| July 5, 2017

How Internet Speeds at African Airports Compare

Our investigations of free airport Wi-Fi were nearly grounded when we reached Africa. Not only is free airport Wi-Fi not universally available on the African continent, when you do find it, it’s often very slow and available for only limited periods of time. But digging into Speedtest data for March-May 2017, we did discover a few bright spots.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

Only five of the 10 busiest airports in Africa showed Speedtest results on free, publicly-available Wi-Fi during the time we surveyed. And three of those airports were in South Africa.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

Of those five airports, though, Casablanca’s Mohammed V International Airport wins download speed by far. At 33.46 Mbps, the airport Wi-Fi is faster than any airport we’ve seen in Africa or Europe, and faster than all of the airports in Asia except for Dubai. Upload speed is terrible, though, so if Rick wants to send Ilsa a few snapshots of their final meeting, he’s going to spend more than a little time watching that upload wheel spin.

South Africa’s free airport Wi-Fi is all managed by VAST, an open-access Wi-Fi infrastructure provider, which doesn’t explain why the download speed at Durban’s King Shaka International Airport is about half that in Cape Town, but the company does seem to offer a general band of speed for free service. We saw other, faster tests on VAST-related SSIDs and can only assume that these are the pay-to-play options that are available to users after their first four hours of free Wi-Fi have expired.

Though we found many reports of free airport Wi-Fi, we were not able to verify tests on published SSIDs for airports in Cairo, Addis Ababa, Nairobi, Lagos and Tunis. And as far as we can tell, there is no free, public Wi-Fi at the airport in Algiers. If we’re wrong, take a Speedtest using your phone on the airport Wi-Fi and share your results with us on Twitter or Facebook.

Fastest airport cell

The good news is that cellular service is available at all the busiest African airports. The better news is that download speeds are decent at eight out of 10 of those airports.

Fastest airport cell

Mobile downloads are slower at all three of South Africa’s major airports than the country average of 34.45 Mbps, but they are still three of the four fastest airports in Africa for mobile.

The mobile download speed at Tunis’ airport is nearly twice as fast as the country average of 15.08 Mbps while the speed at Lagos’ Murtala Muhammed is just over 50% faster than Nigeria’s average of 10.64 Mbps. And although the Houari Boumediene download speed is among the slowest on the list, it’s 68% faster than the average download speed in Algeria.

Nairobi Kenyatta’s mobile download speed is closer to the Kenyan average of 14.51 Mbps, and downloads at Casablanca’s Mohammed V are slightly slower than the Moroccan average of 16.54 Mbps.

The slowest airports on our list, Bole and Cairo, are both located in countries with some of the slowest mobile downloads we saw, with Ethiopia at 10.50 Mbps and Egypt at 7.68 Mbps.

Upload speeds overall are slow, but they are in the same range as airports in Asia and Europe and they should get you by for any normal usage.

Wi-Fi or cell?

At five of the African airports we examined, the choice between Wi-Fi and cellular service is a no-brainer because the free Wi-Fi just doesn’t exist.

Wi-Fi or cell?

Casablanca’s download speed over Wi-Fi is 120% faster than over cellular, but it’s alone in this distinction.

At all other airports in Africa, choose cellular downloads rather than the free Wi-Fi. Cellular services is 88% faster than Wi-Fi at the Cape Town airport, 96% at Johannesburg, 326% at Durban and 53% at Addis Ababa.

Regional trends

Northern Africa

On the whole, the airports we surveyed in Northern Africa offer slower cellular downloads than those elsewhere on the continent. Tunisia is the exception.

Northern African airports were also the least likely to offer free Wi-Fi with three out of four airports showing no Speedtest results over free airport Wi-Fi. Morocco is the exception here, not only because Casablanca offers free airport Wi-Fi, but because that Wi-Fi is the fastest we found on the entire continent.

Eastern Africa

We only surveyed two airports in Eastern Africa, but what they have in common is ranking at the bottom of the list for cellular download speeds. Addis Ababa offered Wi-Fi, albeit slow. Cairo did not.

Western, Central, and Southern Africa

Africa is a very large and diverse continent and so we only examined one airport apiece in Western and Southern Africa this time around. And because we were focused on the busiest airports in Africa, we didn’t look at any airports in Central Africa at all. We’re hesitant to draw any trend lines based on this limited data, but we are definitely interested to learn more about internet performance in Africa as a whole and at airports in Africa. If you want to show us what your experience of the internet in any part of Africa (or anywhere else) is like, take a Speedtest on Android or iOS.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| July 17, 2017

#FarFlungInternet: Exploring Internet Performance at the Edge of the Earth

These days we expect the internet to be with us wherever we go. We catch up on emails on the bus, video chat with the fam on business trips, and check out cafes from our phones while on vacation. But there are still a few places on Earth we think of as flat-out inaccessible—as too remote even to connect to the world wide web.

You might be surprised, then, to know how far-flung the Speedtest results we see truly are. From the isolated to the uninhabited, we’re curious about what the internet looks like in unusual places. In honor of the summer travel season, we are sharing data on some of the most interesting and far-out tests we’ve ever seen with #FarFlungInternet. And we’re starting with Mt. Everest.

What’s the internet like at Mt. Everest?

Mountaineers train (and save) for years to finally summit this epic peak. But they don’t leave the internet behind until they’ve departed base camp. Somewhere between excited emails and social posts, some of these climbers are taking a Speedtest. Here’s what the internet looks like at 18,000 ft. in the Himalayas.

