a whole during the same period. Jorge Chávez International Airport in Lima had the fastest upload speed.

Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport in Santiago, Chile took second place for both download and upload speeds over cellular. The download speed at the airport is 22% faster than Chile’s average cellular download speed of 16.23 Mbps.

The cellular download speed at Simón Bolívar International Airport in Caracas is 75% faster than Venezuela’s country average of 8.89 Mbps. Meanwhile, the airports we surveyed in Lima, Peru and Bogotȧ, Colombia both have slower download speeds than their country averages. The average cellular speed for Peru as a whole was 16.97 Mbps. In Colombia it was 14.76 Mbps.

Only at Jorge Newbery Airfield in Buenos Aires, Argentina was the cellular download speed almost exactly the same as the country’s average of 12.06 Mbps.

Wi-Fi or cell?

Unless you’re traveling through São Paulo/Congonhas Airport, cellular service is a much better choice than Wi-Fi at South America’s busiest airports. In many cases, cellular download speeds are several times faster than those over Wi-Fi.


Regional trends

Brazil

Brazil has decent cellular speeds, but their Wi-Fi speeds are all over the map. Avoid the Wi-Fi in Belo Horizonte or Brasília. While at São Paulo/Congonhas Airport the Wi-Fi is your best bet as the speeds are the fastest we saw at any airport in South America on either cell or Wi-Fi.

Andean States

Cellular download speeds at airports in Colombia, Peru and Venezuela are perfectly workable. In each of the airports we looked at in this region, cellular downloads are significantly faster than Wi-Fi. Especially in Venezuela where the Wi-Fi download speed is as awful as you might expect in a politically unstable country.

Southern Cone

Airport internet in the two Southern Cone countries we examined differed widely. Although neither Chile nor Argentina had fast free Wi-Fi in their major airports, downloads over free airport Wi-Fi were especially slow in Buenos Aires. And cellular downloads in Chile’s busiest airport were 62% faster than those at Jorge Newbery Airfield in Argentina.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| July 17, 2017

#FarFlungInternet: Exploring Internet Performance at the Edge of the Earth

These days we expect the internet to be with us wherever we go. We catch up on emails on the bus, video chat with the fam on business trips, and check out cafes from our phones while on vacation. But there are still a few places on Earth we think of as flat-out inaccessible—as too remote even to connect to the world wide web.

You might be surprised, then, to know how far-flung the Speedtest results we see truly are. From the isolated to the uninhabited, we’re curious about what the internet looks like in unusual places. In honor of the summer travel season, we are sharing data on some of the most interesting and far-out tests we’ve ever seen with #FarFlungInternet. And we’re starting with Mt. Everest.

What’s the internet like at Mt. Everest?

Mountaineers train (and save) for years to finally summit this epic peak. But they don’t leave the internet behind until they’ve departed base camp. Somewhere between excited emails and social posts, some of these climbers are taking a Speedtest. Here’s what the internet looks like at 18,000 ft. in the Himalayas.

South Base Camp

<Td “> April 9, 2017
12.49
10.10
31
Everest Link
12.53
9.53
29
Everest Link
9.51
10.70
38
Everest Link
1.67
2.67
39
Everest Link
6.59
11.99
46
Everest Link

 Test date Download (Mbps) Upload (Mbps) Ping ISP
April 9, 2017
April 9, 2017
April 15, 2017
April 27, 2017

Everest Link bills itself as “Extreme Internet” and we’d have to say they’re right. With more than 200 Wi-Fi hotspots located in more than 40 villages in Nepal, they not only have the highest network in the world, they probably have one of the most difficult working zones as well—including below freezing temperatures and low oxygen levels. And because their access points are so remote, they rely on solar power, the only electricity source available. Everest Link CEO Tsering G. Sherpa describes the setup at the Everest South Base Camp by saying, “at 5,320 meters altitude we have a solar powered cnPilot E500 outdoor Wi-Fi hotspot” using a TP 650 wireless backhaul from Cambium Networks.

Everest Link is the only ISP we saw data from at Everest’s South Base Camp and the speeds were much better than we expected. We don’t know if the camp got more crowded on those later dates or if something else happened, but there is internet on Everest. Even if the ping’s a little slow.

Our analysis spanning June 2016-June 2017 turned up only those five tests in April 2017, likely because that’s the peak of climbing season for Everest. We also checked for Speedtest results from the North Base Camp in Tibet, but found none. That doesn’t mean there’s no Wi-Fi up there, but it does mean we can’t verify the speed of anything offered.

How you can contribute to #FarFlungInternet

If you’re going someplace way off the beaten path this summer, take a Speedtest and share your results and location with us on Facebook or Twitter.

  1. Take a Speedtest on your mobile device with the Android or iOS app
  2. Click the results share icon
  3. Select Facebook or Twitter
  4. Add your location and #FarFlungInternet to the autogenerated message
  5. Post away

Not only are we excited to see parts of the world we may never get to visit, but we also really want to understand what the internet is like outside our daily lives. So, be sure to share your findings with us so we can share them with the world.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| July 12, 2017

Analyzing Internet Speeds at the Busiest Airports in North America

The last time we analyzed internet speeds at airports in North America, we focused entirely on the busiest airports in the U.S. As part of our series on the fastest airports around the world, this time we’re expanding to include the busiest airports across the entire North American continent.

