Luke Kehoe | December 9, 2024

UK Telecoms at a Crossroads: Consolidation, Convergence, and Looking Ahead to 2025

After years of decline in international rankings, can the UK’s largest telecoms merger in decades revive competition in network quality?

In this special year-end article, we examine the past year in UK telecoms, assessing the country’s global competitiveness, evaluating 5G SA rollouts and monetisation strategies, highlighting the growing trend of convergence and looking ahead to what the market may bring in 2025.

The State of the UK’s Mobile Networks

The UK continued to trail its developed peers in mobile performance in 2024

Reports of mobile not-spots, outages and peak-time congestion dominated discussions around the UK’s mobile networks this year, with high-profile publications highlighting their underperformance compared to developed peers elsewhere in Europe and North America. Particular attention has been drawn to indoor coverage deficits—where over 80% of mobile traffic originates today—and lingering blackspots along key rail corridors nationwide.

Consumer research published by Ookla earlier this year, based on a survey of over 2,000 smartphone users in the UK and US, revealed significantly higher dissatisfaction among UK mobile users. Quality of experience (QoE) issues, such as slow-loading web pages (37%) and interrupted video streams (19%), were prominent, with over a quarter of UK respondents also reporting service interruptions or outages at least once a month. These experiences are likely driving a higher propensity to churn, with 27% of users planning to switch operators within the next twelve months citing coverage as their primary reason.

Analysis of Speedtest Intelligence® data underscores UK consumers’ concerns, revealing the country’s stark international underperformance. Over the past eight years, the UK has shifted from being a G7 leader to a laggard in mobile download speeds at the 10th percentile—a key measure of baseline network performance, as it reflects the experience of users with the slowest connections. These speeds are now lower in the UK than in all but one other G7 country (Japan), with the gap to the leader (France) now widening rapidly on a year-on-year basis.

Outside the G7, the UK recorded the lowest Consistency score in Europe (82.56%) during Q2-Q3 2024, ahead of only Ireland. This metric reflects the percentage of consumer-initiated Speedtest samples meeting minimum speed thresholds: 5 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload on 4G, and 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload on 5G. Market-wide Consistency in the UK saw only slight increases over the year, primarily driven by improvements in the performance of 4G networks.

Investments in RAN upgrades and site expansion are driving progress in coverage and QoE moving into 2025

Notwithstanding the challenges, there is evidence that the performance of the UK’s mobile networks improved notably during the year, as reflected in other key indicators. Speedtest Intelligence data revealed a reduction in market-wide latency to 51.83 ms, reflecting progress across three of the four operators. Moreover, the observed quality of experience for bread-and-butter activities such as gaming and video streaming moved in the right direction again after a decline last year.

Significant investments in RAN upgrades and site expansions, bolstered in part by the government’s 4G-focused Shared Rural Network (SRN) initiative, contributed to substantial improvements in network coverage across all operators over the year. Overall 5G Availability in the UK rose by nearly 10 percentage points to 36.25% between 2023 and 2024, while 4G Availability increased from 93.8% to 95.7% during the same period.

Ofcom noted, however, that there remains a substantial rural-urban divide in terms of 5G deployment progress in the UK, with 5G deployed on 42% of sites in urban areas, compared with just 16% of sites in rural areas, at the end of 2024.

Progress in the 3G sunset underlines the importance of supporting new measures to improve indoor connectivity outcomes

The shutdown of 3G networks, which reportedly accounted for less than 1% of traffic but over a quarter of operators’ RAN electricity consumption in some cases, has played an important role in freeing up spectrum for 4G and 5G. EE, for instance, has expanded its refarmed 2100 MHz spectrum deployments (n1) for 5G, increasing channel bandwidth from 15 MHz to 20 MHz during the year.

Speedtest Intelligence data reveals a decrease in overall 3G General Availability in the UK from 3.43% last year to 1.60% in 2024, indicating the percentage of users falling back to and mainly using 3G networks more than halved in the period. A potential consequence of the 3G sunset, however, is an increased reliance on 2G networks, particularly in deep indoor environments—the percentage of overall users that spend the majority of their time on 2G increased from 0.37% in 2023 to 0.76% this year.

By the end of 2025, all four of the UK’s mobile operators are expected to have completed their 3G sunsets. Reducing the propensity to fall back to 2G and enhancing the handover experience to 4G and 5G networks are likely to remain key priorities for operators’ RAN strategies. Progress in enhancing the indoor mobile network experience in the UK, enabled by deployment models such as Boldyn Networks’ small cell rollout on the London Underground and new in-building neutral host solutions from companies like Freshwave and Proptivity, will be key and may benefit from policy support.

Merger approval transforms spectrum landscape and provides certainty moving into 2025

The successful approval of the merger between Three and Vodafone by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) brings much-needed certainty to the market heading into 2025. This decision is expected to encourage long-term commitments to capital spending on network upgrades across all operators in the UK market, not just required by the merged entity for integrating its networks and complying with the CMA’s behavioural remedies. With the consolidation and redistribution of spectrum benefiting both the merged entity and Virgin Media O2 (VMO2), two of the three in-market operators will have more headroom to expand network capacity where needed.

Research published by Ookla earlier this year examined the impact of operator consolidation on network quality outcomes across Europe and a sample of other high-income countries. It found that a three-player market structure—now set to define the UK market following the merger—tends to be associated with higher median download speeds, improved network consistency and more positive consumer sentiment in the markets where it is present over time.

The UK leads Europe in the commercialisation of 5G SA

While the UK lags behind its developed peers in mobile network performance, it has emerged as a global leader in the commercial rollout of the standalone (SA) 5G architecture. It remains the only European country with three commercially available 5G SA networks at the end of 2024, as VMO2 and EE joined Vodafone this year in launching the technology, primarily targeting dense urban areas in cities and towns. Ofcom reported that there were 3,300 5G SA-capable sites by the end of 2024, representing 15% of all reported 5G sites and carrying 3% of the UK’s overall monthly mobile traffic.

Controlled network testing by RootMetrics®, an Ookla company, on EE’s 5G network in Birmingham in October confirmed the significant latency improvements unlocked by the SA architecture. With 115 MHz of channel bandwidth observed across much of EE’s SA deployments along the test route, the operator stands out as the closest European equivalent to T-Mobile in the US which, like EE, has distinguished itself through extensive SA spectrum allocation spanning multiple carriers from low-band to mid- and high-bands.

In addition to upgrading traditional rooftop and monopole sites for 5G SA, operators like VMO2 are deploying street-level 5G SA small cells in increasing numbers to boost network capacity in high-footfall areas. This approach to network densification is expected to accelerate next year as macro site grid upgrades mature and operators collaborate with local authorities to streamline deployment processes for street-level mobile infrastructure.

Stimulating consumer demand for 5G SA proves a challenge, with bundling emerging as a key sales strategy

On a business level, each operator has adopted a distinct strategy to market 5G SA in the UK, highlighting the persistent challenges of monetising 5G investments as far as mid-way through the technology cycle. Vodafone led the charge with a consumer-focused launch in 2023, branding its SA service as ‘5G Ultra’. In an effort to upsell its base, the offering was limited to postpay subscribers, with ‘improved phone battery life’ promoted as a key selling point.

In contrast, VMO2 launched its 5G SA network this year, following the playbook of operators like Iliad’s Free in the French market, by offering access to its existing subscribers at no additional cost. While the operator touted improvements in latency and uplink performance unlocked by the new 5G SA core and enhanced carrier aggregation, the aggressive pricing strategy reinforces the increasing industry consensus in Europe that consumers are unwilling to pay a premium for 5G SA alone.

Recognising this challenge in marketing the technology as a worthy consumer upgrade from the NSA architecture, and aligning with its strategy to transition from a traditional telecoms operator to a dynamic, service-led household brand, EE has taken a more ambitious approach. The operator has bundled its 5G SA offerings, restricted to its most expensive tariffs, with content packages, securing a partnership with Google to provide access to its premium Gemini Advanced AI model as part of the deal.

Bundling has proven effective for upselling in other advanced markets, particularly in Asia, where operators have successfully boosted ARPU by introducing differentiated services early in the 5G cycle. In addition to bundling Google’s AI services, EE introduced a ‘Network Boost’ subscription add-on with its 5G SA launch, offering premium subscribers the option to pay for prioritised network access during times of congestion.

This bundling strategy is expected to expand further in the UK next year, aligning with converged fixed and mobile offerings from operators like BT and VMO2. As the rollout of 5G SA matures and is afforded greater strategic priority under the government’s Wireless Infrastructure Strategy (WIS), and the device and solution ecosystem continues to mature, operators are likely to shift their focus to the enterprise segment—arguably the only market where SA-specific features, such as network slicing, hold any substantive monetisation potential.

The State of the UK’s Fixed Broadband Networks

Fibre land grab boosts the UK’s international ranking in fixed broadband performance

The recent groundswell of investment in fibre infrastructure across the UK is paying off, with median download speeds on fixed networks increasing by nearly 40% between 2023 and 2024 to 107.07 Mbps, according to Speedtest Intelligence data. This improvement trend also extended to other key metrics, including a 6% reduction in latency to 20.47 ms and enhanced QoE for gaming and video streaming across major ISPs. Ofcom reported that FTTH reached nearly 7 in 10 homes at the end of 2024, putting the UK on track to reach the government’s target of 85% full-fibre coverage by the end of 2025.

UK leads Germany and Italy in Fixed Download Speeds, but Trails G7 Leaders
Source: Speedtest Intelligence® | 2018 – 2024
Spline plot comparison of median fixed download speeds among the G7 countries between 2018 and 2024 based on Speedtest Intelligence® data.

Notably, in the context of Ookla’s Speedtest Global Index™, the UK continues to rank relatively higher in fixed network performance compared to mobile performance. The significant gains in median fixed download, upload and latency performance over the last year have propelled the UK up twelve places in the index, positioning it ahead of other G7 countries like Germany and Italy. However, it remains in the lower half of Western European countries.

Wi-Fi 7 poised to become the default standard for ISPs targeting premium experiences in 2025

The growing adoption of advanced Wi-Fi solutions, including mesh routers for enhanced whole-home coverage and Wi-Fi 6E-capable access points for higher throughput on multi-gigabit FTTH connections, continues to play an important role in enhancing fixed performance outcomes in the UK. In the year gone by, fixed ISPs have increasingly relied on ‘Wi-Fi guarantees’ as a cornerstone of their marketing strategies, offering promises of minimum download speeds in every room—backed by money-back assurances.

Building on this momentum, Wi-Fi 7 is expected to become the default standard for CPE provided by UK ISPs on premium FTTH tariffs from next year. BT was among the first ISPs globally to launch a next-generation Wi-Fi 7 router earlier this year, partnering with Qualcomm to introduce its new ‘Smart Hub Pro’ and ‘Smart Wi-Fi Pro’ CPE solutions to EE Home Broadband customers.

Merger approval ups the ante on convergence moving into 2025

The merger between Three and Vodafone paves the way for the UK to have three converged operators for the first time. The merged entity, following in the footsteps of previous tie-ups between BT and EE in 2016 and Virgin Media and O2 in 2021, will aim to fully integrate its fixed and combined mobile networks to deliver a differentiated experience that is better than the sum of its individual parts.

This trend is expected to drive operators to move beyond basic cross-selling of mobile and fixed services, instead positioning converged solutions as premium tariff bundles that deliver seamless, best-in-class experiences across fixed, mobile and Wi-Fi—on any device, anywhere. BT’s ‘EE One’ converged solution, unveiled alongside its 5G SA and Wi-Fi 7 launches earlier this year, offers a preview of the kinds of solutions likely to emerge from all converged operators in 2025.

Operator investments in bringing their fixed and mobile networks closer together will play a key role in ensuring subscribers enjoy an improved experience across all access paths. VMO2, for example, recently announced the activation of its ‘Converged Interconnected Network’ architecture, which it touted as improving the operator’s ability to manage traffic flows across its fixed and mobile services by aggregating data closer to the end user before routing it back to the core network.

Key Trends to Watch in 2025

Mobile Data Traffic Growth Plateau

The UK, like other advanced mobile markets in Europe and North America, is entering a phase of declining mobile data traffic growth, following an S-curve trajectory. Ofcom reported an 18% increase in total monthly traffic in 2024, marking a slowdown from the 25% growth observed in both 2022 and 2023. This trend of moderated growth is expected to continue next year and warrants close attention, as it could significantly impact mobile operators’ capital cycles, spectrum demand and equipment vendors’ business models over the long term in the UK and further afield.

Private Network Proliferation

The removal of the requirement to individually register end-user devices for low-power use in shared bands, increased availability of medium-power licenses and the launch of a comprehensive spectrum mapping tool for the 3.8-4.2 GHz band were key milestones in Ofcom’s support for private networks in 2024. These measures contributed to the provision of 113 new shared access licenses between July and November, including 45 in the 1800 MHz band and 68 in the 3.8-4.2 GHz band. Further growth in the UK’s private network ecosystem is expected in 2025, with Ofcom set to enable low-power indoor access in the 2.3 GHz band.