South Base Camp

<Td “> April 9, 2017
12.49
10.10
31
Everest Link
12.53
9.53
29
Everest Link
9.51
10.70
38
Everest Link
1.67
2.67
39
Everest Link
6.59
11.99
46
Everest Link

 Test date Download (Mbps) Upload (Mbps) Ping ISP
April 9, 2017
April 9, 2017
April 15, 2017
April 27, 2017

Everest Link bills itself as “Extreme Internet” and we’d have to say they’re right. With more than 200 Wi-Fi hotspots located in more than 40 villages in Nepal, they not only have the highest network in the world, they probably have one of the most difficult working zones as well—including below freezing temperatures and low oxygen levels. And because their access points are so remote, they rely on solar power, the only electricity source available. Everest Link CEO Tsering G. Sherpa describes the setup at the Everest South Base Camp by saying, “at 5,320 meters altitude we have a solar powered cnPilot E500 outdoor Wi-Fi hotspot” using a TP 650 wireless backhaul from Cambium Networks.

Everest Link is the only ISP we saw data from at Everest’s South Base Camp and the speeds were much better than we expected. We don’t know if the camp got more crowded on those later dates or if something else happened, but there is internet on Everest. Even if the ping’s a little slow.

Our analysis spanning June 2016-June 2017 turned up only those five tests in April 2017, likely because that’s the peak of climbing season for Everest. We also checked for Speedtest results from the North Base Camp in Tibet, but found none. That doesn’t mean there’s no Wi-Fi up there, but it does mean we can’t verify the speed of anything offered.

How you can contribute to #FarFlungInternet

If you’re going someplace way off the beaten path this summer, take a Speedtest and share your results and location with us on Facebook or Twitter.

  1. Take a Speedtest on your mobile device with the Android or iOS app
  2. Click the results share icon
  3. Select Facebook or Twitter
  4. Add your location and #FarFlungInternet to the autogenerated message
  5. Post away

Not only are we excited to see parts of the world we may never get to visit, but we also really want to understand what the internet is like outside our daily lives. So, be sure to share your findings with us so we can share them with the world.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| August 1, 2017

How Fast is the Internet at the Busiest Airports in Australia?

Almost all the way through our tour of internet speeds at the busiest airports in the world we find ourselves in Australia. With the delightful distinction of being both a continent and a country, we were able to look at more airports here than in any other country except the U.S. We’re proud to present data on which of Australia’s six busiest airports has the fastest free airport Wi-Fi and cellular speeds based on Speedtest data from March-May 2017.

Fastest airport Wi-Fi

There is some seriously fast free airport Wi-Fi in some parts of Australia.


In fact, download speed on the free airport Wi-Fi at Gold Coast Airport is faster even than that in Denver, which was previously the fastest seen of all the airports we analyzed around the world. Denver still has faster uploads, though—barely. The download speed at Perth Airport is also excellent and flyers who travel through Brisbane and Melbourne should also be able to use the free airport Wi-Fi with no complaints about speed.

All of these airports offer faster downloads over Wi-Fi than Australia’s average speed of 20.77 Mbps for downloads over mobile Wi-Fi.

The story is very different in Adelaide and Sydney, however. Download speeds at airports in both cities are as slow as they are at Shanghai Pudong International Airport and at Gatwick Airport. The connections are fast enough for basic emails and likely some social updates, but you will not want to try streaming video or catching a last minute client video conference.

Fastest airport cell

Cellular download speeds, on the other hand, are universally good at the airports we looked at in Australia. Taken as a group, they’re almost as good as the speeds we saw at airports in Canada and better on average than cellular speeds at airports we’ve surveyed on any other continent.


Although cellular downloads at Brisbane Airport are 35% faster than those at Gold Coast Airport, download speeds at almost every airport we analyzed outpaced the average cellular download speed in Australia of 41.96 Mbps. And Gold Coast Airport was not too far behind that average.

Wi-Fi or cell?


Face it, unless you’re trying to use the free airport Wi-Fi at airports in Adelaide or Sydney, there’s not a bad choice in the bunch. Wi-Fi at Gold Coast Airport and Perth Airport is so amazingly good that you probably want to use it because you can. And Brisbane Airport’s cellular download speed is 74% faster than their already good Wi-Fi download speed, while cellular downloads are 115% faster at Melbourne Airport than those over Wi-Fi. But for the most part, Australians and travelers to Australia will be very, very happy with internet performance at the airports we analyzed.

Regional trends

New South Wales

The airport in Sydney has a strong showings for cellular download speeds but the Wi-Fi download speed seriously suffers.

Queensland

Gold Coast and Brisbane Airports are very close to one another and both take top marks among airports we’ve analyzed—Gold Coast Airport for fastest Wi-Fi download speed in Australia (and the world) and Brisbane Airport for fastest cellular download speed in Australia.

South Australia

The only airport we examined in South Australia, Adelaide Airport had the second to worst download speed over free airport Wi-Fi in the country. Thankfully, the cellular download speed outpaces the country average.

Victoria

Melbourne’s airport performed well for cellular download speeds. The Wi-Fi download speed, albeit strong, is on the slow side among Australia’s busiest airports.

Western Australia

Perth Airport holds its own way out west with very fast Wi-Fi downloads and fast cellular downloads.