Using Speedtest data from March-May 2017, we’re ranking free airport Wi-Fi and cellular speeds at 30 airports from Calgary to Panamá City. For airports we’ve examined before, we’ve also included details on how much their speeds have improved, or (sadly) declined.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

Free airport Wi-Fi is clearly an expectation travelers have at North American airports and many airports are rising to the challenge. Once again, Denver International’s Wi-Fi is fast. In fact, downloads at Denver’s airport are 27% faster than the last time we crunched the numbers. Even better, it’s the fastest Wi-Fi we’ve seen at any airport on the planet. Second fastest in North America and (as far as airports we’ve examined in Africa, Asia, Europe and North America) second fastest in the world is Vancouver International Airport.


Flyers at international airports in Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle-Tacoma and Calgary should also be delighted with the free airport Wi-Fi they see at those hubs—all of which are faster than any free airport Wi-Fi we saw in Asia, Europe or Africa. Though mostly slower than the average mobile Wi-Fi download speed in the U.S. (57.31 Mbps) and Canada (51.17 Mbps), travelers at these airports should have no complaints about Wi-Fi speeds.

Wi-Fi download speeds at airports in Boston, Dallas-Fort Worth and Mexico City are about as fast as those in Moscow or Seoul. Miami’s speed is similar to that in Delhi. Meanwhile the speeds in Toronto, Atlanta and Montréal were slower than any Wi-Fi we saw in Africa, though comparable to many airports in China. The Wi-Fi at Benito Juárez is 87% faster than Mexico’s country average for mobile Wi-Fi of 14.81 Mbps.

We were delighted to see how much some airports had improved their Wi-Fi download speeds in the last 6 months. San Francisco, in particular, offered a 718% improvement. Boston was up 283%, LaGuardia increased 145% and Orlando 124%. And then there are the airports where Wi-Fi got slower: Miami, Chicago, and Newark all saw double-digit drops.

We saw no tests on the published free airport Wi-Fi SSIDs in San Salvador, Cancún, Panamá City and San José. Guadalajara did not seem to have free airport Wi-Fi.

Fastest airport cell

Canada’s airports rule when it comes to the fastest cellular service at airports in North America. Of the top five airports with the fastest download speeds over cellular, only one (Detroit) is located in the U.S., and pretty close to the Canadian border at that. That makes sense considering Canada has the fastest cellular download speeds for the country as a whole (33.40 Mbps) of any of the countries included in this analysis. Vancouver and Toronto had particularly fast cellular download speeds, faster than any other airports we’ve examined, including those in Munich or Rome.


Of the next 10 fastest airports for cellular downloads, Mexico City is the only one not in the U.S. Ranging from nearly 20 Mbps to just over 30 Mbps, download speeds at these airports most closely resemble those in South Africa.

It’s a little surprising how many major U.S. airports have cellular download speeds that are about half as slow as the country-wide average of 22.64 Mbps during the same time period. Monseñor Óscar Arnulfo Romero International Airport in San Salvador fares better with a download speed that’s more than twice as fast as the El Salvadorean average of 8.13 Mbps.

Elsewhere on the continent, airport speeds more closely mirror country averages. Of the airports we looked at in Mexico, both Benito Juárez and Guadalajara closely straddle the country average of 19.75 Mbps, while Cancún falls a little behind. Tocumen is only somewhat slower than the 13.03 Mbps average download speed in Panamá and Juan Santamaría International Airport in San José is barely above Costa Rica’s 3.37 Mbps.

The 60% improvement in cellular download speeds at Denver International is impressive and Phoenix Sky Harbor, LaGuardia, George Bush Metropolitan and Detroit Intercontinental all showed double-digit increases. Disappointing, though is the fact that cellular download speeds decreased at 9 of the 30 airports we’d previously surveyed.

Wi-Fi or cell?

The answer to this question very much varies depending on which airport you’re at, providing you’re somewhere that both free airport Wi-Fi and cellular service are available.


Canadian airports have such great cellular speeds that you can skip the Wi-Fi. Even though Wi-Fi is technically faster in Calgary. And you’re better off with Wi-Fi in Mexico City.

U.S. airports are all over the map when it comes to choosing Wi-Fi or cell. Nothing beats the Wi-Fi download speed at the Denver airport and, in general, Wi-Fi tends to be faster than cell speeds at airports in the western (but not southwestern) U.S. Wi-Fi is better than cell throughout the northeastern U.S. Meanwhile, airports from Houston to Orlando have better cellular service. But then you’re back to Wi-Fi in Miami.

Regional trends

Canada

Canada has great cellular speeds overall but the Wi-Fi varies a lot by airport. It’s poor at the two easternmost airports we looked at and wonderfully fast at the two westernmost airports.

Central America

Free Wi-Fi is a no-go at the Central American airports we looked at and cellular speeds varied widely depending on the country.

Mexico

Cellular service is a safe bet in Mexico. Though free Wi-Fi is faster at Benito Juárez International Airport, it’s either not available or untested at the other two airports we surveyed and the cellular speeds aren’t terrible at any of the three.

