| July 24, 2023

5G in Asia Pacific: Deployment Momentum Continues

The Asia Pacific region has successfully implemented 5G technology despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, global economy, and geopolitical climate. South Korea, China, and Japan have led the way in 5G network deployment. With the continued rollout of 5G networks in other regional markets, Asia Pacific is on track to become the largest 5G market globally.

Key messages

  • Advanced Asia Pacific markets have taken the lead in the 5G rollout. Countries such as South Korea, Australia, and China, were among the first in the world to launch commercial 5G networks as more markets joined the ranks.
  • 5G performance outranks Europe. Early adopters in the Asia Pacific region have outperformed major European markets in terms of 5G performance. This is mainly due to factors like early spectrum availability and supportive government policies. 
  • 5G Availability varies. The region experiences varying levels of 5G Availability and adoption due to factors like population density, device affordability, and tariffs.
  • Seoul and Kuala Lumpur are the top cities for 5G performance, boasting median download speeds of 533.95 Mbps and 523.44 Mbps, respectively.
  • 5G helps to narrow the digital divide. 5G FWA is a viable alternative to traditional fixed broadband to narrow down the digital divide in the region

South Korea sets the pace as 5G networks expand across the region

Many of the more advanced markets in the Asia Pacific have been the frontrunners in terms of 5G rollout. South Korea was the first market in the world to deploy a nationwide 5G network in April 2019, followed by Australia, the Philippines, China, and New Zealand later that year. As predicted by GSMA Intelligence, the recent second wave of 5G rollouts in the region in countries such as Indonesia, India, and Malaysia will see Asia Pacific becoming one of the largest 5G markets in the world by 2025.

5G Launch Timeline in Selected Asia Pacific and European Markets

Allocation of spectrum resources is crucial

In our recent spectrum analysis, we discussed how important spectrum is for the performance and coverage of 5G. In general, regulators in the Asia Pacific region have been quick to allocate spectrum for 5G applications, and in many cases, operators have been able to secure substantial bandwidth in the key C-band.

List of the 5G Pioneer Band Spectrum Awards Across Select Asia Pacific Countries

The mid-band spectrum is the most frequently awarded spectrum band in the Asia Pacific region. It is the top choice for commercial 5G deployment because it balances 5G coverage and capacity. In some markets, 5G deployment uses low-band (sub 1 GHz) frequencies, allowing for wider outdoor 5G coverage and better penetration inside buildings in urban and suburban areas. However, this may come at the expense of the median download speed, which typically peaks at around 100 Mbps.

For some markets, 5G spectrum awards are subject to strict milestones and requirements. Operators in South Korea were required to have 22,500 base stations by the end of 2021, 45,000 by the end of 2023, and 150,000 base stations upon completion of their 3.5 GHz spectrum rollout. Additionally, within three years, there were required to install 15,000 base stations utilizing 28 GHz. However, a review by South Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) found that all mobile operators met the minimum requirements for the 3.5GHz spectrum but not the 28GHz spectrum. Consequently, the ministry has withdrawn all operators’ spectrum licenses in the 28GHz band. In our recent mmWave analysis, we thoroughly covered the performance and progress inherent in that spectrum band.

Asia Pacific outpaced major European markets in terms of 5G performance

While Europe and the Asia Pacific markets share similarities such as large cultural diversity, customers with varying demographics, and mixed regulations and policies, our recent analysis of European 5G performance revealed that early 5G adopters in the Asia Pacific region performed better than some major European markets. 

Chart of Median 5G Download Speed in Asia Pacific Markets Compared to European Benchmarks

According to Speedtest Intelligence® H1 2023 data, several markets in the Asia Pacific region had faster median download performance compared to the top five European economies. Malaysia and South Korea led the pack with speeds of over 500 Mbps, with Malaysia reporting a median download performance of 512.10 Mbps, and South Korea at 503.99 Mbps  – an impressive accomplishment for Malaysia, which launched 5G 3.5 years after South Korea and has caught up to them in performance. Both countries have notable differences in terms of their telecommunications landscapes. The Malaysian government went with a nationwide single wholesale network (SWN) approach as its 5G deployment plan. Digital Nasional Berhad (DNB) was established in 2021 to construct and operate the 5G network infrastructure and provide 5G services to mobile network operators at wholesale prices. South Korea has long been at the forefront of mobile technology and boasts one of the highest internet penetration rates globally. As a result of its early commitment to 5G development, South Korea became the first market in the world to launch a commercial 5G network.

During the same period, Singapore, India, New Zealand, China, and Australia achieved a median 5G download speed exceeding 200 Mbps. In comparison, only France recorded speeds above 200 Mbps among the European countries mentioned, while Italy, Germany, United Kingdom, and Spain, recorded median download speeds below 150 Mbps.

5G Availability and adoption vary across the region

Chart of 5G Availability in Selected Markets in Asia Pacific and Europe

5G Availability (the percentage of users on 5G-capable devices that spend most of the time with access to 5G networks) varied widely across the Asia Pacific region during H1 2023. Factors such as access to low-band spectrum and affordability and availability of 5G devices influence each market’s reported 5G Availability. Analysis based on data from Speedtest Intelligence shows that Hong Kong stands out as the only country analyzed to have surpassed 40% 5G Availability, reaching 42.3% in H1 2023. Part of the reason is the city’s high population density, 5G coverage that reaches over 90% of the population, and a high 5G smartphone penetration rate, which Counterpoint Research reported as 78% in Q1 of 2023.

Despite Australia being 78 times larger than South Korea, and being one of the least densely populated countries, both countries reported similar 5G Availability rates, at around 36.6%. Counterpoint Research reported a 5G smartphone penetration rate of more than 80% for both countries, with South Korea at 88% and Australia at 82%. Across the European markets, France, Spain, Germany, and the U.K. ranged between 20%-30%. Similarly, Thailand also falls within this range at 26.8%. 

Chart of 5G Connections as Proportion of All Connections in Select Markets in Asia Pacific and Europe

Based on Q2 2023 data from GSMA Intelligence, South Korea, China, and Japan led in 5G adoption, measured as the percentage of 5G connections compared to total connections, higher than the selected European markets looked at in this report. South Korea had a total of 31.3 million 5G connections, which accounted for more than 48% of all mobile connections in the country, while China boasts over 700 million 5G connections, equivalent to 41% of connections. Other early adopters of 5G in the region, such as Japan, Hong Kong, and Australia, have all seen a considerable rise in their total 5G connections from the previous year. Japan experienced a 76% increase of 5G connections between Q2 2022 to Q2 2023, to 60.8 million connections. Hong Kong increased by 65% to 4.8 million, and Australia had 8.8 million connections, up by almost 40% during the same period of time.

Seoul and Kuala Lumpur are the top cities in the Asia Pacific region for 5G speeds.

Map of 5G Performance and 5G Availability Across Selected Cities in Asia Pacific

Given that both Malaysia and South Korea are ahead in 5G performance among their peers, it is unsurprising that their capital cities came first as well in the ranking of selected cities. In H1 2023, Seoul had a median download speed of 533.95 Mbps, while Malaysia’s capital, Kuala Lumpur, reported a median download speed of 523.44 Mbps. Digital Nasional Berhad (DNB), Malaysia’s designated 5G wholesale provider, reported 90% 5G coverage of populated areas (COPA) throughout Kuala Lumpur at the end of 2022. 

Despite being one of the latest markets to launch 5G, the Indian cities of Delhi and Mumbai performed well in the cities’ speeds ranking. Both cities reported median download speeds of over 300 Mbps in H1 2023, with Delhi at 357.43 Mbps and Mumbai at 319.45 Mbps. While Kuala Lumpur, Mumbai, and Delhi have shown 5G performance comparable to or even exceeding those of well-established 5G markets in the region, their 5G networks are still relatively new. As a result, these cities have lower 5G Availability than others as anticipated.

Metro Manila, with one-third of the population of the Philippines, had the lowest median download speed among all the cities in this report for H1 2023, with a speed of 135.51 Mbps. During the same period, Metro Manila reported a 5G availability rate of 35.7%, slightly lower than Seoul (35.9%) and Sydney (39.2%).

Breaking the digital divide with 5G FWA

The benefits of 5G go beyond the faster speeds compared to 4G. It also plays a role in bringing connectivity to underserved areas. Although developed markets in the Asia Pacific are leading in ultra-fast, fixed fiber broadband, there is still a portion of the region where internet connectivity is expensive, unavailable, or insufficient. Many people in these underserved regions rely on mobile devices to access the internet. According to GSMA Intelligence, mobile broadband networks are accessible to more than 96% of the population, making it the primary option for internet access in many households. 

In some markets, mobile operators see 5G, particularly 5G fixed-wireless access (FWA) services, as a viable alternative to traditional fixed broadband. While FWA is not a new concept, the use of 5G technology is expected to accelerate its growth, especially in areas where it is not economically feasible to deploy high-speed fixed broadband networks. According to GSMA Intelligence, nearly three in five users who either have upgraded or plan to upgrade to 5G find the idea of using 5G for home broadband appealing. FWA is becoming one of the operators’ primary 5G use cases, providing an opportunity to increase revenue and monetize network investments and wireless spectrum.

The Asia-Pacific region is seeing a rise in the adoption of 5G FWA, with Southeast Asia leading the way. In 2019, Globe Telecom in the Philippines, became the first country in the region to launch FWA. Other regional operators, such as Telkomsel in Indonesia and AIS in Thailand, have also begun offering FWA services. In New Zealand, operators plan to provide FWA coverage to 90% of the population by the end of 2023.

While 5G FWA shows promising growth potential, operators need to ensure that as 5G adoption in the network increases, they have the capacity to support their FWA services and the spectrum to guarantee quality. When the demand for 5G FWA service grows, operators may have to look at utilizing the mmWave spectrum to maintain the quality of their FWA services while keeping network capacity intact.

We will keep a close eye on the progress and effectiveness of 5G implementation throughout the Asia Pacific region. If you are interested in benchmarking your performance or if you’d like to learn more about internet speeds and performance in other markets around the world, visit the Speedtest Global Index.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| October 1, 2023

India’s Remarkable 5G Advancement Elevates its Global Mobile Ranking

Ookla® data shows that in India over the past year, mobile download speeds in the country have seen significant improvement. In fact, India jumped 72 places on the Speedtest Global Index™ over the past year, with India’s 5G launch largely responsible for boosting the country’s ranking.

Key messages

  • India ranked 47 in August 2023. The country’s speed performance has seen a 3.59 times increase since the introduction 5G, with median download speeds improving from 13.87 Mbps in September 2022 to 50.21 Mbps in August 2023. This improvement has led to India’s rise in the Speedtest Global Index, moving up 72 places, from 119th place to the 47th position.
  • 5G benefits extend to all telecom circles. 5G deployments have led to an improved overall user experience across all telecom circles thanks to operators investing in backhaul infrastructure. The launch of 5G technology by operators like Jio and Airtel has led to a substantial increase in 5G subscribers, and operators still have ambitious rollout plans, with the deployment of a significant number of 5G base stations across the country.
  • Not only faster speeds. 5G has not only brought faster speeds but also higher customer satisfaction, as indicated by the Net Promoter Score (NPS), which shows that 5G users in India consistently rate their network operators more positively compared to 4G users. Additionally, 5G Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) services have been introduced to provide broadband connectivity in areas where laying fiber is costly or impractical.