We’d love to present data from Australian airports that are farther afield like Darwin and Hobart on our next go round. If you’re traveling through, please take a Speedtest on Android or iOS to discover internet speeds and help us gather data about the best and worst Wi-Fi and cellular experiences.

Editor’s note: This article was amended on August 2, 2017 to correct a geographical error.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| January 24, 2018

GOOOOAL: Which World Cup Finalist Scored the Fastest Internet in their Capital City?

Whether you call it soccer or football, everyone calls the World Cup fun. We couldn’t wait for the actual match-ups in June, so we decided to pit the qualifying countries against one another to see who has the fastest internet speeds in their capital cities. The results might surprise you.

Get ready to watch Russia best Brazil and Portugal defeat Iran; meanwhile, Argentina and Nigeria and Belgium and England are preparing for penalty shoot-outs.

Using data from Speedtest Intelligence for Q3-Q4 2017, we’ve calculated which capital cities of World Cup-qualifying countries have the fastest mobile and fixed broadband speeds. We also took a peek at the fastest carriers and internet service providers (ISPs) in each capital using Speed Score, a comprehensive metric that combines measures of internet performance at all levels.

Mobile winners

Iceland’s sixth place ranking for mobile download speed in the Speedtest Global IndexTM virtually assured that Reykjavík would come out at the top of the list of fastest World Cup contenders. Canberra represents Australia well with a second place finish for mobile download speeds among World Cup capitals. And Brussels, Belgium barely surpasses Bern, Switzerland for a third place finish.

Mobile Internet Speeds
Capitals of World Cup Qualifying Countries | Q3 – Q4 2017
Country Capital City Average Download (Mbps) Average Upload (Mbps)
Iceland Reykjavík 55.49 21.53
Australia Canberra 44.24 12.60
Belgium Brussels 42.52 16.74
Switzerland Bern 42.02 17.52
South Korea Seoul 41.85 14.15
Denmark Copenhagen 41.78 18.29
Croatia Zagreb 41.16 16.40
Sweden Stockholm 40.12 12.63
Spain Madrid 38.30 14.02
Portugal Lisbon 30.60 11.39
Serbia Belgrade 30.33 12.49
France Paris 29.03 9.26
Poland Warsaw 26.94 9.84
Germany Berlin 25.83 9.51
England London 25.09 11.49
Russia Moscow 21.89 8.49
Japan Tokyo 19.89 7.10
Uruguay Montevideo 19.82 11.49
Mexico Mexico City 19.11 11.51
Peru Lima 18.33 12.90
Tunisia Tunis 18.27 8.07
Brazil Brasília 18.00 8.64
Morocco Rabat 17.32 9.76
Colombia Bogotá 16.87 9.50
Nigeria Abuja 16.17 6.76
Iran Tehran 15.05 7.04
Argentina Buenos Aires 13.77 7.70
Egypt Cairo 13.15 6.33
Panama Panama City 12.89 8.45
Saudi Arabia Riyadh 12.28 8.88
Senegal Dakar 8.85 3.81
Costa Rica San José 5.97 3.33

Looking at the group draw, Group A fares the worst with 16th place Moscow, Russia being the capital city with the fastest mobile downloads in the group. In Group B, Spain comes out on top. Australia wins Group C, Iceland takes Group D, Switzerland leads Group E and South Korea has the fastest mobile download speed in Group F. Belgium finishes first in Group G and Poland prevails in Group H, despite a 13th place finish overall.

From a regional perspective, European capitals top the rankings with all 14 European World Cup capitals sitting in the top half of the list. Latin American, Middle Eastern and African cities fare worst. Asia’s two contenders are split with Seoul boasting the fifth fastest mobile download speed among World Cup capitals and Tokyo, Japan coming in 17th.

The fastest World Cup capital in Latin America (Montevideo, Uruguay) shows a 64.3% slower mobile download speed than Reykjavík. First place among African World Cup capitals, Rabat, Morocco is 68.8% slower than Reykjavík for mobile downloads. And Tehran, Iran, the fastest World Cup capital in the Middle East, is 72.9% slower than Reykjavík.

Fastest carriers

We also looked into which carriers were fastest in each of the 32 World Cup capital cities.

With Speed Scores ranging from 8.89 in Dakar, Senegal to 46.57 in Brussels, mobile carrier Orange was fastest in four cities and tied for fastest in one. Vodafone was fastest in both Lisbon, Portugal and Madrid, Spain with comparable Speed Scores in the two locations. The rest of the cities show the diversity of fastest carriers that you might expect from a worldwide competition.

Fastest Carriers Speeds
Capitals of World Cup Qualifying Countries | Q3 – Q4 2017
Country Capital City Fastest Carrier Speed Score
Argentina Buenos Aires Personal 16.15
Australia Canberra Telstra 50.21
Belgium Brussels Orange 46.57
Brazil Brasília Claro 24.72
Colombia Bogotá Avantel 20.93
Costa Rica San José ICE 8.30
Croatia Zagreb Hrvatski Telekom 49.35
Denmark Copenhagen TDC / Telia 45.34 / 45.09
Egypt Cairo Orange 16.50
England London EE 36.83
France Paris Orange 33.15
Germany Berlin Telekom 53.54
Iceland Reykjavík Nova 64.61
Iran Tehran MTN IranCell 15.89
Japan Tokyo SoftBank 27.26
Mexico Mexico City AT&T 20.26
Morocco Rabat inwi 20.51
Nigeria Abuja MTN 29.23
Panama Panama City Cable & Wireless Panama / Movistar 14.85 / 14.80
Peru Lima Entel Peru 20.73
Poland Warsaw T-Mobile 36.07
Portugal Lisbon Vodafone 42.44
Russia Moscow MegaFon 37.06
Saudi Arabia Riyadh Zain 13.20
Senegal Dakar Orange 8.89
Serbia Belgrade Vip mobile 45.56
South Korea Seoul LG U+ 50.03
Spain Madrid Vodafone 40.17
Sweden Stockholm Telia 54.49
Switzerland Bern Sunrise / Swisscom 42.14 / 41.91
Tunisia Tunis Ooredoo / Orange 19.90 / 19.89
Uruguay Montevideo Antel 20.35

