Hughesnet and Viasat continue to lose ground to Starlink in network performance as its median download and upload speeds climb and its latency declines.
Key takeaways:
- According to Ookla Speedtest® data from the second half of 2025, Speedtest users on Starlink in every state but Alaska were able to get median download speeds of 100 Mbps or higher, moving it from a last-ditch option to a viable competitor for broadband service in many areas. This is more than double the number of states in 2H 2024 when users in just 23 states were able to get median download speeds of 100 Mbps or higher.
- Starlink users in 22 states were able to get median upload speeds of 20 Mbps or higher, an improvement over the 2H of 2024 when users in no states were able to get 20 Mbps in upload speeds. This is a significant milestone because the FCC designates 20 Mbps upload speeds as the minimum threshold for broadband connectivity.
- 44.7% of Speedtest users on Starlink in Q4 2025 were able to meet the FCC’s minimum standard of broadband speeds of 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. This is an increase over the 17.4% of Starlink users who were able to get the FCC’s minimum standard for broadband in Q1 2025.
- Starlink improved its median multi-server latency in all but three states —Hawaii, New Mexico and Oregon. In the 2H of 2025 10 states had a median multi-server latency of less than 40 milliseconds (ms). This is a shift from the 2H 2024 when just one state—New Jersey—had a median multi-server latency less than 40 ms.
- GEO satellite providers Hughesnet and Viasat are increasingly losing ground to Starlink in speeds and latency. Starlink’s median download speeds are now more than 60% higher than Hughesnet’s and more than 65% higher than Viasat’s. Median upload speeds show an even greater disparity with Starlink’s upload speeds more than 80% higher than Hughesnet’s upload speeds and 95% higher than Viasat’s.
Starlink’s speeds are rising and latency is declining
No longer confined to rural America, SpaceX’s low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite provider Starlink is quickly emerging as a key player in the broader telecommunications landscape. This move is exemplified by T-Mobile’s recent partnership with Starlink and the creation of SuperBroadband, a new service that combines T-Mobile’s 5G fixed wireless access (FWA) network with Starlink Broadband satellite connectivity for businesses. This white-glove service from T-Mobile, while targeted at business customers, would not be possible if Starlink’s download and upload speeds weren’t on the upswing.
Indeed, Ookla Speedtest® data from the second half of 2025 indicates that Starlink dramatically improved its download speed performance across all 50 states compared to the second half of 2024. In fact, Speedtest users on Starlink are now able to get median download speeds exceeding 100 Mbps in every state but Alaska. This is more than double the 23 states that recorded median download speeds exceeding 100 Mbps in the second half of 2024.
In addition Starlink also improved its download performance in the 25th percentile, or the bottom quarter of Speedtest users on Starlink. All but two states —Connecticut and Hawaii—saw an increase in their 25th percentile speeds.
In the second half of 2024 eleven states—Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington— had 25th percentile speeds below 50 Mbps compared to the second half of 2025 when just two states—Alaska and Florida— had 25th percentile speeds below 50 Mbps.
Latency also improved year-over-year. Starlink has said that its goal is to deliver satellite service with just 20 milliseconds (ms) median latency and the company is making progress toward that goal. According to Speedtest data, the number of states where latency is under 40 ms increased from one (New Jersey) to 10 between 2H 2024 and 1H 2025.
The states with the lowest median multi-server latency in the second half of 2025 were New Jersey, Colorado, Arizona, and the District of Columbia, which all had median latencies of 37 ms.
Starlink Speedtest Performance In the 50 U.S. States
How each state performs in latency, median download, and 25th percentile download. Ookla Speedtest® | 2H 2024 – 2H 2025
Starlink's performance in latency, median download, and 25th percentile download in all 50 states in the U.S.
Starlink’s “secret sauce”
Much of the reason behind Starlink’s performance improvements is due to SpaceX’s acceleration of its satellite launches and its new Generation 3 (V3) satellites that are more powerful than earlier versions.
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket is able to add dozens of new satellites to the constellation. In February 2026, Starlink had more than 10,000 satellites in orbit. The more satellites a constellation has, the more capacity it has to handle subscribers and the faster speeds it can deliver to more places.
In addition, Starlink’s V3 satellites provide roughly 10 times the downlink capacity. The company also has improved its inter-satellite links that allow data to bypass ground stations for longer stretches, which reduces traffic bottlenecks and lowers the latency.