United States

Because we looked at so many airports in the U.S., it became difficult to draw larger trend lines through the data. Unless you’re at LaGuardia or LAX, cellular speeds are pretty good. Free Wi-Fi is generally available, though slow in Atlanta, Minneapolis, Orlando and Phoenix. We’re excited that cellular speeds are getting better in most places and mystified by the places where Wi-Fi is even slower than before.

Do these findings mirror your experience? Do you want us to check out other airports? Take a Speedtest on iOS or Android to help us all better understand internet performance around the globe.

Editor’s note: This article was updated on July 14, 2017 to include data on Vancouver Airport’s Wi-Fi once the SSID was confirmed.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| July 5, 2017

How Internet Speeds at African Airports Compare

Our investigations of free airport Wi-Fi were nearly grounded when we reached Africa. Not only is free airport Wi-Fi not universally available on the African continent, when you do find it, it’s often very slow and available for only limited periods of time. But digging into Speedtest data for March-May 2017, we did discover a few bright spots.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

Only five of the 10 busiest airports in Africa showed Speedtest results on free, publicly-available Wi-Fi during the time we surveyed. And three of those airports were in South Africa.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

Of those five airports, though, Casablanca’s Mohammed V International Airport wins download speed by far. At 33.46 Mbps, the airport Wi-Fi is faster than any airport we’ve seen in Africa or Europe, and faster than all of the airports in Asia except for Dubai. Upload speed is terrible, though, so if Rick wants to send Ilsa a few snapshots of their final meeting, he’s going to spend more than a little time watching that upload wheel spin.

South Africa’s free airport Wi-Fi is all managed by VAST, an open-access Wi-Fi infrastructure provider, which doesn’t explain why the download speed at Durban’s King Shaka International Airport is about half that in Cape Town, but the company does seem to offer a general band of speed for free service. We saw other, faster tests on VAST-related SSIDs and can only assume that these are the pay-to-play options that are available to users after their first four hours of free Wi-Fi have expired.

Though we found many reports of free airport Wi-Fi, we were not able to verify tests on published SSIDs for airports in Cairo, Addis Ababa, Nairobi, Lagos and Tunis. And as far as we can tell, there is no free, public Wi-Fi at the airport in Algiers. If we’re wrong, take a Speedtest using your phone on the airport Wi-Fi and share your results with us on Twitter or Facebook.

Fastest airport cell

The good news is that cellular service is available at all the busiest African airports. The better news is that download speeds are decent at eight out of 10 of those airports.

Fastest airport cell

Mobile downloads are slower at all three of South Africa’s major airports than the country average of 34.45 Mbps, but they are still three of the four fastest airports in Africa for mobile.

The mobile download speed at Tunis’ airport is nearly twice as fast as the country average of 15.08 Mbps while the speed at Lagos’ Murtala Muhammed is just over 50% faster than Nigeria’s average of 10.64 Mbps. And although the Houari Boumediene download speed is among the slowest on the list, it’s 68% faster than the average download speed in Algeria.

Nairobi Kenyatta’s mobile download speed is closer to the Kenyan average of 14.51 Mbps, and downloads at Casablanca’s Mohammed V are slightly slower than the Moroccan average of 16.54 Mbps.

The slowest airports on our list, Bole and Cairo, are both located in countries with some of the slowest mobile downloads we saw, with Ethiopia at 10.50 Mbps and Egypt at 7.68 Mbps.

Upload speeds overall are slow, but they are in the same range as airports in Asia and Europe and they should get you by for any normal usage.

Wi-Fi or cell?

At five of the African airports we examined, the choice between Wi-Fi and cellular service is a no-brainer because the free Wi-Fi just doesn’t exist.

Wi-Fi or cell?

Casablanca’s download speed over Wi-Fi is 120% faster than over cellular, but it’s alone in this distinction.

At all other airports in Africa, choose cellular downloads rather than the free Wi-Fi. Cellular services is 88% faster than Wi-Fi at the Cape Town airport, 96% at Johannesburg, 326% at Durban and 53% at Addis Ababa.

Regional trends

Northern Africa

On the whole, the airports we surveyed in Northern Africa offer slower cellular downloads than those elsewhere on the continent. Tunisia is the exception.

Northern African airports were also the least likely to offer free Wi-Fi with three out of four airports showing no Speedtest results over free airport Wi-Fi. Morocco is the exception here, not only because Casablanca offers free airport Wi-Fi, but because that Wi-Fi is the fastest we found on the entire continent.

Eastern Africa

We only surveyed two airports in Eastern Africa, but what they have in common is ranking at the bottom of the list for cellular download speeds. Addis Ababa offered Wi-Fi, albeit slow. Cairo did not.