Direct-to-Device (D2D) Arrival

Ofcom is developing a framework to authorise and facilitate D2D services in the UK, with a consultation scheduled for the first half of 2025. It will also review its approach to the mobile satellite service (MSS) licences in the 2 GHz band, as the current EU-wide licences are set to expire in 2027, allowing the UK to independently determine their future use. EE and O2 are the most likely potential candidates for a Direct-to-Cell (D2C) partnership with SpaceX’s Starlink, while Vodafone has been flirting with AST SpaceMobile.

Ookla retains ownership of this article including all of the intellectual property rights, data, content graphs and analysis. This article may not be quoted, reproduced, distributed or published for any commercial purpose without prior consent. Members of the press and others using the findings in this article for non-commercial purposes are welcome to publicly share and link to report information with attribution to Ookla.

About the Author

Luke Kehoe

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Dave Andersen | April 14, 2024

Early 5G Results for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Family: How do New S24 Models Stack up to Previous Generations and iPhone 15’s on 5G?

Consumers around the world eagerly awaited Samsung’s release of the latest line of its flagship Galaxy S series of smartphones on February 1, 2024. Was the wait worth it? In this article, we analyze how the Samsung Galaxy S24 family measures up against its predecessors in terms of 5G speed and latency during its first several weeks on the market (February 1 – March 24, 2024).

With new chipsets and technologies alongside plenty of other cool new features in Galaxy S24 devices, we examined early results from Speedtest® users in 15 select countries around the world to see whether the Galaxy S24 lineup — comprising the S24, S24+, and S24 Ultra models — outpaced Samsung’s earlier S22 and S23 families for 5G performance. Additionally, we’ve compared the 5G speeds and latency of Apple’s iPhone 15 family — including the iPhone 15, 15 Pro, and 15 Pro Max — against Samsung’s offerings.

It’s important to note that device performance metrics can vary significantly from one country to another. Factors such as government and mobile operator investments in 5G infrastructure, spectrum allocations, and the extent of 5G network deployment all contribute to these variations.

Key takeaways:

The Samsung Galaxy S24 family showed a statistically significant lead for median 5G download speeds in seven out of 15 countries in this study. On the other hand, the Apple iPhone 15 family posted the fastest 5G speeds in only one country. It’s worth noting, however, that speed differences between Galaxy S24 devices and iPhone 15’s were relatively minor in some of the countries analyzed (see the charts below for details).
The S24 family recorded the lowest median 5G multi-server latency in 10 of 15 countries, whereas iPhone 15 devices offered the highest median 5G latency in 10 markets.
Samsung Galaxy S22 models unsurprisingly offered the slowest median 5G download speeds in eight countries, while the Galaxy S23 family was slowest in four countries.
Devices in the Galaxy S24 family experienced the fastest median 5G upload speed in 13 of the 15 countries examined for this analysis. However, upload speeds were much slower than 5G download speeds, ranging from 11.83 Mbps to Mbps to 66.52 Mbps, with median 5G upload speeds of 50 Mbps or better found in only three countries (South Korea, Qatar, and the U.A.E.).

To learn more about what speeds mean in real-world terms, check out our article looking at how much speed users need for a variety of daily mobile activities.

Take me straight to the data!

Asia Pacific | Middle East & Africa | Europe | North America

New chipsets and modems in the Galaxy S24 family

Everyone wants to know if the newest technology is worth the upgrade when they’re investing in an expensive new smartphone. Each device within the Galaxy S24 family has various upgrades (including new AI features), but when it comes to features that impact speed and latency performance, here’s a look at the chipsets and modems for each line of smarthpones in our study:

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra models use Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset globally, while the S24 and S24+ use it only in Canada, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States. The Samsung Exynos 2400 is used elsewhere for the S24 & S24+.
The Galaxy S23 series uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 worldwide, while Samsung S22 models use an Exynos 2200 chipset in Europe and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 elsewhere.
Galaxy S24 devices utilize the Snapdragon X75 5G modem, S23 models have a Qualcomm Snapdragon X70 modem, while S22 models have a Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 modem.
Apple iPhone 15 models use Apple’s A16 Bionic chipset, while iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max models use the A 17 Pro chip. All devices in the Apple iPhone 15 family utilize Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X70 5G modem.

Do you own one of these devices? See how your speeds compare by taking a quick Speedtest. And to learn more about mobile and fixed broadband performance in cities and regions across the world, visit the Speedtest Performance Directory^™, where you’ll find ISP recommendations, insights on mobile and fixed broadband performance, and more.

Digging into the Data: Where does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Family Lead its S22, S23, and iPhone 15 Counterparts Around the Globe?

Early findings from Speedtest Intelligence® reveal that the latest Galaxy S24 family outperformed its predecessors — especially S22 models — in terms of 5G speed across several of the countries we analyzed. While differences in speed between devices were minimal in some countries, S24 models showed significant speed advantages over previous generation Samsung devices in markets like Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and others.

Does that mean users in those locations should upgrade immediately? Not necessarily. The decision to upgrade depends on various factors, from price to features to performance and more. However, if speed is your primary concern, the Galaxy S24 series is a compelling option, especially for consumers currently utilizing devices from the Galaxy S22 lineup, which is now over two years old.

Read on to see our complete analysis of all 15 countries in this study or select a region below to dig into more localized results.

Asia Pacific | Middle East & Africa | Europe | North America

Asia Pacific

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Hong Kong

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in India

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Indonesia

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Japan

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Philippines

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in South Korea

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Thailand

Consumers in Hong Kong who want new features might want to upgrade

Speedtest Intelligence data revealed strong performance for all device families in Hong Kong, with the new Galaxy S24 family performing particularly well, boasting a median 5G download speed of 165.74 Mbps and the lowest median 5G multi-server latency in the market at 21.74 ms. However, the S24’s median 5G download speed was statistically comparable to that of its older Samsung and iPhone 15 peers, making the choice to upgrade currently more about new features than about performance.

Bottom line: With strong — and similar — 5G download speeds across all device families in Japan, upgrading to a new Galaxy device isn’t a must just yet, unless you want to enjoy the S24 family’s new features.

5G speeds were fast across the board in India, where the Samsung Galaxy 24 family held a slight edge

In the early days following the release of the Galaxy S24 series in India, the latest Samsung models led for both 5G download speeds and 5G multi-server latency. While 5G speeds impressed across all device families in India — all notched speeds of at least 273.78 Mbps — Galaxy S24 models posted the top median 5G download speed at 302.43 Mbps and the lowest median 5G multi-server latency at 41.56 ms. On the other hand, Galaxy S22 devices showed the slowest — but still impressive — speeds in India at 273.78 Mbps, while the Samsung Galaxy S23 was just a tick behind at 279.93 Mbps. The iPhone 15 family, meanwhile, clocked in with a median 5G download speed of 285.78 Mbps.

Bottom line: Consumers in India currently using S22 devices might want to upgrade to an S24 model, given the nearly 30 Mbps speed advantage the new devices provided in this study. However, with excellent 5G speeds across all device families and similar speeds for devices in the S22, S23, and iPhone 15 families, users might not feel a huge difference in their 5G experience from one device to another.

Samsung Galaxy enthusiasts in Indonesia needn’t rush to upgrade to an S24 device — yet

In contrast with what our results showed in most countries, the iPhone 15 family emerged as the leader in Indonesia with a median 5G download speed of 80.49 Mbps. All three Samsung Galaxy families trailed with speeds ranging from 55.61 Mbps for the S24 family to 69.24 Mbps for S23 models. While the iPhone 15 family’s 5G speed was nearly 25 Mbps faster than that of S24 devices, it’s worth noting that the difference among all three Samsung Galaxy models was only about 14 Mbps, and our results revealed no statistical difference in median 5G download speeds between the S22 and S23 families.

Bottom line: Despite the iPhone 15 providing the top speeds in the market, the Galaxy S24 could hold greater long-term potential for consumers in Indonesia, especially when compared to older Samsung models. Equipped with a newer processor and modem, the S24 could see quicker speeds over time as Indonesia’s 5G networks evolve. In the meantime, users shouldn’t experience notable disparities in speed or latency among all three Samsung device families analyzed.

No clear advantage to upgrading to a new Galaxy S24 in Japan

People in Japan who upgraded to a Galaxy S24 device likely haven’t seen a performance boost just yet. While all four device families performed similarly well in Japan, there was no statistical difference in the median 5G download speeds offered by all three Galaxy families, with speeds ranging from 110.48 Mbps to 118.93 Mbps across all three Galaxy devices. The iPhone 15 lineup also had a strong speed at 125.48 Mbps.

Bottom line: With generally similar median 5G download speeds across all device families in Japan, users who are considering upgrading to a new Galaxy smartphone might want to wait. While we anticipate the S24’s speeds to surpass those of its predecessors over time, 5G speeds in the market were quite close across all three Galaxy device families in the early days of the S24’s release.

For users in the Philippines who want the fastest 5G, Galaxy S22 users may want to upgrade.

Samsung Galaxy S24 users in the Philippines might have noticed a modest improvement to their 5G speeds compared to those on older S23 and S22 models since they upgraded, as the Galaxy S24 family’s median 5G download speed of 157.38 Mbps was about 20 Mbps faster than that of Galaxy S22’s (137.68 Mbps) and a little over 15 Mbps faster than the Galaxy S23 family (140.06 Mbps). Meanwhile, the iPhone 15 family’s median 5G download speed of 120.04 Mbps trailed all three Samsung Galaxy families in the market.

Bottom line: For users in the Philippines seeking the fastest possible 5G experience, upgrading to an S24 device is worth considering. However, it’s worth noting that the differences in speed between devices wasn’t as stark as that in some other countries, and upgrading likely isn’t for everyone just yet.

Samsung Galaxy S24 and iPhone 15 much faster on 5G in South Korea than S22 devices

In South Korea, home to the first widespread 5G launch in the world, our results reflected outstanding 5G speeds, with the iPhone 15 and Samsung Galaxy S24 families posting similar median 5G download speeds of 598.64 Mbps and 590.28 Mbps, respectively. The S22 family, meanwhile, offered the “slowest” 5G speeds in South Korea, posting an excellent median 5G download speed of 475.42 Mbps, while Galaxy S23 devices came in at 511.82 Mbps.

Bottom line: 5G users in South Korea can expect remarkable 5G speeds across the board, regardless of their device. However, Samsung Galaxy loyalists who currently use S22 models might want to consider moving to an S24 model, given that the S24 family was over 100 Mbps faster than Galaxy S22’s, while also offering the top median 5G upload speed in the market at 55.22 Mbps. For users who prioritize the fastest 5G experience, Galaxy S24’s and iPhone 15’s are both worth a look.

Samsung Galaxy S24 family provides top 5G download speeds in Thailand

In Thailand, Speedtest Intelligence showed that the Galaxy S24 family delivered the fastest median 5G download speed in the market at 171.27 Mbps. That speed marks a notable improvement of roughly 35 Mbps over the S22’s 132.60 Mbps and the S23’s 135.55 Mbps. The Galaxy S24 family also offered the lowest median 5G multi-server latency in Thailand at 32.46 ms. The iPhone 15 family provided the second-fastest median 5G download speed in the market at 147.53 Mbps.

Bottom line: If you’re thinking of upgrading from an S22 or S23 device, our findings suggest that the Galaxy S24 might be the right choice. With faster 5G speeds compared to previous generations, coupled with low latency, smartphones in the Galaxy S24 family should allow for quick content downloads and smooth connectivity overall.

Middle East and Africa

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Nigeria

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Qatar

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in U.A.E.

Excellent 5G speeds in Nigeria, but too soon to tell if you should upgrade for performance

In Nigeria, 5G speeds were impressive overall, from the Galaxy S23 family’s median 5G download speed of 281.67 Mbps to the new Galaxy S24’s speed of 383.97 Mbps. However, in these early days of the S24 lineup’s release, we are still waiting to see how things stabilize in the market before we can make a firm recommendation on whether to upgrade.

Bottom line: For users who like to have the latest gear and/or want the new features offered by the S24 lineup, upgrading is certainly worth considering. But with fast 5G speeds in general, users on any of the device families we looked at should see a quick download experience in general.

Samsung Galaxy S24 by far the fastest 5G in Qatar

Home to some of the fastest 5G speeds in the world, Qatar showcased impressive median 5G download speeds across all three device families analyzed. The Galaxy S24 family led the pack with a jaw-dropping median 5G download speed of 971.49 Mbps and the top median 5G upload speed in the market at 66.52 Mbps. The Galaxy S22 and S23 families trailed, albeit with great median 5G download speeds of 675.06 Mbps and 758.49 Mbps, respectively. The iPhone 15 family also had a strong showing in Qatar, posting a median 5G download speed of 788.97 Mbps.