India climbed by 72 places on Speedtests’s mobile rankings thanks to 5G rollouts

Speedtest Intelligence® data shows that median download speeds across India increased by 259% since before 5G launched, jumping from 13.87 Mbps in September 2022 to a median download speed of 50.21 Mbps in August 2023. As a result, India’s position on the Speedtest Global Index™ improved by 72 places, from 119th in September 2022 to 47th in August 2023. This puts India ahead of its neighbors, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan, but also some G20 countries, such as Mexico (90th), Turkey (68th), the UK (62nd), Japan (58th), Brazil (50th place), and South Africa (48th place).

Chart of Global Index Raking Among Select Countries Compared to India

Mobile performance improved in all telecom circles

Mobile users in India are among the most data-intensive consumers in the world. However, India’s 4G networks have been unable to keep up with consumer expectations, primarily due to network congestion caused by population density, lack of cellular infrastructure, backhaul, as well as spectrum constraints. Following the 5G spectrum auction, operators have been able to addres some of those issues and help to offload 4G traffic onto 5G networks, thus reducing 4G network congestion – the strategy has proven successful already, as 25% to 35% of traffic is already getting offloaded on 5G from 4G. 

Map of India Median Cellular Download Speed by Telecom Circles, All Operators Combined

According to Speedtest data, India’s median download speed has improved remarkably, increasing by 3.59 times since 5G was launched in the country. Back in October 2022, for example, India’s median download speed ranged from 10.37 Mbps in North East to 21.49 Mbps in Jammu and Kashmir. However, by August 2023, the range of median download speeds had widened significantly, with each circle clocking a speed of more than 28 Mbps. The North East saw a median download speed of 28.02 Mbps, while Jammu and Kashmir recorded a high of 150.95 Mbps.

In August 2023, Jammu and Kashmir, located in the northernmost part of India, emerged as the leader in mobile median download speeds at 150.96 Mbps, surpassing Bihar (73.00 Mbps) and Kolkata (66.47 Mbps). Jammu and Kashmir was one of the last states to launch a mobile network in 2003, and due to security concerns and internet shutdowns, there were occasional disruptions in mobile network services. However, the local administration has been focusing on developing infrastructure in various tourist places, particularly in Kashmir.

Fast-paced 5G adoption

Jio and Airtel have been implementing 5G technology since October 2022, following the acquisition of 5G spectrum licenses. At first, they concentrated on launching in major cities, but their coverage has expanded significantly, and 5G performance has improved across all telecom circles. In October 2022, there was a noticeable difference in the performance of 5G networks on 5G-compatible devices. Median download speeds ranged from 512.57 Mbps in Gujarat to 19.23 Mbps in Uttar Pradesh West as the networks were under development. In fact, in nine telecom circles: Andhra Pradesh, Kolkata, North East, Haryana, Rajasthan, Bihar, Punjab, Kerala, and Uttar Pradesh West, median 5G download speeds were below 100 Mbps because networks were in early testing stages. However, by August 2023, median 5G download speeds exceeded 240 Mbps across all telecom areas, with Kolkata leading the pack with a median download speed of 385.50 Mbps.

Map of India Median 5G Download Speed by Telecom Circles, All Operators Combined

As 5G deployments continue in India, the number of subscribers keeps growing. Reliance Jio announced it has over 50 million customers, and Bharti Airtel claimed it had over 10 million 5G customers in June

Jio also has ambitious rollout targets – it aims to deploy nearly 1 million base stations by December 2023 to address growing data consumption on its network. According to The Department of Telecommunications (DoT), the country had 338,572 5G base stations (BTS) as of August 28, 2023, a significant increase from the 53,590 reported at the beginning of the year. The three most populous states in India – Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Bihar – account for 25% of all wireless subscribers in the country and also hold a 25% share of 5G BTS.


5G speeds in India are particularly impressive compared to those on 4G; in August 2023, for example, median download speeds on 5G were 2,003% faster than those on 4G, with 5G showing a median download speed of 316.24 Mbps compared to 14.97 Mbps on 4G. The speed increase has been heavily propelled by operators investing in fiber technology to improve backhaul.

5G has a positive impact on Net Promoter Scores

Chart of 5G NPS in India

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a tool that gauges customer loyalty and satisfaction. NPS is a key performance indicator of customer experience, categorizing users into Detractors (those that score 0-6), Passives (scores between 7 and 8), and Promoters (score of 9-10), with the NPS representing the percentage of Promoters minus the percent of Detractors, displayed in the range from -100 to 100. 

In our recent article, we found that 5G users, on average, rated their network operator with NPS scores that were universally higher than those for 4G LTE users. The story is similar in India, where in Q2 2023, 5G scored 15.80 compared to -29.65 for 4G. In most telecom regions, except for the North East, the 5G NPS consistently outperforms that of 4G/LTE.

Ookla understands real-life consumer experience

Median 5G performance allows us to understand the midpoint of the user experience on 5G networks, but it doesn’t paint the complete picture. Speedtest® is designed to thoroughly saturate a user’s connection, uniquely allowing us to accurately measure the maximum speeds available. This is especially important for 5G connections, which can be capable of tremendous speeds, such as those we observed in India. Using Speedtest data, we can see that operators in India have already achieved maximum download speeds exceeding 1.7 Gbps. Speedtest simultaneously measures download speeds from multiple servers to ensure a fully utilized connection.

Chart of 5G Maximum Download Speed in India for Jio and Airtel

Early days for 5G FWA

In addition, operators have introduced 5G Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) services to complement their existing 5G offerings. FWA offers an excellent opportunity to cover areas that are too costly to lay fiber and is an alternative to fixed networks. 5G FWA offers an opportunity in India because it will use 5G as the last-mile technology to provide broadband connectivity. 

5G FWA has already been very successful in the United States, South Africa, and the Philippines. Bharti Airtel launched ‘Airtel Xstream AirFiber’ in Delhi and Mumbai in August 2023, extending their services beyond their fiber footprint. Their plans start at Rs 799 ($9.64) per month and offer download speeds of up to 100 Mbps. Jio also launched ‘JioAirFiber,’ in September, initially available in eight cities, including Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Pune. There are several plan options available for ‘AirFiber’ and ‘AirFiber Max’ with download speeds ranging from 30 Mbps to 1 Gbps. Pricing starts at INR 599 ($7.22) per month and goes up to INR 3,999 ($48.23). 


We will continue to monitor 5G performance in India, see how operators scale networks, and assess the real-world performance as more consumers will connect with 5G devices and use 5G FWA. If you want to learn more, subscribe to Ookla Research™ to be the first to read our analyses.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| November 5, 2020

Unable to Connect — The Most Significant Online Service Outages in Q3 2020

“Is it down?” frustrated users asked themselves during the multiple online service outages in Q3 2020. The fourth installment of our online service outage tracking series used Downdetector® data from Q3 2020 and focused on the following online service categories: cloud services, collaboration platforms, financial services, gaming, internet service providers and social media.

Cloud services

Cloudflare (July 17, 2020): 14,198 reports at peak

Downdetector_Cloudflare_Outage_1020

On July 17, a major disruption in Cloudflare’s service broke the internet, taking multiple online services down with it. Users rushed to Downdetector to log issues with multiple services that rely on Cloudflare for content delivery, including 4chan, DoorDash and Zendesk. At the peak of the outage, there were 14,198 reports of issues with the service in the U.S.

Azure (September 28, 2020): 2,846 reports at peak

Azure, Microsoft’s cloud service, was affected by September 28’s Microsoft-wide outage (see next category). Users from Germany, India, Japan and the U.S. stated they had issues with the cloud service. That day, there were 2,846 reports of issues at the peak of the outage in the U.S.

Collaboration platforms

Office 365 (September 28,2020): 20,437 reports at peak

Downdetector_Office365_Outage_1020

Microsoft’s suite of online collaboration services including Outlook, Sharepoint, OneDrive and Skype went down on September 28 (along with Azure, see above). Logs of issues with the services started coming into Downdetector at 3 p.m Pacific. Most users stated being unable to log in or connect to the server. At the peak, there were 20,437 reported issues in the U.S. Users from Japan and India also logged problems with the service that day.

Zoom (August 24, 2020): 17,874 reports at peak

On August 24, users were upset to find that they were unable to connect with their coworkers, friends and family through Zoom. Most users stated problems with logging in and joining a conference. There were 17,874 reports of issues in the U.S. at the peak of the outage. Users in the U.K. and Canada also had issues with the video conferencing service that day.

Google Drive (September 24, 2020): 14,715 reports at peak

Users in the U.S., Philippines and Indonesia were unable to collaborate on projects, upload files or access their documents stored in Google Drive on September 24. At the peak of the outage in the U.S., there were 14,715 reported issues. Users of Google products YouTube and Gmail also logged issues in Brazil, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico and the U.K.

Slack (September 29, 2020): 1,396 reports at peak

Slack received 1,396 logs of issues at the peak of the outage reports on September 29. Users in the U.S. had problems with sending messages, videos and images to their peers — and some were unable to connect to the platform at all.

Financial services

TD Ameritrade (August 18, 2020): 7,814 reports at peak

Downdetector_TD-Ameritrade_Outage_1020

The online stock investment tool reportedly went down on August 18. Users were unable to log into their account or buy and sell stocks. At the peak of the outage, there were 7,814 reports of issues in the U.S. There were two other notable outages that month — August 17 with 5,816 reports at peak and August 31 with 6,893 reports at peak.

Gaming

Steam (August 5, 2020): 69,255 reports at peak

Downdetector_Steam_Outage_1020

Users from Brazil, Germany, Japan, the U.K and the U.S. submitted issues with Steam on August 5. Most users stated problems when trying to log into the platform and play with other users. At the peak of the outage in the U.S, there were 69,255 reports of issues with the gaming platform.

Fall Guys (September 2, 2020): 2,890 reports at peak

The Fall Guys status page on Downdetector showed there were problems with the popular online game on September 2. Users in Brazil, the U.K. and the U.S. were struggling to play the game online. That day, 97% of reports stated problems with the server connection.

Internet service providers

Spectrum (July 29, 2020): 56,318 reports at peak

Downdetector_Spectrum_Outage_1020

Spectrum users from the both coasts of the United States flooded Downdetector with logs of issues with the service when they started experiencing problems with their internet connections. Complaints with the service started surging at around 5 p.m. Pacific and lasted for about an hour. At the peak of the outage there were 56,318 reports of issues.

CenturyLink (August 30, 2020): 11,543 reports at peak

CenturyLink customers on the East Coast of the U.S. had problems with their internet service on August 30 starting around 2 a.m. Pacific and ending around 8 a.m. Pacific. There were 11,543 reports of issues at the peak of the outage.

Social Media

WhatsApp (July 14, 2020): 148,573 reports at peak

Downdetector_WhatsApp_Outage_1020-1

A multi-country outage affected WhatsApp on July 14. Users from all over the world stated problems with sending and receiving messages on the Facebook-owned app. The country with the most issues submitted was Germany with 148,573 reports of issues at the peak of the outage. Users in Brazil, India, the Netherlands, Mexico, Spain and the U.K. were also affected by the outage.