Western, Central, and Southern Africa

Africa is a very large and diverse continent and so we only examined one airport apiece in Western and Southern Africa this time around. And because we were focused on the busiest airports in Africa, we didn’t look at any airports in Central Africa at all. We’re hesitant to draw any trend lines based on this limited data, but we are definitely interested to learn more about internet performance in Africa as a whole and at airports in Africa. If you want to show us what your experience of the internet in any part of Africa (or anywhere else) is like, take a Speedtest on Android or iOS.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| June 28, 2017

Seeking Out the Fastest Free Wi-Fi at European Airports

If Europe is on your travel itinerary this summer, you probably want to know which airports offer free Wi-Fi and whether the service is fast enough for you to handle all of life’s last minute details before jetting across the continent. We took a look at Speedtest data from March through May 2017 from twelve of Europe’s busiest airports to help you find out.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

It’s a good thing many airports in Europe offer paid Wi-Fi options if you want better speeds, because speeds on the free Wi-Fi everywhere besides Moscow and Munich are slow.

Moscow’s Sheremetyevo International Airport has the fastest free Wi-Fi in Europe, about equal to the mobile Wi-Fi country average in Russia of 27.96 Mbps, although you’ll need a Russian phone number to access the airport Wi-Fi.

Germany’s second busiest airport, Munich, comes in a close second. Both airports have even faster upload speeds than download, so you can spend your layover safely stowing those vacation pics in the cloud. Munich’s Wi-Fi is 36% slower than Germany’s average download speed over mobile Wi-Fi of 37.94 Mbps.

The rest of the airports offer speeds that are much slower than the average mobile Wi-Fi speeds in their respective countries: Spain (42.72 Mbps), the UK (41.98 Mbps), Italy (21.02 Mbps), and the Netherlands (57.07 Mbps).

For comparison, Hong Kong’s International Airport offers free Wi-Fi with an average speed of 8.93 Mbps while the three largest airports in mainland China offer service ranging from 2.40 to 3.72 Mbps. Those are the slowest airports in Asia, read about the fastest.

Oddly, we saw no Speedtest results in Istanbul’s Atatürk Airport or at either of Paris’ two airports on the published free airport Wi-FI SSIDs during the time we surveyed. At both Orly and Charles de Gaulle, though, we did see networks called “*WIFI-AIRPORT”. If those are indeed the free airport Wi-Fi networks, Charles de Gaulle would rank 7th in Europe at 2.33 Mbps and Orly would rank 8th at 2.32 Mbps.

You can help us get accurate speed data for those airports by taking a Speedtest using the airport’s free Wi-Fi.

Fastest airport cell

In cases where you can’t connect to Wi-Fi, you’ll be delighted to find that cellular service in these airports is much, much faster than the Wi-Fi.

Munich Airport has the fastest average download speed on cellular with Rome’s Fiumicino Airport and Istanbul’s Atatürk Airport ranking a very close second and third, respectively. And Istanbul has the fastest average upload speed on cell networks.

In many cases, cellular service at these airports is faster than average speeds in the country as a whole. The airports in Munich, Istanbul, and Moscow are all more than twice as fast as that in their respective countries of Germany (23.05 Mbps), Turkey (29.45 Mbps) and Russia (14.92 Mbps). Cell downloads at Rome’s Fiumincino Airport are 56% faster than Italy’s average of 32.52 Mbps over the same period.

The Spanish and British airports we surveyed offer download speeds that are loosely comparable to the averages in their respective countries: Spain’s average is 28.32 Mbps and the UK’s is 25.92 Mbps. Download speed at Paris’s two airports is harder to summarize with the speed at Charles de Gaulle 27% slower than the country average of 29.08 Mbps while Orly’s downloads coming in 54% slower than the country. And Amsterdam’s Schiphol download speed is only half as fast as that in the Netherlands overall (47.38 Mbps).

If you want to know more, read our full country reports on Germany, Turkey and the United Kingdom.

Wi-Fi or cell?

Given those painful Wi-Fi speeds, this is kind of a no-brainer, but we thought you might want to see just how slow the Wi-Fi is at various airports compared to the cellular service.

We omitted data about the Istanbul and Paris airports from these graphs because we can’t verify the Wi-Fi SSIDs, but you get the point: when in doubt in Europe, use cellular service rather than free airport Wi-Fi.

Regional trends

You might be surprised how similar and how different Wi-Fi and cellular service can be at two different airports in the same country or even the same city.

Heathrow vs. Gatwick

The free Wi-Fi at Heathrow and Gatwick is similarly bad but you’ll get faster downloads at Heathrow and slightly faster uploads at Gatwick.

Charles de Gaulle vs. Orly

Wi-Fi downloads at Charles de Gaulle and Orly on the *WIFI-AIRPORT are almost exactly as awfully slow as each other. But on cellular, Charles de Gaulle has significantly faster download and upload speeds.

Barcelona Airport vs. Madrid-Barajas

Barcelona Airport’s slow 5.72 Mbps download speed over Wi-Fi is more than twice as fast as the 2.11 Mbps at Madrid–Barajas Airport. When it comes to cellular, however, Madrid’s downloads are 28% faster and their uploads are 15% faster than those in Barcelona.

Frankfurt Airport vs. Munich Airport

Munich Airport’s Wi-Fi download speed is more than three times faster than Frankfurt’s and Munich’s upload speed is nearly two and a half times faster. Munich also shows an average download speed over cellular that is 67% faster than Frankfurt’s while Munich’s uploads are 59% faster.

If your experience of internet performance at European airports is different than what’s reported here, take a Speedtest on Android or iOS so we can see what you’re experiencing. We’ll be watching for big changes and reporting on them here.