Fixed broadband winners

Given that Iceland ranks second in the world for fixed broadband download speed on the Speedtest Global Index and has the world’s highest gigabit user penetration (GUP), we’re not surprised to see Reykjavík shut out the competition by coming out on top of World Cup contenders for fixed broadband speed, too. Seoul, South Korea comes in second for fixed broadband download speed among World Cup capitals and Paris, France takes third.

Fixed Broadband Internet Speeds
Capitals of World Cup Qualifying Countries | Q3 – Q4 2017
Country Capital City Average Download (Mbps) Average Upload (Mbps)
Iceland Reykjavík 142.89 154.28
South Korea Seoul 130.75 131.96
France Paris 112.58 55.86
Sweden Stockholm 98.77 66.68
Spain Madrid 86.59 73.43
Japan Tokyo 75.88 70.46
Denmark Copenhagen 72.74 52.13
Switzerland Bern 68.82 54.44
Poland Warsaw 62.57 16.19
Portugal Lisbon 55.80 30.97
England London 52.53 16.12
Germany Berlin 46.84 9.52
Russia Moscow 45.25 42.96
Belgium Brussels 43.25 9.63
Panama Panama City 29.11 5.93
Australia Canberra 28.85 12.46
Serbia Belgrade 26.45 5.59
Croatia Zagreb 26.20 11.40
Mexico Mexico City 24.11 10.14
Uruguay Montevideo 23.02 5.82
Argentina Buenos Aires 22.03 4.26
Brazil Brasília 21.57 5.29
Saudi Arabia Riyadh 20.93 9.05
Peru Lima 18.15 3.51
Colombia Bogotá 13.43 6.48
Morocco Rabat 11.83 2.51
Iran Tehran 9.33 4.18
Costa Rica San José 8.79 4.29
Nigeria Abuja 8.07 5.27
Tunisia Tunis 7.82 4.49
Senegal Dakar 7.42 3.11
Egypt Cairo 5.61 1.92

Group A again suffers on the fixed side with leader Russia coming in 13th based on Moscow’s fixed broadband download speed. Spain’s still the front-runner of Group B. France takes Group C, Iceland wins Group D, Switzerland tops Group E, South Korea reigns over Group F, England heads up Group G and Japan starts Group H based on average download speeds over fixed broadband in their respective capitals.

European capitals again fare well, with 12 of the 14 placing in the top half of fastest World Cup capitals for fixed broadband download speed. Belgrade, Serbia and Zagreb, Croatia rank 17th and 18th, respectively. Tokyo ranks much better for fixed broadband download speed than for mobile, which puts both Asian World Cup capitals in the top six.

With the exception of Panama City, Panama, which ranks 15th, all Latin American World Cup capitals are in the bottom half of the list for download speed over fixed broadband. As are all Middle Eastern and African capital cities.

Panama City’s fixed broadband download speed is 79.6% slower than Reykjavík’s. Riyadh, Saudia Arabia boasts the title of fastest World Cup capital in the Middle East, but is still 85.4% slower for fixed broadband downloads than Reykjavík. The fastest World Cup capital in Africa — Rabat, Morocco — is 91.7% slower than Reykjavík.

Fastest providers

Comparing Speed Scores for fixed broadband across World Cup capitals, Vodafone had wins in Berlin, Germany and Lisbon and Orange took Paris and tied for first in Madrid. The rest of the fastest ISPs vary by location as listed below:

Fastest ISPs Speeds
Capitals of World Cup Qualifying Countries | Q3 – Q4 2017
Country Capital City Fastest ISP Speed Score
Argentina Buenos Aires Cablevisión Fibertel 21.72
Australia Canberra iiNet 33.23
Belgium Brussels Telenet 66.95
Brazil Brasília NET Virtua 27.30
Colombia Bogotá ETB 19.17
Costa Rica San José Cabletica 8.28
Croatia Zagreb vip 30.23
Denmark Copenhagen Fiberby 103.26
Egypt Cairo TE Data 4.84
England London Hyperoptic 117.40
France Paris Orange 107.20
Germany Berlin Vodafone 55.46
Iceland Reykjavík Nova 278.06
Iran Tehran Mobin Net 11.74
Japan Tokyo So-net 118.05
Mexico Mexico City Axtel 45.83
Morocco Rabat Maroc Telecom 9.25
Nigeria Abuja MTN 10.73
Panama Panama City Cable Onda 25.08
Peru Lima Movistar 16.64
Poland Warsaw UPC 82.72
Portugal Lisbon Vodafone 61.80
Russia Moscow MGTS 62.00
Saudi Arabia Riyadh STC 16.46
Senegal Dakar Tigo 6.42
Serbia Belgrade SBB 34.60
South Korea Seoul KT 162.45
Spain Madrid Masmovil / Orange 101.52 / 101.34
Sweden Stockholm Ownit 158.78
Switzerland Bern Fiber7 241.93
Tunisia Tunis TOPNET 7.61
Uruguay Montevideo Antel 22.01