Facebook (September 17, 2020): 30,918 reports at peak

Facebook users from multiple countries experienced problems with the social media platform on September 17. More than half of the logs were labeled as “total blackout” — users were unable to access the platform or any of its features. There were 30,918 reports of issues at the peak of the outage in the U.S. Users in Italy, Poland and the U.K. also had problems with Facebook that day.

Want to know when an online service is down? Keep up with outages by visiting Downdetector.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| August 7, 2022

89% of Indian Smartphone Users Are Ready to Upgrade to 5G

India’s long awaited 5G spectrum auction has just come to a close

Four players participated in the 5G auction — Reliance Jio Infocomm (Jio), Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Idea (Vi), and transport and utility infrastructure firm Adani Group – spending a grand total of Rs 1.5 trillion (US$ 19bn) for spectrum across 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz, 3300 MHz, and 26 GHz frequency bands. MmWave spectrum is capable of delivering super-fast speeds (thinking Gigabits), but is limited in terms of range. Low-band (sub-1GHz) spectrum is able to travel farther, cover a greater geographical region, and provide deeper penetration within buildings. But, low band spectrum lacks the capacity to deliver true 5G speeds. The so-called “sweet spot” for 5G is mid-band spectrum (1-6 GHz spectrum, and in particular C-band), which offers the best of both worlds in terms of coverage and capacity.

Jio acquired the most spectrum, especially in the sought after C-band spectrum (2,440 MHz), but it was the only operator that acquired the 700 MHz band. This will give Reliance Jio an advantage compared to providers who have acquired only C-band, especially since low-band spectrum allows for better indoor signal penetration in urban areas and also better coverage in rural areas. Now that operators have acquired 5G spectrum, they start their race to become the first operators to go to market with 5G, with some already hinting that 5G deployments will begin in the next few months. 

5G has been a long time coming

While mobile users in India are among the most data-intensive users in the world, India’s 4G/LTE networks have become a bottleneck for demand. Only 1.4% of respondents stated that they are satisfied with the existing network performance and are not planning to upgrade to 5G. The promise of 5G is that it will unlock a world of possibilities beyond just a faster network connection. In order to understand how 5G can change the current mobile behavior of Indian consumers, we commissioned a survey in the run up to the spectrum auction. Ookla’s Consumer Survey spans a sample of 2,000 smartphone users aged 18 and above across urban and rural areas of India. 

So what do Indian consumers expect from 5G?

Consumers have an appetite for video streaming and gaming

Our survey shows that if mobile internet connections were better, 70% of respondents would increase their use of video streaming, while 68% stated they would boost their mobile gaming. Operators acquired a total of 44,960 MHz of spectrum in the 26 GHz spectrum band (mmWave), which due to its high throughput, is particularly useful for streaming and gaming. It will also lend additional capacity in dense areas such as stadiums. Better connectivity will also have a wider reaching effect on a consumer’s ability to communicate more often. That’s especially true for social media and using phones for work, which are currently the top two use cases among consumers in India. Meanwhile, other consumer behaviours such as online shopping, mobile money, and watching esports aren’t impacted as much by high network speeds. Indeed, just over half of the respondents said they would use these services the same amount of time despite network upgrades. 

Consumers want faster speeds

42% of respondents believe that faster speeds would most improve service currently being provided to them. The good news is that the operators’ spectrum holdings in the C-band will help them do just that. Both Airtel and Jio splurged on C-band spectrum at auction, acquiring spectrum in all of the 22 telecom circles, while Vodafone acquired spectrum only in its priority circles. Having access to contiguous spectrum helps to achieve faster, lower latency, and greener 5G services. In addition to faster speeds, 24% of respondents desire a more reliable connection, while 21% want better indoor coverage. However, only one in 10 respondents pointed to better outdoor coverage as a factor that would be most beneficial. 

Which of the following do yuou believe would most improve the service provided to you by your mobile provider? - consumer survey 2022 results

Delay to India’s 5G auction did come with some benefits

Namely, the decrease of the cost of 5G hardware as the technology and vendor ecosystem continues to mature. Following the spectrum auction, Bharti Airtel has already contracted Ericsson, Nokia, and Samsung to deploy 5G services in August 2022. Indian operators’ move to embrace Open RAN will drive network costs even lower. Another key factor is the 5G device ecosystem, with 5G smartphone prices falling since the technology launched. We’re already seeing a growing number of tests taken with Speedtest® that are running on 5G-capable devices in the market. According to our Consumer Survey, almost half of respondents have a 5G-ready handset. This offers operators an existing customer base that they can target from day one.

Indian telcos are set for a disruptive year ahead once 5G launches

Consumers are keen to upgrade, with 89% of respondents intending to upgrade to 5G and only 2% stating that they don’t intend to upgrade to 5G at all. It’s worth noting that almost half of the respondents (48%) plan to upgrade to 5G as soon as it is available in their area and would consider switching providers if necessary. Twenty percent will do so as soon as their current provider offers 5G, 14% when they have a 5G-capable phone, and 7% plan to wait for their current contract to end. Those that aren’t sure about the new technology will likely wait to see how attractive it is once other people start using it. Indian operators are already voicing their plans regarding network rollout, with Jio targeting a pan-Indian rollout coinciding with the “Azadi ka Amrit Mahotsav” Independence Day while Airtel plans to start 5G services in key cities across the country. 

Cost, lack of education, and 5G phones are the main hurdles

As with any new technology, there will be a number of challenges that must be addressed, including affordability, coverage, and consumer education. Our survey results also informed us that the key reason for not upgrading to 5G is the perceived cost of the 5G tariff. Just over a quarter of those who don’t plan to upgrade said that they think the 5G tariff cost would be too expensive. Beyond tariffs, 24% of those that don’t plan to upgrade to 5G stated lack of 5G knowledge as an issue, while 23% don’t have a 5G-capable phone. Only 1.4% of the overall respondents are satisfied with the existing network performance and would not upgrade to 5G. 

We will continue to share more insights and takeaways from our latest study, including our analysis on 5G perception broken down by age, location, and operator. Subscribe to Ookla Research to be the first to read our analyses.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| October 9, 2022

India's 5G Speeds Reach 500 Mbps

Ookla® recently commented on the outcome of the 5G spectrum auction and how Indian consumers are ready to upgrade to 5G networks. We now have data from Speedtest Intelligence® to show early 5G performance across select cities as well as an indication of the growth of the number of 5G-capable devices. 

Key messages:

  • 5G download speeds reach 500 Mbps on 5G test networks 
  • Almost 600 Mbps median download speed on Jio’s 5G network in Delhi 
  • Consumers are 5G ready 
  • iPhone users have most 5G-capable phones 

Airtel and Jio turned 5G on  

Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched 5G services in select Indian cities on Saturday, October 1 during India Mobile Congress 2022 in New Delhi. Operators took the opportunity to discuss their 5G plans at the event as well. Bharti Airtel’s chairman Sunil Bharti Mittal said 5G services would be available in eight cities: Delhi, Mumbai, Varanasi, Hyderabad, Siliguri, Chennai, Nagpur, and Bengaluru from the launch and will expand across India by March 2024. 

Reliance Jio, which shook up the Indian telecom industry when it launched 4G, also has ambitious 5G plans. Jio’s 5G beta trial “Jio True 5G for All” launched during Dussehra on October 5  in four Indian cities, including Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Varanasi. Jio has rolled out a 5G Standalone (5G SA) network, which doesn’t rely on its existing LTE network and which Jio justifies for using the “true 5G” name. Jio’s “welcome offer” is available to those that receive an invitation. Users can get unlimited 5G data with up to 1 Gbps speeds. Jio plans to gradually expand its 5G footprint to deliver the Jio 5G service across the entire country by December 2023. Jio also is looking to make the services “very affordable,” according to Reliance Jio chairman Akash Ambani during the IMC event. “it should be affordable for every Indian – right from devices to service.”

Despite financial woes, Vodafone India has also reiterated its commitment to the 5G roll-out but it has not yet provided specific timelines.

5G download speeds reach 500 Mbps on 5G test networks 

Speedtest Intelligence shows that operators have been testing their networks before the October 1 launch. We’ve already seen a wide range of 5G download speeds: from low double-digit (16.27 Mbps) to a mindblowing 809.94 Mbps, which points to the fact that the operators are still recalibrating their networks. We expect these speeds to be more stable moving forward as these networks will enter the commercial stage. 

5G download speed distribution among select cities in India

Jio’s 5G network showed almost 600 Mbps median download speed in Delhi 

We used Speedtest® data to compare median 5G download speeds across four cities both Jio and Airtel built their networks. In the capital city, Delhi, Airtel reached nearly 200 Mbps median download speed at 197.98 Mbps while Jio almost broke 600 Mbps (598.58 Mbps) since June 2022. 

In Kolkata, operators’ median download speeds varied the most since June 2022: Airtel’s median download speed was 33.83 Mbps while Jio had a much faster median download speed at 482.02 Mbps. 

In Mumbai, one of the most densely populated cities in India, Airtel fell behind Jio once again, reaching 271.07 Mbps median download speed compared to Jio’s 515.38 Mbps median download since June 2022.

In Varanasi, which is considered the Hindu spiritual capital of India, Jio and Airtel achieved closer parity, with Airtel achieving a 5G median download speed at 516.57 Mbps to Jio’s 485.22 Mbps median download speed since June 2022.

The future of mobile internet in India will be much faster than what 4G LTE is achieving

According to the Speedtest Global Index™, India ranked 117th in the world for mobile download speed at 13.52 Mbps in August 2022. These new 5G results show that 5G speeds are far superior than India’s existing network. 

While we need to approach these early results with caution, 5G devices are already showing they can achieve much faster speeds, at least under artificial controlled testing circumstances e.g., no network congestion and ideal network coverage.

chart of median 5g download speeds among select cities in India, top providers

When we cross reference operators’ 5G speeds versus the frequency band they are using, we see a cautionary tale. During the recent spectrum auction, Jio acquired the most spectrum, especially in the highly sought-after C-band spectrum, and Jio was the only operator that acquired the 700 MHz band. This gives Reliance Jio an advantage compared to providers who have acquired only C-band, especially since the low-band spectrum allows for better indoor signal penetration in urban areas and also better coverage in rural areas.

Using Speedtest Intelligence data we can see that Jio’s 5G performance differs depending on the spectrum band it uses. Jio’s 5G network using the C-band (n=78) results in performance ranging between 606.53 Mbps and 875.26 Mbps median download speed. While 5G networks using the lower – 700 MHz frequency band (n=28) so-called coverage band, gives speeds lower than100 Mbps median download speed, ranging between 78.69 Mbps and 95.13 Mbps. Airtel, on the other hand, achieved speeds from 365.48 Mbps to 716.85 Mbps deploying 5G utilizing only its C-band spectrum holding.

chart of median download speed by spectrum band among select cities in India

Consumers are 5G ready 

Earlier this year, we surveyed Indian consumers and found 89% of Indian smartphone users are ready to upgrade to 5G. Operators have an existing addressable base of devices that they can target from the start, and over the past year the number of 5G-capable devices has been on the rise. Among Speedtest users, Jio saw the largest increase in 5G-capable devices (67.4%), followed by Airtel (61.6%), and Vi India (56%). 