Up next in our fastest airports in the world series, we’ll be looking at internet speeds at the busiest airports in Africa.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| June 27, 2017

Which Airport Has the Fastest Internet in Asia?

Travelers jetting off to Asia this summer will probably want to know whether you can connect to the internet upon landing and whether that internet is fast enough to help you nail down any final travel details before hitting the hotel and sleeping off the jet lag.

Using Speedtest data for March-May 2017, we analyzed the speeds of free airport Wi-Fi and local cellular signals at the busiest airports in Asia to see what your best options are and where you’re flat out of luck.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

Dubai reigns when it comes to free airport Wi-Fi. In fact, this airport has the fastest Wi-Fi we’ve seen at any airport in Asia, Europe or Africa. And their average upload speed is even faster than their download. Travelers to second-place Seoul are also in excellent shape if they need to connect to the internet while in transit.

Tokyo, Delhi and Singapore have decently fast download speeds over airport Wi-Fi while Bangkok’s and Hong Kong’s are merely okay. Sadly, the rest of the airports offer painfully slow free Wi-Fi.

You might think airport Wi-Fi is similar to the average mobile Wi-Fi speeds of the country, but instead some of the fastest countries — Singapore (111.59 Mbps), Hong Kong (63.70 Mbps) and China (47.64 Mbps) — have poor to average airport Wi-Fi speeds. Though sitting near the top of the airport Wi-Fi pack, South Korea’s 66.67 Mbps, Japan’s 42.00 Mbps and Thailand’s 30.48 Mbps country averages show the Wi-Fi at their premier airports could be a lot faster. India’s average download speed (12.39 Mbps) is right in line with the Wi-Fi at Indira Gandhi International Airport.

On the other end of the spectrum, the United Arab Emirates has clearly prioritized airport Wi-Fi because the Wi-Fi download speed at Dubai International is nearly double the country average of 22.12 Mbps.

Fastest airport cell

In countries including China and India, you can’t connect to the free airport Wi-Fi without an in-country mobile number, so we checked Speedtest results for users on cell networks as well.

The average mobile download speed at Singapore’s Changi Airport is nearly as fast as the country’s average of 46.12 Mbps. Considering Singapore ranks second fastest in the world for mobile downloads, that’s a hard speed to beat. Dubai also has wonderfully fast speeds, and they beat the country average of 29.81 Mbps.

East Asia’s airports form a strong middle of the pack with cellular download speeds ranging from 18.18 Mbps in Bangkok to 27.12 in Guangzhou. These are comparable to the country average mobile download speeds of 33.63 Mbps for China, 19.70 Mbps for Hong Kong, 18.48 for Japan, and 14.58 for Thailand. Flyers at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi Airport, though, will be sorely disappointed with the 5.85 Mbps on offer. But that’s only slightly slower than India’s 7.62 Mbps mobile download average.

Wi-Fi or cell?

If you’ve already nailed down your international SIM card options, you’re going to have a lot better luck in many parts of Asia on a cellular signal than you would using the free airport Wi-Fi.

Of course you’re in good shape either way in Dubai, Seoul’s Wi-Fi download speed is slightly faster than that on cell, and in India you’ll definitely want to use the airport Wi-Fi if you can access it. Everywhere else the local cell performance puts airport Wi-Fi to shame.

Regional trends

Southeast Asia

If you’re jet-setting through Southeast Asia, count on any time spent in the Singapore Airport for your internet needs and plan to enjoy a more disconnected experience in India and Thailand, especially if you don’t have an Indian phone number and have to rely on cell service at the Delhi airport.

East Asia

As mentioned above, all the airports we analyzed in China, Japan and Korea had strong cellular speeds. Tokyo’s Haneda Airport and Seoul’s Incheon Airport also had good download speeds over their free airport Wi-Fi networks. China’s free airport Wi-Fi, on the other hand, is varying degrees of slow.

China

Within China, Hong Kong has the fastest free airport Wi-Fi, but you will be much better off with cellular networks at any of the airports we surveyed in China. Guangzhou has the fastest average download on cell while Hong Kong is the slowest, but with averages between 22 Mbps and 28 Mbps, you should be just fine.

Watch this space for upcoming articles comparing Wi-Fi and cellular speeds at airports across the globe. Until then, if you think your local airport is over- (or under-) rated, take a Speedtest on Android or iOS and show us what you’re experiencing.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| May 3, 2017

Are You Gigabit Ready? 17 Tips to Help You Get the Highest Speeds Possible

The future of the internet is fast. Fourteen times faster than the 70 Mbps the US averaged for download speed in March, gigabit-speed fixed broadband is still rare, but it’s making appearances in locations over the globe. Before you get too attached to the idea of downloading 1 billion bits of data per second, know that getting gigabit service and adjusting your set-up to achieve top speeds is harder than you might think.

We’re here to offer a few tips to help you achieve the Speedtest results you dream of. Some of these will help you maximize your potential internet speeds even if gigabit is not available in your area.

Factors you can’t control

1. Is gigabit-level service available in your area?

While internet service providers (ISPs), municipalities and companies like Google have been making headlines with gigabit (the ability to download 1 billion bits of information in one second), service is still rare (and expensive).