However, during this time of dramatic performance improvements, the company also has added a significant number of subscribers. At the end of 2024, Starlink had a reported 4.6 million subscribers globally. This more than doubled in 2025 and by early 2026 (February) Starlink said that it had more than 10 million active subscribers globally.
Midwest surge: Nebraska, Wyoming, and Utah lead in speed
New Jersey, North Dakota, Nebraska, South Dakota and Wyoming experienced the biggest year-over-year increase in download speeds of all the states and the District of Columbia. With the exception of New Jersey, these states are primarily in the Midwest and are characterized by having low population density. These states also benefit from having relatively flat terrain making it easier to maintain a constant, unobstructed line of sight with the satellites.
Nebraska clocks in with the highest overall median download speed of 200.80 Mbps in the second half of 2025, an increase from 129.40 Mbps in the second half of 2024.
New Jersey’s performance leap
New Jersey also saw a big jump in its 25th percentile download speeds from 11.68 Mbps in the second half of 2024 to 77.64 Mbps in the second half of 2025. This increase suggests that Starlink’s rollout of its newer high capacity satellites was particularly advantageous to New Jersey customers. This is notable because New Jersey is the most densely populated state in the U.S. and historically Starlink has been thought to be primarily useful for those in rural areas without other broadband alternatives.
High-performing states see smaller gains
In contrast to the states like Nebraska and New Jersey that saw big increases in median download speeds, Hawaii, Connecticut and Rhode Island experienced the smallest amount of change year-over-year.
For example, both Connecticut and Rhode Island already had strong median download speeds in the second half of 2024. Connecticut’s median download speed was 135.48 Mbps and Rhode Island’s was 116.21 Mbps, both of which were above average compared to the rest of the states.
Hawaii also had a high median download speed of 120.46 Mbps in the second half of 2024. However, Hawaii is different from the other two states because its median multi-server latency remains high (109 ms in the second half of 2025 compared to 112 ms in the second half of 2025).
Hawaii’s high latency numbers are due to its geography. In the mainland U.S. most users live within a few hundred miles of both a ground station and a major data center (like those in Seattle, Dallas, or Virginia) so the trip that the data must make is relatively short. Because of Hawaii’s location, the data has a much longer route to a ground station and data center, making the latency higher.
Upload speeds improve year-over-year
Upload speeds also saw a dramatic improvement year-over-year. In the second half of 2025, Starlink users in 22 states were able to get median upload speeds of 20 Mbps or higher, an improvement over the second half of 2024 when Speedtest users in no states were able to get 20 Mbps in upload speeds.
This is important because the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) designates 20 Mbps upload speeds as the minimum threshold for U.S. broadband connectivity.
New Jersey, Nebraska and Minnesota had the biggest gains in median upload speeds in the second half of 2025. New Jersey increased its upload speeds from 13.79 Mbps in the second half of 2024 to 23.35 Mbps in the second half of 2025, Nebraska’s median upload speeds rose from 18.35 Mbps in the second half of 2024 to 24.94 Mbps in the second half of 2025 (Nebraska ranks No. 1 in median upload speeds for all 50 states and the District of Columbia). And Minnesota increased its median upload speeds from 16.05 Mbps to 22.35 Mbps in the second half of 2025.
On the other end of the spectrum, Connecticut, Hawaii, and New Hampshire saw the smallest gains in median upload speeds year-over-year. Connecticut increased its median upload speeds from just 18.14 Mbps to 20.05 Mbps in the second half of 2025. Hawaii increased its median upload speeds from 14.45 Mbps in 2H 2024 to 16.70 Mbps in 2H 2025 and New Hampshire increased its median upload speeds from 17.24 Mbps to 19.81 Mbps year-over-year.
The growing gap between Starlink and the GEOs
When we compare the nationwide median download speeds, median upload speeds, and median multi-server latency for Starlink and the two primary geostationary providers in the U.S. —Viasat and Hughesnet, we can see the growing performance divide between Starlink and the GEO providers.
At a nationwide level, Viasat and Hughesnet Speedtest users experience median download speeds that are more than half of that of Starlink users. As of Q1 2026 Hughesnet users were experiencing median download speeds of 48.55 Mbps, Viasat users were getting median download speeds of just 41.05 Mbps compared to Starlink users that were experiencing median download speeds of 127.39 Mbps.
A similar gap exists in median upload speeds where in Q1 2026 Starlink users were experiencing median upload speeds of 21.46 Mbps compared to Hughesnet users with median upload speeds of 4.10 Mbps and Viasat at 0.95 Mbps.