Chart of 5g-capable devices by providers, year on year growth

Using Speedtest Intelligence data we compared 5G-capable devices across different cities. Hyderabad was the one city where all operators have seen significant growth in terms of 5G-capable devices, with Jio even tripling its install base.

chart of 5g-capable devices in major cities by top providers, year on year growth

iPhone users have most 5G-capable phones 

In our survey, 51% of survey respondents already had smartphones supporting 5G. The top smartphone vendors in the market are Samsung (31%), followed by Xiaomi (23%), Realme, and Vivo. While only one in ten survey respondents had an iPhone, Apple smartphones tend to be more 5G capable. In fact, according to Speedtest Intelligence data, the iPhone 12 5G is the most popular 5G-capable device in the Indian market. Jio will launch an Android-based 5G phone in partnership with Google in 2023, repeating the go-to-market strategy it used when entering the 4G market. In the meantime, Jio is working with smartphone vendors to ensure that consumers can access its 5G SA network. 

These are still early days for 5G in India, with most of Jio’s and Airtel’s respective networks still in beta testing. We will continue to monitor 5G performance in India, see how operators scale networks, and assess the real-world performance as more consumers will get online with 5G devices. If you want to learn more, subscribe to Ookla Research™ to be the first to read our analyses.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| February 28, 2023

5G in India: 25 Times Faster than 4G

5G has been in place in India for over four months and already it’s having a tremendous impact on the state of mobile in the country compared to last October when we commented on initial 5G speeds just after 5G networks launched. 

Key takeaways

  • India’s mobile speeds increased by 115%. India has climbed 49 places on the Speedtest Global Index™ since launching 5G, from 118th in September 2022 to 69th in January 2023. Ookla® data shows improvement in LTE speeds for both Jio and Airtel since the launch of 5G services, as all their investments into network modernization are paying off.
  • Median 5G download speeds are 25 times faster than 4G. 5G performance has increased across early 5G adopters in most of the telecom circles, Kolkata achieved the fastest median 5G download speeds in January 2023 at above 500 Mbps. Jio experienced a top median 5G download speed of 506.25 Mbps in Kolkata, while Airtel of 268.89 Mbps in Delhi. 
  • 5G Availability increased 55-fold. Airtel and Jio have ambitious targets in terms of 5G network rollout. From 5G networks’ inception, 5G Availability across 5G-capable devices has steadily increased, reaching 8.0% for Airtel and 5.1% for Jio.
  • 5G is further impacting the competitive landscape. We can see Speedtest® users migrating away from Vi, which has been further stimulated by the operator’s inability to launch 5G.

5G will benefit Digital India

Speedtest Intelligence® data shows that median download speeds across India increased by 115%  since before the 5G launch, from a 13.87 Mbps median download speed in September 2022 to 29.85 Mbps in January 2023. As a result, India’s position on the Speedtest Global Index improved by 49 places from 118th in September 2022 to 69th in January 2023. This puts India ahead of some of the G20 countries, such as Mexico, Russia, and Argentina, and its neighbors: Indonesia, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan. India is also catching up with the likes of Turkey (a 30.98 Mbps median download speed/65th place on the Speedtest Global Index), South Africa (34.71 Mbps/58th place), and Brazil (35.85 Mbps/57th place).

chart of global index ranking among select countries

There are over half a billion internet users in India, making it the second-largest online market worldwide, just behind China. India has already made significant progress in terms of mobile broadband growth. One of the key reasons behind the acceleration in adoption was the launch of the Digital India initiative in 2015, which made government services digitally available to citizens. Digital India’s goal is to transform India into a digital society and economy. Since its launch, almost 270 million Indians have been connected to the internet via mobile internet. This was enabled by expanding mobile broadband networks, particularly using 4G technology. Now, 5G is stepping in to play a role in enabling digital transformation across multiple sectors of the Indian economy. GSMA Intelligence forecasts that 5G could contribute $455 billion to GDP by 2040. 

Median 5G download speed is 25 times that of 4G 

map of median 5g download speed by telecom circles, all operators combined

When 5G was first launched in October 2022, there was a wide disparity in the early 5G network performance users were experiencing on 5G-capable devices; median 5G download speeds oscillated between 512.57 Mbps (Gujarat) and 19.23 Mbps (Uttar Pradesh West) as the 5G networks build out started. In fact, in nine telecom circles: Andhra Pradesh, Kolkata, North East, Haryana, Rajasthan, Bihar, Punjab, Kerala, and Uttar Pradesh West, the median 5G download speed was below 100 Mbps because networks were very much at the testing stage. Four months on, in January 2023, 5G median download speeds had greatly increased across all of the telecom circles — exceeding 200 Mbps everywhere except Jammu and Kashmir, with Kolkata clocking speeds over 500 Mbps. 

5G investment has also propelled an increase in 4G LTE speeds thanks to the modernization of the underlying infrastructure. When we compare 5G and 4G performance in January 2023: 

  • median 5G download speed is 25 times that of 4G LTE (338.12 Mbps vs. 13.30 Mbps), and
  • median 5G upload speed is 4.5 times 4G LTE (19.65 Mbps vs 3.55 Mbps)

We see improvements in LTE speeds (both for Airtel & Jio) in multiple cities as they are offloading 4G traffic onto their 5G network, therefore reducing 4G network congestion.  This has to be caveated by the fact that these are still early days for 5G in India, and 5G performance will most likely decrease once those networks are commercially available. 

Jio and Airtel are expanding their 5G networks

map of median 5g download speed by teleocm circles, jio and airtel

Jio’s $25 bn investment seems to be paying off. In January 2023 Jio achieved median 5G download speeds above 400 Mbps across ten telecom circles. Jio’s True 5G network is based on a 5G Standalone (5G SA), which doesn’t rely on a 4G LTE network. While Jio’s initial 5G speeds fluctuated massively – from low single-digit to speeds well above 800 Mbps, which pointed to the operator recalibrating its networks, Jio’s 5G performance has stabilized over the past four months. In January 2023, Jio’s 5G early adopters experienced speeds ranging from 246.49 Mbps median download speed in Himachal Pradesh to 506.25 Mbps in Kolkata. 

Airtel looks to 5G to offload capacity from 4G to 5G. Gopal Vittal, MD & CEO of Bharti Airtel Limited, mentioned during the latest quarterly results call that “between 25% to 35% of traffic is already getting offloaded on 5G from 4G.” Airtel deployed 5G in a Non-Standalone mode (5G NSA) – the operator stated that commercial trials using NSA give a 30% higher coverage than SA. In January 2023, Airtel’s 5G early adopters experienced speeds ranging from a 78.13 Mbps median download speed in Kolkata to 268.89 Mbps in Delhi. 

Operators have already committed a significant amount of capex towards 5G. One of the key challenges Indian telcos face is low ARPU levels, which came in below Rs 200 ($2.41) in Q3 FY 2023 results: Airtel led the pack at Rs 193 ($2.33), Jio followed at Rs 178.2 ($2.15), Vi at Rs 135 ($1.63). Recently, Airtel has removed its based Rs 99 ($1.20) plan across 17 circles, with the new base plan priced at Rs 155 ($1.87). The other two operators have not followed the lead yet. While this could lead to churn, it could help solidify ARPU as Airtel plans to use 5G to migrate customers to higher-value postpaid plans. 

chart of 5g maximum download speed, jio and airtel

Median 5G performance allows us to understand the midpoint of user experience on 5G networks, but it doesn’t paint the full picture. Using Speedtest data we can see that operators have achieved maximum download speeds exceeding 1.6 Gbps – close to speeds that operators in the United States achieved using mmWave spectrum

Spectrum is not the only factor affecting 5G performance 

chart of 5g median download speed by spectrum band

Operators’ spectrum holding affects their speeds; we have recently commented on the relationship between low- and C-band spectrum and 5G performance. A similar holds true in India. Using Speedtest Intelligence data, we can see that Jio’s 5G performance differs depending on the spectrum band it uses. Jio’s 5G network using the C-band (n=78) results in a 462.60 Mbps median download speed. When Jio’s 5G network uses the lower – 700 MHz frequency band (n=28), the so-called coverage band, the median download speed was 75.70 Mbps. This, however, doesn’t necessarily explain the difference in performance between Jio and Airtel, which also uses the C-band spectrum. Airtel deployed 5G utilizing only its C-band spectrum holding in an NSA (Non-Standalone Mode), and it clocks a median 5G download speed of 277.30 Mbps. 

There is another factor at play that can explain the difference in performance between the operators – the type of backhaul network they are using. Indian operators heavily rely on terrestrial wireless backhaul solutions. While fiber penetration in backhaul networks is increasing, according to the DoT, only a third of mobile towers are connected with fiber – versus the National Broadband Mission’s goal of 70% being connected by 2024. The reason why this presents a challenge in the face of 5G rollout is that the capacity per tower site has to increase substantially to accommodate 5G traffic requirements, which in turn requires fiberized backhaul. E-band spectrum, which operators received last year, helps but isn’t enough to support a 5G rollout.  

There are various challenges related to laying fiber, including right-of-way (RoW) access and availability of stable power that operators have to overcome. Airtel looks to AI to understand where most of its traffic is located and plans its network roll-out strategy accordingly. 

5G Availability in India increased 55 times

chart of 5g availability for top providers in india, 5g capable devices

Speedtest Intelligence data shows that 5G Availability – the proportion of users with 5G-capable devices that use 5G network – had increased 55 times between September 2022, when 5G Availability stood at 0.1%, and January 2023, when it reached 5.5%. Operators already have an existing base of consumers owning 5G-capable devices. During the latest quarterly call, Airtel shared that about 11% of their smartphones are 5G ready. Airtel users with 5G smartphones can access Airtel 5G Plus services at no additional cost using their existing 4G SIM cards. Airtel is busy carrying out a 5G network rollout, planning to go live in about 300 cities by March 2023 and to cover all urban areas by March 2024.  

Jio also has ambitious targets for 5G network deployment, it recently stated that it is on track to complete the pan-India 5G rollout by December 2023, having already deployed over 25,000 sites across 700MHz and 3.5 GHz bands. Jio’s customers can connect to 5G at no additional cost upon receiving the 5G Welcome offer, which is extended to users with 5G-enabled smartphones who subscribe to a plan or Rs239 or higher. The existing 4G SIM will also connect to the 5G network. There is a need to do a software upgrade for older models of smartphones to be able to connect to Jio’s 5G SA network. 

chart of 5g availability across cities in India, all operators combined

During the early days of 5G – in October 2022 – we could see 5G device testing in just over a dozen of cities. Only three cities had a 5G Availability exceeding 2% – namely, the capital, New Delhi, Hyderabad, and Siliguri. Fast forward to January 2023, and 5G Availability exceeded 2% across 39 cities where both Jio and Airtel had rolled out their networks. 5G Availability across three cities was above 13%, namely in Cuttack, Chennai, and Noida.  

5G will further change the competitive landscape in India

chart of cumulative monthly percentage change in the number of speedtest® users

Based on our data, we can infer churn pattern of Speedtest users from January to December 2022, we can see that Vi India has been losing users throughout 2022, following the 5G launch, the disconnections increased significantly. On the other hand, Jio has been adding new users. This has been validated by the latest data released by TRAI, which shows a similar trend: Vodafone Idea had negative 2.5m net additions in December 2022, compared to Reliance Jio (1.7 million net adds) and Bharti Airtel (1.5 million net adds). 