Did your team not come out as expected? Or are you defending a tight match? Take a Speedtest on Android, iOS or on the web and we’ll check back in on scores closer to the main event.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| March 7, 2018

India’s Digital Divide: How Broadband Speed Splits the Nation

India ranked 67th in the world in February for download speed over fixed broadband based on the Speedtest Global IndexTM, with an average speed of 20.72 Mbps. But averaging across a country as large and diverse as India can mask some pretty important differences.

To get a fuller picture of fixed broadband performance on the Indian subcontinent, we’re taking a look at the average download speeds in every state and union territory that showed Speedtest results for more than 100 users in February 2018. We’re also comparing speeds in the 20 largest cities in India.

Exploring internet speeds in India’s states and union territories

India is making strides in an area where many countries struggle — connecting rural communities to the internet. Fiber connections have been extended to 250,000 (2.5 lakh) rural villages in India so far under the first phase of Bharat Net. In addition, Phase 2 of Bharat Net will expand the number of Wi-Fi hotspots that connect villages to broadband from 38,000 to 500,000 (5 lakh) so that every village in India has at least one.

This investment in rural connectivity might be one reason that the average broadband speeds we’ve seen across India’s states and union territories don’t seem to correlate to population density. South India occupies four of the five top spots on the list of states and union territories with the fastest broadband download speeds in India, and North India holds four of the top ten. Karnataka is fastest with a mean download speed of 28.46 Mbps during the month of February, 37.4% faster than the country as a whole. Tamil Nadu is close behind at 27.94 Mbps.

On the other end of the spectrum, Northeast India accounts for four of the five slowest states and union territories we analyzed and seven of the ten slowest. Mizoram is the slowest with a mean download speed of 3.62 Mbps in February, 82.5% slower than the country as a whole. Manipur takes second-to-last place at 4.30 Mbps and Tripura barely edges into third-to-last place at 4.52 Mbps.

Which city in India has the fastest fixed broadband?

Fastest Cities in India Feb 2018

When looking at the 20 largest cities in India, Chennai is the fastest with a mean download speed over fixed broadband that’s 57.7% faster than India’s as a whole. Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Visakhapatnam and Delhi all score above the country’s average.

The slowest of these large cities, Patna, was 62.4% slower than the country’s average for mean download speed. Nagpur, Jaipur, Kanpur, and Ahmedabad round out the bottom five. It’s also notable that the download speeds of Kanpur, Lucknow, Pune and Nagpur are significantly slower than that of their respective states.

Is your broadband living up to these speeds? Take a Speedtest on the web or from our desktop apps to show us what speeds you’re seeing.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| April 17, 2018

EU Roaming is Free! But is it Fast?

When the European Commission put an end to roaming charges within the European Union (EU) last summer, they gave residents of member countries the freedom to take their mobile phones with them on vacation without fearing the bill when they got home. But how well are those phones performing when faced with foreign cell towers?

To find out, we took a look at Speedtest data from the first quarter of 2018 to see which countries’ residents are having the best (and worst) internet speed experiences abroad.

How much download speeds drop when you cross a border

The mean download speed in the EU when customers are at home is 30.57 Mbps, but that slows 16.6% to 25.50 Mbps when Europeans roam across a border.

Because your experience of speeds abroad is going to be based on what you’re used to, we compared countries based on the amount download speeds decreased rather than the actual speed abroad. Italians enjoyed a 15.4% increase in download speed when traveling. Estonians, Latvians and the Portuguese also saw faster downloads abroad.

Mobile Download Speeds
EU Countries | Q1 2018
Country Local (Mbps) Roaming (Mbps) % Change
Austria 31.62 28.66 -9.4%
Belgium 44.56 26.00 -41.7%
Bulgaria 35.71 22.31 -37.5%
Croatia 34.75 31.36 -9.8%
Cyprus 25.34 23.40 -7.7%
Czech Republic 38.30 25.78 -32.7%
Denmark 42.55 22.40 -47.4%
Estonia 31.98 34.24 7.1%
Finland 32.68 29.99 -8.2%
France 32.35 24.47 -24.4%
Germany 26.03 26.00 -0.1%
Greece 34.48 28.40 -17.6%
Hungary 46.10 26.01 -43.6%
Ireland 19.98 19.00 -4.9%
Italy 30.32 34.98 15.4%
Latvia 27.37 28.97 5.8%
Lithuania 36.80 28.28 -23.2%
Luxembourg 42.43 22.46 -47.1%
Malta 42.14 25.05 -40.6%
Netherlands 53.07 25.46 -52.0%
Poland 22.05 20.29 -8.0%
Portugal 26.45 27.44 3.7%
Romania 28.74 21.95 -23.6%
Slovakia 28.79 23.73 -17.6%
Slovenia 28.42 27.15 -4.5%
Spain 31.94 24.32 -23.9%
Sweden 38.23 26.13 -31.7%
United Kingdom 26.16 21.08 -19.4%

On the other end of the spectrum, Dutch travelers experienced a 52% decrease in download speed when using mobile phones elsewhere in the EU. Residents of Denmark, Luxembourg, Hungary, Belgium and Malta all saw decreases of more than 40% when roaming.