Ask around to see if gigabit is available in your area. Google Fiber is one option in some cities. Also check with phone companies and smaller ISPs to see if they offer gigabit. Some forward-thinking governments in places like Longmont, CO; Grant County, WA and New Westminster, BC have even created their own fiber networks.

2. What kind of infrastructure is your service delivered over?

You’ll get the best speeds with fiber because you won’t have to deal with the noise or interference that occurs over copper lines. However, new coaxial technologies, namely DOCSIS 3.1, have the potential to provide gigabit speeds, but not symmetrically (see the next point). Finally, phone lines, used for DSL, absolutely won’t cut it at all.

Having fiber doesn’t mean you’ll automatically have gigabit; the service still needs to be available in your area and you’ll likely pay more for it.

3. Is the available service plan symmetrical?

That is, are the advertised download and upload speeds the same? This varies by ISP, but asymmetrical service is more likely over coaxial connections — symmetrical gigabit service requires the robustness of a fiber optic connection. Asymmetrical service can lead to bufferbloat.

4. Understand the network located upstream of you.

And the quality of that network matters. If your ISP’s central office doesn’t have the bandwidth to support all the gigabit connections in your area, everyone will see slower speeds during peak usage times.

This also applies to peer-to-peer connections. If you’re downloading games and/or streaming movies, your performance is impacted by both the quality of the network those applications are using and how fast those services allow content to be downloaded. Gigabit is great for ensuring that multiple users are having a consistent internet experience, but don’t expect to be downloading games from Steam at gigabit speeds.

5. Data overhead makes 1 Gbps a theoretical number.

Though perfect circumstances might allow you to send 1 billion bits of information per second, some of those bits are overhead (including preamble, inter-frame gaps and TCP) and your actual data throughput will be a little smaller. If there was no overhead, you might be able to achieve a Speedtest result of 997 Mbps, but you’re more likely to top out at 940 Mbps. For more details on the math, read this.

What you can control

6. Good quality wiring is essential.

To achieve the fastest speeds possible, the most important thing you can do is use Cat 6 ethernet wiring to connect your devices to your modem and/or router. Cat 5e can do it but you’ll get less crosstalk using Cat 6. Plus, if you’re going to spend the money on new cables, it’s worth future-proofing your investment. Cat 5e supports up to up to 1,000 Mbps while Cat 6 supports ten times that. Also don’t run your data cabling parallel to power lines — interference from the power lines can cause interference in the ethernet cabling.

7. Are both the ports and the CPU in your router gigabit-ready?

Read the fine print when choosing a router. Not every consumer-grade router can support gigabit speeds over the ports in the back. And sometimes the ports support gigabit but the router’s CPU can’t keep up. In general, x86 processors are fastest, followed by ARM and then MIPS. You still need to check this even if your router was provided by your ISP.

Typically you’ll find that recently-released and the more expensive consumer grade routers are up to the task. Here are two routers we recommend along with affiliate links to make your shopping easy:

  • Ubiquiti Edgerouter. The super advanced user will enjoy the pared-down customizability of this router. Many of the Ooklers use some version of this router. It doesn’t have Wi-Fi built in so be sure to get one or more compatible access points.
  • Velop Whole Home Wire Mesh. To set up your entire house at once, try this system. It comes pre-loaded with Speedtest so you can easily test your connection.

8. Use a hardwired connection.

While Wi-Fi technology is catching up, you’ll still likely see better speeds if you plug that Cat 6 ethernet cable directly into your computer.

9. Check your adapter.

Not all laptops have ethernet ports, so you’ll need an adapter for a hardwired connection. Make sure the adapter you’re using is gigabit capable. Thunderbolt and USB 3.0 adapters are usually good, but the performance of other adapters varies widely. And don’t forget, USB based adapters also add data overhead.

wifi wave animation

10. If you must use Wi-Fi, pick a clear channel and sit close to your router.

All kinds of things can interfere with your Wi-Fi signal and thereby slow down your connection: fluorescent bulbs, baby monitors or even a cheap pair of wireless headphones. This is critical for Wi-Fi performance as only one device can use the channel at a time. In addition, Wi-FI uses CSMA-CA to handle collisions — if it detects a collision on the channel, the Wi-Fi device will halt sending and wait until the channel is clear. Interference counts as collisions, so you will end up with a sporadic and halting connection with interference nearby.

If your connection is clear, attenuation (signal drop over distance) is a very real problem when using Wi-Fi. The 2.4 GHz band handles attenuation better but is more subject to interference. The 5GHz band is less subject to interference but has more issues with attenuation. Either way, you’re still likely only to achieve speeds topping out around 600 Mbps.

If you are on the 2.4 GHz band, make sure to chose from channels 1, 6, or 11 (or 14 if allowed by your country) — those are the only non-colliding channels at 20 MHz. At 40 MHz, you will pretty well consume the entire 2.4 channel spectrum, thus, it will be even more at risk of interference. For an illustration, click here.