We can also gain insights into where consumers move when changing their network providers. Most of Vi’s customers have moved away to Jio (1.88%) and Airtel (1.32%). Jio gained around 1.3% of customers from Airtel & Vi India. In comparison, Airtel has lost 0.53% to Jio but gained 0.63% from Vi over the same period of time.

chart of overall movement of speedtest® users

We will continue to monitor 5G performance in India, see how operators scale networks, and assess the real-world performance as more consumers will get online with 5G devices. If you want to learn more, subscribe to Ookla Research™ to be the first to read our analyses.

Methodology note:

Speedtest® is designed to fully saturate a user’s connection, which uniquely allows us to accurately measure the maximum speeds available. This is especially important for 5G connections, which can be capable of tremendous speeds. Speedtest simultaneously measures download speeds from multiple servers in order to ensure that a connection is being fully utilized.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| May 23, 2023

U.S. Airports Have Fastest Free Airport Wi-Fi, Chinese Airports Have Faster Mobile

The summer travel season is about to officially begin across the northern hemisphere and we’re back with fresh data for our series on airport Wi-Fi performance. This year we examined mobile Wi-Fi on free Wi-Fi provided by the individual airports as well as mobile speeds at some of the busiest airports in the world during Q1 2023. While airports in the United States top the list of fastest free airport Wi-Fi, the fastest mobile speeds we saw were in China. Read on for a specific look at internet performance including: download speed, upload speed, and latency.

U.S. airports have fastest airport Wi-Fi

Speedtest Intelligence® showed two U.S. airports at the top of the list for free airport Wi-Fi with Fort Lauderdale’s Hollywood International Airport Terminal 3 and San Francisco International Airport showing median download speeds of 157.60 Mbps and 156.66 Mbps, respectively, during Q1 2023. This represented a small drop for SFO since our November analysis but an increase for FLL. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (143.42 Mbps), John F. Kennedy International Airport (136.06 Mbps), and Seattle–Tacoma International Airport (136.02 Mbps) rounded out the top five with three additional SSIDs from FLL following closely behind with median download speeds from 122.07 Mbps to 134.62 Mbps.

Chart of Mobile Internet Performance Over Free Wi-Fi at Select Airports

As we’ve seen in most recent analyses, the airports with the fastest Wi-Fi are international hubs that passengers from around the world pass through on their way to all kinds of destinations. If you are connecting through any of these airports, you should have no trouble with internet speeds this fast. In case of video calls, upload speeds are even faster than downloads at almost all of these airports, and SFO had the fastest uploads on the list.

Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport and SEA had the lowest median multi-server latency on Wi-Fi of any of the airports surveyed during Q1 2023. This means your device should see very little delay when relaying information across the web.

Shanghai tops Wi-Fi performance at global airports

Shanghai Pudong International Airport was the fastest non-U.S. airport on our list with a fastest median download speed of 118.67 Mbps. Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris (98.82 Mbps), Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (82.83 Mbps), Dubai International Airport (67.21 Mbps), and Frankfurt Airport (59.10 Mbps) followed for median download speeds at non-U.S. airports. All of these airports have internet speeds that qualify as at least good, which means you should be okay unless you want to try multi-player gaming (which is probably not your first choice on an airport layover anyway). Both Mexican airports on our list showed speeds in the slow range, so log off early and enjoy your vacation if you’re at the airport in Cancún or Mexico City.

Chinese airports have fastest mobile speeds

Get ready to connect to local mobile service or tether your phone to your laptop if you’re traveling through airports in Shanghai and Beijing and have access to 5G. Not only did Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Beijing Capital International Airport, and Beijing Daxing International Airport have the fastest median downloads over mobile on our list at 308.51 Mbps, 304.87 Mbps, and 300.70 Mbps, respectively, during Q1 2023 — the mobile speeds at these airports were dramatically faster than the airport Wi-Fi. Salt Lake City International Airport (282.21 Mbps) and Hangzhou Xiaoshan International Airport (259.86 Mbps) rounded out the top five.

Chart of Mobile Network Performance at Select Airports

While latency on mobile was generally higher than that on Wi-Fi, these same three Chinese airports (PEK, PKX, and PVG) also showed the lowest median multi-server latency on mobile during Q1 2023, indicating that your internet experience at these airports will have the least lag. Airports outside the U.S. performed better for latency overall with the top 16 airports for latency all located outside North America. CUN had the highest latency on mobile.

We were able to include more airports in the mobile analysis because there were more mobile samples to analyze at those airports than there were samples over Wi-Fi.

Airport Wi-Fi or mobile? Connecting on your next trip

Save yourself time by using this checklist to decide whether to try out the Wi-Fi or simply use the local mobile network. We compared internet performance on free airport Wi-Fi with median download speeds over mobile for the 38 airports we have both Wi-Fi and mobile data for during Q1 2023. Twenty-one airports had faster mobile internet than airport Wi-Fi. Twelve airports had faster Wi-Fi than mobile, and four airports showed only a slight distinction between Wi-Fi and mobile so we gave both the green check marks.

Chart Comparing Airport Wi-Fi and Mobile Speeds at Select Airports

Airport Wi-Fi has come a long way since we started this series in 2017. We hope your connections are smooth and if you’re traveling this summer, take a Speedtest® at the airport to see how your experience compares.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| January 21, 2021

New Year, Great Data: The Best Ookla Open Data Projects We’ve Seen So Far


When we announced Ookla® Open Datasets from Ookla For Good™ in October, we were hoping to see exciting projects that raise the bar on the conversation about internet speeds and accessibility — and you delivered. From analyses of internet inequity in the United States to measures of data affluence in India, today we’re highlighting four projects that really show what this data can do. We also have a new, simpler tutorial on how you can use this data for your own efforts to improve the state of networks worldwide.

Highlighting the digital divide in the U.S.

Jamie Saxon with the Center for Data and Computing at the University of Chicago married Ookla data on broadband performance with data from the American Community Survey to create interactive maps of the digital divide in 20 U.S. cities. These maps provide views into many variables that contribute to internet inequities.

Ookla_open_datasets_James_Saxon_0121-1

Building a data affluence map

Raj Bhagat P shows how different variables can be combined with this map of data affluence that combines data on internet speeds and device counts in India.

Ookla_open_datasets_Raj-Bhagat-P_0121-1

Internet speeds are beautiful

This map of fixed broadband speeds across Europe from Boris Mericskay shows that internet performance can be as visually stunning as a map of city lights.

Ookla_open_datasets_Boris-Mericskay_0121-1

Topi Tjunakov created a similar image of internet speeds in and around Japan.

Ookla_open_datasets_Topi-Tjunakov_0121-1

Use Ookla Open Datasets to make your own maps

This section will demonstrate a few possible ways to use Ookla Open Datasets using the United Kingdom as an example. The ideas can be adapted for any area around the world. This tutorial uses the R programming language, but there are also Python tutorials available in the Ookla Open Data GitHub repository.

library(tidyverse)
library(patchwork)
library(janitor)
library(ggrepel)
library(usethis)
library(lubridate)
library(colorspace)
library(scales)
library(kableExtra)
library(knitr)
library(sf)

# colors for plots
purple <- "#A244DA"
light_purple <- colorspace::lighten("#A244DA", 0.5)
green <- colorspace::desaturate("#2DE5D1", 0.2)
blue_gray <- "#464a62"
mid_gray <- "#ccd0dd"
light_gray <- "#f9f9fd"

# set some global theme defaults
theme_set(theme_minimal())
theme_update(text = element_text(family = "sans", color = "#464a62"))
theme_update(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, face = "bold"))
theme_update(plot.subtitle = element_text(hjust = 0.5))

Ookla Open Datasets include quarterly performance and test count data for both mobile networks and fixed broadband aggregated over all providers. The tests are binned into global zoom level 16 tiles which can be thought of as roughly a few football fields. As of today, all four quarters of 2020 are available and subsequent quarters will be added as they complete.

Administrative unit data

I chose to analyse the mobile data at the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS) 3 level (1:1 million). These administrative units are maintained by the European Union to allow for comparable analysis across member states. NUTS 3 areas mean:

  • In England, upper tier authorities and groups of unitary authorities and districts
  • In Wales, groups of Principal Areas
  • In Scotland, groups of Council Areas or Islands Areas
  • In Northern Ireland, groups of districts

To make a comparison to the U.S. administrative structure, these can be roughly thought of as the size of counties. Here is the code you’ll want to use to download the NUTS shapefiles from the Eurostat site. Once the zipfile is downloaded you will need to unzip it again in order to read it into your R environment:

# create a directory called “data”
dir.create("data")
use_zip("https://gisco-services.ec.europa.eu/distribution/v2/nuts/download/ref-nuts-2021-01m.shp.zip", destdir = "data")

uk_nuts_3 <- read_sf("data/ref-nuts-2021-01m.shp/NUTS_RG_01M_2021_3857_LEVL_3.shp/NUTS_RG_01M_2021_3857_LEVL_3.shp") %>%
  filter(CNTR_CODE == "UK") %>%
  st_transform(4326) %>%
  clean_names() %>%
  mutate(urbn_desc = case_when( # add more descriptive labels for urban variable
    urbn_type == 1 ~ "Urban",
    urbn_type == 2 ~ "Intermediate",
    urbn_type == 3 ~ "Rural"
  ),
  urbn_desc = factor(urbn_desc, levels = c("Urban", "Intermediate", "Rural")))

# contextual city data
uk_cities <- read_sf("https://opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/6996f03a1b364dbab4008d99380370ed_0.geojson") %>%
  clean_names() %>%
  filter(fips_cntry == "UK", pop_rank <= 5)

ggplot(uk_nuts_3) +
  geom_sf(color = mid_gray, fill = light_gray, lwd = 0.08) +
  geom_text_repel(data = uk_cities, 
                           aes(label = city_name, geometry = geometry), 
                           family = "sans", 
                           color = blue_gray, 
                           size = 2.2, 
                           stat = "sf_coordinates",
                           min.segment.length = 2) +
  labs(title = "United Kingdom",
       subtitle = "NUTS 3 Areas") +
  theme(panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        axis.text = element_blank(),
        axis.title = element_blank())

plot_uk-1-1

Adding data from Ookla Open Datasets

You’ll want to crop the global dataset to the bounding box of the U.K. This will include some extra tiles (within the box but not within the country, i.e. some of western Ireland), but it makes the data much easier to work with later on.

uk_bbox <- uk_nuts_3 %>%
  st_union() %>% # otherwise would be calculating the bounding box of each individual area
  st_bbox()
  

Each of the quarters are stored in separate shapefiles. You can read them in one-by-one and crop them to the U.K. box in the same pipeline.