In some cases, the decrease in download speed is due to the country’s relative speed. For example, the Netherlands has recently had the third fastest mobile speeds in the world according to the Speedtest Global Index so its residents are likely to see much slower speeds when traveling anywhere but Norway and Iceland. Other differences are probably better explained by how carriers prioritize out of country traffic, a decision that’s made between each individual carrier in each individual country.

Slow or not, at least roaming no longer comes with extra fees for EU residents. Unless you’re British, of course. With Brexit looming, not only could citizens of the UK have to return to paying roaming fees, the download speed they’ll be paying for abroad will be 19.4% slower than it is at home.

Again, a lot of factors go into what speeds you experience while roaming the continent. We hope this data will help you make an informed choice about your carrier depending on what your roaming data needs are. Share your experience by taking a Speedtest on Android or iOS

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| May 2, 2018

The American Globetrotter's Guide to Roaming Speeds

Mobile roaming has come a long way from the days when I spent most of my tour of China touring hotel lobbies desperately hoping to connect my U.S. flip phone to the Wi-Fi. Not only can you actually get a signal in most countries these days, some carriers offer special packages for the jet set so you don’t have to pay extra for roaming calls and data.

But how are the speeds?

Using Q1 2018 Speedtest® data, we’re here to report on mobile roaming speeds for U.S. consumers in 15 popular destinations, including which carriers are fastest where. For overall speeds we look at data from all devices and when we analyze carriers we look only at data for modern (LTE-capable) devices.

Where roaming speeds will (and will not) let you down

Get thee to Canada! Our analysis of roaming Speedtest results found that U.S. customers in Canada saw a mean download speed of 42.03 Mbps during Q1 2018. That’s not quite as fast as the 45.28 Mbps Canadians receive on their home mobile networks, but it beats the 27.08 Mbps average in the U.S.

Roaming Speeds for U.S. Customers Abroad
Q1 2018
Country Download (Mbps) Upload (Mbps)
Canada 42.03 13.50
South Korea 21.81 8.60
Mexico 18.02 10.18
Spain 13.23 7.09
Italy 12.70 6.38
France 12.48 5.45
Australia 11.84 6.96
Japan 10.91 4.79
United Kingdom 10.40 5.68
Germany 9.02 4.03
Costa Rica 7.72 4.11
China 7.05 3.91
Dominican Republic 5.75 3.58
India 2.96 1.96
The Bahamas 1.70 2.99

Second place South Korea showed roaming speeds for U.S. travelers about half as fast as those in Canada. Mexico was third fastest. The middle tier of the roaming speed ranking is taken up mostly by western European countries (with Japan and Australia to break up the pack).

At the bottom of the spectrum, Bahamian roaming speeds are painfully slow. They aren’t much better in India or the Dominican Republic.

A lot of factors go into the roaming speeds you’ll experience abroad, including how carriers prioritize out of country traffic, something that’s decided between each individual carrier in each individual country.

How does your carrier stack up?

Your roaming experience on your next trip is going to depend a lot on which carrier you have, so we broke our roaming speed analysis of Speedtest results on modern devices down to the carrier level.

US Carrier Speeds While Roaming Abroad
Q1 2018 | Mean Download (Mbps)
Country AT&T Sprint T-Mobile Verizon Wireless
Australia 21.24 N/A 2.14 22.14
Canada 26.53 27.65 53.56 43.22
China 17.23 4.77 1.15 13.15
Costa Rica 13.67 N/A 0.70 14.86
Dominican Republic 11.00 N/A 0.57 7.68
France 22.72 N/A 1.96 26.30
Germany 20.55 N/A 1.86 20.58
India 4.92 1.70 0.79 7.13
Italy 24.05 N/A 1.99 25.19
Japan 18.22 24.79 1.40 11.46
Mexico 19.95 9.66 17.22 22.35
South Korea 27.97 17.49 21.67 N/A
Spain 29.27 N/A 1.18 24.82
The Bahamas 1.79 N/A 0.25 3.53
United Kingdom 19.87 9.07 1.74 16.61

From the above, it looks like there’s no one right answer for the fastest roaming carrier. And there are other things to consider when roaming, too, like does your carrier offer a special plan that includes free roaming or are you paying through the nose.

It’s important to remember that roaming comes at a cost to carriers, which means that if your carrier includes free or low-cost roaming on almost all types of plans, the trade-off might be that you get slower speeds than you would with another carrier.

So if speed is your primary criterion, there are two standouts on this list. Verizon wins eight of the 15 countries we analyzed and AT&T wins six. T-Mobile and Sprint each win one country. We excluded Sprint from the running in eight countries because of a low number of test results.

Are you roaming (for business or pleasure) this summer? Take a Speedtest on Android or iOS to show us how fast (or slow) your connection is.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| May 15, 2018

Analyzing the Reach of South Africa’s Modern Mobile Speeds

Though South Africa has the fastest average mobile download speed in Africa (22.42 Mbps in Q1 2018), the story is not that simple. Download speed in the country’s fastest province (Free State) was 38.7% faster than that in the slowest (Northern Cape), while speeds in the country’s largest cities are relatively similar.