Bottom line: Consumers in Qatar with older Galaxy S22 or S23 devices might want to make the switch, given that the S24 family’s remarkable median 5G download speed of nearly 1 Gbps was much faster than those of either the Galaxy S23 or especially S22 families.

Galaxy S24 a good option for Samsung fans in the U.A.E.

In the U.A.E., which is home to outstanding 5G speeds in general, the Samsung Galaxy S24 and iPhone 15 families delivered the top median 5G download speeds in the market at 828.11 Mbps and 819.48 Mbps, respectively. When compared to its earlier generation Samsung predecessors, the S24 family held a commanding speed advantage, boasting speeds that were at least 170 Mbps higher than those of either the S22 (639.33 Mbps) or S23 (657.79 Mbps) families.

Bottom line: With median 5G download speeds ranging from 639.33 Mbps to 828.11 Mbps, consumers in the U.A.E. will likely enjoy fantastic speeds regardless of device model. However, for current S22 or S23 users hoping to boost their speeds, the Galaxy S24 family stands out as a good choice.

Europe

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in France

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Spain

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in the U.K.

Galaxy 24 family clocked 5G speeds over 80 Mbps faster than those on S22 devices in France

In France, the Galaxy S24 family was the frontrunner, delivering the fastest median 5G download speed among all device families in the market at 292.15 Mbps. That marks a significant improvement of over 80 Mbps compared to the S22 family’s speed of 211.32 Mbps, along with a jump of more than 60 Mbps compared to the S23’s speed of 229.78 Mbps. Meanwhile, iPhone 15 users experienced the second-fastest median 5G download speed in the market at 257.15 Mbps, with 5G latency nearly identical to that of the S22 and S23 families.

Bottom line: For consumers currently using an S23 or especially an S22 model, upgrading to an S24 device is worth considering. Our results in France showed that the latest Samsung lineup delivered a superior 5G speed experience over older Galaxy models, especially those in the Galaxy S22 family.

Galaxy S24’s a good choice over S22 models in Spain

All four device families in Spain provided good 5G speeds, ranging from the S22’s median 5G download speed of 141.33 Mbps to the S24 family’s speed of 179.34 Mbps. While speeds recorded on S24, S23, and iPhone 15 devices were statistically similar, the difference in speed between the S24 and S22 was much starker, with the S24 nearly 40 Mbps faster than the S22.

Bottom line: The decision to upgrade should be more straightforward for S22 users in Spain compared to those with S23 or iPhone 15 models, as the S24’s median 5G download speed of 179.34 Mbps was almost 40 Mbps faster than that of the S22 family.

Samsung Galaxy S24 likely worth an upgrade from S22 in the U.K.

In the U.K., Samsung Galaxy S24 models were the fastest in the market, with the S24’s median 5G download speed of 156.71 Mbps offering a speed gain of nearly 40 Mbps compared to the Galaxy S22 family. Galaxy S24 models also posted faster speeds than both the Galaxy S23 and iPhone 15 families, but the difference was less stark than it was with the S22 family, with Galaxy S22 models clocking in at 120.49 Mbps, Galaxy S23’s at 133.49 Mbps, and iPhone 15’s at 138.07 Mbps.

Bottom line: U.K. consumers using either S22 or S23 models may want to look into upgrading to the S24 to enjoy faster speeds. That’s especially true for S22 users, given that the S24’s median 5G download speed was nearly 40 Mbps faster than that of S22 devices.

North America

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in Mexico

Chart of Samsung Galaxy S24 Family vs. Its Earlier Counterparts in the United States

No major 5G speed boost for users in Mexico who upgraded to a Galaxy S24

5G speeds in Mexico were impressive, with all device families posting median 5G download speeds of 176.53 Mbps or better. While Speedtest users of the Galaxy S24 family experienced the fastest median 5G download speed in the market at 197.42 Mbps, that speed marked only a modest improvement compared to Galaxy S22 devices (186.51 Mbps) and iPhone 15 models (193.73 Mbps). The Galaxy S23 family showed the slowest 5G speed in the market at 176.53 Mbps, coming in about 20 Mbps slower than Galaxy S24 models

Bottom line: For users eager to embrace the new features offered by Galaxy S24 devices or move on from S23 devices, an upgrade might be worthwhile. However, with fast 5G speeds across all device families in Mexico and only about 20 Mbps separating all four device families in our study, users likely won’t see a major change in their 5G experience by upgrading.

Galaxy S22 users in the U.S. could get faster 5G with the S24 family.

5G speeds in the U.S. had an impressive showing across the board, with median 5G download speeds of at least 232.46 Mbps across all device families. The Samsung Galaxy S24 family led the way with an excellent median 5G download speed of 306.90 Mbps and the lowest median 5G multi-server latency at 45.71 ms. Users of the Galaxy S24 family enjoyed speeds roughly 75 Mbps faster than those on S22 models (232.46 Mbps) and approximately 65 Mbps faster than those on S23 devices (241.60 Mbps). Meanwhile, the iPhone 15 family also offered a strong performance, with a median 5G download speed of 272.99 Mbps.

Bottom line: Users of older Samsung device models in the United States may want to switch to one of the newer models to capitalize on the faster 5G speeds offered by S24 devices, though speeds were strong for all device families in this study.

Ookla will continue monitoring how devices are performing

We’ll continue to check in on device performance as new models enter the market, so stay tuned for further insights into mobile and fixed broadband performance in countries around the world.

If you’ve recently made the switch to an S24 device, make sure you’re getting the speeds you need by downloading the iOS or Android Speedtest® app.

About the Author

Dave Andersen

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Ookla | November 4, 2024

Smartphone User Survey Reveals Habits and Frustrations

In a recent study conducted by Omdia and commissioned by Ookla, over 2,000 smartphone users across the U.S. and U.K. were surveyed to learn about consumer usage patterns, satisfaction levels, and pain points. The findings highlight user expectations in each country, from cost concerns to reliable connectivity to fast browsing speeds and more.

Read on for a look at some of the key findings from our study, or you can download our full white paper for a deeper dive into its findings, with in-depth analysis and the complete survey results.

Wi-Fi remains crucial alongside widespread cellular data usage

In a survey focused primarily on smartphone users, the results showed that Wi-Fi continues to play a vital role for all users. This underscores the enduring importance of Wi-Fi in users’ connectivity strategies, even as 5G technology continues to gain traction.

Network outages: a critical issue for user satisfaction

While not the most frequently cited frustration, network outages emerge as a critical issue with far-reaching implications for user satisfaction and loyalty. The survey reveals that outages have a disproportionate impact on customer perceptions and behavior. Respondents strongly considered switching carriers as a result of network outages and emphasized the importance of timely communication from their providers to alleviate frustration and maintain trust.

In such a dynamic and complex connectivity ecosystem, tools like Speedtest® and Downdetector® play vital roles. By providing objective data on network performance and real-time information on service outages, these tools help address many of the key issues highlighted in our survey. For instance, Speedtest data can help providers pinpoint areas for improvement to enhance customer satisfaction and reduce churn, while Downdetector’s outage reporting can help service providers address user concerns about prompt updates during network issues.

Want to explore all of the findings from our latest smartphone survey? Download the white paper to see all of the survey questions, results, and in-depth analysis.

About the Author

Ookla

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Karim Yaici | July 29, 2024

Faster Speeds and the Promise of New Use Cases is Driving 5G SA Adoption

The deployment of 5G networks is progressing as demand for faster and more reliable connectivity continues to grow. The standalone (SA) deployment model marks a significant milestone in the evolution of 5G, aiming to offer lower latency, increased bandwidth, and improved reliability compared to earlier network configurations. In this article, we use Ookla Speedtest Intelligence® data to track 5G SA deployments since Q2 2023, 5G SA service adoption, and examine its impact on network performance. We also highlight key regions and countries that made notable advancements in 5G SA infrastructure.

Key Takeaways:

India, the U.S., and Southeast Asia are at the forefront of 5G SA adoption. T-Mobile and SK Telekom were among the first to launch 5G SA in 2020, while Chinese operators and Jio in India lead in terms of active 5G SA users. Europe somewhat lags, with operators still hesitant due to the relatively low ROI on existing 5G investments and unclear business cases for 5G SA. However, Europe has the highest number of operators planning to launch it.
The U.A.E. and South Korea lead the world in 5G SA performance. 5G SA download speeds reached 879.89 Mbps and 729.89 Mbps, respectively. Their 5G SA upload speeds were also impressive, at 70.93 Mbps and 77.65 Mbps, respectively. This performance is a result of significant advancements made by local operators in deploying 5G SA and testing advanced features such as network slicing and mobile edge computing (MEC).
The change in speed of 5G SA varied widely between countries over a year. Speedtest Intelligence data shows that 5G SA performance declined in many countries between Q2 2023 and Q2 2024, primarily driven by increased user base and network traffic. Conversely, markets such as Canada and the U.S. improved their performance thanks to access to additional spectrum.

5G SA deployments are expected to increase this year as adoption gains momentum and ecosystem matures

Most existing 5G deployments use the non-standalone (NSA) model which uses the 4G core network. This model is faster to roll out, requires less investment, and maximizes existing network assets. Unlike 5G NSA, 5G SA uses a dedicated 5G core network, unlocking the full capabilities of 5G with better speed, latency, support for large numbers of devices, and more agile service creation. It also enables new features such as network slicing where an operator can dedicate a network segment to specific customers or use cases. Furthermore, the core network functions provided by a cloud-native architecture enable more scalability and automation than physical or virtualized architectures. However, this comes with higher infrastructure complexity, investment as well as staff training costs. Many operators use NSA as a stepping stone towards SA, with a few exceptions, such as DISH in the U.S. and Jio in India, which adopted SA from the outset. Other scenarios for deploying 5G SA include an overlay for a public 5G NSA network or as a private network for enterprise use cases.

The Global Mobile Suppliers Association (GSA) identified 130 operators that had invested in public 5G SA networks as of the end of June 2024. 5G SA represented more than 37% of the 614 operators known to have invested in 5G either through trials or deployments. The GSA reported 1,535 commercially available devices, including handsets and fixed wireless access (FWA) customer premises equipment (CPEs), that support 5G SA, demonstrating the growing maturity of the device ecosystem.

However, only 11 new 5G SA deployments in nine countries were recorded (out of 46 new 5G networks launched in 32 countries) in 2023, according to Analysys Mason, showing a slowdown in deployments. We expect the pace of 5G SA launches to accelerate in 2024 and beyond supported by the growing device ecosystem and commercial appetite for new 5G use cases.

To identify where 5G SA access has been activated and the network expanded between Q2 2023 and Q2 2024, we used Speedtest Intelligence® data to identify devices that connect to 5G SA. The maps below confirm that the number of 5G SA samples increased year-on-year and that coverage has expanded beyond urban centers. However, mobile subscribers in most of Africa, Europe, Central Asia, and Latin America have yet to experience 5G SA.

Speedtest Samples That Use 5G Standalone

In the following sections, we examine the year-on-year changes in 5G SA performance across different regions and identify which countries are leading in the Developed Asia Pacific, the Americas, Emerging Asia Pacific, and Europe.

The developed Asia-Pacific (DVAP) region is at the forefront of 5G SA launches

Operators in this region boast 5G SA networks, with launches happening as early as 2020. Strong government support, operators’ technology leadership, and a high consumer appetite for high-speed internet services drove this rapid adoption.

South Korea is considered a pioneer in the adoption and deployment of 5G technology, with SK Telecom deploying one of the first 5G SA services in H1 2020, and supporting advanced features such as network slicing and mobile edge computing (MEC). Speedtest Intelligence data shows that the country led the region in download and upload speeds in Q2 2024. South Korea has one of the highest median speeds among the countries analyzed at 729.89 Mbps (download) and 77.65 Mbps (upload). The other top-performing country is the U.A.E with a median download speed of 879.89 Mbps and a median upload speed of 70.93 Mbps.

All three service providers in Singapore commercialized 5G SA services, covering more than 95% of the country. Users experienced excellent download speed with a median value of 481.96 Mbps. However, Singapore lagged in upload speed with a median value of 32.09 Mbps.

Macau and Japan are second and third in the region with median download speeds of 404.22 Mbps and 272.73 Mbps, respectively. Mainland China followed with a median speed of 236.95 Mbps. Policies and initiatives such as network-sharing agreements and government subsidies supported 5G growth.

In Australia, TPG Telecom launched its 5G SA network in November 2021, following Telstra’s announcement in May 2020. However, the country lagged behind its regional peers with median download speeds and upload speeds of 146.68 Mbps and 17.69 Mbps, respectively.