# download the data with the following code:

use_zip("https://ookla-open-data.s3.amazonaws.com/shapefiles/performance/type=mobile/year=2020/quarter=1/2020-01-01_performance_mobile_tiles.zip", destdir = "data")
use_zip("https://ookla-open-data.s3.amazonaws.com/shapefiles/performance/type=mobile/year=2020/quarter=2/2020-04-01_performance_mobile_tiles.zip", destdir = "data")
use_zip("https://ookla-open-data.s3.amazonaws.com/shapefiles/performance/type=mobile/year=2020/quarter=3/2020-07-01_performance_mobile_tiles.zip", destdir = "data")
use_zip("https://ookla-open-data.s3.amazonaws.com/shapefiles/performance/type=mobile/year=2020/quarter=4/2020-10-01_performance_mobile_tiles.zip", destdir = "data")

# and then read in those downloaded files
mobile_tiles_q1 <- read_sf("data/2020-01-01_performance_mobile_tiles/gps_mobile_tiles.shp") %>%
  st_crop(uk_bbox)
mobile_tiles_q2 <- read_sf("data/2020-04-01_performance_mobile_tiles/gps_mobile_tiles.shp") %>%
  st_crop(uk_bbox)
mobile_tiles_q3 <- read_sf("data/2020-07-01_performance_mobile_tiles/gps_mobile_tiles.shp") %>%
  st_crop(uk_bbox)
mobile_tiles_q4 <- read_sf("data/2020-10-01_performance_mobile_tiles/gps_mobile_tiles.shp") %>%
  st_crop(uk_bbox)

As you see, the tiles cover most of the area, with more tiles in more densely populated areas. (And note that you still have tiles included that are outside the boundary of the area but within the bounding box.)

ggplot(uk_nuts_3) +
  geom_sf(color = mid_gray, fill = light_gray, lwd = 0.08) +
  geom_sf(data = mobile_tiles_q4, fill = purple, color = NA) +
  geom_text_repel(data = uk_cities, 
                           aes(label = city_name, geometry = geometry), 
                           family = "sans", 
                           color = blue_gray, 
                           size = 2.2, 
                           stat = "sf_coordinates",
                           min.segment.length = 2) +
  labs(title = "United Kingdom",
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Data Mobile Tiles, NUTS 3 Areas") +
  theme(panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        axis.text = element_blank(),
        axis.title = element_blank())

tile_map-1-3

Now that the cropped tiles are read in, you’ll use a spatial join to determine which NUTS 3 area each tile is in. In this step, I am also reprojecting the data to the British National Grid (meters). I’ve also added a variable to identify the time period (quarter).

tiles_q1_nuts <- uk_nuts_3 %>%
  st_transform(27700) %>% # British National Grid
  st_join(mobile_tiles_q1 %>% st_transform(27700), left = FALSE) %>%
  mutate(quarter_start = "2020-01-01")

tiles_q2_nuts <- uk_nuts_3 %>%
  st_transform(27700) %>%
  st_join(mobile_tiles_q2 %>% st_transform(27700), left = FALSE) %>%
  mutate(quarter_start = "2020-04-01")

tiles_q3_nuts <- uk_nuts_3 %>%
  st_transform(27700) %>%
  st_join(mobile_tiles_q3 %>% st_transform(27700), left = FALSE) %>%
  mutate(quarter_start = "2020-07-01")

tiles_q4_nuts <- uk_nuts_3 %>%
  st_transform(27700) %>%
  st_join(mobile_tiles_q4 %>% st_transform(27700), left = FALSE) %>%
  mutate(quarter_start = "2020-10-01")

In order to make the data easier to work with, combine the tiles into a long dataframe with each row representing one tile in one quarter. The geometry now represents the NUTS region, not the original tile shape.

tiles_all <- tiles_q1_nuts %>%
  rbind(tiles_q2_nuts) %>%
  rbind(tiles_q3_nuts) %>%
  rbind(tiles_q4_nuts) %>%
  mutate(quarter_start = ymd(quarter_start)) # convert to date format

With this dataframe, you can start to generate some aggregates. In this table you’ll include the tile count, test count, quarter and average download and upload speeds.

Exploratory data analysis

aggs_quarter <- tiles_all %>%
  st_set_geometry(NULL) %>%
  group_by(quarter_start) %>%
  summarise(tiles = n(),
            avg_d_mbps = weighted.mean(avg_d_kbps / 1000, tests), # I find Mbps easier to work with
            avg_u_mbps = weighted.mean(avg_u_kbps / 1000, tests),
            tests = sum(tests)) %>%
  ungroup()


knitr::kable(aggs_quarter) %>%
  kable_styling()

aggregates_table_kj

We can see from this table that both download and upload speeds increased throughout the year, with a small dip in upload speeds in Q2. Next, you’ll want to plot this data.

ggplot(aggs_quarter, aes(x = quarter_start)) +
  geom_point(aes(y = avg_d_mbps), color = purple) +
  geom_line(aes(y = avg_d_mbps), color = purple, lwd = 0.5) +
  geom_text(aes(y = avg_d_mbps - 2, label = round(avg_d_mbps, 1)), color = purple, size = 3, family = "sans") +
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-02-01"), y = 47, label = "Download speed", color = purple, size = 3, family = "sans") +
  geom_point(aes(y = avg_u_mbps), color = light_purple) +
  geom_line(aes(y = avg_u_mbps), color = light_purple, lwd = 0.5) +
  geom_text(aes(y = avg_u_mbps - 2, label = round(avg_u_mbps, 1)), color = light_purple, size = 3, family = "sans") +
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-02-05"), y = 14, label = "Upload speed", color = light_purple, size = 3, family = "sans") +
  labs(y = "", x = "Quarter start date",
       title = "Mobile Network Performance, U.K.",
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | 2020") +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1)) +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps", scale = 1, accuracy = 1)) +
  scale_x_date(date_labels = "%b %d")

line_up_down-1

Examining test counts

We also saw above that the number of tests decreased between Q1 and Q2 and then peaked in Q3 at a little over 700,000 before coming back down. The increase likely followed resulted from interest in network performance during COVID-19 when more people started working from home. This spike is even more obvious in chart form.

ggplot(aggs_quarter, aes(x = quarter_start)) +
  geom_point(aes(y = tests), color = purple) +
  geom_line(aes(y = tests), color = purple, lwd = 0.5) +
  geom_text(aes(y = tests - 6000, label = comma(tests), x= quarter_start + 5), size = 3, color = purple) +
  labs(y = "", x = "Quarter start date",
       title = "Mobile Test Count, U.K.",
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | 2020") +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        axis.text = element_text(color = blue_gray)) +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = comma) +
  scale_x_date(date_labels = "%b %d")

line_tests-1-1

Data distribution

Next, I wanted to check the distribution of average download speeds.

ggplot(tiles_all) + 
  geom_histogram(aes(x = avg_d_kbps / 1000, group = quarter_start), size = 0.3, color = light_gray, fill = green) + 
  scale_x_continuous(labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps", accuracy = 1)) +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = comma) +
  facet_grid(quarter_start ~ .) +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(), 
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(), 
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        axis.text = element_text(color = blue_gray),
        strip.text.y = element_text(angle = 0, color = blue_gray)) + 
  labs(y = "", x = "", title = "Mobile Download Speed Distribution by Tile, U.K.", 
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | 2020")

histogram-1-1

The underlying distribution of average download speeds across the tiles has stayed fairly stable.

Mapping average speed

Making a quick map of the average download speed in each region across the U.K. is relatively simple.

# generate aggregates table
nuts_3_aggs <- tiles_all %>%
  group_by(quarter_start, nuts_id, nuts_name, urbn_desc, urbn_type) %>%
  summarise(tiles = n(),
            avg_d_mbps = weighted.mean(avg_d_kbps / 1000, tests), # I find Mbps easier to work with
            avg_u_mbps = weighted.mean(avg_u_kbps / 1000, tests),
            tests = sum(tests)) %>%
  ungroup()
ggplot(nuts_3_aggs %>% filter(quarter_start == "2020-10-01")) +
  geom_sf(aes(fill = avg_d_mbps), color = blue_gray, lwd = 0.08) +
  scale_fill_stepsn(colors = RColorBrewer::brewer.pal(n = 5, name = "BuPu"), labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps"), n.breaks = 4, guide = guide_colorsteps(title = "")) +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        legend.text = element_text(color = blue_gray),
        axis.text = element_blank()) +
  labs(title = "Mobile Download Speed, U.K.", subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | Q4 2020")

choropleth-1-1

As you can see, the areas around large cities have faster download speeds on average and the lowest average download speeds are typically in more rural areas.

Rural and urban analysis

People are often interested in the difference between mobile networks in urban and rural areas. The Eurostat NUTS data includes an urban indicator with three levels: rural, intermediate and urban. This typology is determined primarily by population density and proximity to a population center.

ggplot(uk_nuts_3) +
  geom_sf(aes(fill = urbn_desc), color = light_gray, lwd = 0.08) +
  geom_text_repel(data = uk_cities, 
                           aes(label = city_name, geometry = geometry), 
                           family = "sans", 
                           color = "#1a1b2e", 
                           size = 2.2, 
                           stat = "sf_coordinates",
                           min.segment.length = 2) +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green), name = "", guide = guide_legend(direction = "horizontal", label.position = "top", keywidth = 3, keyheight = 0.5)) +
  labs(title = "U.K., NUTS 3 Areas") +
  theme(panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        axis.text = element_blank(),
        axis.title = element_blank(),
        legend.position = "top")

rural_urban_reference-1

Data distribution overall and over time

When you aggregate by the urban indicator variable different patterns come up in the data.

# generate aggregates table
rural_urban_aggs <- tiles_all %>%
  st_set_geometry(NULL) %>%
  group_by(quarter_start, urbn_desc, urbn_type) %>%
  summarise(tiles = n(),
            avg_d_mbps = weighted.mean(avg_d_kbps / 1000, tests), # I find Mbps easier to work with
            avg_u_mbps = weighted.mean(avg_u_kbps / 1000, tests),
            tests = sum(tests)) %>%
  ungroup()

As you might expect, the download speeds during Q4 are faster in urban areas than in rural areas – with the intermediate ones somewhere in between. This pattern holds for other quarters as well.

ggplot(rural_urban_aggs %>% filter(quarter_start == "2020-10-01"), aes(x = avg_d_mbps, y = urbn_desc, fill = urbn_desc)) +
  geom_col(width = .3, show.legend = FALSE) +
  geom_jitter(data = nuts_3_aggs, aes(x = avg_d_mbps, y = urbn_desc, color = urbn_desc), size = 0.7) + 
  geom_text(aes(x = avg_d_mbps - 4, label = round(avg_d_mbps, 1)), family = "sans",  size = 3.5, color = blue_gray) +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green)) +
  scale_color_manual(values = darken(c(purple, light_purple, green))) +
  scale_x_continuous(labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps", scale = 1, accuracy = 1)) +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        legend.position = "none",
        axis.text = element_text(color = blue_gray)) +
  labs(y = "", x = "", 
       title = "Mobile Download Speed Distribution by NUTS 3 Area, U.K.", 
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | 2020")  

rural_urban_bar-1-2
Interestingly though, the patterns differ when you look at a time series plot. Urban mobile networks steadily improve, while the intermediate and rural areas saw slower average download speeds starting in Q2 before going back up after Q3. This is likely the result of increased pressure on the networks during stay-at-home orders (although this graph is not conclusive evidence of that).