11. Make sure your computer is using the latest Wi-Fi standards.

The nonprofit Wi-Fi Alliance keeps a close eye on these standards. In 2016 they announced Wi-Fi CERTIFIED ac standards which include Multi-User Multi-Input Multi-Output (MU-MIMO), 160MHz channels, quad-streams and extended 5GHz channel support. These standards change as technology improves, so check to make sure you’re working with the latest certifications. And just because your router supports these standards doesn’t mean your laptop or wireless device does.

spot illustration

12. Decipher the hype behind the marketing.

For example, a wireless router that says it can support 4 gigs doesn’t necessarily mean it can support one 4 Gbps connection. It’s more likely that the device has four radios with 1 Gbps specified maximums (real world performance is likely to be slower).

13. Stay up to date on router firmware, but don’t update on day zero.

Vendors regularly release software updates for their routers to improve their stability, performance and security. It’s usually always the best option to stay up to date with these firmware patches. With that said, many of us Ooklaers wait anywhere from a week to a month to apply these patches (assuming they are not critical security updates) to make sure there are not any regressions or issues.

14. Use our desktop apps to run your Speedtest.

If you’re sure your setup is perfect but you’re still not seeing the Speedtest result you expect, download our free desktop apps for Windows or MacOS. Many lower performance systems can’t reach 1 Gbps via browser tests due to various limitations. Plus our desktop apps give you data on jitter and packet loss.

Advanced options: For the tech savviest

15. Is your network interface card (NIC) up to the task?

Just being rated for 1000-Base-T may not be enough. NICs that use software offload instead of hardware offload are often found in older, cheaper computers and struggle to support gigabit speeds. Intel offers some of the best driver and hardware support on their NICs.

16. Encryption can be slow if it’s not done right.

Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) encryption, often enabled by default on Wi-Fi routers, will slow you doooowwwwn. Use Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) instead as it’s often hardware accelerated. The standard for WPA2 encryption, AES is both more secure and faster than TKIP. Some routers have TKIP options for compatibility reasons, though, even if you’re using WPA2, so check.

17. Turn off QoS shaping.

Quality of Service (QoS) shaping on a router can help you prevent large downloads from eating up all your bandwidth. But on consumer hardware, you’re also bypassing hardware acceleration so all your packets of data have to be inspected by the main CPU. This can cut your performance by 10x on a high bandwidth connection.

If you’ve gone this far and still want more, read how our lead systems engineer set up his non-gigabit connection to achieve super fast speeds

Is gigabit worth the trouble?

By now you’re probably thinking, “Getting the fastest internet speeds sure is a lot of work.” For some people hitting the maximum speed is worth any amount of work to get there. Others will be more than happy with the 300, 400 or 500 Mbps that they see on their gigabit plan with minimal tinkering.

Whether you’re gigabit ready or not, these tips will help you get the best speeds out of your internet connection now and in the future. Use this handy little list to keep track of all the steps:

If you answered “yes” to all of the above questions, congratulations! You’re now ready to unlock that superfast Speedtest result.


Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| March 21, 2017

Who has the Fastest Internet in the Sweet 16?

There’s nothing like the final seconds of a great basketball game. The squeak of custom shoes on the court, the hush of the crowd as that final free throw nears the basket. If you’re streaming the NCAA Basketball Championship over your school’s network, the speed of your connection determines whether you’re cheering in time with the rest of the world or if you have to wait a few agonizing moments longer to see if you made it to the next round.

The rules of the game

Examining Speedtest data on schools that made the Sweet 16, we checked download and upload speeds on the school’s network over the last 90 days. That includes desktop tests using our website and mobile tests taken over Wi-Fi. What we found is that being a top seed doesn’t guarantee you have fast internet.

Player of the year

There’s no debate that North Carolina brings it with amazing download and upload speeds. We know North Carolina’s tech sector is booming, but we did not know how much that has benefitted the Tar Heels. The internet is so fast that even if every single student at UNC Chapel Hill decides to stream the next game on their individual devices, buffering would not be a problem.

The Zags and Wolverines are in enviable shape for speeds too.

Ready for a rebound

The Boilermakers and Bruins are in a sweet spot to overtake the faster schools next year. With speeds like these, we’d expect students at Purdue and UCLA to have no trouble keeping up with the game, even in HD streaming.

Warming up

The (Arizona) Wildcats, Mountaineers, Badgers, Ducks and Bulldogs have solid download and upload speeds. We can’t say what Arizona, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Oregon and Butler have planned in terms of infrastructure upgrades in the near future, but students at these schools will probably be happy with the speeds they’re getting for at least the next year or two.

Delay of game

The slowest downloads we saw came from the Gamecocks, Jayhawks, Bears, Gators and (Kentucky) Wildcats. Let’s be real, though, we can’t cite any of the schools above for delay of game, because even Kentucky’s “slowest” download speed beats the US’s 70.01 Mbps average download speed over fixed broadband in the past thirty days.

We can say that the internet is an essential educational tool. While some of these schools are in good shape now, they’ll need to keep boosting their speeds to keep up with their rivals — both in terms of internet speeds and to recruit the best students and players. So we hope South Carolina, Kansas, Baylor, Florida and Kentucky turn their attention to their internet infrastructure soon (but maybe not before the final game).

On the bench

We’re sad to say we benched Xavier because we didn’t have enough tests to give you reliable data. If you want to see Xavier (or any other school) ranked next time we peek at collegiate speeds, take a Speedtest on your school’s network.