The performance of most reviewed DVAP countries remained largely stable or slightly declined between Q2 2023 and Q2 2024. The only two exceptions are South Korea and Australia where performance improved by 12% and 18%, respectively. The most substantial declines were observed in upload speeds, while South Korea stood out with a 17% boost in performance.

5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in Developed Asia Pacific
Source: Speedtest Intelligence® | Q2 2023 – Q2 2024
5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in Developed Asia Pacific

T-Mobile and DISH Push 5G SA Coverage in the U.S.

In the U.S., T-Mobile launched its 5G Standalone (SA) network over 600 MHz spectrum in August 2020, becoming one of the first operators in the world to do so. This was followed by a faster service over 2.5 GHz mid-band spectrum in November 2022 which helped the operator to maintain its national lead in 5G performance. On the other hand, Verizon extensively tested 5G SA in 2023 but so far has been slow to deploy a nationwide SA network. DISH, another notable 5G SA operator, pioneered a cloud-native Open RAN-based 5G SA network in June 2023 and expanded coverage to 73% of the population by the end of that year. In Canada, Rogers Wireless launched the first 5G SA at the beginning of 2021, a year after introducing 5G NSA.

In Brazil, the median download and upload speeds reached 474.65 Mbps and 32.36 Mbps in Q2 2024, respectively, exceeding those in Canada and the U.S. The main operators in Brazil, Claro, Telefonica (Vivo), and TIM have launched 5G SA over the 3.5 GHz band, making the service available to a large proportion of the population.

While download and upload speed improved in Canada and the U.S. between Q2 2023 and Q2 2024, according to Speedtest Intelligence, it declined in Brazil. The deployment of C-band has likely helped to increase download speed in both Canada and the U.S.

5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in the Americas
Source: Speedtest Intelligence® | Q2 2023 – Q2 2024
5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in the Americas

India leads in the Emerging Asian Pacific (EMAP) region with fast expansion to 5G SA network

India is at the forefront of the Emerging Asian Pacific region’s rapid 5G Standalone (SA) network expansion. However, according to Ookla’s Speedtest data for Q2 2024, the Philippines surpasses both India and Thailand with a median 5G SA download speed of 375.40 Mbps. Globe, the first mobile operator to introduce 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) in the Philippines, expanded its 5G outdoor coverage to 97.44% of the capital by the end of H1 2023. The company also launched 5G SA private networks in 2023, along with network slicing.

India follows closely behind the Philippines, with a median download speed of just under 300 Mbps. Jio has been a leader in enhancing 5G SA coverage since its launch in October 2022, while Bharti Airtel initially opted for NSA, with plans to transition to full 5G SA.

Jio’s rapid coverage expansion and high throughput are supported by its access to mid-band (3.5 GHz) and low-band (700 MHz) frequencies. Additionally, all new 5G handsets released in India are SA-compatible, boosting the adoption of 5G SA services, and more than 90% of them support carrier aggregation and Voice over New Radio (VoNR).

Thailand lags behind in median download speed for Q2 2024 but outperforms India and the Philippines in upload speed. It was among the first countries in the region to introduce 5G services, with operators quickly expanding coverage to reach over 80% of the population. AIS, the leading operator in Thailand, launched 5G NSA services in February 2020 using 700 MHz, 2.6 GHz, and 26 GHz bandwidths, followed by 5G SA in July 2020. The operator enabled VoNR in 2021.

Unlike the DVAP region, countries in EMAP have experienced a more substantial decline in 5G SA network performance compared to Q2 2023. The rapid coverage expansion and adoption have likely increased the load on 5G SA infrastructure, putting pressure on the operators to scale up network capacity in the future to at least maintain a similar performance level.

5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in Emerging Asia Pacific
Source: Speedtest Intelligence® | Q2 2023 – Q2 2024
5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in Emerging Asia Pacific

Europe is home to the highest number of operators looking to deploy 5G SA

A growing number of European operators are offering or planning to offer 5G SA, driven by a maturing device ecosystem. However, many remain hesitant due to cost and the need to demonstrate clear business cases for 5G SA. GSMA Intelligence reports that Europe has the highest number of planned 5G SA launches, with 45 operators planning to deploy it as of Q1 2024.

Elisa in Finland was one of the first operators in the region to launch 5G SA in November 2021. Other notable examples of SA implementations include Vodafone in Germany (April 2021) and the UK (June 2023), Bouygues Telecom (2022) in France, Three in Austria, Wind Tre in Italy (both in 2022), Orange and Telefónica in Spain, and TDC Denmark in 2023.

The recent 5G SA launch in Spain may explain why that country saw such high speeds, with Speedtest Intelligence reporting download and upload speeds of 614.91 Mbps and 56.93 Mbps, respectively, in Q2 2023. However, Spain experienced a significant drop in performance in 2024, with speeds falling to 427.64 Mbps (download) and 30.55 Mbps (upload). Despite this decline, Spain continued to outperform the UK and Germany.

5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in Europe
Source: Speedtest Intelligence® | Q2 2023 – Q2 2024
5G Standalone Network Performance, Select Countries in Europe

While 5G SA deployments appear to have slowed in 2023 compared to previous years, we expect momentum to increase from 2024 due to rising enterprise demand for private networks and interest in network slicing, as well as consumer demand for immersive gaming and VR applications. The ecosystem’s maturity and the availability of more network equipment and devices supporting 5G SA will also stimulate the market. According to the GSA, 21% of operators worldwide investing in 5G have included 5G SA in their plans.

Interestingly, the growing popularity and adoption of 5G SA have impacted its performance, with many markets seeing some degradation compared to 2023, according to Speedtest Intelligence. Nonetheless, 5G SA still offers a markedly faster download speed than 5G NSA. Beyond speed, 5G SA promises new capabilities, such as network slicing, that have started to emerge in the most advanced markets but will take time to become a reality for most consumers and enterprises worldwide.

We will continue to track the deployments of 5G SA and monitor their impact on network global performance. For more information about Speedtest Intelligence data and insights, please contact us.

About the Author

Karim Yaici

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Isla McKetta | June 17, 2024

Your Guide to Airport Wi-Fi and Mobile Performance at 50+ Global Airports in 2024

Airports around the world have been packed with travelers this year, which puts extra stress on the Wi-Fi. With summer travel already well in swing in the northern hemisphere, we’re back with fresh data for our series on airport Wi-Fi performance to help you plan for connectivity at all your connections. You’ll find information about Wi-Fi on free networks provided by the individual airports as well as mobile speeds at some of the busiest airports in the world during Q1 2024. Read on for a look at internet performance at over 50 of the world’s busiest airports with data on download speed, upload speed, and latency.

Key takeaways

The seven fastest airports for downloads over Wi-Fi were in the United States: San Francisco International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Seattle–Tacoma International Airport, Dallas Fort Worth International Airport, and Harry Reid International Airport.
Six U.S. airports had the fastest uploads over Wi-Fi: San Francisco International Airport, Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport, Seattle–Tacoma International Airport, Dallas Fort Worth International Airport, and John F. Kennedy International Airport.
The fastest mobile download speeds on our list were at Hamad International Airport in Doha, Qatar, Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport in China, and Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in the U.S.
Eight of the 10 airports with the fastest mobile upload speeds were in China.

9 airports have 100+ Mbps Wi-Fi download speeds

Speedtest Intelligence® showed seven of the nine airports with median Wi-Fi download speeds over 100 Mbps were in the U.S.:

San Francisco International Airport (173.55 Mbps),
Newark Liberty International Airport (166.51 Mbps),
John F. Kennedy International Airport (151.59 Mbps),
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (151.28 Mbps),
Seattle–Tacoma International Airport (137.31 Mbps),
Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (119.92 Mbps), and
Harry Reid International Airport (107.84 Mbps).

Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris, France and China’s Hangzhou Xiaoshan International Airport rounded out the list with median download speeds of 107.13 Mbps and 101.01 Mbps, respectively. Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport and Sea–Tac had the lowest median multi-server latency on Wi-Fi of any of the airports surveyed during Q1 2024.

Hover on the pins on the map below to see full details for download and upload speeds as well as latency at all the airports analyzed.

Fixed Broadband Internet Speeds Over Free Wi-Fi at Global Airports
Speedtest Intelligence® | Q1 2024
A map showing fixed broadband speeds in selected global airports.

At Ookla®, we’re dedicated to making sure the networks you depend on are always at their best. With Ekahau®, our Wi-Fi solution, we know firsthand just how challenging it can be to optimize Wi-Fi at airports, especially when you have up to 900 people waiting at each boarding gate during the busiest travel times. While the speeds achieved by these top airports are impressive, we saw two smaller U.S. airports with median Wi-Fi download speeds over 200 Mbps during our U.S.-only analysis of airport Wi-Fi in the fall.

Six airports on our list use multiple SSIDs for their Wi-Fi networks for different terminals or to take advantage of the coverage advantages of 2.4 GHz and the speed advantages of 5 GHz frequencies. We have included data for all the SSIDs with sufficient samples in the map and reported in the text on the best result when using multiple SSIDs results in dramatically different speeds.

Eighteen airports on our list had median Wi-Fi download speeds of less than 25 Mbps. Mexico City International Airport in Mexico had the lowest median Wi-Fi download speed at 5.11 Mbps, followed by:

Tan Son Nhat International Airport in Vietnam (7.07 Mbps),
Beijing Capital International Airport in China (9.45 Mbps),
Cairo International Airport in Egypt (10.62 Mbps), and
Tokyo Haneda Airport in Japan (11.37 Mbps).

You may struggle with everything from video chatting to streaming at any airport with a download speed below 25 Mbps. Latency is also a factor in performance so if your airport is one of the three with a median Wi-Fi latency over 60 ms, a mobile hotspot may be a better option for a stable connection.

Wi-Fi 6 has arrived

Our analysis shows at least 15 airports on our list were using the new Wi-Fi 6 standard in their Wi-Fi setup. Wi-Fi 6 uses Multi-User Multiple Input, Multiple Output (MU-MIMO) and Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) to increase performance and throughput, especially when serving multiple devices. This offers a real advantage at a large public location like an airport. In order to get maximum benefit from Wi-Fi 6, consumers would need to be using Wi-Fi 6-compatible devices. Speedtest data shows a fairly even split between airports that saw faster download speeds on Wi-Fi 6 and airports where Wi-Fi 6 results were comparable to those on other earlier Wi-Fi generations.

As you know, international travel can be complicated. Even if the airport offers free Wi-Fi, you may encounter other barriers to access. For example, a local number is required in Cairo to receive the access code to connect to the airport Wi-Fi. And while we’d love to include other large airports like Nigeria’s Murtala Muhammed International Airport in future Wi-Fi analyses, they currently do not offer free Wi-Fi so we have included mobile data below.

11 airports show mobile speeds over 200 Mbps

Speedtest® data shows mobile speeds massively outpaced Wi-Fi, with 14 airports showing faster median downloads over mobile than the fastest airport for Wi-Fi. Hamad International Airport in Qatar had the fastest median download speed over mobile on our list at 442.49 Mbps during Q1 2024, followed by:

Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport (341.19 Mbps),
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (295.94 Mbps),
Shanghai Pudong International Airport (264.71 Mbps),
Chongqing Jiangbei International Airport (258.42 Mbps), and
Istanbul Airport (255.51 Mbps).

Mobile Network Speeds at Global Airports
Speedtest Intelligence® | Q1 2024

Fastest mobile speeds at airports in Africa and South America

Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in Kenya had the fastest mobile download speeds of the four African airports we analyzed at 88.12 Mbps during Q1 2024. São Paulo/Guarulhos International Airport in Brazil was the faster of the two Latin American airports analyzed with a median download speed of 55.44 Mbps.

Airports with slow mobile speeds

Mobile can’t fix everything, because six airports came in with a median mobile download speed below 25 Mbps. Mexico City International Airport was again at the bottom with 8.75 Mbps, followed by:

Josep Tarradellas Barcelona–El Prat Airport (15.21 Mbps),
Orlando International Airport (15.84 Mbps),
Adolfo Suárez Madrid–Barajas Airport (20.37 Mbps),
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (20.96 Mbps), and
Indira Gandhi International Airport (21.80 Mbps).

Latency on mobile was generally higher than that on Wi-Fi with 46 airports showing a Wi-Fi latency lower than the lowest latency on mobile, 27.51 ms at China’s Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport. As noted above, latency is an important factor in performance, so it might be worth investigating the airport Wi-Fi by running a Speedtest if your mobile performance seems to lag.

Airport Wi-Fi or mobile? Connecting on your next trip

We created a quick guide to help you decide whether to try out the Wi-Fi or simply use the local mobile network if you have access. Use it to compare free airport Wi-Fi performance against mobile performance for the 52 airports we have both Wi-Fi and mobile data for during Q1 2024. Twenty-six airports had faster mobile internet than airport Wi-Fi. Eight airports had faster Wi-Fi than mobile, and seven airports showed only a slight distinction between Wi-Fi and mobile or download speeds over 100 Mbps on both, so we gave both the green check marks. We were able to include more airports in the mobile analysis because there were more mobile samples to analyze at those airports than there were samples over Wi-Fi.