To better understand South Africa’s mobile landscape, we analyzed data from Speedtest Intelligence® during Q1 2018. We considered mean speeds for each of the country’s provinces and the five most populous cities.

South Africa’s fastest (and slowest) provinces

The three South African provinces with the fastest average download speeds (Free State, KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng) are all in the center of the country. Of those, both KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng are densely populated while Free State is less so.

The two slowest provinces (Northern Cape and North West) are both along South Africa’s northern border and are among the country’s least densely populated. The third slowest province, Mpumalanga, is more centrally located with a border along Gauteng and the countries of Mozambique and the Kingdom of eSwatini (formerly known as Swaziland).

Mobile speeds in South Africa’s largest cities

Looking at South Africa’s five most populous cities, we find that the mean download speed in first-place Durban during Q1 2018 was 17.3% faster than that of fifth-place Cape Town.

Mobile Internet Speeds in South Africa’s Largest Cities
Q1 2018
City Download (Mbps) Upload (Mbps)
Durban 26.66 9.12
Pretoria 24.25 8.54
Johannesburg 23.62 9.17
Soweto 22.90 8.71
Cape Town 22.72 7.33

The band of speeds these cities fall into is relatively narrow, though. And although Pretoria’s download speed was 5.9% faster than that in nearby Soweto, a casual user would not notice the difference in performance between the two.

How fast is your mobile connection? Take a Speedtest on Android or iOS to show us what speeds you’re experiencing.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| June 26, 2018

Comparing Mobile Markets in South America’s Largest Economies

Though some of the largest economies in South America have struggled in recent years, the size of the region’s economies and populations make it worth watching from a telecommunications perspective. As such, we took a look at data from Speedtest Intelligence® from Q1 2018 to understand which countries are making the biggest strides in mobile internet speeds.

Which South American country has the fastest mobile speeds?

Peru had the fastest mean download speed during Q1 2018 of any of the countries on our list. Brazil showed a 28.7% increase over the same period last year to rank second. Third place Chile’s download speed actually declined slightly. Though Argentina came in fifth, the country’s 25.8% improvement in mobile download speed is impressive.

Download Speeds in South America’s Largest Economies
Q1 2018
Country Mean Download (Mbps) % Change YOY
Peru 20.00 10.9%
Brazil 16.95 28.7%
Chile 16.26 -1.2%
Colombia 15.74 8.9%
Argentina 14.39 25.8%
Venezuela 7.95 -10.1%

It’s not surprising that Venezuela shows the slowest mobile speed given the country’s economic collapse which has caused operational problems for many corporations. Unfortunately, Venezuela’s last place position is accompanied by a 10.1% decline in mobile download speed.

Mobile speeds in South America’s largest cities

Comparing mean download speeds in the continent’s 10 most populous cities, we found that Rio was the fastest city in South America in Q1 2018. Lima, the second fastest city, was the only city in the top five not located in Brazil.

Salvador, Buenos Aires, Rio, Brasília and São Paulo all saw impressive double-digit increases in their mobile download speeds over the same period the year before.

Download Speeds in South America’s Largest Cities
Q1 2018
City Mean Download (Mbps) % Change YOY
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 22.40 30.4%
Lima, Peru 21.32 -3.5%
Brasília, Brazil 19.55 27.5%
Salvador, Brazil 18.25 41.7%
São Paulo, Brazil 18.02 21.1%
Bogotá, Colombia 16.67 4.1%
Santiago, Chile 15.98 0.4%
Buenos Aires, Argentina 15.48 33.8%
Fortaleza, Brazil 14.33 4.4%
Caracas, Venezuela 9.06 -11.6%

Venezuela again fares poorly with a mean mobile download speed of 9.06 Mbps in Caracas, a decline of 11.6% since Q1 2017. Caracas was not the only city where internet speeds decreased, however, Lima saw a 3.5% decline.

How forward-looking carriers are improving their infrastructure (and speeds)

Carriers are a driving force in improving speeds in any market, so we dug into what some of the largest players in these six countries are doing to improve the speeds their customers are experiencing.

Avantel (Colombia)

Over the past four years, Avantel has been delivering a very competitive experience mainly using its AWS spectrum assets. Using Nokia’s modular infrastructure, Avantel has been able to seamlessly integrate IMS into the core and successfully launch services such as Voice over LTE (VoLTE), enabling a more efficient use of spectrum assets.

Bitel (Peru)

After launching LTE in the 900MHz band in 500 towns and cities at the tail end of 2016, Vietnamese-backed operator Bitel has committed to expanding their coverage and adding a capacity layer in the 2.6 GHz band over the next three years. This will surely offer a boost in performance and overall user experience.

Claro (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru)

In Brazil, Claro’s leading LTE network uses a healthy mix of low, mid and high frequency bands offering depth of coverage across a wide area. Using carrier aggregation, the operator is able to increase the speeds for users with capable handsets in 140 cities. In good signal conditions modern devices equipped with four receive antennas (4×4 MIMO) and capable of processing 8-bits per transmission (256 QAM) should allow subscribers to achieve even higher peak and average data rates in many areas. In some areas of São Paulo the operator is able to offer peak speeds of 1 Gbps by aggregating licensed (2.5 GHz) with the unlicensed (5 GHz) spectrum using technology called License-Assisted Access (LAA). In preparation for 5G, Claro and Ericsson staged a demo utilizing 100 MHz-wide channels of spectrum in the 15 GHz band, achieving speeds of up to 4.5 Gbps.