ggplot(rural_urban_aggs) +
  geom_line(aes(x = quarter_start, y = avg_d_mbps, color = urbn_desc)) +
  geom_point(aes(x = quarter_start, y = avg_d_mbps, color = urbn_desc)) +
  # urban label
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-02-01"), y = 50, label = "Urban", color = purple, family = "sans", size = 3) +
  # intermediate label
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-02-15"), y = 35, label = "Intermediate", color = light_purple, family = "sans", size = 3) +
  # rural label
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-01-15"), y = 26, label = "Rural", color = green, family = "sans", size = 3) +
  scale_color_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green)) +
  scale_x_date(date_labels = "%b %d") +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps", scale = 1, accuracy = 1)) +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        legend.position = "none",
        axis.text = element_text(color = blue_gray)) +
  labs(y = "", x = "Quarter start date", 
       title = "Mobile Download Speed by NUTS 3 Urban-Rural Type, U.K.", 
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | 2020") 

rural_urban_line-1-1

When you repeat the same plot but map the test count to the site of the point, you can see why the overall download speed increased steadily. The number of tests in urban areas is much higher than in intermediate and rural areas, thus pulling up the overall average.

ggplot(rural_urban_aggs) +
  geom_line(aes(x = quarter_start, y = avg_d_mbps, color = urbn_desc)) +
  geom_point(aes(x = quarter_start, y = avg_d_mbps, color = urbn_desc, size = tests)) +
  # urban label
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-02-01"), y = 50, label = "Urban", color = purple, family = "sans", size = 3) +
  # intermediate label
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-02-15"), y = 35, label = "Intermediate", color = light_purple, family = "sans", size = 3) +
  # rural label
  geom_text(data = NULL, x = ymd("2020-01-15"), y = 26, label = "Rural", color = green, family = "sans", size = 3) +
  scale_color_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green)) +
  scale_x_date(date_labels = "%b %d") +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps", scale = 1, accuracy = 1)) +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        legend.position = "none",
        axis.text = element_text(color = blue_gray)) +
  labs(y = "", x = "Quarter start date", 
       title = ("Mobile Download Speed by NUTS 3 Urban-Rural Type, U.K."), 
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | 2020",
       caption = "Circle size indicates test count")  

rural_urban_line_size-1-1

Spotlighting regional variances

Parsing the data by specific geographies can reveal additional information.

bottom_20_q4 <- nuts_3_aggs %>% 
  filter(quarter_start == "2020-10-01") %>% 
  top_n(n = -20, wt = avg_d_mbps) %>%
  mutate(nuts_name = fct_reorder(factor(nuts_name), -avg_d_mbps))
map <- ggplot() +
  geom_sf(data = uk_nuts_3, fill = light_gray, color = mid_gray, lwd = 0.08) +
  geom_sf(data = bottom_20_q4, aes(fill = urbn_desc), color = mid_gray, lwd = 0.08, show.legend = FALSE) +
  geom_text_repel(data = uk_cities, 
                           aes(label = city_name, geometry = geometry), 
                           family = "sans", 
                           color = blue_gray, 
                           size = 2.2, 
                           stat = "sf_coordinates",
                           min.segment.length = 2) +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green), name = "", guide = guide_legend(direction = "horizontal", label.position = "top", keywidth = 3, keyheight = 0.5)) +
  labs(title = NULL,
       subtitle = NULL) +
  theme(panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        axis.text = element_blank(),
        axis.title = element_blank(),
        legend.position = "top")
barplot <- ggplot(data = bottom_20_q4, aes(x = avg_d_mbps, y = nuts_name, fill = urbn_desc)) +
  geom_col(width = .5) +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green), guide = guide_legend(direction = "horizontal", label.position = "top", keywidth = 3, keyheight = 0.5, title = NULL)) +
  scale_x_continuous(labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps", scale = 1, accuracy = 1)) +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        legend.position = "top",
        axis.text = element_text(color = blue_gray)) +
  labs(y = "", x = "", 
       title = ("Slowest 20 NUTS 3 Areas by Download Speed, U.K."), 
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | Q4 2020") 
# use patchwork to put it all together
barplot + map

bottom_20-1-2
Among the 20 areas with the lowest average download speed in Q4 2020 there were three urban areas and six intermediate. The rest were rural.

top_20_q4 <- nuts_3_aggs %>% 
  filter(quarter_start == "2020-10-01") %>% 
  top_n(n = 20, wt = avg_d_mbps) %>%
  mutate(nuts_name = fct_reorder(factor(nuts_name), avg_d_mbps))
top_map <- ggplot() +
  geom_sf(data = uk_nuts_3, fill = light_gray, color = mid_gray, lwd = 0.08) +
  geom_sf(data = top_20_q4, aes(fill = urbn_desc), color = mid_gray, lwd = 0.08, show.legend = FALSE) +
  geom_text_repel(data = uk_cities, 
                           aes(label = city_name, geometry = geometry), 
                           family = "sans", 
                           color = blue_gray, 
                           size = 2.2, 
                           stat = "sf_coordinates",
                           min.segment.length = 2) +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green), name = "", guide = guide_legend(direction = "horizontal", label.position = "top", keywidth = 3, keyheight = 0.5)) +
  labs(title = NULL,
       subtitle = NULL) +
  theme(panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        axis.text = element_blank(),
        axis.title = element_blank(),
        legend.position = "top")
top_barplot <- ggplot(data = top_20_q4, aes(x = avg_d_mbps, y = nuts_name, fill = urbn_desc)) +
  geom_col(width = .5) +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green), guide = guide_legend(direction = "horizontal", label.position = "top", keywidth = 3, keyheight = 0.5, title = NULL)) +
  scale_x_continuous(labels = label_number(suffix = " Mbps", scale = 1, accuracy = 1), breaks = c(50, 100)) +
  theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        axis.title.x = element_text(hjust=1),
        legend.position = "top",
        axis.text = element_text(color = blue_gray)) +
  labs(y = "", x = "", 
       title = "Fastest 20 NUTS 3 Areas by Mobile Download Speed, U.K.", 
       subtitle = "Ookla® Open Datasets | Q4 2020") 
top_london <- ggplot() +
  geom_sf(data = uk_nuts_3 %>% filter(str_detect(fid, "UKI")), fill = light_gray, color = mid_gray, lwd = 0.08) +
  geom_sf(data = top_20_q4 %>% filter(str_detect(nuts_id, "UKI")), aes(fill = urbn_desc), color = mid_gray, lwd = 0.08, show.legend = FALSE) +
  geom_text_repel(data = uk_cities %>% filter(city_name == "London"), 
                           aes(label = city_name, geometry = geometry), 
                           family = "sans", 
                           color = "black", 
                           size = 2.2, 
                           stat = "sf_coordinates",
                           min.segment.length = 2) +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c(purple, light_purple, green), name = "", guide = guide_legend(direction = "horizontal", label.position = "top", keywidth = 3, keyheight = 0.5)) +
  labs(title = NULL,
       subtitle = NULL) +
  theme(panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
        panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
        axis.text = element_blank(),
        axis.title = element_blank(),
        legend.position = "top",
        panel.border = element_rect(colour = blue_gray, fill=NA, size=0.5))
top_map_comp <- top_map + inset_element(top_london, left = 0.6, bottom = 0.6, right = 1, top = 1)

top_barplot + top_map_comp

top_20-1-1
Meanwhile, all of the fastest 20 NUTS 3 areas were urban.

What else you can do with this data

Don’t forget there are also more tutorials with examples written in Python and R. Aside from what I showed here, you could do an interesting analysis looking at clustering patterns, sociodemographic variables and other types of administrative units like legislative or school districts.

We hope this tutorial will help you use Ookla’s open data for your own projects. Please tag us if you share your projects on social media using the hashtag #OoklaForGood so we can learn from your analyses.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| March 14, 2019

Ditch the Lag: Cities with Great Gaming Culture and Low Ping

Yes, you can game from anywhere with an internet connection. But if you’re at all competitive, it’s nice to play from somewhere with low ping and fast internet speeds. Plus when you need to leave the house, it’s extra nice to know you’re also surrounded by gamer culture. We’ve examined February 2019 Speedtest results in 35 cities that are known for their esports events, gaming conferences, game companies and more to find out who has the advantage and ranked them based on their ping.

The top contenders

Eleven_Gaming_Cities_0219

First place Bucharest, Romania is home to super-low ping, a lightning fast download speed and a thriving gaming culture. From Bucharest Gaming Week (which includes the CS:GO Southeast Europe Championship and the FIFA National Tournament) to their numerous local game studios, Bucharest is a great place to be a gamer whether you’re online or out and about.

The next five gaming cities with the lowest pings are all in Asia. Hangzhou, China comes in second overall with a fast ping and world-class download speeds. This city is so devoted to its gamers that it opened a $280 million gaming “city” in 2018 and plans 14 new esports arenas before 2022. Coming in third, Chengdu, China has an equally low ping to our first two contenders and serves as one of two host locations in China for the Global Mobile Game Confederation (GMGC). Both Hangzhou and Chengdu are also franchise holders in the Overwatch League, giving local gaming fans something to cheer about. Fourth place Singapore, host of the 5th Annual GameStart Convention in October 2018, had only a slightly slower ping than the first four cities and the fastest download speed of any of the cities we considered.

South Korea is home to the fifth and sixth best cities for gamers. A satellite city of Seoul, Seongnam-si boasts the Pangyo Techno Valley (a.k.a. the Silicon Valley of Korea) and numerous game development companies. Perfect for a city with a 9 ms ping. Though Incheon’s ping was a little slower at 12 ms, gamers there can console themselves with the city’s gamer cred — the 2018 League of Legends World Championship was held in Incheon’s Munhak Stadium.

Coming in at number seven, Budapest, Hungary is an emerging game city, having hosted its first big esports event (the V4 Future Sports Festival) in 2018, but a 12 ms ping makes them a strong contender. More established Malmö, Sweden is number eight with a slightly slower average download speed but the city is headquarters to Massive Entertainment, creators of Tom Clancy’s The Division series, Far Cry 3, Assassin’s Creed: Revelations and many more.

Vancouver, Canada, North America’s only qualifier for the top gaming cities list, comes in at number nine with a 12 ms ping and many gaming companies including the Canadian arms of Nintendo of Canada and EA (Electronic Arts). We included both Shanghai, China and Moscow, Russia on the top gamer cities list as both had a 12 ms ping as well, though the internet speeds in Shanghai are superior. Shanghai will also host the International Dota 2 in 2019 while Moscow is known for Epicenter.

The rest of the pack

Notably absent from the list above is most of the western hemisphere. Cities in North America were held back by their high pings. Cities in South America suffered from high pings and also slow internet speeds — something that esports leagues have complained is a barrier to investment.

Our full list of gaming cities provides wider geographical representation, even if the internet performance is not always as stellar. You’ll find Los Angeles in 27th place, behind Seattle, Boston and Las Vegas. And São Paulo, Brazil has the best showing in Latin America at 23rd.