The averages reported here are based on real-world data, so your experience may differ, especially on a busy travel day. Take a Speedtest® at the airport to see how your performance compares. Cheers to safe travels and rapid connections wherever you’re flying.

About the Author

Isla McKetta

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Maria Gómez | February 12, 2020

How Roaming Affects Mobile Speeds in Europe

Last year, we conducted an expansive analysis of mobile roaming in the European Union. We’re updating our data to see which countries have the best roaming speeds and how roaming affects time spent on Wi-Fi. This analysis is based on Speedtest data from Android devices in Europe during Q3-Q4 2019. Despite Brexit, we’ve included data from the United Kingdom to keep parity year-over-year, as the roaming agreement remains in place for 2020 and this data involves travel within a specific set of countries.

Roaming in Europe typically means slower download speeds

Mobile roaming speeds are affected by the deals struck between individual mobile operators on a country-by-country basis. This means roaming speeds can depend on the plan a subscriber has selected in their home country and on what is offered in the country of destination.

Out of the 28 countries we examined, residents of 22 countries experienced slower speeds when roaming elsewhere in Europe than they do in their home countries. Travelers from the Netherlands experience the most significant loss in speed, with a roaming download speed that is 54.7% slower than at home. However, users in Slovakia barely notice a change in download speed with a roaming download speed only 2.6% slower than the mean download speed in Slovakia during this period.

Roaming vs. Local Mobile Download Speeds in Europe

Speedtest^® Data | Q3-Q4 2019

Country	Local Speeds (Mbps)	Roaming Speed Upload (Mbps)	% Change
Austria	46.30	35.93	-22.4%
Belgium	50.95	33.38	-34.5%
Bulgaria	55.32	30.95	-44.1%
Croatia	52.40	43.73	-16.6%
Cyprus	43.50	21.04	-51.6%
Czech Republic	47.00	36.37	-22.6%
Denmark	48.38	32.28	-33.3%
Estonia	42.61	43.90	3.0%
Finland	43.38	41.46	-4.4%
France	44.34	34.00	-23.3%
Germany	34.07	30.48	-10.5%
Greece	39.90	45.03	12.9%
Hungary	45.53	29.55	-35.1%
Ireland	26.73	32.05	19.9%
Italy	33.64	40.98	21.8%
Latvia	33.20	38.54	16.1%
Lithuania	46.72	39.73	-15.0%
Luxembourg	52.55	34.61	-34.1%
Malta	48.88	32.30	-33.9%
Netherlands	62.52	28.31	-54.7%
Poland	33.07	25.57	-22.7%
Portugal	34.49	36.34	5.4%
Romania	37.84	33.69	-11.0%
Slovakia	34.74	33.83	-2.6%
Slovenia	39.34	32.67	-16.9%
Spain	34.28	27.56	-19.6%
Sweden	48.52	36.55	-24.7%
United Kingdom	36.36	34.96	-3.8%

Upload speeds locally are also mostly faster than those experienced while roaming. Cyprus, Denmark, and the Netherlands all had relatively high mean upload speeds locally, but they also had the largest loss in roaming upload speeds ranging from 31.3% to 36.7% slower upload speeds on mobile roaming.

Residents of some European countries do benefit from faster speeds when roaming on mobile. Users from Estonia, Portugal, Greece, Latvia, Ireland, and Italy all experienced faster download speeds when roaming elsewhere in Europe than they did in their home countries during Q3-Q4 2019. Italian and Irish travelers gained the most when roaming with download speeds that were 21.8% and 19.9% faster than their local speeds, respectively.

A total of 12 countries had higher mean upload speeds while roaming than they experienced locally during this period. France, Latvia, and Ireland benefitted the most with an increase in upload speeds that ranged from 26.5% to 21.4% while roaming.

Latency increases dramatically while roaming in Europe

Unlike mean download and upload speeds, latency is almost always dramatically different while roaming. This is because roaming signals are routed through a user’s home network, making latency a significant issue for Europeans when traveling.

Local vs. Roaming Latency in Europe

Speedtest^® Data | Q3-Q4 2019

Country	Local Latency (ms)	Roaming Latency (ms)	% Change
Austria	26	84	220.4%
Belgium	27	83	205.7%
Bulgaria	27	127	368.3%
Croatia	33	89	166.0%
Cyprus	23	213	825.5%
Czech Republic	26	74	187.6%
Denmark	26	100	287.9%
Estonia	25	76	201.5%
Finland	27	97	254.6%
France	41	82	98.8%
Germany	38	87	128.1%
Greece	29	129	349.8%
Hungary	25	93	272.6%
Ireland	35	100	185.0%
Italy	50	91	81.2%
Latvia	26	95	268.2%
Lithuania	27	107	302.2%
Luxembourg	23	83	262.6%
Malta	19	136	611.6%
Netherlands	28	87	208.3%
Poland	35	109	209.2%
Portugal	30	109	258.8%
Romania	30	113	275.3%
Slovakia	31	76	105.5%
Slovenia	24	74	208.2%
Spain	45	107	137.4%
Sweden	29	118	304.3%
United Kingdom	38	103	173.1%

In their home country, residents of Malta (19 ms), Luxembourg (22 ms) and Cyprus (23 ms) enjoyed the lowest latencies in Europe. Residents of France, Spain and Italy experienced the highest latencies in their home countries at 41 ms, 45 ms and 50 ms, respectively.

European residents experienced an increase of at least 81.2% in their latency when visiting other countries within Europe. Residents from Cyprus, Malta and Bulgaria experience the biggest increase in latency when visiting other countries in Europe, ranging from Cyprus’ 825.5% to Bulgaria’s 368.3%. The countries that experienced the smallest increase in latency were Italy (81.2%), France (98.8%) and Germany (128.1%).

Locals spend more time on Wi-Fi than visitors in Europe

While there are no roaming changes within the E.U., users often opt to connect to Wi-Fi to avoid additional data overages at home and abroad. The following table compares the percentage of time spent on Wi-Fi by a resident of a country with that of a visitor to the same country during Q3-Q4 2019.

Percentage of Time Spent on Wi-Fi in Europe

Speedtest^® Data | Q3-Q4 2019

Country	Local Customers	Visitors	% Change
Austria	75.5%	40.5%	-46.3%
Belgium	77.9%	35.8%	-54.1%
Bulgaria	74.0%	60.3%	-18.5%
Croatia	74.3%	53.8%	-27.5%
Cyprus	79.3%	70.2%	-11.5%
Czech Republic	80.1%	46.6%	-41.8%
Denmark	78.7%	60.3%	-23.4%
Estonia	70.3%	51.9%	-26.2%
Finland	63.0%	60.3%	-4.4%
France	69.3%	48.7%	-29.7%
Germany	80.0%	47.1%	-41.1%
Greece	79.3%	64.3%	-19.0%
Hungary	76.8%	47.8%	-37.8%
Ireland	75.6%	58.9%	-22.0%
Italy	70.9%	55.1%	-22.2%
Latvia	68.8%	49.2%	-28.4%
Lithuania	73.8%	52.2%	-29.2%
Luxembourg	72.4%	30.8%	-57.4%
Malta	79.4%	65.9%	-17.1%
Netherlands	81.8%	49.1%	-40.1%
Poland	70.2%	58.2%	-17.1%
Portugal	76.5%	61.9%	-19.0%
Romania	69.6%	64.1%	-7.9%
Slovakia	76.2%	40.1%	-47.4%
Slovenia	70.7%	24.7%	-65.2%
Spain	78.3%	62.8%	-19.7%
Sweden	81.8%	53.8%	-34.3%
United Kingdom	79.3%	60.9%	-23.1%

As we saw last year, Finnish residents spent the least amount of time on Wi-Fi at 63.0%. Latvia showed the second lowest time spent on Wi-Fi (68.8%), followed by France (69.3%). Residents from the Netherlands, Sweden and the Czech Republic spent the most time on Wi-Fi at 81.8%, 81.8%, and 80.1%, respectively.

Visitors to Cyprus, Malta and Greece spent the most amount of time on Wi-Fi during this period. Time spent on Wi-Fi by visitors ranged from 64.3% in Greece to 70.2% in Cyprus. Visitors to Slovenia, Luxembourg and Belgium as a destination country spent the least amount of time on Wi-Fi at 25.7%, 30.8% and 35.8%, respectively.

Are you interested in more data on roaming performance? Read more here!

About the Author

Maria Gómez

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Maria Gómez | March 2, 2020

Mobile and Fixed Broadband Speeds and 4G Availability in Spain

Versión en español

We investigated Spain’s fixed broadband and mobile network performance, 4G Availability, how Spain’s speeds and coverage compare with neighboring European countries and the performance and 4G Availability of top providers in Spain’s ten largest cities during Q3-Q4 2019. In addition to ranking Spain’s providers by top speeds and coverage, we also analyzed the effects of mobile plans with speed caps on Speedtest® results and ranked the providers on consistency of their network performance.

Spain and France were the fastest on our list for fixed broadband

We compared Spain’s fixed broadband performance at the country level to several other western European countries during Q3-Q4 2019. Spain was well positioned for mean download speed on fixed broadband at 113.72 Mbps, second only to France’s 119.37 Mbps. Spain had the fastest mean upload speed on this list at 103.72 Mbps. Italy had the slowest mean download speed on this list at 56.72 Mbps while the United Kingdom had the slowest mean upload speed at 18.28 Mbps.

fixed-broadband-speeds-eng-1

France showed the highest increase in mean download speed during Q3-Q4 2019 at 21.5%, followed by Portugal and Italy at 15.4% and Spain at 14.5%. Speeds remained relatively flat for this period for Italy, the U.K. and Germany.

An examination of latency over fixed broadband during Q3-Q4 2019 revealed a very different performance order. Portugal had the lowest latency during this period at 16 ms. Germany and the U.K. were tied for second at 23 ms. Spain was third (25 ms), Italy fourth (30 ms) and France fifth (32 ms).

Spain ranks fourth for mobile download speed

mobile-speeds-eng-1

Spain did not rank as well for mean download speed over mobile as they did on fixed broadband, coming in fourth with 33.97 Mbps during Q3-Q4 2019. This was 22.8% slower than first-place France. However, Spain showed the fastest mean upload speeds on mobile at 13.12 Mbps during Q3-Q4 2019.

Portugal saw the largest increase in mobile download speed during Q3-Q4 2019 at 18.4%. Spain’s mean download speed over mobile increased only 6.7% during this period. France showed the smallest increase in mobile download speed at 2.8%.

As we saw on fixed broadband, Portugal had the lowest mobile latency at 32 ms. Germany was second at 41 ms, France third at 43 ms, the U.K. fourth at 44 ms, Spain fifth at 47 ms and Italy last at 52 ms.

United Kingdom and Spain lead in 4G Availability

We used data from Speedtest coverage scans on Android to compare 4G Availability in each market during Q3-Q4 2019. While the U.K. showed the highest 4G Availability at 88.8%, Spain tied for a very close second, with 4G available in 87.7% of tested locations. Germany had the lowest 4G Availability at 72.1% during this period.

4G Availability in Major European Markets

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Country	4G Availability
United Kingdom	88.8%
Spain	87.7%
France	87.7%
Italy	86.7%
Portugal	85.0%
Germany	72.1%

Looking specifically at Spain’s top mobile providers, Orange had the highest 4G Availability at 88.1%. Movistar was second, Yoigo third, and Vodafone fourth.

4G Availability by Provider in Spain

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Provider	4G Availability
Orange	88.1%
Movistar	87.7%
Yoigo	87.4%
Vodafone	86.1%

Spain’s 5G deployments are expanding

5G-Deployments-in-Spain-0220-1
The excitement for 5G is evident in Spain. Vodafone had commercially available 5G deployments in a total of 18 Spanish cities as of February 13, 2020, including Barcelona, Madrid, Valencia, Málaga and Bilbao. Speedtest data reveals the mean download speed on 5G for Spain in Q3-Q4 2019 was 350.68 Mbps — an order of magnitude faster than the national average for mobile download speed — and the mean upload speed over 5G was 31.82 Mbps. Mean latency over 5G in Spain was 27 ms during Q3-Q4 2019.

MÁSMÓVIL was Spain’s fastest fixed broadband provider

Using Speed Score^™, a metric that combines measures of download and upload speed, to compare top ISPs in Spain during Q3-Q4 2019, we found that MÁSMÓVIL led with a score of 133.75 on fixed broadband. Orange was in second place with 115.25, followed by Vodafone (105.07) and Movistar (103.01).