Neither Hughesnet nor Viasat are remotely close to matching Starlink in median multi-server latency where Starlink has a latency of just 39 ms as of Q1 2026 compared to Hughesnet with a latency of 674 ms and Viasat with 750 ms.
A comparison of HughesNet, ViaSat and Starlink's Speeds and Latency
Ookla Speedtest® | 2H 2024 – 2H 2025
Starlink's low earth orbit download speeds compared with geostationary satellite systems HughesNet and ViaSat
GEOs try to stop their losses with lower prices
With Starlink better speeds and lower latency and its ability to attract more customers, Viasat and Hughesnet are going on the defensive to try to minimize their customer losses. Both companies are losing customers at a steady pace. Hughesnet’s global subscriber count declined from 1.22 million in 2022 to just 739,000 in Q4 2025. Likewise Viasat’s global subscriber count dropped from 590,000 in fiscal Q4 2021 to an estimated 159,000 in Q4 2025.
HughesNet and ViaSat Subscribers Over Time
Data from company reports and estimates 2022 through Q4 2025
A comparison of HughesNet and ViaSat's subscriber counts
According to Speedtest data, both Hughesnet and Viasat are attracting the majority of their customers in California and Texas. While these aren’t actual subscriber numbers, Speedtest sample percentages can serve as a proxy and provide some insight into where the majority of Viasat and Hughesnet’s customers are located:
The top 5 states with the highest percentage of samples for Viasat in Q3-Q4 2025 are:
- California: 12%
- Texas: 10%
- Florida: 9%
- Georgia: 9%
- New York: 7%
The top 5 states with the highest percentage of samples for Hughesnet for the Q3-Q4 2025 period are:
- Texas: 10%
- California: 7%
- Michigan: 5%
- North Carolina: 4%
- Missouri: 4%
To counteract Starlink’s impact Viasat introduced a budget-friendly plan that starts at $40 per month. According to Viasat’s web site the company has a promotional plan that costs $39.99 per month for three months, jumping to $69.99 per month thereafter. The plan, which requires a 24-month contract, claims typical download speeds will be 67 Mbps and upload speeds will be 4 Mbps. Viasat also warns users that while the plan is for unlimited data, the company may throttle speeds after 35 GB of data are used.
Viasat is also adding capacity and speed by upgrading its satellites. It launched Viasat-3 F1 in May 2023 to deliver more coverage to North America. That satellite has been operational since 2024. In addition, it launched Viasat-3 F2 in November 2025 and that satellite is currently in the testing phase and will enter commercial service over the Americas in May 2026. The final satellite, Viasat-3 F3 was just launched on April 29.
Similar to Viasat, Hughesnet also introduced a low-cost plan of $39.99 per month. The plan requires a 12-month contract and promises speeds of up to 25 Mbps. Hughesnet also says that the plans include 100 GB of priority data. However, when 100 GB of priority data is gone, Hughesnet may throttle speeds.
However, despite the low-cost plans, both Viasat and Hughesnet appear to be shifting their focus away from residential offerings toward more wholesale and enterprise customers. In fact,
PCMag recently reported that Hughesnet is preparing to refer its own satellite internet customers to Starlink after its parent company, EchoStar, agreed to sell spectrum to SpaceX.
Starlink’s growing dominance
In Q4, 44.7% of Speedtest Starlink users were able to receive the FCC’s minimum threshold for broadband of 100/20 Mbps, making the provider look a lot less like a niche connectivity provider for unserved areas and more like a legitimate broadband competitor.
By aggressively growing its LEO constellation to more than 10,000 satellites and deploying more powerful satellites, Starlink has managed to significantly increase its speeds and lower latency even as its global subscriber base grew to 10 million. While Starlink hasn’t revealed the exact number of subscribers in the U.S., we do know that the U.S. is Starlink’s largest market.
It will be interesting to see how Starlink reacts to potential competition from other LEO players such as Amazon LEO. Amazon is required by the FCC to have 1,618 satellites in orbit by July 30, 2026. As of early April the company had launched between 210 and 241 satellites. In addition, it has filed a request with the FCC for a two-year extension to launch the 1,618 satellites citing a shortage of available launch vehicles.
Starlink’s inroads puts GEO providers such as Hughesnet and Viasat at a critical crossroads. Despite efforts to retain customers through budget-friendly pricing and localized hardware upgrades, the performance gap—particularly in latency—remains a huge hurdle for the GEO architecture.
For more information about Speedtest Intelligence data and insights, subscribe to Ookla Research updates.
Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.
