Until then, enjoy the madness!

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| February 22, 2017

How’s the Mobile Performance at Mobile World Congress?

You might expect the world’s largest gathering of professionals in the mobile industry to have amazing mobile speeds. Then again, maybe not, since large gatherings can sap the bandwidth right out of a network. We took a look at the speeds at last year’s event to see what you might expect if you’re attending Mobile World Congress (MWC) 2017.

Recapping 2016 performance

We isolated MWC 2016 speeds by geofencing Barcelona’s Fira Gran Via, where the conference was held, and analyzing a sample of Speedtest data from February 22–25, 2016, the dates of last year’s MWC. We then compared that data to the results from the entire city of Barcelona during the month of February 2016.

You can see that all carriers except Yoigo significantly exceeded average speeds for Barcelona at MWC 2016. So the mobile performance at MWC 2016 almost universally rocked.

The average download speed over Wi-Fi, on the other hand, was a paltry 14.62 Mbps.

We’re watching 2017 data

Of course the MWC crowd will put connectivity at Fira Gran Via to the test during the conference. Carriers will likely bring portable cell sites to offer fast coverage to the masses of mobile-savvy attendees. But we won’t know the actual speeds until the event begins and the Speedtest data starts rolling in.

  • Will the speeds be as fast as last year?
  • Will Orange come out on top for download speed again this year?
  • Will Vodafone offer the fastest uploads?

To find out, watch this space for daily Speedtest data and analysis during the conference, or follow us on Twitter.

As always, you can contribute to our data by taking a Speedtest at the event. And be sure to share your Speedtest results from #MWC17 with #CrowdSpeed on Twitter.

February 27, 2017

The first official day of MWC is just wrapping up and here’s what we saw for speeds at the event during the hours of 6am-7pm UTC:

  • Orange lives up to the first day excitement by knocking mobile download speed out of the park so far.
  • Vodafone and Yoigo are also significantly faster for downloads than they were last year.
  • Movistar is the only carrier whose download speed decreased compared to last year’s conference.
  • Upload speeds are mixed with Movistar and Orange posting strong increases while Vodafone and Yoigo’s download speeds decreased.

We’ll see how that all changes tomorrow…

February 28, 2017

Day two of MWC 2017 has wrapped up. Amidst all the device unveilings and amazing predictions for the future, we have news on whose mobile speeds are rocking the conference.

And the winner is… Orange!

  • For the second day in a row Orange has the fastest download speed. Though slower than yesterday, their download speed is still enviable.
  • Movistar’s downloads are significantly faster than yesterday and have almost caught up to Vodafone’s.
  • Vodafone’s download speed decreased slightly from yesterday, but is still fast enough to live-stream those keynotes.
  • Upload speeds are slower overall than yesterday, but in most cases you should have the performance you need for a video call back home.
  • Sadly, Yoigo’s download and upload speeds are already showing conference fatigue. Let’s hope they rally for tomorrow.

See you back here tomorrow for a recap of day three.

March 1, 2017

The mobile performance numbers are in for day three of MWC and we saw a huge shakeup overnight:

  • Vodafone has pulled way ahead of previous leader Orange for download speed since yesterday with a speed almost as fast as Orange’s day one showing.
  • Movistar has jumped into second place for downloads with now third place Orange ever so slightly behind.
  • Yoigo more than doubled their download speed from yesterday, but they’re still less than half as fast as Movistar and Orange.
  • Upload speeds are looking better than ever across the board with the three fastest carriers all coming in at better than 30 Mbps. Even Yoigo had their fastest day yet for uploads.

Tomorrow’s your last chance to help us gather data, so don’t forget to download those apps for Android or iOS and take a Speedtest. We’ll have day four results as well as averages from the conference as a whole at the end of the day tomorrow.

March 2, 2017

The final day of MWC 2017 saw the most dramatic shift in speeds of the whole conference:

  • Vodafone downloads came in at a lightning-quick 123.05 Mbps. Their uploads were also the fastest we’ve seen from any carrier during the conference.
  • Movistar’s download and upload speeds dipped way down from their prior strength.
  • Orange brought the stability with a download speed that was relatively close to yesterday’s performance, though their upload speed dipped a bit.
  • Meanwhile, there were no Yoigo tests at all.

MWC 2017 mobile performance as a whole

But what you really want to know is which carrier had the fastest speeds for the duration of the conference. The averages are in and…

  • Orange takes first place with a very impressive 97.36 Mbps average download over the four days.
  • Vodafone is a strong second for downloads and Movistar’s third place speed is still quite respectable.
  • If you’ve been watching these updates, it’s no surprise that Yoigo had the slowest speeds overall. That was also true last year, though their year-over-year improvement is solid.
  • Strangely, the upload speeds of the top three fastest carriers were nearly indistinguishable. That 25 Mbps or so is good news for anyone who’s sending masses of conference pics (or snapshots of Sagrada Familia, we won’t tell) back home.

That’s it for our Barcelona coverage this year. We hope your MWC experience was as amazing as some of these speeds. We’re going to go catch up on some sleep and we’ll be back with more analysis soon.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.