Fixed Broadband Performance by Provider in Spain

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Provider	Speed Score^TM
MÁSMÓVIL	133.75
Orange	115.25
Vodafone	105.07
Movistar	103.01

Movistar was Spain’s fastest mobile operator

Movistar had the highest Speed Score among Spain’s mobile operators during Q3-Q4 2019 at 37.76. Orange was second at 33.02, Vodafone third at 26.34 and Yoigo fourth at 22.43. As we will discuss below, overall speed performance can be impacted by the speed caps and tariff plans that are in place in Spain.

Mobile Performance by Operator in Spain

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Provider	Speed Score^TM
Movistar	37.76
Orange	33.02
Vodafone	26.34
Yoigo	22.43

Speed capping affects overall performance

Speed capping, a limit of service imposed onto an internet connection by an operator, allows operators to also offer plans that focus on affordability rather than maximum performance.
Ookla_Distribution-Speedtest-Results_Vodafone_Spain_0220-3_en
The chart above shows how Vodafone’s introduction of subscription plans that use speed capping affected the distribution of download speeds. While those plans (with caps at 2 Mbps and 10 Mbps, respectively) were available starting in April, we don’t see the true effect on average speeds until May and June when the 0-5 Mbps and 10-15 Mbps buckets start to spike. We’ve only showed bins up to 60 Mbps to make this and the following graphs more legible.

In contrast, we see more even distributions of download speeds among all other mobile operators in Spain.
Ookla_Distribution-Speedtest-Results_Movistar_Spain_0220-3_en

MÁSMÓVIL and Movistar (mobile) offer the most consistent speeds

Speed is important, but if those speeds are inconsistent, it becomes difficult for users to reliably use their devices to stream HD video, browse the web or use online gaming. We used Speedtest data to calculate each top provider’s APS (Acceptable Performance Score) in Spain during Q3-Q4 2019.

APS for fixed broadband measures the percentage of samples that equal or exceed a download speed of 25 Mbps and also equal or exceed an upload speed of 3 Mbps. MÁSMÓVIL provided the most consistent experience in Spain on fixed broadband in Q3-Q4 2019 with an APS of 81.6%. Movistar was in last place with an APS of 61.9%.

Speed Consistency by Provider on Fixed Broadband

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Provider	APS
MÁSMÓVIL	81.6%
Orange	75.1%
Vodafone	73.5%
Movistar	61.9%

APS on mobile measures the percentage of samples that equal or exceed a download speed of 5 Mbps and also equal or exceed an upload speed of 1 Mbps. Movistar took the top spot for consistency on mobile broadband with an APS of 88.9%. Vodafone had the lowest consistency score with an APS of 79.8%.

Speed Consistency by Operator on Mobile

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Provider	APS
Movistar	88.9%
Orange	84.3%
Yoigo	82.6%
Vodafone	79.8%

Madrid led fixed and mobile broadband speeds

Ookla_Fixed-Broadband-Speeds_Spain_0220-1
We used Speedtest data from 2,183,336 user-initiated tests to investigate internet speeds in Spain’s ten most populous cities during Q3-Q4 2019. Madrid had the fastest mean download speeds on both fixed broadband and mobile.

Mean download speeds on fixed broadband ranged from 141.87 Mbps in Madrid to 91.66 Mbps in Las Palmas de la Gran Canaria, a 35.4% difference. Madrid also had the fastest mean upload speed over fixed broadband at 145.08 Mbps. Oviedo took the last place in upload speeds on fixed broadband with a 61.4% slower upload speed than Madrid.

Oviedo had the lowest latency over fixed broadband of the cities on our list during Q3-Q4 2019 at 15 ms. Málaga had the highest latency at 28 ms.
Ookla_Mobile-Broadband-Speeds_Spain_0220-1
The gap between fastest and slowest speeds between Spanish cities on mobile broadband was similar to what we saw fixed broadband during Q3-Q4 2019. Madrid once again led in performance on mobile broadband with a mean download speed of 44.35 Mbps and a mean upload speed of 15.89 Mbps. Las Palmas was in last place on download speeds with a 37.9% slower mean download speed than Madrid. Valencia had the slowest mean upload speed over mobile at 13.86 Mbps. Seville had the lowest latency over mobile at 36 ms during Q3-Q4 2019 and Las Palmas had the highest mobile latency at 73 ms.

Zaragoza led 4G Availability in Spain’s most populous cities

4G Availability in Spain’s Largest Cities

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

City	4G Availability
Zaragoza	97.2%
Valencia	97.1%
Seville	96.8%
Málaga	96.7%
Oviedo	95.4%
Madrid	95.1%
Las Palmas de la Gran Canaria	95.0%
Alicante	94.6%
Bilbao	94.3%
Barcelona	87.7%

4G Availability was higher in Spain’s largest cities than the country’s average, with Zaragoza having the highest 4G Availability at 97.2% of tested locations. Barcelona had the lowest 4G Availability on our list at 87.7%.

MÁSMÓVIL was fastest fixed broadband provider in 6 cities

Looking specifically at Speed Score in individual Spanish cities during Q3-Q4 2019, we found MÁSMÓVIL was the fastest provider in six cities: Málaga, Seville, Zaragoza, Madrid, Valencia and Alicante. Adamo, the fastest fixed provider in Barcelona, had the highest Speed Score on the list at 185.29. Vodafone was the fastest provider in Bilbao and Oviedo.

Fixed Broadband Performance by Operator in Spain’s Largest Cities

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

City	Provider	Speed Score^TM
Barcelona	Adamo	185.29
Málaga	MÁSMÓVIL	156.24
Seville	MÁSMÓVIL	148.78
Madrid	MÁSMÓVIL	145.83
Bilbao	Vodafone	144.65
Zaragoza	MÁSMÓVIL	144.40
Oviedo	Vodafone	143.85
Valencia	MÁSMÓVIL	143.99
Alicante	MÁSMÓVIL	143.72
Las Palmas	Orange	114.46

Looking at the fastest Spanish providers on mobile broadband for each city during Q3-Q4 2019, Movistar dominated the list with the fastest Speed Score in 7 cities. Movistar also had the highest Speed Score overall at 52.04 in Seville. Vodafone was the fastest mobile provider in Madrid (35.67). Orange was the fastest provider in Barcelona (35.37) and Oviedo (45.10).

Mobile Performance by Operator in Spain’s Largest Cities

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

City	Provider	Speed Score^TM
Seville	Movistar	52.04
Valencia	Movistar	50.80
Alicante	Movistar	50.36
Málaga	Movistar	48.97
Bilbao	Movistar	48.86
Oviedo	Orange	45.10
Zaragoza	Movistar	40.79
Madrid	Vodafone	35.67
Las Palmas	Movistar	35.37
Barcelona	Vodafone	31.37

We look forward to following these markets and investigating the changing landscape of internet performance and mobile coverage in Europe. Want to learn more about fixed and mobile speeds in different markets? Click here to read more Ookla Research.

Editor’s note: This article was updated on March 4, 2020 to correct an editing error that incorrectly reported the figures for mobile APS.

Velocidades de banda ancha fija y móvil, y disponibilidad de 4G en España

Hemos investigado el rendimiento de la banda ancha fija y móvil, así como la disponibilidad de 4G en España. También hemos comparado las velocidades y la cobertura españolas con las de los países europeos vecinos, así como el rendimiento y la disponibilidad de 4G de los principales proveedores de las diez ciudades más grandes de España en el segundo semestre de 2019. Además de clasificar a los proveedores españoles por su velocidad y cobertura máximas, también hemos analizado los efectos de los planes móviles con limitaciones de velocidad basándonos en los resultados de Speedtest® y hemos clasificado a los proveedores según la constancia del rendimiento de sus redes.

España y Francia fueron los países más rápidos de nuestra lista de banda ancha fija

Hemos comparado el rendimiento de la banda ancha fija de España a nivel de país con varios otros países de la Europa occidental en el segundo semestre de 2019. España obtuvo una buena posición en cuanto a velocidad de descarga media en banda ancha fija, con 113,72 Mbps, en segundo lugar solo después de los 119,37 Mbps de Francia. España registró la velocidad de subida media más alta de esta lista: 103,72 Mbps. Italia obtuvo la velocidad de descarga media más baja de esta lista, 56,72 Mbps, mientras que el Reino Unido registró la velocidad de subida media más baja, 18,28 Mbps.

fixed-broadband-speeds-sp-2

Francia registró el mayor aumento en la velocidad de descarga media del segundo semestre de 2019, con el 21,5 %, seguida de Portugal y Italia, con el 15,4 %, y España, con el 14,5 %. Las velocidades se mantuvieron relativamente invariables durante este periodo en Italia, Reino Unido y Alemania.

Un análisis de la latencia en banda ancha fija en el segundo semestre de 2019 reveló una clasificación por rendimiento muy distinta. Portugal se anotó la latencia más baja de este periodo: 16 ms. Alemania y Reino Unido empataron en el segundo puesto con 23 ms. España resultó tercera (25 ms), Italia cuarta (30 ms) y Francia quinta (32 ms).

España, cuarto país en velocidad de descarga en Internet móvil

mobile-speeds-sp-3

La clasificación de España en velocidad de descarga media por móvil no fue tan buena como la de banda ancha fija, quedándose con un cuarto puesto con 33,97 Mbps en el segundo semestre de 2019. Esto supuso una velocidad un 22,8 % más lenta que la del primer país clasificado, Francia. Sin embargo, España registró las velocidades de subida medias más altas en Internet móvil, con 13,12 Mbps en el segundo semestre de 2019.

Portugal experimentó el mayor aumento en velocidad de descarga de Internet móvil en el segundo semestre de 2019, el 18,4 %. La velocidad de descarga media de España en Internet móvil aumentó solo un 6,7 % en este periodo. Francia registró el menor aumento de velocidad de descarga de Internet móvil, un 2,8 %.

Como vimos en la banda ancha fija, la latencia móvil más baja fue la de Portugal, con 32 ms. Alemania fue segunda con 41 ms, Francia tercera con 43 ms, Reino Unido cuarto con 44 ms, España quinta con 47 ms e Italia última con 52 ms.

Reino Unido y España, líderes en disponibilidad de 4G

Utilizamos datos de exploraciones de cobertura de Speedtest en Android para comparar la disponibilidad de 4G en cada mercado en el segundo semestre de 2019. Mientras que el Reino Unido mostró la mayor disponibilidad de 4G con el 88,8 %, España y Francia ocuparon el segundo lugar, con 4G disponible en el 87,7 % de las ubicaciones probadas. Durante ese período, Alemania tuvo la menor disponibilidad de 4G con un 72,1 %.

Disponibilidad de 4G en los principales mercados europeos

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

País	Disponibilidad de 4G
Reino Unido	88,8 %
España	87,7 %
Francia	87,7 %
Italia	86,7 %
Portugal	85,0 %
Alemania	72,1 %

Si nos fijamos específicamente en los principales proveedores móviles de España, Orange ofreció la mayor disponibilidad de 4G con un 88,1 %. Movistar fue segundo, Yoigo tercero, y Vodafone cuarto.

Disponibilidad de 4G por proveedor en España

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Proveedor	Disponibilidad de 4G
Orange	88,1 %
Movistar	87,7 %
Yoigo	87,4 %
Vodafone	86,1 %

Los despliegues de 5G en España se están expandiendo

5G-Deployments-in-Spain-0220_es
El entusiasmo por el 5G es evidente en España. Vodafone desplegó 5G comercialmente disponible en un total de 18 ciudades españolas a fecha del 13 de febrero de 2020, incluidas Barcelona, Madrid, Valencia, Málaga y Bilbao. Los datos de Speedtest revelan que en España la velocidad media de descarga en 5G en el segundo semestre de 2019 fue de 350,68 Mbps (velocidad superior a la media nacional para Internet móvil) y la velocidad de subida media por 5G fue de 31,82 Mbps. La latencia media por 5G en España fue de 27 ms en el segundo semestre de 2019.

MÁSMÓVIL fue el proveedor de banda ancha fija más rápido de España

Al utilizar Speed Score™, sistema que combina mediciones de velocidades de descarga y de subida, para comparar los principales proveedores de servicios de Internet de España en el segundo semestre de 2019, descubrimos que MÁSMÓVIL obtuvo los mejores resultados, con una puntuación de 133,75 en banda ancha fija. Orange ocupó el segundo lugar con 115,25, seguido de Vodafone (105,07) y Movistar (103,01).

Rendimiento de la banda ancha fija en España por proveedor

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Proveedor	Speed Score^TM
MÁSMÓVIL	133,75
Orange	115,25
Vodafone	105,07
Movistar	103,01

Movistar fue el operador móvil más rápido de España

Movistar obtuvo la máxima puntuación de velocidad de entre los operadores móviles de España en el segundo semestre de 2019, con 37,76. Orange fue segundo con 33,02, Vodafone la tercera con 26,34 y Yoigo cuarta con 22,43. Como veremos más adelante, el rendimiento general de la velocidad puede verse afectado por los límites de velocidad y los planes de tarifas vigentes en España.