Internet Performance in 35 Cities with a Gaming Culture
Speedtest Results | February 2019
City Ping (ms) Mean Download (Mbps) Mean Upload (Mbps)
Bucharest, Romania 8 172.13 126.57
Hangzhou, China 8 125.93 29.54
Chengdu, China 8 101.92 33.80
Singapore 9 196.43 200.08
Seongnam-si, South Korea 9 155.25 114.83
Incheon, South Korea 12 139.84 102.91
Budapest, Hungary 12 132.72 54.46
Malmö, Sweden 12 126.28 105.67
Vancouver, Canada 12 117.55 50.23
Shanghai, China 12 75.14 30.06
Moscow, Russia 12 64.56 63.59
Oslo, Norway 13 115.46 69.03
Hong Kong, Hong Kong (SAR) 14 167.59 161.14
Zürich, Switzerland 14 144.36 109.39
Seattle, United States 15 138.50 79.88
Stockholm, Sweden 15 134.16 93.83
Auckland, New Zealand 15 92.05 53.30
Toronto, Canada 16 134.75 67.42
Boston, United States 17 152.42 60.87
Las Vegas, United States 17 141.69 41.22
Chennai, India 17 48.40 42.93
Cologne, Germany 18 63.77 18.36
São Paulo, Brazil 18 46.43 21.57
Jakarta, Indonesia 18 17.88 10.21
Mumbai, India 19 23.40 19.26
Paris, France 20 161.04 93.68
Los Angeles, United States 20 121.00 23.57
London, United Kingdom 20 63.58 23.18
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20 36.50 13.33
Buenos Aires, Argentina 21 34.31 6.40
Katowice, Poland 22 83.99 20.91
Mexico City, Mexico 25 37.66 15.39
Sydney, Australia 25 34.20 9.61
Santiago, Chile 26 56.13 18.49
Tokyo, Japan 28 99.24 101.90

Of course, die-hard gamers will know that a low ping in your city won’t necessarily save you if you’re playing on a distant server.

What’s the ping like in your city? Take a Speedtest and see if your connection is hurting your gameplay.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

| November 15, 2023

Your Black Friday/Cyber Monday Guide to iPhone 15 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 and Flip5 Performance

To upgrade or not to upgrade, with Black Friday and Cyber Monday deals on the latest iPhone and Samsung devices on the horizon you may be asking yourself just that question. We analyzed data from Speedtest Intelligence® in 13 major markets to see how well the Apple iPhone 15 devices and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 and Flip5 models are performing in comparison to last year’s models over 5G to help you make an informed decision. For details on performance by Samsung Galaxy S23 models, read our analysis from earlier this year. We’re especially interested in seeing if technical improvements on iPhone 15 models including support for WiFi 6E drive better performance.

Data for iPhone models is provided for the period from September 22-October 20, 2023, while data for the Samsung models is for the period from August 11-October 20, 2023. Keep in mind that device data differs across markets due to a variety of factors, including: 5G investments by governments and mobile operators, different 5G spectrum allocations, and mobile 5G plans. As many of these devices are very new, the sample counts in some countries are still low so the statistical ranges of expected performance are wider for the newer devices than the older models.

Half of models surveyed worth the upgrade in Australia

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in Australia

In Australia, two out of four iPhone 15 models showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. Speedtest Intelligence reveals the iPhone 15 Pro and the iPhone 15 Pro Max both had a 14% better download speed than their prior year counterparts. There was no statistical winner for the iPhone standard model or the iPhone Plus in Australia during this period.

The Galaxy Z Flip5 had a 30% better download speed than the Galaxy Z Flip4 during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period in Australia, while there was no statistical winner for the Galaxy Z Fold.

Recommendation: Depending on your model of choice, only half the devices surveyed merit an upgrade based on performance alone in Australia.

iPhones mostly worth the upgrade in Brazil

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in Brazil

Three out of four iPhone 15 models in Brazil showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. Speedtest Intelligence showed the iPhone 15 had a better download speed than the iPhone 14, with the iPhone 15 Pro Max having a 8% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, and the iPhone 15 Pro showing a 1% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro. There was no statistical winner for the iPhone Plus in Brazil during this period.

There was no statistical winner for 5G median download speed during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period for the Galaxy Z Flip or the Galaxy Z Fold in Brazil.

Recommendation: iPhone users in Brazil should consider an upgrade based on performance, while Samsung Galaxy fans only need to upgrade if they are looking for feature improvements.

All iPhones show improvement over prior models in Canada

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in Canada

All four iPhone 15 models in Canada showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. Data from Speedtest Intelligence demonstrated the iPhone 15 had a better download speed than the iPhone 14, with the iPhone 15 Pro Max having a 26% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, the iPhone 15 Pro Plus showed a 12% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Plus, and the iPhone 15 Pro had an 8% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro.

The Galaxy Z Fold5 had a better download speed than the Galaxy Z Fold4 during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period in Canada, while there was no statistical winner for the Galaxy Z Flip.

Recommendation: iPhone users in Canada should consider an upgrade based on performance, while Samsung Galaxy fans should make a decision based on which model they’re considering.

Three iPhone models show decent improvement over prior versions in France

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in France

Three out of four iPhone 15 models in France showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. Speedtest Intelligence reveals the iPhone 15 and the iPhone 15 Pro Max both had 18% better download speeds than their respective prior year models. The iPhone 15 Pro had a 5% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro. There was no statistical winner for the iPhone Plus in France during this period.

There was no statistical winner for 5G median download speed during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period for the Galaxy Z Flip or the Galaxy Z Fold in France.

Recommendation: iPhone users in France should consider an upgrade based on performance, and Samsung Galaxy users only need to upgrade if they are looking for feature improvements.

Galaxy Z Fold5 shows some improvements in Germany

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in Germany

Two out of four iPhone 15 models showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents in Germany during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. Speedtest Intelligence reveals slight improvements with the iPhone 15 Pro Max having a 6% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Max and the iPhone 15 Pro having a 2% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro. There was no statistical winner for the iPhone standard model or the iPhone Plus in Germany during this period.

The Galaxy Z Fold5 had a 13% better download speed than the Galaxy Z Fold4 during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period in Germany, while there was no statistical winner for the Galaxy Z Flip.

Recommendation: Apple users won’t see major performance improvements from the new models, but the Galaxy Z Fold5 is worth the upgrade on performance alone.

India sees better performance on three iPhone models

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in India

Three out of four iPhone 15 models in India showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. Speedtest Intelligence showed the iPhone 15, iPhone 15 Pro, and the iPhone 15 Plus had better speeds than their respective prior models. There was no statistical winner for the iPhone Pro Max in India during this period.

There was no statistical winner for 5G median download speed during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period for the Galaxy Z Flip or the Galaxy Z Fold in India.

Recommendation: Indian iPhone users should consider an upgrade based on performance, and Samsung Galaxy users only need to upgrade if they are looking for feature improvements.

No significant performance gains on new devices in the Philippines

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in the Philippines

Neither the iPhone 15 Pro nor the iPhone 15 Pro Max had a statistically better median download speed over 5G than their prior year models during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period in the Philippines. There were not enough samples to properly assess the performance of the other two iPhone models.

Likewise, there was no statistical winner for 5G median download speed during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period for the Galaxy Z Flip or the Galaxy Z Fold in the Philippines.

Recommendation: Filipino consumers looking to upgrade their phones to the latest models will have to look for reasons beyond performance.

Galaxy Z Fold5 sees performance improvement in South Korea

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in South Korea

Mobile speeds in South Korea are already fast with a top 10 performance on the Speedtest Global Index™ as of September 2023. New phones may not push performance boosts, though, as Speedtest Intelligence data did not show significant increases in median download speed over 5G for the iPhone 15 Pro or the iPhone 15 Pro Max in South Korea during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. However, the iPhone 15 Pro Max had a 16% better upload speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Max. There were not enough samples to properly assess the performance of the other two iPhone models.

On the other hand, the Galaxy Z Fold5 had a 10% better download speed than the Galaxy Z Fold4 during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period in South Korea, while there was no statistical winner for the Galaxy Z Flip.

Recommendation: If South Korean consumers are looking for better performance, upgrading from the Galaxy Z Fold4 to the Galaxy Z Fold5 is worth looking into.

Spain sees major increases in iPhone speed

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in Spain

Three iPhone 15 models in Spain showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period, and the improvements in performance were mostly greater than we saw in other countries, with the exception of the United States. Speedtest Intelligence reveals the iPhone 15 Pro had a 40% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro, the iPhone 15 Pro Max had a 36% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, and the iPhone 15 had an 11% better download speed than the iPhone 14. There were not enough samples to properly assess the performance of the iPhone Plus.

There were not enough samples to evaluate the Galaxy Z Flip or the Galaxy Z Fold during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period in Spain.

Recommendation: Spanish iPhone fans should definitely upgrade their devices while Samsung users can hold off for now.

Unbeatable performance in U.A.E. makes upgrades unnecessary

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in U.A.E.

While Speedtest Intelligence data did not show significant increases in median download speed over 5G for the iPhone 15 Pro or the iPhone 15 Pro Max during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period, performance likely isn’t a concern in the United Arab Emirates, whose blisteringly fast download speeds topped the Speedtest Global Index™ in September 2023. There were not enough samples to properly assess the performance of the other two iPhone models.

Similarly, there was no statistical winner for 5G median download speed during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period for the Galaxy Z Fold in the U.A.E., and there were not enough samples to evaluate the Galaxy Z Flip.

Recommendation: Consumers in the U.A.E. should upgrade if they are looking for the new features on the new phone models, but upgrades for performance are unnecessary.

iPhone upgrades are the way to go in the U.K.

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in the United Kingdom

All four iPhone 15 models in the United Kingdom showed median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period. Speedtest Intelligence reveals the iPhone 15 had a 16% better download speed than the iPhone 14, the iPhone 15 Pro had a 14% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro Max had a 10% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, and iPhone 15 Plus has a 4% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Plus. 

There was no statistical winner for 5G median download speed during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period for the Galaxy Z Flip or the Galaxy Z Fold in the U.K.

Recommendation: iPhone users in the U.K. should see performance improvements that make upgrading to the latest models worthwhile. Samsung Galaxy users only need to upgrade if they are looking for new features.

U.S. consumers see some of the highest improvements when upgrading to new iPhone models

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in United States

Not only did all four iPhone 15 models in the United States show median 5G download speeds that were significantly faster than their iPhone 14 equivalents during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period, the improvements in performance were greater than we saw in most other countries, with the exception of Spain. Speedtest Intelligence showed the iPhone 15 Plus had a 54% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Plus, the iPhone 15 had a 45% better download speed than the iPhone 14, iPhone 15 Pro Max had a 27% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, and iPhone 15 Pro has a 25% better download speed than the iPhone 14 Pro. 

Samsung users also saw increased median download speeds over 5G when using the newer models during the August 11-October 20, 2023 period in the U.S. The Galaxy Z Flip5 had a 15% better download speed than the Galaxy Z Flip4, and the Galaxy Z Fold5 had a 10% better download speed than the Galaxy Z Fold4.

Recommendation: Upgrades for all this holiday season!

No performance boost on iPhone 15 Pro Max in Vietnam

Chart of New Device Performance on 5G in Vietnam

The iPhone 15 Pro Max did not have a statistically better median download speed over 5G than the iPhone 14 Pro Max during the September 22-October 20, 2023 period in Vietnam. There were not enough samples to properly assess the performance of the other three iPhone models. Likewise, there were not enough samples to evaluate the Galaxy Z Flip or the Galaxy Z Fold.

Recommendation: Vietnamese consumers don’t need to upgrade to newer models on performance alone.

Ookla will continue evaluating device performance

We’re excited by the number of countries where mobile device performance increased with the new models and even more excited by the countries where performance is so fast that consumers can look to new modes of connectivity. Even if your country didn’t see the speed boosts you were hoping for, don’t hold back on upgrading if you want to treat yourself or a loved one based on any other number of reasons. Remember to download the iOS or Android Speedtest® app on any new devices to make sure your mobile operator is delivering the speeds you expect.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.