Entel Movil (Chile, Peru)

In Chile, the second largest mobile operator Entel Chile is leveraging its 700 MHz and 2600 MHz spectrum assets to provide a solid user experience across its footprint. In addition, a partnership with Ericsson ensures a rich portfolio of advanced LTE features and future upgradability to the upcoming technologies, including 5G.

Movilnet (Venezuela)

Following the launch of LTE in the 2100 MHz spectrum band in 2017, Movilnet is looking to expand its LTE capacity in 2019 as the CDMA sunset is scheduled for tail end of this year.

Movistar (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Venezuela)

The major player across the South American continent is Movistar, owned by Spain’s Telefonica. Using its scale and financial might, the brand is able to provide an extremely competitive mobile experience by leveraging the latest LTE technologies, including Higher Order MIMO and Higher Order Modulation. This improves speeds, lowers the resource utilization and increases the network efficiency.

Nextel (Brazil)

In Brazil, Nextel’s LTE network is delivered over the 1800 MHz spectrum band, and the limited LTE spectrum assets (15 MHz wide) are making it difficult for the carrier to compete with larger operators. But with the help of Huawei’s LTE-Advanced equipment, the carrier is able to maximize the spectral efficiency by installing the 4T4R (four-transmit, four-receive) radios at cell sites in order to deliver speeds up to 225 Mbps in selected areas. It’s worth noting that Nextel Brazil is one of the last iDEN operators in the world, and the carrier has been delaying the sunset of this network technology originally launched in 1998. Once iDEN is decommissioned, the 800 MHz spectrum assets could be repurposed to deliver significant improvements in radio access, specifically in terms of network propagation and penetration.

Oi (Brazil)

After a recent financial struggle, which included filing the largest bankruptcy request in Brazil’s history, Oi is getting ready to launch LTE-Advanced in July with a plan to cover 26 cities by the end of 2018. Using two frequency bands (1800 MHz and 2600 MHz), Oi is looking to offer competitive network experience to over 40 million of its subscribers.

Personal (Argentina)

Telecom Personal now covers more than 1,000 cities and towns which make up more than 80% of the population of Argentina. About two-thirds of all the traffic is now carried over the carrier’s LTE network which supports the speeds in excess of 100 Mbps by combining 700 MHz, 2100 MHz and 2600 MHz spectrum bands. Together with Nokia, Telecom Personal successfully completed 5G trials in Buenos Aires using 400 MHz of the millimeter wave spectrum in the 28 GHz band, reaching speeds of 10 Gbps.

Telefonica Brasil (Brazil)

Telefonica Brasil, operating as Vivo, holds a similar spectrum portfolio to Claro of Band 28, Band 3 and Band 7 assets. Using the available tools from the LTE-A toolbox (carrier aggregation, 256 QAM and 4×4 MIMO), the operator is able to offer speeds in excess of 530 Mbps in selected areas on capable devices powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon X16 and X20 LTE modems. Vivo also offers Voice Over LTE (VoLTE) service in two markets, Rio Verde and Brasília.

TIM Brasil (Brazil)

Leveraging a long-term partnership with Nokia, TIM Brasil has been able to provide LTE service across many regions of the country. Using Nokia’s scalable “5G-ready” AirScale radio platform, TIM has been able to deliver the latest LTE-Advanced network features and pave the way for the upcoming 5G wave. TIM also prides itself in being the first Latin American VoLTE operator, launching the service in Brasília in July 2017 and subsequently in 20 additional markets.

Tigo (Colombia)

Back in April, Tigo has activated carrier aggregation in parts of Bogotá, claiming the title of the first LTE-Advanced network in Colombia. As a result, users in the busiest areas of the nation’s capital should be able to experience speeds in excess of 100 Mbps.

WOM (Chile)

After the initial launch of LTE in 2015 and the continued rollout in 2016, WOM continues to provide LTE service in the 2100 MHz band, and aims to expand its market share over the next 5 years from 11% to 25%.

Learn more about the insights offered from Speedtest Intelligence, including data on the speed and quality of your networks and those of your competitors.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| October 16, 2018

Why Ookla Uses Consumer-initiated Testing to Measure Internet Speed (Video)

At Ookla, the company behind Speedtest, we use consumer-initiated testing to determine the speed and performance of global networks. People often ask us why we take this approach. The short answer is that we believe consumer-initiated testing is the most accurate way to measure real world internet speeds, because it reflects when and where people actually use the internet. The long(er) answer is right here in this video that we hope you’ll enjoy…

Why Speedtest uses consumer-initiated testing


As you saw, it’s important that consumer-initiated testing meets three basic criteria:

  1. Data must come from various devices and contexts
  2. The testing server must be nearby
  3. The number of tests being analyzed must be statistically significant

That’s why we’re grateful to the millions of people all over the globe who use Speedtest every day to determine the speed of their internet connection. You help us report the most accurate and reliable picture of internet speeds across the world.

What about other testing methods?

The limits of drive testing

Drive testing is one common way that mobile operators measure networks. They like it because they can get a repeatable sample of tests taken on the same device in the same place. But drive testing is limited to where cars can actually drive, and most areas that they do test are only measured infrequently. If you want to learn more about the limits of drive testing and why they matter, we have a video for that, too…


To learn even more about different internet measurement methods and their strengths and weaknesses, read our full description here.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.