Rendimiento de Internet móvil en España por operador

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Proveedor	Speed Score^TM
Movistar	37,76
Orange	33,02
Vodafone	26,34
Yoigo	22,43

La limitación de velocidad afecta al rendimiento general

La limitación de la velocidad, una restricción de servicio impuesta a una conexión de Internet por los operadores, permite a estos ofrecer también planes que se centren en la asequibilidad más que en el rendimiento máximo.
Ookla_Distribution-Speedtest-Results_Vodafone_Spain_0220-3_es
En el gráfico anterior se muestra cómo los planes de suscripción con limitación de velocidad introducidos por Vodafone afectaron a la distribución de las velocidades de descarga. Aunque esos planes (con limitaciones de 2 Mbps y 10 Mbps, respectivamente) estaban disponibles desde abril, no vemos un efecto verdadero en las velocidades medias hasta mayo y junio cuando las medidas de 0-5 Mbps y 10-15 Mbps empiezan a sobresalir.

En cambio, en el resto de operadores móviles de España vemos distribuciones más uniformes de las velocidades de descarga.
Ookla_Distribution-Speedtest-Results_Movistar_Spain_0220-3_es

MÁSMÓVIL y Movistar (móvil) ofrecen las velocidades más constantes

La velocidad es importante, pero si no es constante, resulta difícil que los usuarios utilicen sus dispositivos con fiabilidad para transmitir vídeo de alta definición, navegar por la web o jugar en línea. Utilizamos los datos de Speedtest para calcular la PRA (puntuación de rendimiento aceptable) de cada uno de los principales proveedores de España durante el segundo semestre de 2019.

La PRA de banda ancha fija mide el porcentaje de muestras que igualan o superan una velocidad de descarga de 25 Mbps y que también igualan o superan una velocidad de subida de 3 Mbps. MÁSMÓVIL proporcionó el mayor nivel de constancia de España en banda ancha fija en el segundo semestre de 2019 con una PRA de 81,6 %. Movistar quedó en último lugar con una PRA del 61,9 %.

Constancia de velocidad por proveedor en banda ancha fija

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Proveedor	PRA
MÁSMÓVIL	81,6 %
Orange	75,1 %
Vodafone	73,5 %
Movistar	61,9 %

La PRA de Internet móvil mide el porcentaje de muestras que igualan o superan una velocidad de descarga de 5 Mbps y que también igualan o superan una velocidad de subida de 1 Mbps. Movistar ocupó el primer lugar en constancia de banda ancha móvil con una PRA del 88,9 %, Vodafone obtuvo la puntuación más baja en constancia con una PRA del 79,8 %.

Constancia de velocidad por operador en Internet móvil

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Proveedor	PRA
Movistar	88,9 %
Orange	84,3 %
Yoigo	82,6 %
Vodafone	79,8 %

Madrid lideró las velocidades de banda ancha fija y móvil

Ookla_Fixed-Broadband-Speeds_Spain_0220_es-2
Para estudiar las velocidades de Internet de las diez ciudades más pobladas de España en el segundo semestre de 2019 utilizamos los datos de Speedtest de 2.183.336 pruebas realizadas por los usuarios. Madrid registró las velocidades medias de descarga más altas tanto en banda ancha fija como en Internet móvil.

Las velocidades medias de descarga por banda ancha fija oscilaron entre los 141,87 Mbps de Madrid y los 91,66 Mbps de Las Palmas de la Gran Canaria, una diferencia del 35,4 %. Madrid registró también la velocidad de subida media más alta por banda ancha fija, con 145,08 Mbps. Oviedo ocupó el último lugar en velocidad de subida por banda ancha fija con un 61,4 % menos de velocidad de subida que Madrid.

Oviedo tuvo la menor latencia en banda ancha fija de las ciudades de nuestra lista durante el segundo semestre de 2019, con 15 ms. Málaga registró la latencia más alta, con 28 ms.
Ookla_Mobile-Broadband-Speeds_Spain_0220_es-1
La brecha entre las velocidades más rápidas y más lentas de las ciudades españolas por banda ancha móvil fue similar a la que apreciamos en la banda ancha fija en el segundo semestre de 2019. Madrid volvió a liderar el rendimiento de la banda ancha móvil con una velocidad media de descarga de 44,35 Mbps y una velocidad media de subida de 15,89 Mbps. Las Palmas quedó en último lugar en velocidades de descarga con un 37,9 % menos de velocidad media de descarga que Madrid. Valencia registró la velocidad de subida media más baja por Internet móvil: 13,86 Mbps. Sevilla obtuvo la menor latencia por Internet móvil con 36 ms en el segundo semestre de 2019 y Las Palmas registró la mayor latencia por Internet móvil con 73 ms.

Zaragoza lideró la disponibilidad de 4G en las ciudades españolas más pobladas

Disponibilidad de 4G en las ciudades más grandes de España

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Ciudad	Disponibilidad de 4G
Zaragoza	97,2 %
Valencia	97,1 %
Sevilla	96,8 %
Málaga	96,7 %
Oviedo	95,4 %
Madrid	95,1 %
Las Palmas de la Gran Canaria	95,0 %
Alicante	94,6 %
Bilbao	94,3 %
Barcelona	87,7 %

La disponibilidad de 4G en las ciudades más grandes de España superó el promedio del país, siendo Zaragoza la de mayor disponibilidad de 4G con el 97,2 % de las ubicaciones analizadas. Barcelona tuvo la menor disponibilidad de 4G de nuestra lista, con el 87,7 %.

MÁSMÓVIL fue el proveedor de banda ancha fija más rápido de 6 ciudades

Si nos fijamos específicamente en la puntuación de velocidad en cada una de las ciudades españolas en el segundo semestre de 2019, vemos que MÁSMÓVIL fue el proveedor más rápido en seis ciudades: Málaga, Sevilla, Zaragoza, Madrid, Valencia y Alicante. Adamo, el proveedor fijo más rápido de Barcelona, consiguió la puntuación de velocidad más alta de la lista con 185,29. Vodafone fue el proveedor más rápido en Bilbao y Oviedo.

Rendimiento de la banda ancha fija por operador en las ciudades más grandes de España

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Ciudad	Proveedor	Speed Score^TM
Barcelona	Adamo	185,29
Málaga	MÁSMÓVIL	156,24
Sevilla	MÁSMÓVIL	148,78
Madrid	MÁSMÓVIL	145,83
Bilbao	Vodafone	144,65
Zaragoza	MÁSMÓVIL	144,40
Valencia	MÁSMÓVIL	143,99
Oviedo	Vodafone	143,85
Alicante	MÁSMÓVIL	143,72
Las Palmas	Orange	114,46

Si nos fijamos en los proveedores españoles más rápidos en banda ancha móvil de cada ciudad en el segundo semestre de 2019, Movistar dominó la lista con la puntuación de velocidad más alta en 7 ciudades. Movistar consiguió también la puntuación de velocidad máxima, con 52,04 en Sevilla. Vodafone fue el proveedor de Internet móvil más rápido en Madrid (35,67). Orange fue el proveedor más rápido de Barcelona (35,37) y Oviedo (45,10).

Rendimiento de Internet móvil por operador en las ciudades más grandes de España

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Ciudad	Proveedor	Speed Score^TM
Sevilla	Movistar	52,04
Valencia	Movistar	50,80
Alicante	Movistar	50,36
Málaga	Movistar	48,97
Bilbao	Movistar	48,86
Oviedo	Orange	45,10
Zaragoza	Movistar	40,79
Madrid	Vodafone	35,67
Barcelona	Orange	35,37
Las Palmas	Movistar	31,37

Nos encantará seguir la evolución de estos mercados y estudiar el cambiante panorama del rendimiento de Internet y de la cobertura móvil en Europa. Si desea obtener más información sobre las velocidades fijas y móviles en diferentes mercados, haga clic aquí para leer más información de Ookla.

Nota del editor: Este artículo fue actualizado el 4 de marzo del 2020 que para corregir un error de edición que reportaba cifras incorrectas del PRA móvil.

About the Author

Maria Gómez

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Maria Gómez | April 14, 2020

Can’t Connect? The Most Significant Online Service Outages in Q1 2020

“We’re experiencing problems at the moment” became an all-too-familiar phrase during the first three months of 2020. As we continue with our series of most significant outages across the globe, this article examines major web and online service outages from Q1 2020 using Downdetector® data. Outages came under increased scrutiny as COVID-19 spread and more people began working or studying from home, gaming, video conferencing and using more online services than ever before. However, we saw significant outages both before and after this time. The six categories of outages we’re highlighting here are: collaboration platforms, gaming, telecom operators, streaming services, social media and financial institutions.

Collaboration platforms

Google Drive (January 27, 2020): 24,558 outage reports at peak

1-Google-Drive-1
Users of Google’s popular file storage and synchronization service rushed to Downdetector when receiving the following error message: “Google Docs encountered an error. Please try reloading this page, or coming back to it in a few minutes.” on January 27. The outage reportedly lasted an hour and Downdetector received 24,558 reports during the peak fifteen minutes of the outage. Most reports originated from the US, but users also reported problems in Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands and the UK.

Zoom (March 20, 2020): 1,483 reports at peak

2-Zoom-1
Video conferencing software like Zoom has become an important tool to communicate. Amid an increase in volume, Zoom users, mostly in the U.S., reported an outage on March 20 that left people unable to access the service or make calls. The service also experienced a smaller outage on March 5 with 586 reports at the peak. Both outages lasted approximately two hours.

Microsoft Teams (March 16): Multiple outages

3-Teams
Microsoft Teams experienced a worldwide outage on March 16. The collaboration platform that streamlines communication in an organization was reportedly down for users in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the U.S. The duration of the outage varied by country, but lasted more than six hours in most and recurred in the Netherlands for a period on March 17. Teams also experienced a significant outage over the span of five hours on February 2 when 9,386 users in the U.S. reported problems at the peak.

Gaming

Steam (multiple outages)

Steam-Bar-Outage-1
Steam suffered nine major outages during Q1 2020 (seven of which are pictured above), according to reports from users in Germany, the U.K. and the U.S. The largest outage took place on February 18 when the gaming platform was down for about three hours and 14,955 users reported issues at the peak of the outage. Steam users rushed to Downdetector again on March 17, which was Steam’s second largest outage with 11,585 reports at the peak of the outage. The two subsequent Tuesdays also proved problematic for Steam with 6,931 outages during the peak on March 24 and 4,440 outages during the March 31 peak.

Call of Duty (March 15): 7,761 outages at peak

4-Call-of-Duty
Users in the U.S. reported multiple Call of Duty outages during Q1 2020. The largest outage took place on March 15, with 7,761 reports at the peak of an outage that primarily affected the server connection of the gaming platform. Gamers were unable to play with friends for about four hours that day. On March 17, Call of Duty had a smaller outage with 3,549 reports at peak.

Fortnite (March 17): 3,998 reports at peak

5-Fortnite

On March 17, Fornite tweeted “We’re currently investigating issues with logins, matchmaking, the Item Shop, and other Fortnight services. We’ll provide an update when these are resolved,” after users reported having problems with the gaming platform. Users were unable to access Fornite for about four hours that day. Most of the reports came from France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, the U.K. and the U.S.

Telecom providers

Italy

TIM Italy (March 12): 2,667 reports at peak

6-TIM
Users throughout Italy flooded Downdetector with reports of problems with their mobile internet connections on March 12. The outage lasted close to an hour and showed 2,667 reports at the peak of the outage. TIM had a smaller outage the day before with 1,337 reports at the peak of the outage.

Vodafone Italy (February 14th): 1,733 reports at peak

7-Vodafone
Vodafone users in Italy reported having problems with their mobile service on February 14. The outage lasted four hours and peaked at 1,733 reports. Users also reported problems with their mobile internet connection.

United States

Comcast (January 23): 39,638 reports at peak

8-Comcast
The U.S. internet service provider experienced a major outage on January 23. The outage lasted for two hours with 39,638 reports at the peak of the outage. Weeks later, the service experienced a smaller outage on March 3 with 1,124 reports during the peak.

United Kingdom

Virgin Media (March 4-5): 4,348 reports at peak

9-Virgin-UK
Users in the U.K. reported their internet service was not working during Virgin Media’s outage starting on March 4 and continuing through March 5. The outage peaked on March 5 when 4,348 users reported issues.

Social Media

Twitter (February 7): 11,542 reports at peak

The largest social media outage in Q1 2020 belonged to Twitter. On February 7, users in the Twitterverse were unable to tweet, retweet or like tweets for about two hours. Over 11,500 U.S. users reported problems during the peak of the outage. Users in Germany, Japan and the U.K. also reported problems with the platform.

Facebook (January 24-25): 3,718 reports at peak

Facebook users reported problems with the site on Downdetector starting on January 24. Most users reported problems with their newsfeed or the inability to log in to the social media platform. At the peak of the outage, there were 3,718 reports from users in the U.S. Users in Germany and the U.K. also reported problems that day. Users were still experiencing issues through January 25.

Streaming Services

Streaming-bar-outages

Hulu (March 20): 4,017 reports at peak

People hoping to binge-watch their favorite shows while in quarantine were disappointed to find Hulu was down on March 20. Users complaints on Downdetector included not being able to log in or of the player not working properly. The outage lasted approximately two hours.

Disney+ (January 6): 1,710 reports at peak

Disney + experienced an outage at the beginning of Q1 2020 that reached 1,710 reports at the peak. For an hour, users in the U.S. reported they were unable to log in to the platform.

Netflix (March 25): 1,690 reports at peak

For two hours on March 25, thousands of Netflix users were unable to stream their favorite shows. At the peak of Nexflix’s biggest outage in Q1 2020, 1,690 users reported problems in the U.S.

Funimation (March 25): 1,191 reports at peak

Anime lovers in the US reported problems with Funimation towards the end of Q1 2020. Most users complained of not being able to log in to the service for about an hour that day. There were 1,191 reports at the peak of the outage.

Financial Services

Robinhood (multiple outages)

robinhood-barchart

Robinhood had multiple fumbles during Q1 2020, leaving users frustrated with the financial service. The most significant outage took place on March 2 with 14,429 reports at the peak of the outage. Robin Hood experienced additional outages on March 3 and March 9 with 3,538 and 3,119 reports during the respective peaks.

Is an outage disrupting your day? You’re not alone. Find out if there’s an outage and bond with other frustrated users on Downdetector and read about other significant outages here.

Editor’s note: This article was updated on April 14 to clarify the Steam section and related graphic.

About the Author

Maria Gómez

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Maria Gómez | July 14, 2020

The Most Significant Online Service Outages in Q2 2020

“Try again later” was a phrase that frustrated users all over the world during the multiple online service outages in Q2 2020. This article is the third installment in our quarterly series tracking the most significant web and online service outages. Analyzing Downdetector® data from Q2 2020, we focused on user-reported service disruptions in five categories: social media, communications service providers, collaboration platforms, gaming and financial institutions.

Social media

Downdetector_Snapchat_Outage_0720-1

Snapchat (April 8, 2020): 93,671 reports at peak

Snapchat users began to report problems with the mobile app early on April 8. At the peak of outage reports, there were 93,671 reported issues in the U.S in one 15-minute period. User reports rolled in over a total period of approximately two hours. Users in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands also reported problems with Snapchat during the same time period.

TikTok (May 6, 2020): 49,701 reports at peak

Many U.S. and U.K. users of the popular video-based social media platform struggled to log into their accounts on May 6. Over 49,000 users in the U.S. reported problems logging in, viewing and uploading videos to TikTok that evening.

Tinder (June 12, 2020): 6,967 reports at peak

Users of the mobile dating app Tinder rushed to Downdetector when they encountered problems logging in, sending and receiving messages on the morning of June 12. Almost 7,000 users from the U.S. reported problems with the app, and issues were also reported in the U.K. and Germany.

Communications service providers

Downdetector_T-Mobile_Outage_0720-1

T-Mobile (June 15, 2020): 113,980 reports at peak

U.S. mobile operator T-Mobile suffered a major outage on June 15. Customers reported problems with their mobile phone service, mobile internet connection and their ability to text friends and family. Reports came in over a period of almost ten hours that evening, peaking with 113,980 reports in one 15-minute period. Other mobile network operators also received a significant volume of problem reports that day as their own customers were unable to reach T-Mobile customers, leading to perceived service issues.

U.K. Mobile Operators: Virgin Media (April 27), TalkTalk (May 29) and Vodafone (June 9)

U.K. telecom providers Virgin Media, TalkTalk and Vodafone each struggled with outages in Q2 2020. Virgin Media UK customers rushed to Downdetector on April 27 when they started having problems with their service. Users reported problems throughout the day over a period of about six hours. About 77% of Downdetector reports cited a problem with their cable internet service. The outage had multiple peaks during the day, with 40,397 reports during the highest peak.

TalkTalk users reported problems with their internet connection on May 29, with a peak of 31,942 user reports. According to Downdetector data, the majority of reports came from Manchester, London, Glasgow and Birmingham.

On June 9, Vodafone UK experienced a smaller, but not insignificant outage. During the outage, 94% of Downdetector problem reports cited issues with the mobile network service. At the peak of reported issues, 9,686 Downdetector users reported problems with the network.

Telcel (May 27, 2020): 5,091 reports at peak

Customers of Mexican operator Telcel reported problems with their network on May 27. Over 5,000 reports were recorded during the peak of problem reporting, 95% of which were about Telcel’s mobile network. Most reports came from Mexico City.

Collaboration platforms

Downdetector_Zoom_Outage_0720-1

Zoom (May 17, 2020): 7,523 reports at peak

Video conferences and virtual dates were interrupted on May 17 when Zoom experienced problems in multiple countries. Downdetector measured a peak of 7,523 user-reported issues in one 15-minute period in the U.S., but the outage was also felt in Europe. Most users reported problems with the video conferencing feature of the online service.

Slack (May 12, 2020): 4,163 reports at peak

The popular business communication provider Slack experienced a disruption in their service on May 12, with a peak of 4,163 user-reported issues in 15 minutes. Most users who reported problems on Downdetector were located in San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Jose, and Seattle. Most reports pointed to problems connecting to the online service.

Office 365 (June 14, 2020): 2,056 reports at peak

On June 14, Australian users of Microsoft’s subscription service Office 365 reported issues, with a peak of 2,056 over 15 minutes. Users were unable to log into any of the Office 365 apps and experienced problems connecting to the server. Users in New Zealand also reported issues that day.

Gaming

Downdetector_CallofDuty_Outage_0720-2

Call of Duty (April 12, 2020): 46,278 reports at peak

U.S. players of Call of Duty were unable to connect to the game’s servers on April 12. Users from Dallas, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia and New York City flooded Downdetector with reports when they encountered problems with the game. At the peak of Downdetector reports, more than 46,000 users reported issues.

Financial institutions

Downdetector_BBVA_Outage_0720-1

BBVA Bancomer (June 10, 2020): 1,198 reports at peak

On June 10, customers of BBVA Bancomer in Mexico reported issues with their online banking service. More than 1,000 reports were recorded at the peak of reporting, with many users unable to log in or use the app over a period of approximately four hours The majority of reported issues came from Mexico City, Guadalajara and Monterrey.

Want to know when an online service is down? Keep up with outages by visiting Downdetector.

About the Author

Maria Gómez

| More Articles

Ookla Research™ Articles

Maria Gómez | November 18, 2020

ICYMI: Ookla Data and Research from October 2020

Highlights from the Speedtest Global Index^TM

Global-Index-Tweet-Image-Oct-2020
These are the top stories from October 2020:

Australia is back in the top 5 for mobile for the first time since November 2019.
Luxembourg had a substantial rank change on mobile, moving up 11 places. This is likely due to two thirds of Luxembourg’s top providers now providing 5G.
The U.S. has finally broken the top thirty on mobile for the first time, coming in at 27th. Again, this is likely due to new 5G developments.
With Andorra’s largest fixed broadband provider offering 300 Mbps and 700 Mbps service plans, the country has seen a steady increase in monthly performance since February of this year.
Cyprus has seen steady increases in fixed broadband speed over the last few months, with one of the country’s top providers now offering fixed broadband plans up to 300 Mbps. The country now ranks 68th.

Articles worth a second look

Rakuten is Leveraging O-RAN to Reimagine Mobile and it Could Change the Way We Use Our Phones Forever

Discover how O-RAN works and how Rakuten is using a fully virtual, cloud-native mobile network approach to disrupt mobile markets around the world.

Upgrades in Mobile Speeds in India Come with Expanded 4G Availability

Comparing India to neighboring countries for mobile internet speeds and 4G Availability, this market snapshot includes information about the country’s fastest operators.

Make Better Funding Decisions with Accurate Broadband Network Data: A Guide for Federal, State and Local Governments (White Paper)

Federal, state and local policymakers are tasked with spending on broadband development. Learn how inaccurate data on network performance negatively impacts these government funding efforts with this white paper, including a case study from New York.

About the Author

Maria Gómez

| More Articles

How Boingo Leverages Ookla's Comprehensive Network Intelligence

Ookla Joins Ericsson's Leading Telecommunications Open RApp System

UK Telecoms at a Crossroads: Consolidation, Convergence, and Looking Ahead to 2025

Get the latest Ookla Research™

Share

The State of the UK’s Mobile Networks

The UK continued to trail its developed peers in mobile performance in 2024

Investments in RAN upgrades and site expansion are driving progress in coverage and QoE moving into 2025

Progress in the 3G sunset underlines the importance of supporting new measures to improve indoor connectivity outcomes

Merger approval transforms spectrum landscape and provides certainty moving into 2025

The UK leads Europe in the commercialisation of 5G SA

Stimulating consumer demand for 5G SA proves a challenge, with bundling emerging as a key sales strategy

The State of the UK’s Fixed Broadband Networks

Fibre land grab boosts the UK’s international ranking in fixed broadband performance

Wi-Fi 7 poised to become the default standard for ISPs targeting premium experiences in 2025

Merger approval ups the ante on convergence moving into 2025

Key Trends to Watch in 2025

Mobile Data Traffic Growth Plateau

Private Network Proliferation

Direct-to-Device (D2D) Arrival

About the Author

Luke Kehoe

Early 5G Results for the Samsung Galaxy S24 Family: How do New S24 Models Stack up to Previous Generations and iPhone 15’s on 5G?

Get the latest Ookla Research™

Share

Key takeaways:

New chipsets and modems in the Galaxy S24 family

Digging into the Data: Where does the Samsung Galaxy S24 Family Lead its S22, S23, and iPhone 15 Counterparts Around the Globe?

Asia Pacific

Consumers in Hong Kong who want new features might want to upgrade

5G speeds were fast across the board in India, where the Samsung Galaxy 24 family held a slight edge

Samsung Galaxy enthusiasts in Indonesia needn’t rush to upgrade to an S24 device — yet

No clear advantage to upgrading to a new Galaxy S24 in Japan

For users in the Philippines who want the fastest 5G, Galaxy S22 users may want to upgrade.

Samsung Galaxy S24 and iPhone 15 much faster on 5G in South Korea than S22 devices

Samsung Galaxy S24 family provides top 5G download speeds in Thailand

Middle East and Africa

Excellent 5G speeds in Nigeria, but too soon to tell if you should upgrade for performance

Samsung Galaxy S24 by far the fastest 5G in Qatar

Galaxy S24 a good option for Samsung fans in the U.A.E.

Europe

Galaxy 24 family clocked 5G speeds over 80 Mbps faster than those on S22 devices in France

Galaxy S24’s a good choice over S22 models in Spain

Samsung Galaxy S24 likely worth an upgrade from S22 in the U.K.

North America

No major 5G speed boost for users in Mexico who upgraded to a Galaxy S24

Galaxy S22 users in the U.S. could get faster 5G with the S24 family.

Ookla will continue monitoring how devices are performing

About the Author

Dave Andersen

Smartphone User Survey Reveals Habits and Frustrations

Get the latest Ookla Research™

Share

Wi-Fi remains crucial alongside widespread cellular data usage

Network outages: a critical issue for user satisfaction

About the Author

Ookla

Faster Speeds and the Promise of New Use Cases is Driving 5G SA Adoption

Get the latest Ookla Research™

Share

Key Takeaways:

5G SA deployments are expected to increase this year as adoption gains momentum and ecosystem matures

The developed Asia-Pacific (DVAP) region is at the forefront of 5G SA launches

T-Mobile and DISH Push 5G SA Coverage in the U.S.

India leads in the Emerging Asian Pacific (EMAP) region with fast expansion to 5G SA network

Europe is home to the highest number of operators looking to deploy 5G SA

About the Author

Karim Yaici

Your Guide to Airport Wi-Fi and Mobile Performance at 50+ Global Airports in 2024

Get the latest Ookla Research™

Share

Key takeaways

9 airports have 100+ Mbps Wi-Fi download speeds

Wi-Fi 6 has arrived

11 airports show mobile speeds over 200 Mbps

Fastest mobile speeds at airports in Africa and South America

Airports with slow mobile speeds

Airport Wi-Fi or mobile? Connecting on your next trip

About the Author

Isla McKetta

Speedtest^® Data | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest^® Data | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest^® Data | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Q3-Q4 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019

Speedtest Intelligence^® | Segundo semestre de 2019